Discussion

A powerful earthquake struck Japan on March 11, 2011. The quake triggered a tsunami a short time later, which, in turn, set into motion the events leading to the failure of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. This resulted in the radioactive contamination of the local environment.

The health consequences will likely continue for decades and may well extend beyond the borders of Japan. Disasters frequently lead to such cascading events, though they are usually less dramatic and far-reaching. As Christians, our response to a disaster should be one of compassion, but as health planners, we must anticipate potential problems and communicate the associated risks of those problems without producing unwarranted fear.

By March 24, 2011, the concern of a radioactive cloud reaching the United States sparked debate on whether Californians should begin taking iodine tablets. Determine the realistic risk of radiation from food, water, or air, and write an advisory of the risk and actions to be taken by Californians to protect their health against the risk of radiation.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

COURSE PROJECT: DEVELOPED OUTLINE

Students will submit a developed outline that includes main ideas, key points of evidence, and preliminary analyses of their assigned sections of the Course Project. The outline should address an analysis of the chosen technology’s influence on society, considering all of the following components: social, cultural, political, economic, and environmental impacts. This is an individual assignment.

If you are working on the “ethical” implications, you do NOT have to address all the other components above. Just work on the ethical implications of the technology your team has chosen. If you have broken your team responsibilities differently, say various technologies as solutions to a specific problem, then you would have to address the various components from the perspective of your technology.

There are some parts that can be shared, like the introduction and the background on the technology. That’s fine. After that, it becomes an individual assignment.

Please use the template available in the Week 4 Course Project Overview. Please do not just answer the questions in the template. Please remove all the questions once you have explained each in complete sentences, expanding on your ideas. Be sure to address each question in a particular section with sentences of varying length and complexity.

With that said, these outlines should be very detailed and go through multiple levels explaining each element of your section of the paper.

TOPIC :  Other forms of ocean contamination –  discuss the common ocean contamination such as pesticides, herbicides, chemical fertilizers, detergents, oil, sewage, plastics, and other solids and how OTEC ( Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion ) can cause such contamination or how these contaminants may limit the efficiency of OTEC ( Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion ) facilities.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Ecosystem Structure And Function

Assignment Details

Ecologists group together the living things in an ecosystem by their feeding habits. Producers use photosynthesis to make food by harnessing the energy of sunlight. Consumers eat plants and each other. All organisms produce waste that is recycled by decomposers. The interactions of these organisms create a food web.

Humans often disturb ecosystems for their own benefit, either harvesting ecosystem resources or removing unwanted pests. Examples include logging in a tropical rainforest, hunting sea otters for their fur in Monterey Bay, exterminating prairie dogs in South Dakota or eradicating wolves in Wyoming. These disruptions disturb the food web, and they can have unforeseen consequences to abiotic and biotic components of the ecosystem.

Watch this video to see the changes in Yellowstone National Park with the reintroduction of wolves to the food web: Yellowstone National Park: Wolf Cascade.

Recommended: Click on the following links to review materials to enhance your knowledge of ecosystems, disturbance, and recovery:

Design an imaginary food web or describe a real one. Include at least 4 living organisms that interact in your ecosystem.

Answer the following questions about the food web you designed/described:

  1. Explain what would happen to the other members of the food web within your ecosystem (choose a, b, or c):
    1. if a top predator were removed
    2. if a key producer disappeared
    3. if a primary consumer were exterminated
  2. Explain possible effects to the abiotic components that result from the disruption of your ecosystem.
  3. How can the damage or change to your ecosystem be repaired?
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Stakeholders On Environmental Management Issue

Final Applied Project: Presentation to Stakeholders on Environmental Management Issue:

Addresses Outcomes #1, 2, 3, and 4

  • develop and implement management plans that incorporate scientific principles and that comply with environmental laws and ethical principles in a team environment
  • demonstrate quantitative reasoning and analysis of information obtained through literature review, sampling, field investigation, and monitoring
  • apply scientific knowledge and principles, quantitative methods, technology tools, and regulatory policies to think critically and make recommendations to address complex environmental problems
  • communicate orally and in writing on environmental issues, principles, and practices in a clear, well-organized manner so as to effectively persuade, inform, and clarify ideas, information, plans, and procedures to stakeholders and other interested parties

General Considerations for a Presentation to Stakeholders

What you should be sure to convey:

