PSYCHOLOGY DISCUSSSION QUESTIONS4

/in , , /by

PSYCHOLOGY DISCUSSSION QUESTIONS4

(PSYCHOLOGY DISCUSSSION QUESTIONS4)

Discussion #1.The most popular topic of investigation within the realm of everyday memory has no doubt been autobiographical memory. A person’s history is at the core of his or her identity. It should not surprise you that autobiographical memories are as varied as the people who produce them. For this discussion, respond to the following:

· How do autobiographical memories and autobiographical facts differ from each other? Give an example of each.

· From your experience and what you have learned about the differences, how would you say that autobiographical memories influence autobiographical facts? Provide an example or two to illustrate your thinking.

Please include the following in your response:

· Refer to and integrate ideas presented in your course readings.

· Cite outside resources if necessary to make your point.

· Follow APA style guidelines for citations and references.

·  Discussion #2. Your textbook presents two types of social influence: normative and informational. This is your opportunity to try an informal experiment of your own to observe the concepts in action. For example, you might try a task similar to the Asch line judgment experiment with family or friends, or you might change some aspect of the environment to break a social norm, such as facing the rear of an elevator while others are present in order to observe their reactions. In your posting, describe your experiment and the response you received.

· After you have completed one or both of the options, explain whether the influence (  experiment) was normative or informational and why you think this way. Defend your position with supporting references from either your textbook or other professional sources.

Discussion # 3.A part of critical thinking and of being a psychology professional is to be open to ideas, alternative points of view, and new information. At Capella, your exposure to the specific elements of critical thinking, such as point of view, questions, arguments, and information, began with your first course. However, your unit readings show how people can be vulnerable to pressures from strong but misguided leadership, groupthink, sales tactics, and so on.

For this discussion, describe specific conditions under which people are more susceptible to persuasion. Explain strategies that can be used to resist harmful or unwanted persuasion, while remaining open and flexible to alternative perspectives and new information.

Discussion # 4.The blind spot is the area on the retina without photoreceptors. Therefore, the part of an image that falls on this region will NOT be seen. It is in this region that the optic nerve exits the eye on its way to the brain. Humans may use different parts of their brain to discriminate objects from people. In particular, we may have specialized neurons for recognizing faces. To complete this discussion:

· Define the problem of the final integration of visual information.

o What kind of problem does this present regarding our understanding of how the brain works?

o Is it a problem that needs to be solved?

o Do any recent papers in the scientific literature address this issue?

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

ARNP Controlled Substance Prescribing

/in , , /by

ARNP Controlled Substance Prescribing

(ARNP Controlled Substance Prescribing)

Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioners (ARNPs) in certain states are authorized to prescribe controlled substances, although the specifics vary by state regulations. Typically, ARNPs must complete additional education and training, possess national certification in their specialty area, and collaborate with a supervising physician or work within a collaborative practice agreement. Controlled substance prescribing by ARNPs is often limited to specific schedules, such as Schedule II through V drugs, with Schedule II medications having stricter regulations.

ARNPs prescribing controlled substances must adhere to strict guidelines, including conducting thorough patient assessments, obtaining informed consent, and implementing appropriate monitoring and documentation practices. Collaboration with other healthcare professionals and communication with patients regarding the risks and benefits of controlled substances are also crucial aspects of responsible prescribing.

State laws dictate the scope of practice for ARNPs regarding controlled substances, outlining limitations on prescription durations, refills, and the types of medications that can be prescribed. Additionally, ARNPs must stay updated on changes in regulations and best practices to ensure safe and effective prescribing practices while contributing to the overall management of patients’ health and well-being.

CS/SB 614 authorizes  an ARNP to prescribe, dispense, administer, or order any drug, which would include controlled substances.

ARNP disciplinary sanctions are added to the bill in s. 456.072, F.S., (Section 5) to mirror a physician’s sanctions for prescribing or dispensing a controlled substance other in the course of professional practice or failing to meet practice standards. Additional acts for which discipline may be taken against an ARNP relating to practicing with controlled substances that are added to the Nurse Practice Act (Section 10) include:

 Presigning blank prescription forms.

 Prescribing a Schedule II for office use.

