Community Teaching Plan

/in , , /by

Community Teaching Plan

(Community Teaching Plan)

Question description

Hello, this are separate assignment but they are a continuation of each other. Please take in considerationwhen doing the assignment, I broke it down for you and each assignment has their own tittle. Thank you.

1ST Assignment: Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation.

Note: This is an individual assignment. Based on the feedback offered by the provider, identify the best approach for teaching. Prepare a presentation to accompany the teaching plan and present the information to your community. Select one of the following options for delivery of the presentation:

1PowerPoint presentation – no more than 30 minutes

2Pamphlet presentation – 1 to 2 pages

3Poster presentation

Appropriate community settings include:

•Public health clinic

•Community health center

•Long-term care facility

•Transitional care facility

•Home health center

•University/School health center

•Church community

•Adult/Child care center

Before presenting information to the community, seek approval from an agency administrator or representative.

Upon receiving approval from the agency, include the “Community Teaching Experience Form” as part of your assignment submission.

APA format is required for essays only. Solid academic writing is always expected. For all assignment delivery options, documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NRS-427V-RS-CommunityTeachingExperienceForm.doc

2ND Assignment: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal.

Note: This is an individual assignment. Applying what you have learned thus far, develop a community teachingproposal designed to address the needs of your community.

Select one of the following as the focus for the teaching plan:

4Primary Prevention/Health Promotion

5Secondary Prevention/Screenings for a Vulnerable Population

6Bioterrorism/Disaster

7Environmental Issues

Complete the “Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal.” This will help you organize your plan and create an outline for the written assignment.

1. After completing the teaching proposal, review the teaching plan with a community health and public health provider in your local community.

2. Request feedback (strengths and opportunities for improvement) from the provider.

3. Complete the “Community Teaching Experience” form.

APA format is required for essays only. Solid academic writing is always expected. For all assignment delivery options, documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NRS-427V-RS-CommunityTeachingWorkPlanProposal.docx

NRS-427V-RS-CommunityTeachingExperienceForm.doc

3RD Assignment: Teaching Experience Paper.

Note: This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this assignment should include:

8Summary of teaching plan

9Epidemiological rationale for topic

10Evaluation of teaching experience

11Community response to teaching

12Areas of strengths and areas of improvement

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Community Change Proposal Development

/in , , , /by

Community Change Proposal Development

(Community Change Proposal Development)

Discussion

In this course, you will be identifying a problem in your community or workplace that needs solving and proposing a way to address that problem. Even if you have a unique approach to drafting your writing, you need to generate ideas at the beginning of the writing process. To help your writing have a positive impact on your audience, now is a good time to begin doing preparatory work. These activities include gaining inspiration and generating ideas about issues in your community or workplace that would benefit from positive change. While you are not required to use the ideas you produce in this unit for future Assignments, it is a good idea to invest time and thought into viable topics for an argument for change; the sooner you identify a feasible topic and formulate your argument, the easier the upcoming Assignments will be.

After reviewing the Learning Activities, including the TED Talks on generating ideas, begin developing ideas for creating change in your community or workplace and sharing them on the Discussion Board. Your detailed ideas should be related to an issue or problem that interests you in the community or workplace that would also be a suitable topic for an academic research essay like the one due in Unit 8. You are welcome to share several different ideas in order to receive feedback on them. Please respond to the following questions in at least two well-developed paragraphs:

  • Explain your typical idea generation process. How does it compare to those described in one of the TED Talks or the prewriting phases covered in this week’s Learning Activities?
  • Describe a problem you would like to solve in your community or workplace. Why do you think this topic would be interesting to others, why is it important, and do you think you can find research on this topic?

To earn full participation credit, you will need to respond substantively to at least two peers’ initial Discussion posts and show active engagement in the discussion as described in the grading rubric. These responses should stay on topic and generate further discussion by asking questions, mentioning relevant examples, and if possible, referencing concepts from the unit Learning Activities.

All Discussion posts and responses to peers should be written in complete sentences using Standard American English. Before posting, proofread for grammar, spelling, and word-choice issues. Be sure to respond fully to every aspect of the Discussion.