  • content is appropriate for the audience of stakeholders and is sufficiently detailed
  • show that your assessment/review of the issue has scientific rigor, and that it is an on-going monitoring and evaluation process
  • provide representative data and support as graphics, figures, and charts as often as possible
  • be clear about roles and responsibilities
  • address federal laws, regulations, and policies that govern the process as well as who ensures compliance and how compliance is achieved
  • be clear about which natural and treatment resources are involved and which stakeholders are impacted; e.g., processes that impact water or land use will necessarily involve specific jurisdictions
  • make stakeholders feel part of the team and that they will be heard; e.g., include direct quotes from stakeholders or explicitly address concerns that have been expressed
  • reduce unnecessary fears, suspicions, misconceptions
  • encourage the stakeholders to continue participating and working with you to work out fair and equitable solutions
  • make recommendations for maintained or improved health and safety compliance, or maintained or improved environmental sustainability

Possible Audience of Stakeholders:

  • elected officials
  • concerned citizens, especially those who feel directly affected
  • university professors and students
  • engineering consultants for the cities and counties
  • city and county resources personnel
  • county and state department representatives such as transportation, environment, or parks and recreation
  • facility and utility managers such as from industries that might be impacted
  • environmental groups
  • special interest groups such as agricultural growers

EXAMPLE 1: Pollutant Load Reduction for a Watershed

You are a Basin Coordinator working with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Watershed Planning and Coordination Section. It has been determined by scientists at FDEP that an excess of 500,000 pounds of Total Nitrogen discharged into this watershed each year is threatening fishing and recreation in the Caloosahatchee estuary. Although there are five treatment plants discharging effluent into the river, you have determined that pollution from these plants is minimal (represents less than 1 percent of total nitrogen pollutant load) and that most of the pollution is coming from local jurisdictions or upstream in the agricultural areas. The FDEP will not require the treatment plants to reduce their loads to the river because they already have the highest level of wastewater treatment. You are, therefore, going to require a reduction of nonpoint source pollution (generally from stormwater system) from the jurisdictions and from the agriculture. Keep in mind that reductions in nitrogen load will likely cost the jurisdictions millions of dollars.  As always, you should research what has occurred (in this case, the Caloosahatchee watershed) and determine how you should communicate what needs to get done and how for your target audience.

For this case, please decided who your audience is and note that at the beginning of your talk. Will you be talking to farmers or homeowners in this watershed?  Or is this the first of a small watershed meeting you will be having in a specific area of this larger watershed?

EXAMPLE 2: Research Facility Using Nanotechnology

Assume that you are the environmental manager of the research labs at a relatively large university (have fun giving a name to the university). One of the new assistant professors has received a large grant to research methods to rapidly detect infectious disease using nanotechnology. The research has the potential to be the first step in eradicating infectious disease, particularly in the developing world, where detection of infectious disease often comes too late to prevent spread of the disease. The research will involve developing biosensors that use nanomaterials for detecting and signaling the presence of infectious disease, as well as delivering these nanomaterials to non-human research organisms as a model assay.

The president of the university has received telephone calls and e-mails from local residents and special-interest groups expressing concern about the nanotechnology research being conducted by the new assistant professor. The president has asked that you make a presentation that directly addresses safety and regulatory issues, and ethical concerns about the particular nanotechnological approach used in this research.  Note that regulatory issues center on human and environmental health so you will have to address those as part of regulatory issues. Your presentation will be made internally, but will be recorded and provided as a freely accessible presentation at the university website for public and stakeholder scrutiny.

Suggestions for Creating your Presentation

Create your presentation using PowerPoint or other presentation software and turn it in by the last day of class. This project replaces the final exam. Be sure to provide comments on what you would say for each slide in the notes section of the document, or add audio to the presentation using Jing or the software of your choice. If you choose to add voice or visual to your presentation, please make sure to attach your audio or video file so that it can be heard or viewed! You do not have to use voice, but it is a nice option if you want to get your point across with more than written words and pictures.

Project should include:

–  Overview of the environmental issue and a brief statement of its purported impact

–  Questions and concerns are clearly stated and addressed. Discussed which natural and treatment resources are involved and which stakeholders are affected; e.g., processes that impact water or land use will necessarily involve specific jurisdictions

–  Presentation is coherent and cohesive, appropriate for the audience of stakeholders and is sufficiently detailed (Your presentation should take no longer than 30 minutes to present or read, mainly to retain your audience’s attention.)

–  Supporting evidence reflects good library research skills and appropriate interpretation of scientific data and other resources

–  Representative data and graphics/figures/charts provide relevant, supportive information and evidence

–  Roles and responsibilities are clearly presented

–  Presentation incorporated stakeholder concerns and addressed their interests; allayed stakeholder concerns by providing strong recommendations.