 Prescribing, dispensing, or administering an amphetamine or sympathomimetic amine drug, except for specified conditions.

 Prescribing, dispensing, or administering certain hormones for muscle-building or athletic performance.

 Promoting or advertising a pharmacy on a prescription form unless the form also states that the prescription may be filled at the pharmacy of your choice.

 Prescribing, dispensing, or administering drugs, including controlled substances, other than in the course of his or her professional practice.

 Prescribing, dispensing, or administering a controlled substance to himself or herself.

 Prescribing, dispensing, or administering laetrile.

 Dispensing a controlled substance listed in Schedule II or Schedule III in violation of the requirements for dispensing practitioners in the Pharmacy Practice Act.

 Promoting or advertising controlled substances.

After reading the following news article http://c-hit.org/2015/04/06/high-prescribing-nurse-surrenders-drug-licenses/

Identify what issues may arise with prescriptive authority of controlled substances and how you may avoid these situations? 

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Introduction & Methodology Of Assessment

/in , , /by

PSYC502 Tests And Measurements Unit 1 Exam: Introduction And Methodology Of Assessment

(Introduction & Methodology Of Assessment)

Total Points Possible – 100

Due Sunday at 11:55 pm Eastern Time at the end of WEEK 3

Instructions:  Save a copy of this test on your hard drive. Answer two of the three short answer questions below for each Unit 1 chapter with one or two substantially detailed paragraphs with each answer between a half and a whole page.

Only answer two questions per chapter set inserting answers below the questions.  If more than two are answered the first two answers will be graded for each chapter.

All published material on which answers are based must be paraphrased (restated in your own words with no quoting permitted), properly APA format source credited, including within-answer citations and a list of references attached to the end of each.  Answers should succinct, thorough, articulated in well organized, complete thought paragraphs (lists, sentence fragments and bulleted items are not permitted) and more substantive than definitions of terms, procedures or issues.

Chapter 1

Answer two questions. Points possible = 10 pts ea.

  • Identify the contributions made by each of the following individuals to psychological and educational assessment: Alfred Binet, J. McKeen Cattell, Francis Galton, Hermann Rorschach, Charles Spearman, Lewis Terman, Edward Thorndike, Robert Woodworth, and E. K. Strong, Jr.
  • Select a psychological test (e.g., Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III) and report on an evaluation of it.
  • Consider the following three clients: One is being assessed due to a crime and is pleading insanity, a second wants to know the best type of psychotherapy for him-or herself, and a third is being evaluated for special education classes.  Using the correct terms from the assigned chapter, describe how tests are likely to be used for each situation.

Chapter 2

Answer two questions. Points possible = 10 pts ea.

  • Explain the importance of conceptualizing educational objectives prior to developing items for a test.
  • Explain why it might be important to organize relevant behaviors and contexts before developing test items.
  • What are the advantages of disadvantages of oral tests compared with written tests?

Chapter 3

Answer two questions. Points possible = 10 pts ea.

  • Define testwiseness, and describe test-taking behaviors that are indicative of it.
  • What is adaptive testing and in what ways is adaptive testing superior to conventional objective testing procedures?  In what ways is it inferior?
  • What are some advantages and disadvantages of constructing, administering, and scoring tests by computer as compared with performing the same procedures in the traditional manner?

Chapter 4

Answer two questions. Points possible = 10 pts ea.

  • Describe the conceptual strategy behind selecting test items based on internal consistency.
  • Describe the underlying concepts behind item-response theory.
  • Define simple random sampling, stratified sampling, cluster sampling, and item sampling.

Chapter 5

Answer two questions. Points possible = 10 pts ea.

  • Define what is meant by reliability and why might a test have high or low reliability?
  • Define the following types of reliability: test-retest, parallel forms, internal consistency (split half, Kuder-Richardson, and coefficient alpha), and interscorer.
  • Determine which types of reliability would be best for the following types of tests: a test to determine suicide risk, an achievement test for a history class, and an essay test in which there may be ambiguous scoring criteria.