When you refer to concepts from the unit’s Learning Activities, be sure to use a signal phrase like “According to . . .[name of reading].” If you are directly quoting the Learning Activities or another source, be sure to use quotation marks and cite the source using proper APA in-text citations and full references.  The Writing Center has resources on APA citation formatting.

You can review a sample Discussion post and response to a peer by clicking on the following link: Unit 2 Sample Discussion Assignment.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Psychology Course

/in , , , /by

Psychology Course

(Psychology Course)

I have a full course on PSY205 on canvas.

Read the syllabus nicely.

Course Requirements and Policies

Canvas competency – you are expected to know how to use Canvas, including uploading assignments, using discussion boards, and taking tests. If you are unfamiliar with using this program there are tutorials available to you under the Online Learning site http://www.cwu.edu/online-learning/canvas-help-and-support-students. If you have technical difficulties, try using an alternate browser (Firefox, Explorer, Chrome, etc.). If problems persist, contact IT to get additional training or to find out how to change your settings. Although I manage the materials on the site I am not in a position to resolve technical problems, and you will be expected to submit items on time. You should also make sure you have access to a reliable internet connection since late submissions incur penalties (see below).

Course Description:

This course is designed to increase student’s awareness and knowledge in a way that is personally meaningful to students.   In the process of learning, students will be expected to read, write, communicate, and access information technology.

Course Objectives: This course stresses adjustment, growth and self-exploration.

Student Learning Outcome

Activity

Assessment

As a consequence of successfully completing this course, students will be able to:

What activity will the students engage in to meet the learning outcome?

How will this outcome be assessed?

Identify and describe basic concepts and research findings related to: diversity, critical thinking, methods of study adjustment, theories of personality, origins of stress and stress management, psychological factors in health.

Students will read a text on human growth and development.

Students will view and discuss videos of subject-specific interactions.

Assessment will include

1.      multiple choice examinations;

2.      Short essays on the current topics

3.      Weekly discussion

4.      a comprehensive final exam;

Students will submit short notes and reflections about the video.

Identify and describe basic concepts and research findings related to: self-concept, self-esteem, and identity, prejudice and discrimination, persuasion, conformity, mob behavior, resisting social influences, psychological disorders, styles of therapy, what to expect from counseling.

Students will analyze situations in their own lives and also investigate their current perceptions by participation in group discussions related to worksheets completed in class.

Critically analysis of a book representing philosophical, conceptual, and individual issues on relationships, adjustment, and self-esteem.

Assessment will include

1.      multiple choice examinations;

2.      a comprehensive final exam;

3.    weekly discussion questions

4.    class activities related to the current topic

Identify and describe basic concepts and research findings related to: gender roles and gender differences, friendship and love, communication in relationships, being single, sexual behavior, sexual dysfunction, rape, and exploitation.

Students will read a text on human growth and development.

Critically analysis of a book representing philosophical, conceptual, and individual issues on relationships, adjustment, and self-esteem.

Participating in group discussions and also participating in class activities will analyze situations in their own lives and also investigate their current perceptions.

Assessment will include(Psychology Course)

1.      multiple choice examinations;

2.      a comprehensive final exam;

3.      class activities on current topic

Describe and apply psychological research in an effort to reflect upon and express elements of individual identity

Students will read a text on human growth and development.

Critically analysis of a

and individual issues on relationships, adjustment, and self-esteem.

Students will take a personality type quiz and engage in a group discussion about it.

1.      Students will submit self-discovery papers. Paper topics will cover life goals related to college, adjustment to college, caring relationships for others, caring for self, self-esteem and self-concept.

2.      Student will submit weekly discussion about a self-discovery. Discussion topics will cover life goals related to college, adjustment to college, caring relationships for others, caring for self, self-esteem and self-concept.

Students will write a reflection paper based upon their individual results from the personality quiz and from feedback from students in their group.