–  Addressed federal laws, regulations, and policies that govern the process as well as who ensures compliance and how compliance is achieved

–  Made recommendations for maintained or improved health and safety compliance, or maintained or improved environmental sustainability

–  Overview of the next steps this team needs to take, including steps in communications and training

–  References and citations from reliable sources in the APA format

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Create 8-10 Sentence Paragraphs For Each Of The 7 Following Subjects

Creative 8-10 sentence paragraphs for the following subjects; cannot not have direct quotes from an organization (World Wildlife Fund or organizations).

Paragraphs need to establish how each company helped with the noted project and how well the outcome is. I’ve included some reference below the Company name and subject title.

Toyota Motor North America, Inc. — Establishing the Wolakota Buffalo Range with the Rosebud Sioux Tribe in South Dakota
(The  Rosebud Economic Development Corporation (REDCO), the  economic development arm of the Rosebud Sioux Tribal Government in South  Dakota,is partnering with WWF to establish the Wolakota Buffalo Range  with a herd of 1,500 bison. This will be the largest tribally owned and  managed herd in North America ranging on 27,680 acres of tribal land in  the South Dakota Sandhills. Together, we have a prime opportunity to  contribute to environmental and social justice for Rosebud tribal  members in Todd County South Dakota, which is among the 20 poorest  counties in the country. REDCO, the organization leading this project,  is the largest tribal employer on the Rosebud Reservation. Returning  bison successfully to tribal lands after more than a century since their  extermination is righting a social and environmental injustice, but  will require strategic investment rarely available to tribes’ who are  under served and suffer discrimination when seeking access to capital.  This project aligns with traditional perspectives, community interests,  economic development, and positive conservation outcomes)

Facebook — Coalition to End Wildlife Trafficking Online
(Coalition  to End Wildlife Trafficking Onlinee, technology, and social media  companies have joined forces to shut down online marketplaces for  wildlife traffickers. The Coalition to End Wildlife Trafficking Online  brings together companies from across the world in partnership with  wildlife experts at WWF, TRAFFIC, and IFAW for an industry-wide approach)

UPS Foundation — EFN – Tropical Forests Restoration and Reforestation (2016 — )
(Forests  are vital to humans and wildlife, providing critical ecosystem  services. Nearly 1.6 billion people depend on forests and forest  resources as their source of livelihoods; yet, nearly half of the global  forests have been cleared or are degraded. When carefully planned,  forest restoration and reforestation activities can provide  environmental services to the local community and develop new habitats  in formerly bare areas. WWF supports local organizations to conduct  trainings for communities currently undertaking forest restoration and  reforestation programs and projects. For more than 20 years, the WWF  Education for Nature Program (EFN) program has been providing  Reforestation Grants to support non-governmental organizations,  community groups, national parks, and educational institutions to plant  500,000 trees)

Discovery — Project CAT/Bikin
( created a widget for use in conjunction with the  discovery.com/projectcat website and a text to donate platform to raise  funds for WWF’s Tx2 work.  The call to action for text to donate is  currently planned to be included on In Program Messaging (IPM) for  Animal Planet)

Johnson & Johnson — Advancing Forests, Climate and Human Health in Thirty Hills, Sumatra
(Through this collaboration in Thirty Hills, J&J will be securing the  effective management of the concession, protecting 38,665  acres of  rainforest that would likely otherwise be converted to oil palm, pulp or  rubber plantations, and maintaining an essential buffer zone for carbon  stocks and biodiversity in the neighboring Bukit Tigapuluh National  Park. Preventing further deforestation, minimizing human-wildlife  conflict, and supporting livelihoods that do not intensify  livestock-wildlife interactions all serve to reduce the risk of  spillover of zoonotic diseases and incidence of vector-borne zoonoses,  while increasing community resilience to climate change and previous  forest loss.)

The Kroger Co. Foundation —  Zero Hunger | Zero Waste – Wild Classroom – Food Waste Warrior  (school program aimed at providing environmental curriculum for  elementary school students. The program features a stand-alone food  waste curriculum that we believe is an excellent fit for the Kroger  Foundation)

Google — Leadership Summit for Climate, Wood & Forests Sponsorship
(​In convening a Leadership Summit for Climate, Wood and Forests,  WWF’s overarching goal is to advance forest stewardship, restoration and  conservation in North America. Google will publicly recognize Google as  a Summit sponsor at the event, on the Summit website, and in related  communications.)