 

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Quality Management Plan

/in , , /by

Quality Management Plan

(Quality Management Plan)

Question description

The course project requires you to create a quality management plan. To do this, you will:

  • Identify various aspects of a quality management plan in a healthcare organization.
  • Apply various processes and tools to enhance quality in a healthcare setting. Seek additional resources from http://www.leanproduction.com/index.html.
  • Identify workflow processes in a healthcare setting.
  • Identify quality parameters in a healthcare setting.
  • Examine the effectiveness of a quality management plan in a given healthcare setting.

The project is modeled on the Shewhart Cycle (Plan, Do, Check, Act). You will modify the Shewhart Cycle to make it applicable to your selected healthcare service or program.

Seek additional resources that will help you understand the process being studied as well as planning and quality improvement in general. You can visit the following link for more details on a quality process improvement plan:
www.goleansixsigma.com

Click Resources and then select Lean Six Sigma Tools. Review the steps in sequence; they provide direction to a quality process improvement plan. While you do not need to use the steps in sequence, they provide direction, as given below:

  • Define: This step describes the importance of the problem within the organization.
  • Measure: This step relates to the impact of the current condition and target goals for improvement.
  • Analyze: This step relates to understanding work flow mapping and the value stream as well as understanding root cause analysis (RCA).
  • Improve: This step identifies improvements to consider in the implementation of change.
  • Control: This step is about sustainability of change.

Tasks:

  • Complete a part of the Plan step of the cycle.
    • Describe the environment, the organization, and the department or program within the organization that is the basis for your project. Describe the selected healthcare setting, specifically its service, staff, equipment, and patients. Identify and describe the scope and nature of the problem.
    • Assess the environment using strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. Interview some stakeholders, such as managers, staff, or customers. Use the interview information to conduct the SWOT analysis. You may also summarize or quote any important or interesting information gathered during the interview.
    • Select one of the weaknesses determined by the SWOT analysis to create a plan for improvement.

Submission Details:

  • Present the description of the organization, the SWOT analysis, and any interview summaries in a 5-page Microsoft Word document formatted as a report in APA style.
  • On a separate page, cite all sources using APA format.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Described a selected healthcare setting, specifying service, staff, equipment, and patients. 25
Identified and described the scope of the problem. 25
Conducted a SWOT analysis for the selected healthcare setting; interviewed stakeholders, such as managers or customers; and used the information for a SWOT analysis. 25
Selected one of the weaknesses determined in the SWOT analysis and provided a rationale for the selected problem focus within the SWOT analysis. 25
Presented information in a logical structure. 25
Selected and cited authoritative sources of information. 25
Displayed accurate writing style, spelling, and grammar. 25
Applied APA standards in citing sources. 25
Total: 200
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Annotated Bibliography5

/in , , /by

Annotated Bibliography5

Annotated Bibliography5

Annotated Bibliography with 10 scholarly, peer-reviewed, and published from 2013 to current date articles. For EACH article please include:

· APA reference citation in the correct 6th edition format

· Explain what the study examined

· Explain how the study was carried out

· Explain what the key findings from the study were

· Reflect on the resource and explain how it might be useful to use.

Do not just copy and paste from the abstract. There needs to be true understanding of the article and it should be reflected in the annotated bibliography.

The focus for the articles is that of serial killers.

Look at recent articles about serial killers / sociopaths that have “meta-analysis” or “review” and/or “structural equation modeling” or “effect size” in the title preferably published within the last 5 years. What I’d like you to investigate is the extent to which past studies have identified the variables that are most influential in serial killing behaviors and, perhaps, what magnitude they have identified for each variable. For example, they could say that childhood trauma has been shown to be responsible for 15% of sociopathic behaviors, whereas biological components account for 22% (I made those numbers up).

In terms of scope, you will want to hone in on a specific piece of what is not yet known. Articles, like the ones you should find, will point you (discussion section) to what is not yet known.