BID ONLY IF YOU ARE INTERESTED.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

M6A1: Critical Analysis Paper

/in , , , /by

M6A1: Critical Analysis Paper

(M6A1: Critical Analysis Paper)

The M6A1 Critical Analysis Paper explores the implications and efficacy of the M6A1 tank in modern warfare. This paper delves into the tank’s design, performance, and strategic utility, weighing its strengths and weaknesses within the context of contemporary military operations. Through a thorough examination of its specifications, such as armor thickness, firepower, and mobility, the paper assesses how well the M6A1 fulfills its intended role on the battlefield. Additionally, it scrutinizes the tank’s adaptability to various combat environments and its compatibility with allied forces and support systems.

Furthermore, the analysis delves into the M6A1’s technological advancements, comparing them with those of potential adversaries. It evaluates the tank’s survivability against emerging threats, such as anti-tank weapons and unmanned systems, and proposes enhancements or adaptations to ensure its continued effectiveness in future conflicts.

Moreover, the paper considers the economic and logistical factors associated with fielding the M6A1, including production costs, maintenance requirements, and interoperability with existing military infrastructure. By synthesizing these elements, the analysis offers insights into the M6A1’s overall impact on military operations and its potential to shape future warfare strategies.

M6A1: Critical Analysis Paper

The purpose of this assignment is for you to test your understanding of the key concepts that you’ve been learning about over the past few weeks.

Select one (1) of the ethical issues listed below and develop a 4 page paper that will address the following:

  1. Explanation of the selected issue. Why is this issue important in the healthcare field?
  2. Discuss any ethical and legal implications that can arise from the selected issue and the impact on the patient and the healthcare professional.
  3. Identify and explain two (2) challenges related to the selected ethical controversial issue that can impact the role of the healthcare professional?

Paper must be typed in font-size 12, include citations, and references with proper APA formatting. The paper must contain a minimum of three (3) current references. Use your resources from the assigned textbook, periodicals and web sites and the Excelsior College library. Paper length should be 4 pages including a cover page and a reference page.

The paper should address one of the following ethical issues:

  • Stem cell research
  • Genetic testing
  • Persistent vegetative state
  • The Americans Disabilities Act
  • Pre-existing conditions
  • Organ allocation
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Temperament and Infant Development

/in , , , /by

Temperament and Infant Development

(Temperament and Infant Development)

Does an infant’s temperament shape his/her cognitive and socio-emotional development?   

Examine the various theories of human development and choose one or two that best assist you in understanding the issues involved in your topic. In your assignment address the following:

  • Identify some of the major domains of human development and how they are impacted.
  • Examine the physical, biological, emotional, cognitive, and/or social factors that are affected.
  • Identify the stages of development that are affected and describe the cultural and historical perspectives of partitioning the lifespan that influence the interpretations of the available data on the topic.
  • Describe the influences of family, culture, and environment and the roles they play.

Please be aware that i need a Annotated Bibliography  in addition to the regular referance page

 

Writing the Final Paper

  1. Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style
  2. Must include a title page with the following:
    1. Title of paper
    2. Student’s name
    3. Course name and number
    4. Instructor’s name
    5. Date submitted
  3. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
  4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  5. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
    1. Conclude with an answer to the selected question. Did the evidence you surveyed answer the question satisfactorily?
    2. Include an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the available evidence.
    3. Illustrate how each source fits specific sections of your Final Paper. The goal is to demonstrate that supporting evidence exists for statements that are made in the paper.
    4. If possible, suggest the course that future research should take if answers to the selected question are deemed less than conclusive.
  6. Must use at least five scholarly sources, all of which must come from Google Scholar.
  7. Must summarize each article including the purpose of the investigation, its methodology, and results.
    1. Rely on the brief summaries of the articles (including the purpose of each investigation, its methodology and results) that you developed during Week Four to construct an organized summary of the scientific evidence that answers the question you selected.
    2. If possible, select peer-reviewed articles that summarize the evidence available in a given field of study (e.g., meta-analysis combines the findings of different studies to uncover trends, commonalities and differences).
    3. Order the articles in the way you think you will discuss them in your paper. Then develop a summary of the scientific evidence that answers the question you selected.
  • Must include an Annotated Bibliography which briefly summarizes each article including the purpose of the investigation, its methodology, and results.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

National Infrastructure Protection Plan

/in , , /by

National Infrastructure Protection Plan

(National Infrastructure Protection Plan)

Question description

Phase1: Case Study: National Infrastructure Protection Plan

On your first day as an Information Systems Security director, you met with the Chief Information Officer. During the meeting, he revealed to you his deep concerns about the Infrastructure Protection Plan. He asked you to read the Department of Homeland Security. (2009). National Infrastructure Protection Plan. Retrieved from http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/NIPP_Plan.pdf carefully and focus more on chapter 6: Ensuring an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term.

