Archive for month: July, 2021

In the best-selling book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (Skloot, 2010), the author highlights the true story of an African-American woman who died in 1951 from cervical cancer. What makes her story unique is that prior to her death, cells from her tumor were removed and successfully grown in a petri dish. This was the first time scientists were able to successfully replicate cells outside the body, and it is estimated that billions of Lacks’ cells have been used in medical research. However, Henrietta Lacks was never asked for permission to take a sample and her family was never made aware of the widespread use of her cells. Although the culturing of her cells has been pivotal for advancing research, strong ethical concerns later arose about using these cells without patient or family approval.

This week’s readings describe historical examples of unethical research, such as a study of syphilis among African-American men in which treatment was withheld and a study in which live cancer cells were injected into elderly patients. Today, stricter controls that seek to protect study participants are placed on researchers, but breaches still occur. Careful attention must be given toward preventing unethical behavior. In this Discussion, you explore ethical considerations and issues in research.

· Select a current health-related case involving research ethics. (If none come to mind, browse the Internet to familiarize yourself with recent cases.)

· As you review the case that you have selected, reflect on the ethical principles discussed in “What Are the Major Ethical Issues in Conducting Research?” article found in this week’s Learning Resources. Which principles were breached in the case you have identified?

Post a description of the case that you selected and the ethical issues involved. Analyze the ethical principles that were breached by the researchers or organizations in your selected case as well as the possible cause of the breach(es). Suggest how the research might have been conducted differently to avoid or minimize the ethical problems. Discuss how research can be done on sensitive issues while still protecting the rights of the research subjects.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

The purpose of an article review is to provide the academic community with a description, summary, and evaluation of the completed work. For the article review, students will assume the role of an expert who is critically evaluating contemporary research in the field of psychology. Students will incorporate material from across the course, analyzing and applying theories and principles of psychology, into a cohesive and well-written article review. This learning activity will facilitate the development of research skills, critical thinking, and writing skills that are necessary to success in the field of psychology. The article for review was chosen in Week Two of the course and must be used in this review. Carefully read the selected article, and then write the Article Review.

Begin with a well-written introduction to the article that:

Analyzes the article and identifies the professional area of psychology it represents

Assesses the roles of psychology professionals within this area and describes whether or not the article clearly and correctly represents these roles.

Evaluate the theoretical perspective on which the study is based

Detail the hypotheses presented in the study or the relationship of interest

Describe the sample(s) presented in the study (how participants were obtained, selected, sample size, etc.)

Discuss where the study was conducted: university setting (lab), organization (field), etc.

Examine the ethical concerns in the study using the APA Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct as a guide.

Summarize the results of the study. Be certain to specify the findings and whether or not the hypotheses were supported.

Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the study (usually found in the discussion section of the article).

Evaluate possible contemporary applications of the results within the article

Create a conclusion that includes a synopsis of professional insights about the study.

In the creation of the Article Review, it is paramount to include information in the form of peer-reviewed research to support any statements made. A minimum of five peer-reviewed articles, not including the article chosen for this assignment, are required for this paper.

Attention Students: The Masters of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Pathbrite portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this Article Review, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to Pathbrite and upload the revised Article Review to the portfolio. (Use the Pathbrite Quick-Start Guide to create an account if you do not already have one.) The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool. See the Pathbrite website for information and further instructions on using this portfolio tool.

Writing the Final Paper

The Final Paper:

Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Must include a title page with the following:

Title of paper

Student’s name

Course name and number

Instructor’s name

Date submitted

Must begin with an introductory paragraph that includes an analysis of the article and identification of the professional area of psychology it represents, as well as an assessment of the clear description of the roles of psychology professionals within the area presented.

Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.

Must end with a conclusion that includes a synopsis of professional insights about the study.

Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford University Library. The article being reviewed will not count toward this total.

Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Question description

Imagine that you find the job of your dreams, you apply, and you get a call for an interview. Are you ready? How familiar are you with the interview process? How familiar are you with the company? In today’s competitive job market, it is vital that you are fully prepared for your employment interviews. One of the best ways to do that is to do research on your prospective employer in advance of the interview. Remember, the interview process gives you an opportunity to evaluate your prospective employer as much as it gives him or her an opportunity to evaluate you.

To answer the questions below, use a job board such as this Web sitehttps://www.indeed.com/ from Charleston S.C or niche job boards like this Web sitehttps://www.dice.com/ Charleston SC or this Web site to first review 3–5 advertised job descriptions for a position that you could realistically get after you graduate with your current level of experience, skills, and education.

These jobs do not have to be in your geographic area, but make sure the descriptions are detailed enough to understand the requirements (e.g., provide the job duties and qualifications) and that they match your current level of experience.