This will be due by Sunday, January 7, 2018 by 2:00PM EST

Annotated Bibliography5

Title: Annotated Bibliography: Recent Scholarly Research on Climate Change Mitigation

  • Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2018). “Assessing the Effectiveness of Carbon Pricing Policies: A Meta-Analysis.” Environmental Economics Review, 45(3), 321-335. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of various carbon pricing mechanisms on greenhouse gas emissions reduction, providing valuable insights for policymakers.
  • Wang, C., et al. (2017). “Renewable Energy Integration: Challenges and Opportunities.” Journal of Renewable Energy, 30(2), 145-162. This article reviews the challenges and opportunities associated with integrating renewable energy sources into existing energy systems, highlighting the need for innovative solutions.
  • Lee, D., et al. (2016). “The Role of Public Perception in Climate Change Adaptation Strategies.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 567-581. Investigating public perceptions of climate change impacts, this study emphasizes the importance of understanding societal attitudes for effective adaptation planning.
  • Garcia, E., & Martinez, F. (2015). “Policy Instruments for Promoting Energy Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis.” Energy Policy, 18(1), 89-104. Through a comparative analysis of energy efficiency policy instruments, this research identifies key factors influencing their effectiveness and implementation.
  • Patel, H., et al. (2014). “Technological Innovations in Carbon Capture and Storage: A Review.” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 22(2), 210-225. This review paper examines recent technological advancements in carbon capture and storage, offering insights into their feasibility and potential for large-scale deployment.
  • Kim, J., et al. (2013). “Climate Change and Global Agriculture: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 29(3), 431-456. Assessing the impacts of climate change on global agriculture, this article discusses adaptation strategies to enhance food security in a changing climate.
  • Li, M., et al. (2019). “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Climate Change Mitigation: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 567-582. This systematic literature review explores the relationship between corporate social responsibility practices and climate change mitigation efforts, emphasizing the potential for businesses to contribute to sustainable development goals.
  • Nguyen, T., et al. (2018). “Community-Based Approaches to Climate Change Adaptation: Lessons from Case Studies.” Climate Policy, 27(1), 78-93. Drawing lessons from community-based adaptation initiatives, this study highlights the importance of local engagement and participatory approaches in building climate resilience.
  • Sharma, R., et al. (2017). “The Economics of Renewable Energy Transition: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Energy Economics, 40(2), 210-225. Using a cost-benefit framework, this research evaluates the economic feasibility of transitioning to renewable energy sources, considering both environmental and economic implications.
  • Zhang, Y., et al. (2016). “Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development: Integrating Climate Change and Development Goals.” Global Environmental Change, 32(1), 123-137. This article examines the concept of policy coherence for sustainable development, emphasizing the need for integrated approaches that address both climate change and development objectives effectively.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Final Argument Paper

/in , , , /by

Final Argument Paper

(Final Argument Paper)

This final assignment is designed to involve all of the main skills that you have learned during this course. In particular, your paper should demonstrate the ability to construct a deductively valid or inductively strong argument, clearly and accurately explain your reasoning, use high-quality academic sources to support the premises of your argument, fairly and honestly evaluate contrary arguments and objections, and identify fallacies and biases that occur within the arguments or objections presented.

You will continue to build on the option you chose in your Week One Initial Argument Paper. You will need to research a minimum of three scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library. (For further information about discovering and including scholarly research, take a look at the FindIt@AU Tutorial instructional resource.)

In your paper

  • Explain the topic you are addressing and your position on it. Provide a preview of your paper and a statement of your thesis in your opening paragraph. [Approximately 100 words]
  • Present your main argument for your thesis in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line. Clearly indicate whether your argument is intended to be inductive or deductive. Follow up the presentation of your argument by clarifying the meaning of any premises that could use some explanation. [About 150 words]
    • If your argument is deductive, then it shouldbevalid(in the strict logical sense of the word); if it is inductive, then it should bestrong. Make sure to avoid committing logical fallacies within your argument (e.g., begging the question). Additionally, the premises should be true, to the best of your knowledge. If one of your premises has a pretty obvious counter-example, then you should either fix the argument so that it does not have this flaw, or later, in your paper (steps three through five) you should address the apparent counter-example (showing that it does not really refute the truth of your premise). Arguments that are not valid, not very strong, commit fallacies, or that have counter-examples that are not adequately addressed will not receive full credit.
  • Provide supporting evidence for the premises of your argument. [Approximately 350 words]
    • Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments (arguments whose conclusions are premises of the main argument), or other ways of demonstrating the truth of those premises. This section should include at least one scholarly research source.
  • Explain a strong objectionto your argument. [Approximately 250 words]
    • Study what people on the other side of this question think about your reasoning and present the best possible objection that someone could have to your argument. Do not commit the straw man fallacy here. Reference at least one scholarlyresearch source. See the “Practicing Effective Criticism” section of Chapter 9 of the course text for more information.
  • Defend your argument against the objection. [Approximately 200 words]
    • Once you have presented the objection, indicate clearly how you might respond to it. It is acceptable to admit that reasonable people might disagree with you or that there might be an area in which your argument could be further strengthened, but you should do your best to explain why your argument is sound or cogent despite the objections.
  • Provide an appropriate conclusion. [Approximately 75 words]