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Population Pyramids

Population pyramids show the age structure of the population of a country or region. Different growth patterns caused by varying cultural values, war events or both help shape the pyramid. You will obtain the data (population pyramids) from https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/idb/informationGateway.php for three different countries. Once you’re at the site, you will need to locate the three countries of Ethiopia, Indonesia and UK:

  1. Click the drop-down menu under Select Report, and choose the last option “Population Pyramid Graph
  2. Under the Select one or More Countries area, hold down your control button and choose Ethiopia, Indonesia and the United Kingdom
  3. Leave all other selections as entered and click the Submit button at the bottom

Analyze the data: Each of the three countries will produce a population pattern that may be recognized as rapid growth, stable growth or growth decline. After you obtain the pyramids following the directions above, copy and paste them into your assignment and then identify which of the three patterns each country demonstrates.

Write a supporting essay: Please write a brief essay comparing the three pyramids. Consider historical events, the present global population structure and the influence, if any, of the past and the present on future population growth. Compare and contrast these pyramids. Which country will have the greatest population increase? Why? What problems might these countries be facing? You may use additional information from library sources or the Internet. Please cite any outside sources used to prepare your essay and provide a “References Cited” section at the end of your assignment.

Format: Your paper should be 3-5 pages long (excluding figures and references), double-spaced, 1-inch margins all around, and 12-pt font (Times New Roman or similar).

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Starting Post WW-2, When The United States Became The Dominant Foreign Power In The Middle East, Create A Timeline Of US Activities With Middle Eastern Countries.

( https : // www . thoughtco . com / us-and-middle-east-since-1945-2353681 ? print )

 

ThoughtCo.

 

The U.S: and the Middle East Since 1945 to 2008

A Guide to Mideast Policy From Harry Truman to George W. Bush

 

by Pierre Tristam Updated August 18, 2017

 

The first time a Western power got soaked in the politics of oil in the Middle East was toward the end of 1914, when British soldiers landed at Basra, in southern Iraq, to protect oil supplies from neighboring Persia. At the time the United States had little interest in Middle East oil or in imperial designs on the region. Its overseas ambitions were focused south toward Latin America and the Caribbean (remember Maine?) and westward toward east Asia and the Pacific.

When Britain offered to share the spoils of the defunct Ottoman Empire after World War I in the Middle East, President Woodrow Wilson declined. It was only a temporary reprieve from creeping involvement that began during the Truman administration. It’s not been a happy history. But it’s necessary to understand that past, even if only in its general outlines, to better make sense of the present, especially regarding current Arab attitudes toward the West.

 

Truman Administration: 1945–1952.

 

American troops were stationed in Iran during World War II to help transfer military supplies to the Soviet Union and protect Iranian oil. British and Soviet troops were also on Iranian soil. After the war, Stalin withdrew his troops only when Harry Truman protested their continued presence through the United Nations and possibly threatened to use force to boot them

(https://www.thoughtco.com/us-and-middle-east-since-1945-235368?print)

 

( 4 of7 ) ( 7 / 23 / 2018, 4:54 PM )

 

 

out.

 

American duplicity in the Middle East was born: while opposing Soviet influence in Iran, Truman solidified America’s relationship with Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi, in power since 1941, and brought Turkey into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), making it clear to the Soviet Union that the Middle East would be a Cold War hot zone.

Truman accepted the 1947 United Nations partition plan for Palestine, granting 57% of the land to Israel and 43% to Palestine, and personally lobbied for its success. The plan lost support from U.N. member nations, especially as hostilities between Jews and Palestinians multiplied in 1948 and Arabs lost more land or fled. Truman recognized the State of Israel 11 minutes after its creation, on May 14, 1948.

 

Eisenhower Administration: 1953–1960

 

Three major events marked Dwight Eisenhower’s Middle East policy. In 1953, Eisenhower ordered the CIA to depose Mohammed Mossadegh, the popular, elected leader of the Iranian parliament and an ardent nationalist who opposed British and American influence in Iran. The coup severely tarnished America’s reputation among Iranians, who lost trust in American claims of protecting democracy.

In 1956, when Israel, Britain, and France attacked Egypt when Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal, a furious Eisenhower not only refused to join the hostilities, he ended the war.

Two years later, as nationalist forces roiled the Middle East and threatened to topple Lebanon’s Christian-led government, Eisenhower ordered the first landing of U.S. troops in Beirut to protect the regime. The deployment, lasting just three months, ended a brief civil war in Lebanon.

 

Kennedy Administration: 1961–1963.

