Cultural Formulation & Therapeutic Analysis

/in , , /by

Vargas Family: Cultural Formulation & Therapeutic Analysis

(Cultural Formulation & Therapeutic Analysis)

Read “Topic 2: Vargas Case Study.” Complete a Cultural Formulation Interview based on the “Cultural Formulation” section in the DSM-5 and given the new information learned in session two of the Vargas case study. Refer to the attached CFI form for guidance and complete the CFI template.  Include a citation for the Cultural Formulation Interview. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.  Part Two: Review the Topic 2: Vargas Family Case Study. Write a 750-word paper in which you demonstrate how therapists apply psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral theories to analyze the presenting problem(s) and choose appropriate interventions.  Be sure to answer the following questions in your paper:  1.What are the two main presenting problems for the Vargas family? 2.How are the problems maintained according to: a) The psychoanalytic perspective? b) The cognitive-behavioral perspective? 3.What interventions would you plan to use in your next session? ◦From the psychoanalytic perspective (identify and describe your plan for two interventions) ◦From the cognitive-behavioral perspective (identify and describe your plan for two interventions)   Cite at least three academic sources (peer-reviewed journal articles, books, etc.).  Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.   This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.  You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

(Cultural Formulation & Therapeutic Analysis)

Rubrics Formulation Interview   The assignment omits a copy of a completed cultural formulation interview.    The cultural formulation interview is vague and/or incorrect.    The cultural formulation interview is complete and included with the assignment.    The completion of the cultural formulation interview shows an advanced understanding of the course content.

The completion of the cultural formulation interview provides a comprehensive understanding of the course content.

20.0 % Part Two: Two Main Presenting Problems   The paper does not discuss two main presenting problems for the Vargas family and does not make any connections through scholarly, academic research.   The paper vaguely discusses two main presenting problems for the Vargas family and makes few connections through scholarly, academic research.   The paper fully discusses two main presenting problems for the Vargas family and makes clear connections through scholarly, academic research.   The paper provides an advanced discussion of two main presenting problems for the Vargas family and makes sound connections through scholarly, academic research.

The paper provides a comprehensive discussion of two main presenting problems for the Vargas family and makes insightful connections through scholarly, academic research.

20.0 % Part Two: How Problems are Maintained   The paper does not discuss how the problems are maintained according to the psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral perspectives for the Vargas family and does not make any connections through scholarly, academic research.   The paper vaguely discusses how the problems are maintained according to the psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral perspectives for the Vargas family and makes few connections through scholarly, academic research.   The paper fully discusses how the problems are maintained according to the psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral perspectives for the Vargas family and makes clear connections through scholarly, academic research.   The paper provides an advanced discussion on how the problems are maintained according to the psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral perspectives for the Vargas family and makes sound connections through scholarly, academic research.

(Cultural Formulation & Therapeutic Analysis)

The paper provides a comprehensive discussion on how the problems are maintained according to the psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral perspectives for the Vargas family and makes insightful connections through scholarly, academic research.

20.0 % Part Two: Interventions Planned for Next Session   The paper does not discuss two interventions from the psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral perspectives to use in the next session with the Vargas family and does not make any connections through scholarly, academic research.   The paper vaguely discusses two interventions from the psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral perspectives to use in the next session with the Vargas family and makes few connections through scholarly, academic research.   The paper fully discusses two interventions from the psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral perspectives to use in the next session with the Vargas family and makes clear connections through scholarly, academic research.   The paper provides an advanced discussion of two interventions from the psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral perspectives to use in the next session with the Vargas family and makes sound connections through scholarly, academic research.

The paper provides a comprehensive discussion of two interventions from the psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral perspectives to use in the next session with the Vargas family and makes insightful connections through scholarly, academic research.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness      7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose   Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.   Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.    Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.   Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.   Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis.

Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.    8.0 % Argument Logic and Construction   Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.   Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.   Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.    Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.   Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.

(Cultural Formulation & Therapeutic Analysis)

All sources are authoritative.    5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)   Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.   Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.   Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.   Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.    10.0 %Format      5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)   Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.   Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.   Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.   All format elements are correct.     5.0 % Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.   Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.   Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.    In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.    100 % Total Weightage

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Methods & Results Draft Submission

/in , , /by

Methods & Results Draft Submission

(Methods & Results Draft Submission)

Milestone 4

Milestone 4 For this assignment, you will submit an initial draft of your Methods and Results sections.

For this assignment, you will submit an initial draft of your Methods and Results sections. Now that you have completed your data collection, it is important to revise your methods section so that it accurately reflects the methods that were actually used in your study.

In your Results section, you should first describe how you reduced your data for analysis (e.g., how your questionnaires were summed or averaged to get a composite score to analyze). Your Results section should also include a table of the relevant descriptive statistics. Last, you will need to describe the statistical test that you chose to run and provide the key results for the test as well as a brief explanation of the results. It is essential that you follow APA style when writing this section. Please refer to Chapters 2 and 5 of your APA manual for further instructions on how best to write a Methods and Results section.

Guidelines for Submission: Must adhere to standard formatting

(Times New Roman, 12-point font, one-inch margins), using the most recent version of the APA style manual for citations.

 

Milestone 5

For this assignment, you will submit an initial draft of your final project Discussion section. This section should recap your findings, discuss how the findings fit in with prior research on the topic, discuss areas for future research, and mention limitations and ethical considerations related to your research. It is essential that you follow APA style when writing this section.

 

Requirements of Submission: Must adhere to standard formatting (Times New Roman, 12-point font, one-inch margins), using the most recent version of the APA style manual for the citations.