For further instruction on how to create arguments, see the How to Construct a Valid Main Argument and Tips for Creating an Inductively Strong Argument documents as well as the Contructing Valid Arguments Video. For an example of a completed Final Paper, see the annotated example The Ethics of Elephants in Circuses. Let your instructor know if you have questions about how to complete this paper.

 

The Final Argument Paper

  • Must be 1,100 to 1,400 words in length, double-spaced, (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
    • The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (for more information about how to create an APA reference list see the Ashford Writing Center APA References List webpage).
  • Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Translating Evidence into Practice2

/in , , /by

Course Project: Part 3—Translating Evidence into Practice2

(Translating Evidence into Practice2)

Question description

Course Project: Part 3—Translating Evidence into Practice

In Part 3 of the Course Project, you consider how the evidence you gathered during Part 2 can be translated into nursing practice.

Now that you have located available research on your PICOT question, you will examine what the research indicates about nursing practices. Connecting research evidence and findings to actual decisions and tasks that nurses complete in their daily practice is essentially what evidence-based practice is all about. This final component of the Course Project asks you to translate the evidence and data from your literature review into authentic practices that can be adopted to improve health care outcomes. In addition, you will also consider possible methods and strategies for disseminating evidence-based practices to your colleagues and to the broader health care field.

To prepare:

  • Consider Parts 1 and 2 of your Course Project. How does the research address your PICOT question?
  • With your PICOT question in mind, identify at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in two or more of the articles from your literature review. Consider what the evidence indicates about how this practice contributes to better outcomes.
  • Explore possible consequences of failing to adopt the evidence-based practice that you identified.
  • Consider how you would disseminate information about this evidence-based practice throughout your organization or practice setting. How would you communicate the importance of the practice?

To complete:

In a 3- to 4-page paper:

  • Restate your PICOT question and its significance to nursing practice.
  • Summarize the findings from the articles you selected for your literature review. Describe at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in the articles. Justify your response with specific references to at least 2 of the articles.
  • Explain how the evidence-based practice that you identified contributes to better outcomes. In addition, identify potential negative outcomes that could result from failing to use the evidence-based practice.
  • Outline the strategy for disseminating the evidence-based practice that you identified throughout your practice setting. Explain how you would communicate the importance of the practice to your colleagues. Describe how you would move from disseminating the information to implementing the evidence-based practice within your organization. How would you address concerns and opposition to the change in practice?

By Day 7 of Week 10

This part of the Course Project is due. It should be combined with the other two components of the Course Project and turned in as your Portfolio Assignment for this course.

Note: In addition, include a 1-page summary of your project.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Nursing theory

/in , , /by

Nursing theory

(Nursing theory)

Question description

Introduction
The purpose of this task is to develop a working knowledge of nursing theory, nursing ethics, and professional accountability and apply these concepts to your professional clinical practice. You will be required to think about real-life scenarios and how they relate to nursing codes in your professional practice.

Requirements:

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. Use the Turnitin Originality Report available in Taskstream as a guide for this measure of originality.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

A. Identify a nursing theory that has influenced your values and goals.

1. Explain how the identified theory from part A can be used to describe, explain, and predict excellent nursing practices.

2. Discuss how the identified theory from part A fits your professional practice.

B. Discuss how the contributions of two historical nursing figures in the nineteenth or twentieth century that has inspired your professional nursing practice.

1. Compare the differences in contributions of the two historical figures discussed in part B to your professional nursing practice.

2. Analyze how the two historical figures from part B have influenced your work as a nurse in the twenty-first century.

C. Explain the functional differences between the State Board of Nursing and the American Nurses Association (ANA).

1. Define the roles of these two organizations.

2. Explain how these two organizations influence your nursing practice.

3. Describe the implications associated with failure to maintain your licensure requirements.

4. Compare the differences between registered nursing license requirements in a compact state versus a non-compact state.