 

John Kennedy was supposedly uninvolved in the Middle East. But as Warren Bass argued in “Support Any Friend: Kennedy’s Middle East and the Making of the U.S.-Israeli Alliance,” John Kennedy tried to develop a special relationship with Israel while diffusing the effects of his predecessors’ Cold War policies regarding Arab regimes.

Kennedy increased economic aid toward the region and worked to reduce its polarization between Soviet and American

 

spheres. While the friendship with Israel was solidified during his tenure, Kennedy’s abbreviated administration, while briefly inspiring the Arab public, largely failed to mollify Arab leaders.

 

Johnson Administration: 1963–1968

 

Lyndon Johnson was absorbed by his Great Society programs at home and the Vietnam War abroad. The Middle East burst back onto the American foreign policy radar with the Six-Day War of 1967, when Israel, after rising tension and threats from all sides, preempted what it characterized as an impending attack from Egypt, Syria, and Jordan.

Israel occupied the Gaza Strip, the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula, the West Bank, and Syria’s Golan Heights. Israel threatened to go further. The Soviet Union threatened an armed attack if it did. Johnson put the U.S. Navy’s Mediterranean Sixth Fleet on alert but also compelled Israel to agree to a cease-fire on June 10, 1967.

 

Nixon-Ford Administrations: 1969–1976

 

Humiliated by the Six-Day War, Egypt, Syria, and Jordan tried to regain lost territory when they attacked Israel during the Jewish holy day of Yorn Kippur in 1973. Egypt regained some ground, but its Third Army was then surrounded by an Israeli army led by Ariel Sharon (who would later become prime minister).

The Soviets proposed a ceasefire, failing which they threatened to act “unilaterally.” For the second time in six years, the United States faced its second major and potentially nuclear confrontation with the Soviet Union over the Middle East. After what journalist Elizabeth Drew described as “Strangelove Day,” when the Nixon administration put American forces on the highest alert, the administration persuaded Israel to accept a cease-fire.

Americans felt the effects of that war through the 1973 Arab oil embargo, rocketing oil prices upward and contributing to a recession a year later.

In 1974 and 1975, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger negotiated so-called disengagement agreements, first between Israel and Syria, then between Israel and Egypt, formally ending the hostilities begun in 1973 and returning some land Israel had seized from the two countries. Those were not peace agreements, however, and they left the Palestinian situation untouched. Meanwhile, a military strongman called Saddam Hussein was rising through the ranks in Iraq.

(https://www.thoughtco.com/us-and-middle-east-since-l945-235368?print)

 

Carter Administration: 1977–1981.

 

Jimmy Carter’s presidency was marked by American Mid-East policy’s greatest victory and greatest loss since World War II.

II. On the victorious side, Carter’s mediation led to the 1978 Camp David Accord and the 1979 peace treaty between Egypt and Israel, which included a huge increase in U.S. aid to Israel and Egypt. The treaty led Israel to return the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt. The accord took place, remarkably, months after Israel invaded Lebanon for the first time, ostensibly to repel chronic attacks from the Palestine Liberation Organization in south Lebanon.

On the losing side, the Iranian Islamic Revolution culminated in 1978 with demonstrations against the regime of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, culminating with the establishment of an Islamic Republic with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini on April 1, 1979.

On Nov. 4, 1979, Iranian students backed by the new regime took 63 Americans at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran hostage. They’d hold on to 52 of them for 444 days, releasing them the day Ronald Reagan was inaugurated as president.

The hostage crisis, which included one failed military rescue attempt that cost the lives of eight American servicemen, undid the Carter presidency and set back American policy in the region for years. The rise of Shiite power in the Middle East has begun.

To top things off for Carter, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan in December 1979, eliciting little response from the president other than an American boycott of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow.

 

Reagan Administration: 1981–1989

 

Whatever progress the Carter administration achieved on the Israeli-Palestinian front stalled over the next decade. As the Lebanese civil war raged, Israel invaded Lebanon for the second time in June 1982, advancing as far as Beirut, the Lebanese capital city, before Reagan, who had condoned the invasion, intervened to demand a cease-fire.

American, Italian, and French troops landed in Beirut that summer to mediate the exit of 6,000 PLO militants. The troops then withdrew, only to precipitately return following the assassination of Lebanese President-elect Bashir Gemeyel and the retaliatory massacre by Israeli-backed Christian militias of up to 3,000 Palestinians in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila, south of Beirut.