Since he realizes that you are new to this position he asked you to deliver the final plan, memo and budget in 7 weeks (week 8) but he setup 3 checkpoints for you to deliver parts of the plan to ensure consistent progress of the deliverables before the big presentation in week 8.

Phase 1: Memo

In this phase, you need to create 3-5 page professional memo about your assessment of what needs to be done to meet the standards based on the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. You need to make sure that the language in the memo is clear of free of errors. You also need to be creative in presenting this information to capture the most important points from the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. You need to demonstrate critical thinking to prioritize the action items based on your findings.

Phase 1 grading will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the memo, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 25 Case Study
Criteria Unacceptable
Below 70% F		 Fair
70-79% C		 Proficient
80-89% B		 Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Analyze authorities, roles, and responsibilities
Weight: 20%		 Did not submit or incompletely analyzed authorities, roles, and responsibilities Partially analyzed authorities, roles, and responsibilities Satisfactorily analyzed authorities, roles, and responsibilities Thoroughly analyzed authorities, roles, and responsibilities
2. Analyze how to manage risk
Weight: 20%		 Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how to manage risk Partially analyzed how to manage risk Satisfactorily analyzed how to manage risk Thoroughly analyzed how to manage risk
3. Determine methods for organizing and partnering for CIKR Protection
Weight: 20%		 Did not submit or incompletely determined methods for organizing and partnering for CIKR Protection Partially determined methods for organizing and partnering for CIKR Protection Satisfactorily determined methods for organizing and partnering for CIKR Protection Thoroughly determined methods for organizing and partnering for CIKR Protection
4. Ensure an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term
Weight: 25%		 Did not submit or incompletely ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term Partially ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term Satisfactorily ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term Thoroughly ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term
5. 3 references
Weight: 5%		 No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%		 More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Cognitive Psychology Final Project Rough Draft

/in , , , /by

PSY 540 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric: Rough Draft

Cognitive Psychology Final Project Rough Draft

(Cognitive Psychology Final Project Rough Draft)

Overview  

For your rough draft, you will submit a complete proposal that includes all the required elements of the final proposal and incorporates any relevant instructor feedback you received on Milestones One and Two. In your rough draft, be sure to address all the following critical elements:

I. Problem Statement

a) Describe the contemporary problem that is the focus of your proposal with full details with respect to your selected applied setting. Here, consider how new developments or changes in your applied setting are creating new cognition-related challenges. For instance, you might note that increased use of online education is presenting new challenges to students with ADHD.

b) Identify your selected area of cognitive psychology (attention, learning, memory, language, or decision making) and appropriate foundational theories that apply to your selected problem. What are the foundational aspects of these theories, and how do they relate to your selected problem?

Carrying through with the previous example, you would indicate that your area of focus is attention and identify related theories that can shed further light on the contemporary problem of attention demands on students with ADHD.

c) Describe performance issues in your selected applied setting based on limitations of human cognitive systems. What are some of the specific issues related to your contemporary problem, the applied setting, and the limits of the human cognitive system? Here, you will further break down your contemporary problem and explain how the problem relates to the applied setting, what we know about cognition, and how this impacts performance.

d) Create a research question that addresses potential improvements to practices in the applied setting based on the strengths of human cognitive systems. Remember that your research question should address your contemporary problem. For instance, in keeping with the previous example, you might ask, “How can changes to online learning platforms better support increased attention to course materials for students with ADHD?”