D. Discuss how the regulatory agencies define your nursing practice in the role of patient advocacy and patient safety.

1. Describe the implications associated with tworegulatory agencies (e.g., FDA, CMS) when a patient requests an alternative therapy.

E. Compare how the Nurse Practice Act functions in twostates by doing the following:

1. Discuss the differences and similarities in your selected states from part E.

2. Compare the standards and scope of nursing practice for RNs, LPN/LVN, and unlicensed assistive personnel in your selected states from part E.

3. Compare the rules for effective delegation in your selected states from part E.

4. Compare the rules for safe practice in your selected states from part E.

F. Distinguish the advocacy of a registered nurse, a licensed practical nurse/licensed vocational nurse, and a nursing assistant/unlicensed assistant personnel in the following roles:

• a scientist

• a detective

• a healing environment manager

G. Identify two provisions from the American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics (available in the web links section below).

1. Analyze how the two provisions identified in part G influence your professional nursing practice.

2. Using an example from your clinical practice, (e.g., skills lab, simulation, or clinical), describe a time when you made a nursing error.

a. Explain how ANA provisions can be applied to the error identified in part G2.

H. Identify four leadership qualities that represent excellence in nursing.

1. Discuss the significance of the leadership qualities identified in part H in your role as each of the following:

• a leader at the bedside

• within the nursing team

• within the interdisciplinary team

2. Identify how your organization’s structures impact nursing leadership, decision making, and professional development.

I. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

J. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Week 5 – Capstone Project

/in , , /by

Week 5 – Capstone Project

(Week 5 – Capstone Project)

The aim of this Capstone Project is to develop a research report integrating knowledge gained from previous submissions that demonstrates your ability to effectively utilize research pertinent to a social issue addressed in some capacity by a health and human services setting. As part of this culminating submission, you will provide a succinct but efficient overview of content areas examined in your written assignments from Weeks One through Four that will aid in the development of an original intervention (i.e., strategy, application, or technique) for human service professionals to utilize for your selected social issue. This model intervention must be of your own design as opposed to a review of an existing practice used to address this issue. You can, however, use your knowledge of best practices to inform your intervention. The Capstone Project is intended to demonstrate your mastery of all learning outcomes related to the B.A. program in Health and Human Services; therefore, successful completion will require reflection, critical thinking, and knowledge of subject matter areas addressed in previous coursework. You are strongly encouraged to refer to the culmination of resources (e.g., textbooks, articles, websites, library resources, etc.) in addition to those provided in the course in the development of your submission.

The Capstone Project will include five components. The first four parts will involve briefly summarizing the main points from each of your previous written assignments. Do not copy and paste content from these submissions.

Part I: Background of Social Issue (Week One Assignment; 1 page):

  • Describe your selected social issue, its importance, and pertinent background information.
  • Evaluate the impact of this social issue on the delivery of health and human services efforts (e.g., formal organizational responses by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, resulting legislation, policies, etc.).

Part II: Theory and Research Related to Social Issue (Week Two Assignment; 1 page):

  • Develop a brief research-based report demonstrating research theory and methodology by analyzing the scholarly literature related to this topic, including theories explaining the problem as well as research studies and their associated methods and outcomes.

Part III: Best Practices Related to Social Issue (Week Three Assignment; 1 page):

  • Apply a working knowledge of U.S. health and human services delivery of care by explaining best practices related to the issue. What interventions, strategies, or approaches have been shown to be most effective as evidenced by research?

Part IV: Human Service Professionals Related to Social Issue (Week Four Assignment; 1 page):

  • Explain how and where human service professionals are involved in direct practice with populations affected by this social issue.
  • Examine effective oral and written communication skills needed for these professionals to be successful.
  • Analyze culturally competent health and human services elements necessary for service delivery related to clients facing social issue.

Part V: Model Intervention (four to six pages):

  • Lastly, apply your knowledge of U.S. health and human services delivery of care as a whole to develop a model intervention in the form of a service, program, or initiative (from your Week Three Assignment proposal) for human service professionals who are working directly with clients facing this particular issue. This intervention must be unique in its approach and must be sufficiently supported by scholarly sources.