( https :// www.thoughtco.com/us-and-middle-east-since- l 945-235368 l ? print )

 

 

 

In April 1983, a truck bomb demolished the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, killing 63 people. On October 23, 1983, simultaneous bombings killed 241 American soldiers and 57 French paratroopers in their Beirut barracks. The American forces withdrew shortly after. The Reagan administration then faced several crises as the Iranian-backed Lebanese Shiite organization that became known as Hezbollah took several Americans hostage in Lebanon.

The 1986 Iran-Contra Affair revealed that the Reagan administration had secretly negotiated arms-for-hostages deals with Iran, discrediting Reagan’s claim that he would not negotiate with terrorists. It would be December 1991 before the last hostage, former Associated Press reporter Terry Anderson, would be released.

Throughout the 1980s, the Reagan administration supported Israel’s expansion of Jewish settlements in occupied territories. The administration also supported Saddam Hussein in the 1980–1988 Iran–Iraq War. The administration provided logistical and intelligence support, believing wrongly that Saddam could destabilize the Iranian regime and defeat the Islamic Revolution.

 

George H.W. Bush Administration: 1989-1993

 

After benefiting from a decade of support from the United States and receiving conflicting signals immediately before the invasion of Kuwait, Saddam Hussein invaded the small country to his southeast on August 2, 1990. President

Bush launched Operation Desert Shield, immediately deploying U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia to defend against a possible invasion by Iraq.

Desert Shield became Operation Desert Storm when Bush shifted strategy — from defending Saudi Arabia to repelling Iraq from Kuwait, ostensibly because Saddam might, Bush claimed, be developing nuclear weapons. A coalition of 30 nations joined American forces in a military operation that numbered more than half a million troops. An additional 18 countries supplied economic and humanitarian aid.

After a 38-day air campaign and a 100-hour ground war, Kuwait was liberated. Bush stopped the assault short of an invasion of Iraq, fearing what Dick Cheney, his defense secretary, would call a “quagmire.” Bush established instead “no-fly zones” in the south and north of the country, but those didn’t keep Hussein from massacring Shiites following an attempted revolt in the south — which Bush had encouraged — and Kurds in the north.

In Israel and the Palestinian territories, Bush was largely ineffective and uninvolved as the first Palestinian intifada roiled on

 

 

 

for four years.

 

. In the last year of his presidency, Bush launched a military operation in Somalia in conjunction with a humanitarian operation by the United Nations. Operation Restore Hope, involving 25,000 U.S. troops, was designed to help stem the spread of famine caused by the Somali civil war.

The operation had limited success. A 1993 attempt to catch Mohamed Farah Aidid, leader of a brutal Somali militia, ended in disaster, with 18 American soldiers and up to 1,500 Somali militias and civilians killed. Aidid wasn’t caught.

Among the architects of the attacks on Americans in Somalia was a Saudi exile then living in Sudan and largely unknown in the United States: Osama bin Laden.

 

Clinton Administration: 1993-2001

 

Besides mediating the 1994 peace treaty between Israel and Jordan, Bill Clinton’s involvement in the Middle East was bracketed by the short-lived success of the Oslo Accord in August 1993 and the collapse of the Camp David summit in December 2000.

The accord ended the first intifada, established Palestinians’ right to self-determination in Gaza and the West Bank, and established the Palestinian Authority. The accord also called on Israel to withdraw from the occupied territories.

But Oslo left unsettled such fundamental questions as the right of Palestinian refugees to return to Israel, the fate of East Jerusalem — which is claimed by Palestinians — and continuing expansion of Israeli settlements in the territories.

Those issues, still unresolved by 2000, led Clinton to convene a summit with Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and Israeli leader Ehud Barak at Camp David in December 2000, the waning days of his presidency. The summit failed, and the second intifada exploded.

Throughout the Clinton administration, terrorist attacks orchestrated by the increasingly public bin Laden punctured the 1990s’ post-Cold War air of quietude, from the 1993 World Trade Center bombing to the bombing of the USS Cole, a Navy destroyer, in Yemen in 2000.

 

George W. Bush Administration: 2001–2008

( https: // www . thoughtco . com/us-and-middle-east-since-1945 -23 5368l ? print )

 

 

 

After deriding operations involving the U.S. military in what he called “nation-building,” President Bush turned, after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, into the most ambitious nation-builder since the days of Secretary of State George Marshall and the Marshall Plan that helped rebuild Europe after World War II. Bush’s efforts, focused on the Middle East, were not as successful.

Bush had the world’s backing when he led an attack on Afghanistan in October 2001 to topple the Taliban regime there, which had given sanctuary to al-Qaeda. Bush’s expansion of the “war on terror” to Iraq in March 2003, however, had less backing. Bush saw the toppling of Saddam Hussein as the first step in a domino-like birth of democracy in the Middle East.