II. Contemporary Relevance 

a) Evaluate the utility of the theories you identified when describing your problem with respect to their strengths and limitations. Here, revisit the theories you noted in critical element I, part b. How do the theories you identified further explain the problems and performance issues you identified? What are the strengths and limitations of each theory in helping to understand your identified problem?

b) Which particular theory offers the greatest utility for practitioners to apply in addressing real-world issues specific to the contemporary problem you selected? Defend your selection.

III. Interpretation of Research Findings: Explain how each primary or secondary resource you selected supports your research question. This is where you will apply sound methodological principles (by following the prompts below, a–b) to qualify the research results and statistical findings.

a) How do the research results and statistical findings apply to your research question and your proposed improvements?

b) Explain the strengths and limitations of the research results and findings in supporting the research question. This is where you will explain how the research results and findings you have reviewed support your research question and identify specific gaps in the research. In other words, in reviewing your sources, is there sufficient support for this research question? This is also where you will identify what research does not yet exist that is necessary in supporting the application of your research question.

IV. Methodological Principles: This is where you will look at your research question (critical element I, part d) and determine what types of strategies or techniques you would use if you were to hypothesize improving upon the problem in your selected applied setting. Here, you might propose an experiment, a new program or initiative, or adoption of new tools/technologies. Remember, you are not limited to a controlled experiment.

a) What socially responsible strategies and techniques could be used for improving upon human cognitive processes specific to your applied setting? Here, consider how you could implement your proposed solution in a way that does not further aggravate the problem or put participating parties at risk of new problems or performance issues.

b) What are the implications for using these strategies and techniques? Consider, who and what about the applied setting would be impacted by this proposed solution? What would change, and how might these changes be received?

V. Conclusion

a) What potential future direction do you see from implementation of your research specific to addressing the contemporary problem you cited in critical element I, part a? Here, consider how implementation of your proposed solution or improvement can add to the existing body of research on your topic. How might your proposed improvements and any follow-up research prove interesting to other applied settings?

Rubric

Please note that the grading rubric for the rough draft submission is not identical to that of the final project. The Final Project Rubric will include an additional “Exemplary” category that provides guidance as to how you can go above and beyond “Proficient” in your final submission.

Guidelines for Submission: Your rough draft should be double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, with one-inch margins and APA citations. Your draft proposal should be a minimum of six pages, not including cover page and references, and use preapproved resources. (The submission should include a variety of research and findings from at least three of the provided publications. Review the Final Project Document to access the list of approved publications provided for you.)

Milestone 2 feedback:

Nice job describing the studies, in particular, the methods sections, as well as reporting on how the results could be extended. The main areas of improvement are in discussing strengths and weaknesses and reporting on specific statistical results (e.g., p :> .05). Some methodological strengths and weaknesses you may think about are what kinds of groups were studied, measures used, and statistics. Was there a large number of participants? Are the measures validated? Did the researchers use non-parametric analyses? Reviewing the limitations section of the articles will help you look for specific things. I will be posting information about reporting on results in an announcement within the next few days. Overall, great job finding interesting, relevant studies and I look forward to seeing your next milestone!

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Managing Resources and Operations

/in , , , /by

Managing Resources and Operations

(Managing Resources and Operations)

Question description

Many of the concepts that you will write about in this class will be new to you. To do well in this class, you must do the reading and outside research each week.

Assignment Type: Individual Project

Deliverable Length: 4-5 pages in the body of your paper (plus the Title page, the Abstract page, and the References page) You must do an Abstract page!

Points Possible: 100 Due Date: Tuesday night by 11:59:59 PM CT

Consider the following scenario:

You have held conversations with Precision Part’s leaders and obtained the following information, which you want to use in the development of a 4-year strategic management plan.

  • PPQ Parts employees now number 5,000, and all are currently employed in the United States. It plans to grow to 10,000 employees in 4 years.
  • New facilities will be needed in international expansion, and PPQ Parts anticipates building most of those (80%) outside the United States.PPQ Parts holds 5% of the world market share on small SUVs, but its goal is 9% in 4 years.
  • Current stock price is $10 per share. The goal is $22 a share.
    Profit margin 3-year average is 6%. Industry average during this time has also been 6%. The company goal is 13% in 4 years.
  • PPQ Parts has averaged 28% employee turnover during the last 3 years. This is compared to an industry average of 25%. The goal of the company is to increase employee retention by lowering annual turnover to 17%.
  • PPQ Parts contributes to all the local communities in which it is doing business. This is one of its corporate values. Current charity is 0.5% of total profits, but the company would like to raise that to 5% in 4 years.