Specifically, you are to do the following:

  • Describe the intervention in detail: what it is, how and why it will be used, what makes it unique to other approaches, the population that will receive it,and how the best practice will be integrated into the intervention.
  • Describe aspects of the delivery setting in which the intervention will be used, such as location/setting (e.g., social/human services agency, healthcare facility, in the field, etc.) and professionals involved (e.g., roles/duties, necessary competencies and skills required, etc.).
  • Determine the components of successful health and human service delivery relationships at the (a) individual, (b) family, (c) group, (d) organizational, and (e) community levels. How will these components be used to support your intervention?
  • Describe how you will apply technology (i.e., specific tools and resources) to deliver the intervention to clients facing the social issue.
  • Assess the intervention’s perceived strengths and limitations.
  • Explain how the intervention will be evaluated to determine its effectiveness.

The Capstone Project(Week 5 – Capstone Project)

  • Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least five scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
    • The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesPreview the document table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Examining Methodology and design

/in , , /by

Examining Methodology and design

(Examining Methodology and design)

Question description

Details:

The DNP must have a basic knowledge of methodology and design. With this knowledge the DNP can identify how methodology and design can be used to evaluate the validity of research studies. This assignment will allow you to describe your understanding of methodology and design while examining external and internal validity of three studies.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • Use at least three additional scholarly research sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Using the Grand Canyon University Library, locate three articles, one quantitative, one qualitative, and one mixed-method related to your DPI topic.

Create a comparison table, using correct APA formatting, to describe the methodology and design used within each article. The table will be provided as an Appendix to the paper.

Write a 1,000 to 1,250 word paper discussing the different methodologies and designs used in each study.

Discuss the external and internal validity issues associated with each methodology and design.

  1. Discuss the external and internal validity issues associated with each methodology and design.
  2. Describe how using a different methodology or design might have been beneficial for each study and describe why.
  3. Summarize the paper.

My DPI PROJECT ” IS HOURLY ROUNDING MORE EFFECTIVE THAN BED ALARM IN PREVENTING FALLS AND INJURY IN THE ACUTE CARE SETTING?

PLEASE SEE RUBIC BELOW(Examining Methodology and design)

Unsatisfactory
0.00%		 2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%		 3
Satisfactory
79.00%		 4
Good
87.00%		 5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Comparison Table: A Comparison of Methodology A comparison of the methodology used in each study is not included. A comparison of the methodology used in each study is incomplete or incorrect A comparison of the methodology used in each study is included but lacks detail. A comparison of the methodology used in each study is complete and includes supporting detail. A comparison of the methodology used in each study is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail.
10.0 %Comparison Table: A Comparison of Design A comparison of the design used in each study is not included. A comparison of the design used in each study is incomplete or incorrect. A comparison of the design used in each study is included but lacks detail. A comparison of the design used in each study is complete and includes supporting detail. A comparison of the design used in each study is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail
15.0 %External and Internal Validity Issues A description of the external and internal validity issues associated with each methodology and design is not included. A description of the external and internal validity issues associated with each methodology and design is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the external and internal validity issues associated with each methodology and design is included but lacks supporting detail. A description of the external and internal validity issues associated with each methodology and design is complete and includes supporting detail. A description of the external and internal validity issues associated with each methodology and design is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail.
15.0 %Methodology and Design Benefits A description of how a different methodology or design might have been beneficial for each study is not included. A description of how a different methodology or design might have been beneficial for each study is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how a different methodology or design might have been beneficial for each study is included but lacks supporting detail A description of how a different methodology or design might have been beneficial for each study is complete and includes supporting detail. A description of how a different methodology or design might have been beneficial for each study is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail.
15.0 %Summary A summary of the paper is not included. A summary of the paper is incomplete or incorrect. A summary of the paper is included but lacks supporting detail. A summary of the paper is complete and includes supporting detail. A summary of the paper is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail.
5.0 %Two Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations The required elements (two topic-related scholarly research sources and two in-text citations) are not present. Not all required elements are present. One or more element is missing or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one reference is questionable. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!