theory self

Use the theory that you developed in week two.  Improve it by using the information you have obtained in the intervening weeks.  Use the Conceptual – Theoretical – Empirical Model (CTE) to link the operational definitions with the empirical indicators with the theoretical concepts and the conceptual model components.  Post your revised theory and explain how you would measure the concepts and proposition in a research study.ExpectationsInitial Post:Due: Thursday, 11:59 pm PTLength: A minimum of 250 words, not including referencesCitations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Discussion question 6

Older adults (OA) are at risk for potential hazards of hospitalization, these include: immobility, delirium, medication side effects, malnutrition, pressure ulcers, procedures, peri- and postoperative periods, and hospital-acquired infections and more. Discuss in detail three potential hazards for this population while in the hospital and identify potential prevention strategies for each hazard.Your initial posting should be at least 400 words in length and utilize at least one scholarly source other than the textbook. Please reply to at least two classmates. Replies to classmates should be at least 200 words in length.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Case study

Read the case study “ÿHootsuiteÿUses Social Media to Manage Aspects of the Human Resource Function” and respond to this question.What does this case teach you about the use of social media in today’s organization? ÿExplain and support your point of view.Include at least two references beyond the textbook. ÿUse APA to cite your references.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

summary

Details:Throughout the course, students will engage in weekly reflection and scholarly activities. These assignments are presented in Topic 1 to allow students to plan ahead, and incorporate the deliverables into the Individual Success Plan if they so choose.The weekly reflective journals and scholarly activities will not be submitted in LoudCloud each week; a final, culminating submission will be due in Topic 10. No submission is required until Topic 10.Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective JournalStudents are required to maintain weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to combine into a final, course-long reflective journal that integrates leadership and inquiry into current practice as it applies to the Professional Capstone and Practicum course. This course-long journal assignment will be due in Topic 10.In each week’s entry, you should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the Professional Capstone and Practicum course. Your entry should address a variable combination of the following, dependent on the specific practice immersion clinical experiences you encountered that week:New ÿÿÿÿÿpractice approachesIntraprofessional ÿÿÿÿÿcollaborationHealth ÿÿÿÿÿcare delivery and clinical systemsEthical ÿÿÿÿÿconsiderations in health carePopulation ÿÿÿÿÿhealth concernsThe ÿÿÿÿÿrole of technology in improving health care outcomesHealth ÿÿÿÿÿpolicyLeadership ÿÿÿÿÿand economic modelsHealth ÿÿÿÿÿdisparitiesIn the Topic 10 submission, each of the areas should be addressed in one or more of the weekly entries.This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and finally, how they met competencies and course objectives.Scholarly ActivitiesThroughout the RN-to-BSN program, students are required to participate in scholarly activities outside of clinical practice or professional practice. Examples of scholarly activities include attending conferences, seminars, journal club, grand rounds, morbidity and mortality meetings, interdisciplinary committees, quality improvement committees, and any other opportunities available at your site, within your community, or nationally.You are required to post one scholarly activity while you are in the BSN program, which should be documented by the end of this course. In addition to this submission, you are required to be involved and contribute to interdisciplinary initiatives on a regular basis.In Topic 10, you will submit a summary report of your scholarly activity. You may use the “Scholarly Activity Summary” resource to help guide this assignment.NRS-490-RS-ScholarlyActivitySummary.docx

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Wgu c489 task 2

Anyone done this one before?

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

SHORT ANSWER ASSIGNMENT & ASSESSMENT & TREATING PATIENTS WITH ANXIETY DISORDER

FIRST ÿASSIGNMENT IS TWO PAGES ONLY AND REQUIRE SHORT ANSWERS WITH CITATIONS FOR ALL THE QUESTIONS . ÿÿÿÿWHILE THE OTHER IS OUR REGULAR DECISION TREE ASSIGNMENT OF FIVE PAGES. THE CASE STUDY AND MEDS AT THE BOTTOM PART. THANKSPLAG SHOULD BE LESS THAN 10% FOR BOTH ASSIGNMENTS

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

The Nurse as Advocate

The Nurse as AdvocateWhether nurses are advocating for their patients, health care, and/or policies that improve people?s lives, the advocacy processes have commonalities that transcend the subject of their advocacy. There are also differences, although these differences may be more nuanced than obvious.Tasks:Write a 5-page brief to answer the following questions. Be sure to use APA guidelines for writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources.Read the following chapters from your course textbook:Taking Action: Nurse, Educator, and Legislator: My Journey to the Delaware SenateTaking Action: A Nurse in the Board RoomAnswer the below questions:Describe what you believe to be the drivers for each of the individuals? What factors led them to become advocates?Discuss the challenges that each of them identified in their writings.Analyze these drivers and challenges and compare them with your own experience to date as an advocate. In what ways do you believe that you can expand your advocacy skills within the next five years?

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

week4 assignment

Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research AnalysisArchitect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying ?To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.? The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Hence research analysis skills are critical tools for your toolbox.In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.To Prepare:Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this week in support of locating and analyzing research.Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic of interest to you in your specialty field.Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts as described by the articleThe Assignment:Using the ?Week 4 | Part 4? section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:Clearly identify the topic of interest you have selected.Provide an accurate and complete APA formatted citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.Clearly identify and describe in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.Provide a clear and accurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.Write a 1-paragraph justification that clearly and accurately explains in detail whether you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice. Note: You can use the CARP method as presented in the Resources for this week on evaluating resources.Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:Clearly and accurately describe in detail your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.Provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.Integrate at least one outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources to fully support your summary.Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Week 1 Assignment, which was built off the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.By Day 7Submit your analysis, including your competed section of the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template sections including your matrix and summary.Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.Submission and Grading InformationTo submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:Please save your Assignment using the naming convention ?WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)? as the name.Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to ?View Rubric? for grading criteria from this area.Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as ?WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)? and click Open.If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.Rubric DetailSelect Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.Name:ÿNURS_6002_Week_4_Assignment_RubricGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorUsing the Week 4 Part 4 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:úÿÿ The topic of interest you have selected.úÿÿ Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.úÿÿ Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.18 (18%) – 20 (20%)The response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected.The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details.The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.16 (16%) – 17 (17%)The response partially identifies the topic of interest selected.The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details.The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected.The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details.The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.0 (0%) – 13 (13%)The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article, or is missing.Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.úÿÿ Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.18 (18%) – 20 (20%)The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.16 (16%) – 17 (17%)The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.0 (0%) – 13 (13%)The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing.Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:úÿÿ Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed researchúÿÿ Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.úÿÿ Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.úÿÿ Iintegrate at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources to fully support summary.41 (41%) – 45 (45%)The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response fully integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.36 (36%) – 40 (40%)The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that support the summary provided.32 (32%) – 35 (35%)The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.0 (0%) – 31 (31%)The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research, or is missing.The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is missing.Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (ò 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader?s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing,ÿmargins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (ò 5) APA format errors.Total Points: 100Name:ÿNURS_6002_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

UNIT 9 DQ

The Role of the Advanced Practice Nurse in a Changing Health Care EnvironmentAnalyze the role of the advanced practice nurse in the changing health care environment. How will this role augment physicians’ practices? What implications (if any) does the Affordable Care Act have on this delivery system?

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Market Math Pricing

What is meant by marketing math in pricing?ÿDiscuss the significance of marketing math in overall marketing success. Provide an example that supports your ideas. In replies to peers, provide additional examples that support those posted by your peers.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!