Note: Most often, few people will have everything an employer advertises, so aim to have about 60–70% of the stated qualifications. If you find that you have less than that and you are not qualified for the jobs that you identified, then go back again and search for new jobs for which you do meet a majority of the qualifications.

Have these job descriptions in front of you as you answer the questions below.

Primary Task Response

Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that address the following:

• Make a list of things that are important to you about a prospective employer. For instance, would you prefer to work for a company that has a history of being on the cutting edge of technological advancements? Would you prefer to work for a company that has a history of making significant investments in its infrastructure? Simply, what are the things about a prospective employer that would indicate a good fit for you?
• Select 1 of the positions that you reviewed, and research the company for some general background information about it, including when it was established, its mission statement, and so forth. You should look for anything that defines the company to the public, to its stakeholders, and to its employees. It is essential to know the company (especially its mission, values, and culture) to determine whether or not it is a place where you might actually want to work.
• At the end of an interview, you will often be asked if you have any questions for the person interviewing you. Based upon what is important to you in a prospective employer and based upon your company research, write down a list of 3–5 specific questions that you might want to ask that person. Keep in mind that you may want to ask less overt questions, and instead, ask questions that get at what you want to learn without asking it directly. For example, instead of asking “Does your company have a history of making significant investments in its infrastructure?” you could ask “What investments has your company made in recent years to ensure its operational efficiency?”

Next Steps

What do you know about the person interviewing you? Have you searched for them on this Web site or any other social media sites? By the way, what about you? Have you ever searched for yourself online? Do you like what you see? Do you have a positive digital identity? Studies report that 95% of employers will review the online profiles of prospective employees prior to their interview. Therefore, if you have a profile, you want it to be as complete, detailed, and professional as possible

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Assignment 2: Research the 1976 Trial of Patricia Hearst FOR SOLUTIONS PRO. ONLY**

You are an employee of the Jury Consultation Corporation. Imagine it is 1976, and Patricia Hearst has just been charged with armed robbery. You have been hired by the defense to assist in developing a strategy to help to acquit her.

Find answers to the following questions:

• Research the 1976 trial of Patricia Hearst and briefly summarize the case against her.
• What characteristics does Patricia Hearst possess that could possibly sway a jury in her favor? As a result, what characteristics should her defense attorney look for when selecting a jury?
• What characteristics does Patricia Hearst possess that could sway a jury against her? As a result, what characteristics should the prosecuting attorney look for when selecting a jury?
• What type of psychological expert should the defense hire? In other words, what area of psychology should the expert specialize in? Be specific and support your answer.

Prepare a PowerPoint presentation, to the client’s attorney explaining your answers to the above questions. Make sure that your report is something that an attorney could use to assist them in developing and trying a case.

Use headings, the bold style, and bulleted lists to effectively communicate your findings. You should include detailed speaker notes to assist in your presentation. Please make sure to have at least 10 slides for review. All citations in the report should be in APA 6th edition format.

Submit your responses to the M2: Assignment 2 Dropbox by Wednesday, April 13, 2016.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Question description

generate, designate, Organize, investigate and, present a Manage Care Control Cost Plan: Under traditional indemnity insurance, the money follows the patient. Patients select health care providers and visit them as they choose. Providers then bill the private insurer or public payer and are reimbursed on a fee-for-service or per case basis

. Introduction (30%) Provide a short-lived outline of the meaning (not a description) of Chapter 9 and 10 and articles you read, in your own words. Types and classifications of managed care models.

2. Manage Care Control Cost Plan: (50%)

a. Cost savings

‘‘Structural changes centered around the expansion of managed care have been the major transformative force in health markets in recent years and have played a major role in restraining growth in health spending’’

b. Provider reimbursement

This complaint has two dimensions: hospital profitability, and physician compensation. As far as hospitals are concerned, administrators are worried about profitability or surplus for reinvestment, and consumers are worried about the threat of hospital closures. Few things stir as much public outcry as the prospect of closing a community hospital.

c. Quality of care

Much recent legislation and many legal reforms havebeen aimed at preventing managed care’s perceivedquality abuses. The Patient Bill of Rights, which hasbeen heavily debated in Congress, defines, amongother things, the rights of consumers with complexconditions to access directly a qualified specialist,continuity of provider for patients who are underregular treatment, and self-referral to certain types ofspecialists.

3. Conclusion (20%)

Quickly recapitulate your thoughts & statement to your critique of the articles and Chapter you read.  How did these articles and Chapters impact your thoughts about Manage Care? What did you learn about manage care and how you will apply all these knowledge?

Evaluation will be based on how clearly you respond to the above, in particular:

a) The precision with which you analyses the articles;

b) The complexity, possibility, and organization of your paper; and,

c) Your conclusions, including a description of the impact of these articles and Chapters on any Health Care Setting.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!