Bush set in motion his controversial doctrine of preemptive strikes, unilateralism, democratic regime change, and attacking countries that harbored terrorists—or, as Bush wrote in his 2010 memoir, “Decision Points”: “Make no distinction between terrorists and the nations that harbor them and hold both to account… take the fight to the enemy overseas before they can attack us again here at home… confront threats before they fully materialize… and advance liberty and hope as an alternative to the enemy’s ideology of repression and fear.”

But while Bush talked about democracy in Iraq and Afghanistan, he continued to support repressive, undemocratic regimes in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and in several countries in North Africa. The credibility of his democracy campaign was short-lived. By 2006 , with Iraq plunging into civil war, Hamas winning elections in the Gaza Strip, and Hezbollah winning immense popularity following its summer war with Israel, Bush’s democracy campaign was dead. The US military surged troops into Iraq in 2007, but by then the majority of the American people and many government officials were widely skeptical that going to war in Iraq was the right thing to do in the first place.

In an interview with The New York Times magazine in 2008 — toward the end of his presidency — Bush touched upon what he hoped his Middle East legacy would be, saying, “I think history will say George Bush clearly saw the threats thatkeep the Middle East in turmoil and was. willing to do something about it, wa. s willing to lead and had this great faith in the capacity of democracies and great faith in the capacity of people to decide the fate of their countries and that the

democracy movement gained impetus and gained movement in the Middle East.”

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Industrial Health

PowerPoint Presentation

Create a PowerPoint presentation of 15 slides (not counting title and reference slides) that provides an overview of the three major environmental, health, and safety (EHS) disciplines. Include each of the following elements:

summary of the responsibilities for the discipline, evaluation of types of hazards addressed by the discipline, description of how industrial hygiene practices relate to safety and environmental programs, description of how industrial hygiene practices relate to environmental programs, evaluation of types of control methods commonly used by the discipline, interactions with the other two disciplines, and major organizations associated with the discipline.

Construct your presentation using a serif type font such as Times New Roman. A serif type font is easier to read than a non-serif type font. For ease of reading, do not use a font smaller than 28 points

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Safety And Accident

OSHA published a comprehensive ergonomics standard that was subsequently rescinded by Congress using the Congressional Review Act (CRA). Since that time, OSHA has been prohibited from passing another ergonomics standard. OSHA’s current approach is to publish ergonomic guidelines, which are not legally enforceable, for industries with high incidence rates of MSDs and CTDs.

What is your opinion of OSHA’s current approach to ergonomic issues in workplaces? Can you propose an approach that you believe would better address ergonomic issues?

Please respond to one posts from your peers. Please include the name of the person or question to which you are replying in the subject line. For example, “Tom’s response to Susan’s comment.”
ALSO PLEASE REPLY TO ANOTHER STUDENTS COMMENT BELOW

William:

When functioning in a highly charged political environment as well as being subject to congressional approval for rule and law changes. The reality is OSHA can only make recommendations and let lawmakers decide on mandatory versus voluntary or recommended practices. Dudley (2001) argues that OSHA’s research was inadequate and did not provide both the numbers of musculo-skeletal disorders (MSD’s) and how the program would reduce those injuries as well as what casts versus saving would occur for businesses. OSHA indicated that businesses were underreporting these types of injuries and if reporting was accurate the number of incidents would be much higher. This likely supports the assumption that these standards will not become law unless additional research could support the true value as well as the true problem.

OSHA’s current enforcement mechanism outside of voluntary compliance is the use of the general duty clause. While this may be effective in some ways it does not give specific requirements as to the violations that should be accepted as law. One way to address the ergonomic issue could be system engineering as well as coordination with other agencies involved in the improvement of ergonomics. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) is an organization that supports voluntary standards and conformity and has over 270,000 businesses listed as partners and is an international organization (ANSI, 2020). The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) brings together experts to share knowledge and develop voluntary, consensus-based, market relevant International Standards that support innovation and provide solutions to global challenges (ISO, 2020).