Notice, below there are multiple questions (and multiple parts to each question) that you must answer. You may also find it helpful to do some outside research on the topics.

VERY IMPORTANT: Remember that you must use outside resources, and properly cite (in-text citations) and reference (References page entries) your sources.

Assignment:(Managing Resources and Operations)

A strategic management plan is vital for the company business today. Review the company scenario at the beginning of the course for additional information regarding growth goals. Create a basic strategic management plan for PPQ Parts including quantifiable goals and measures. Include the following in your report:

  1. Provide environmental scanning of current conditions in the area of expansion including economy, competition, political stability, and so forth.
  2. Address internal resource analysis such as managerial and financial strengths and weaknesses.
  3. Please include short-term and long-term strategic goals.
  4. Location consideration for implementation is vital. Please explain the benefits and limitations for expansion in your chosen area.

Submitting your assignment in APA format means that, at a minimum, you will need the following:

  • Title page: Remember the running head, your title should be IN ALL CAPITALS (only the title should be all caps, the rest of the title page is sentence case).
  • Abstract: This is a summary of your paper, not an introduction. Begin writing in third-person voice. You must include an Abstract with all paper in this class.
  • Body: The body of your paper begins on the page following the title page and abstract page and must be double-spaced (be careful not to triple- or quadruple-space between paragraphs). The type face should be 12-pt. Times New Roman or 12-pt. Courier in regular black type. Do not use color, bold type, or italics except as required for APA level headings and references. The deliverable length of the body of your paper for this assignment is 3–4 pages. In-text academic citations to support your decisions and analysis are required. A variety of academic sources is encouraged.
  • References page: References that align with your in-text academic sources are listed on the final page of your paper. The references must be in APA format using appropriate spacing, hang indention, italics, and upper- and lowercase usage as appropriate for the type of resource used. Remember, the Reference page is not a bibliography but a further listing of the abbreviated in-text citations used in the paper. Every referenced item must have a corresponding in-text citation.

If you still have questions about APA, you can check with the librarian for assistance. If you would like to see an APA formatted paper example with formatting hints, check out this website:

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/media/pdf/20090212013008_560.pdf (Note, you may need to copy this link and paste into your browse, and you may need to “Allow” your browser to open this.)

Below is the grading rubric that I will use when grading your papers.(Managing Resources and Operations)

Grading Criteria Percentage and Points
Possible		 Your
Points
Deliverable requirements addressed; understanding of material and writer’s message and intent are clear. The body of the paper must be a minimum of 4 to 5 double spaced 12-point font pages. Be sure that you completely answer all 4 of the questions listed above 35% / 35 pts. 35/35
Scholarly research which supports writer’s position properly acknowledged and cited direct quotations may not exceed 10% of the word count of the body of the assignment deliverable (excluded title page, abstract or table of contents if used, tables, exhibits, appendices, and reference page(s). Inclusion of plagiarized content will not be tolerated and may result in adverse academic consequences. You MUST do outside research, with in-text citations and a References page. 20% / 20 pts. 20/20
Critical thinking: Position is well-justified; logical flow; examples provided where appropriate. 20% / 20 pts. 20/20
Structure: Includes introduction and conclusion; proper paragraph format; reads as a polished academic paper or professional presentation, as appropriate for the required assignment deliverable. Paper must be written at a college senior level. 10% / 10 pts. 10/10
Mechanical: No spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors. 10% / 10 pts/ 10/10
APA: Deliverable is cited properly according to the APA Publication Manual (6th ed.). 5% / 5 pts. 5/5
Total Points 100/100
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Managing Health Care Risks

/in , , /by

Managing Health Care Risks

(Managing Health Care Risks)

Details: Select a health care organization in your community to conduct an interview with an appropriate risk management employee

Select a health care organization in your community to conduct an interview with an appropriate risk management employee. The organization can be your current employer, or a different health care facility in your community. Acute care, urgent care, large multi-provider private medical clinics, assisted living facilities, and community/public health clinical facilities are all ideal options to complete the requirements of this assignment. Make sure to select an individual who can provide sufficient information regarding how that organization manages risk within its facility to answer the questions below.