I point out these organizations since they could follow a model of either an Alliance Program or an OSHA Strategic Partnership Program with OSHA. Understanding that many companies conduct business internationally or buy equipment from foreign partners, starting to take on more of a global awareness could create an efficiency for OSHA. It also has the benefit of bringing in experts who work in the field of ergonomics and have credibility and insight to develop standards. From earlier studies it was noted that OSHA can be slow to react to changing environments and outside influences. Expanding this into a Voluntary Participation Program (VPP) begins to place even more onus on businesses for compliance. This not only frees up OSHA personnel involved in inspections but opens up another potential model of accreditation. Many accreditation agencies utilize other agencies as checkpoints for evaluation of their current model. Accredited organizations have been through a process of self-evaluation and have been inspected and reviewed by other agencies who were already accredited. Accreditation can be used to evaluate best business practices, seek favorable insurance and financing options, and also keep an organization competitive among its peers. This wholly funded by participating organizations or grants and keeps OSHA directly out of the development process but still engaged as an inspection and enforcement agency as needed.

References

ANSI. (n.d.). About ANSI. Retrieved from https://www.ansi.org/about_ansi/overview/overview?menuid=1

ISO, (n.d.). About us. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/about-us.html

Dudley, S. E. (2001). The Benefits and Costs of OSHA’s Proposed Ergonomics Program Standard. Journal of Labor Research22(1), 95. Retrieved from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=11&sid=e473a82f-bde6-41c9-b2fb-e9e33fdd64f4%40pdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=4031454&db=edb

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Safety And Accident

OSHA published a comprehensive ergonomics standard that was subsequently rescinded by Congress using the Congressional Review Act (CRA). Since that time, OSHA has been prohibited from passing another ergonomics standard. OSHA’s current approach is to publish ergonomic guidelines, which are not legally enforceable, for industries with high incidence rates of MSDs and CTDs.

What is your opinion of OSHA’s current approach to ergonomic issues in workplaces? Can you propose an approach that you believe would better address ergonomic issues?

Please respond to one posts from your peers. Please include the name of the person or question to which you are replying in the subject line. For example, “Tom’s response to Susan’s comment.”
ALSO PLEASE REPLY TO ANOTHER STUDENTS COMMENT BELOW

William:

When functioning in a highly charged political environment as well as being subject to congressional approval for rule and law changes. The reality is OSHA can only make recommendations and let lawmakers decide on mandatory versus voluntary or recommended practices. Dudley (2001) argues that OSHA’s research was inadequate and did not provide both the numbers of musculo-skeletal disorders (MSD’s) and how the program would reduce those injuries as well as what casts versus saving would occur for businesses. OSHA indicated that businesses were underreporting these types of injuries and if reporting was accurate the number of incidents would be much higher. This likely supports the assumption that these standards will not become law unless additional research could support the true value as well as the true problem.

OSHA’s current enforcement mechanism outside of voluntary compliance is the use of the general duty clause. While this may be effective in some ways it does not give specific requirements as to the violations that should be accepted as law. One way to address the ergonomic issue could be system engineering as well as coordination with other agencies involved in the improvement of ergonomics. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) is an organization that supports voluntary standards and conformity and has over 270,000 businesses listed as partners and is an international organization (ANSI, 2020). The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) brings together experts to share knowledge and develop voluntary, consensus-based, market relevant International Standards that support innovation and provide solutions to global challenges (ISO, 2020).

I point out these organizations since they could follow a model of either an Alliance Program or an OSHA Strategic Partnership Program with OSHA. Understanding that many companies conduct business internationally or buy equipment from foreign partners, starting to take on more of a global awareness could create an efficiency for OSHA. It also has the benefit of bringing in experts who work in the field of ergonomics and have credibility and insight to develop standards. From earlier studies it was noted that OSHA can be slow to react to changing environments and outside influences. Expanding this into a Voluntary Participation Program (VPP) begins to place even more onus on businesses for compliance. This not only frees up OSHA personnel involved in inspections but opens up another potential model of accreditation. Many accreditation agencies utilize other agencies as checkpoints for evaluation of their current model. Accredited organizations have been through a process of self-evaluation and have been inspected and reviewed by other agencies who were already accredited. Accreditation can be used to evaluate best business practices, seek favorable insurance and financing options, and also keep an organization competitive among its peers. This wholly funded by participating organizations or grants and keeps OSHA directly out of the development process but still engaged as an inspection and enforcement agency as needed.

References

ANSI. (n.d.). About ANSI. Retrieved from https://www.ansi.org/about_ansi/overview/overview?menuid=1

ISO, (n.d.). About us. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/about-us.html

Dudley, S. E. (2001). The Benefits and Costs of OSHA’s Proposed Ergonomics Program Standard. Journal of Labor Research22(1), 95. Retrieved from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=11&sid=e473a82f-bde6-41c9-b2fb-e9e33fdd64f4%40pdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=4031454&db=edb

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!