In your interview, address the following:

1. Identification of the challenges the organization faces in controlling infectious diseases.

2. Risk management strategies used in the organization’s infection control program, along with specific examples.

3. How the facility’s educational risk management program addresses key professional issues, such as prevention of negligence, malpractice litigation, and vicarious liability.

4. Policies the facility has implemented that address managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery.

5. Strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program.

Post-interview, compose a 750-1,000 word summary analysis of the interview to include the questions above as well as the following elements:

1. A brief assessment of the organization’s risk management program, including what works well and what could work better (the pros and cons).

2. Action steps you would take to improve the program. Select one area and provide your rationale and possible steps required to implement your suggestion.

Cite appropriate references as needed to support your statements and rationale.

In addition to your textbook, you are required to support your analysis with a minimum of four peer-reviewed references

Book used by school. Risk Management in Health Care Institutions: Limiting Liability and Enhancing Care, 3rd Edition.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Human Services ACADAMICK

/in , , , /by

Human Services ACADAMICK

(Human Services ACADAMICK)
Module 4: Module 4 – M4 Assignment 2
Dropbox AssignmentAssignment 2: Annotated Bibliography

Before you can begin to write a literature review, you must spend a substantial amount of time reviewing the literature to locate the articles that are both relevant to the topic of the review and possess valid and reliable results.

In this assignment, you will review and shortlist articles for the final literature review that you will complete in this course. As you complete this assignment, you will also finalize your research question for the assignment in Module 5.

In Module 5, you will script an 8- to 10-page literature review that uses a minimum of five peer-reviewed articles and 2–3 scholarly websites. In order to find five good articles that are the best fit for your literature review, you will need to read at least 10–12 articles. In addition, many of the articles that have sound abstracts may not be the best fit once you read the complete article.

In M1 Assignment 2, you wrote 2–3 possible research questions. On the basis of these questions and the feedback you received from your instructor and your classmates, develop one strong research question on which you can base your literature review in Module 5. This research question should clearly depict the variables being examined and the relationship between these variables.

Next, locate ten peer-reviewed articles (not older than five years) from the Argosy University online library resources and five scholarly websites that you feel would be good sources for your literature review.

In your literature review in Module 5, you are required to include at least one qualitative and one quantitative study and at least one seminal or foundational source (this source may be older than five years). To ensure that you meet this requirement, include the following in your list of sources:

  • A minimum of one qualitative and one quantitative study.
  • At least one seminal or foundational source.

For this assignment, you will submit your research question for feedback to the instructor. You will also submit your fifteen sources as a reference page in APA format.

Tasks:

Using the Argosy University online library resources and the Internet, locate the articles and scholarly websites that could be used for your Module 5 literature review. When evaluating the articles and websites, make sure that you consider the validity and reliability of the data collected and the tools that you will use for analysis. Professional literature may include the Argosy University online library resources, relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu, .org, or .gov).

Once you have finalized your list, write an annotated bibliography of these sources. Your annotated bibliography must include a minimum of six peer-reviewed articles and four scholarly websites. You must include the following:

  • A minimum of one qualitative and one quantitative research study.
  • At least one seminal or foundational source. with the turnin she said to remove the references before checking for familarity and make sure its below 10% i send you the power point that she wants us to use if its possible ples follow that thank you i will upload the other two assignment by weekend

You can find an example of an annotated bibliography in Appendix A of your course textbook Reading and Understanding Research.

Submission Details:

  • Save your bibliography in a Microsoft Word document with the name M4_A2_Lastname_Firstname.doc, and by Wednesday, January 13, 2016, upload it to M4 Assignment 2 Dropbox.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Submitted an annotated bibliography that contained a minimum of six peer-reviewed articles and four scholarly websites that met the above given criteria.
84
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
16
Total:
100
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!