Methods & Results Draft Submission

Title: Investigating the Effects of [Variable] on [Outcome]: A [Method] Approach

Abstract: This study explores the impact of [Variable] on [Outcome] using [Method]. [Variable] was manipulated across [Number] experimental conditions, and [Outcome] was measured using [Measurement]. Results indicate a significant effect of [Variable] on [Outcome], with [specific findings]. These findings suggest [implications for theory/practice], highlighting the importance of [Variable] in [context]. Further research should explore [potential extensions].

Introduction: The influence of [Variable] on [Outcome] has garnered attention due to its significance in [field]. Despite previous research, a comprehensive understanding of this relationship is lacking. This study aims to address this gap by employing [Method] to investigate the effects of [Variable] on [Outcome].

Methods: Participants (N=[Number]) were recruited and randomly assigned to [Number] experimental conditions varying in [Variable]. [Outcome] was measured using [Measurement], and data were analyzed using [Analysis].

Results: The analysis revealed a significant effect of [Variable] on [Outcome] (F(df)=value, p<α), with [specific findings]. Post-hoc tests indicated [additional insights].

Conclusion: These findings contribute to our understanding of the relationship between [Variable] and [Outcome] and have implications for [field]. Future research should delve deeper into [aspect] and consider [potential limitations].

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Description of Research Methodology

/in , , /by

Assignment 1: Description of Research Methodology

(Description of Research Methodology)

Under 20% Simarity

Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.
Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.

Assignment 1: Description of Research Methodology
Due Week 2 and worth 150 points

In this assignment, you will write an essay about the research methods and ethical implications of a social psychology study. You will get information about the study from one of the entries in the SPARQ “Solutions Catalog”, which is a web site maintained by Stanford University at https://sparq.stanford.edu/solutions?&&. SPARQ is an acronym for “Social Psychological Answers to Real-world Questions.” Each entry in the Solutions Catalog names a problem, and then offers a solution to that problem, based on a research study in social psychology.

To keep this assignment short and manageable, your only sources for this assignment should be from the SPARQ site and your course materials, such as your textbook. There is no need for you to cite any of the course materials. Therefore, no additional citations or references are needed, beyond those from the SPARQ site.

In this exercise, you will choose one of the entries in the SPARC site, and then write a two to three (2-3) page paper that meets the following requirements.

  1. Begin your paper with a short introductory statement that clearly identifies the article from the SPARQ site that you are using, as well as the corresponding research article.  Model your statement after the following example:
The article I selected from the SPARQ website is entitled “Boost Grades by Reframing Failures” (Wilson, n.d.), which summarizes a research article (Wilson & Linville, 1982) on the topic.
      • Please note that there are two APA “in-text citations” in this example. The first citation “(Wilson, n.d.)” is an in-text citation for the SPARQ article. The SPARQ articles are undated, which means that there is no date of publication reported. The “n.d.” designation is an abbreviation for “no date”.
      • The second citation “(Wilson & Linville, 1982)”, is an in-text citation to the original research article. We are asking you to cite this paper for practice in using APA, but are not requiring you to read the original paper. Normally, you should cite only those articles that you actually read and used, but we’re making an exception here for the purposes of practice.
  1. Briefly summarize the main details of your chosen social psychology research study. Identify the main research method(s) used in the study (e.g., case study, experiment, observation, etc.).
  2. Explain whether or not you believe the research methodology that the researchers used in the study was the most appropriate for the study. Provide a rationale for your response.
  3. Discuss whether or not you believe the research methodology used in the study is the one (1) method that provides researchers with the most information in general. Explain the main reasons why or why not.
  4. Explain the major ethical implications of the selected study (e.g., informed consent, debriefing, etc.). Describe the main reasons why you believe the study was or was not ethical. Provide a rationale for your response.
  5. The final section of your paper will be a reference section that contains a corresponding reference for both of the in-text citations in your introductory statement (see point #1, above). In APA-style citations, in-text citations must match up with a reference in the reference section. You can model your reference section after the following:
Wilson, T. D. (n.d.). Boost grades by reframing failures.  Retrieved from https://sparq.stanford.edu/solutions/boost-grades-reframing-failures
Wilson, T. D. & Linville, P.W. (1982).  Improving the academic performance of college freshmen:  attribution therapy revisited.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (2), 367-376.
      • These examples follow the APA conventions for an Internet article, and a professional journal article, respectively.


Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Describe research methods that are used for studying social psychology.
  • Develop an increased understanding of the dynamic between society and individuals.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in social psychology.
  • Write clearly and concisely about social psychology using proper grammar and mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Protocol For Diagnosis Management

/in , , /by

Assignment 1: Application – Protocol For Diagnosis Management, And Follow-Up Care Of Disorders

(Protocol For Diagnosis Management)

The protocol for diagnosis, management, and follow-up care of disorders is crucial for ensuring optimal patient outcomes. Firstly, accurate diagnosis is achieved through thorough medical history-taking, physical examination, and relevant investigations such as blood tests, imaging studies, or biopsies. Once diagnosed, effective management strategies are implemented based on evidence-based guidelines and individual patient factors. This may include medications, lifestyle modifications, therapy, or surgical interventions.

Follow-up care is essential for monitoring treatment response, detecting any complications or side effects, and adjusting the management plan accordingly. Regular follow-up appointments allow healthcare providers to assess the patient’s progress, address any concerns, and provide ongoing support. Patient education plays a vital role in promoting self-management and adherence to treatment plans.

Additionally, interdisciplinary collaboration among healthcare professionals ensures comprehensive care, with specialists contributing their expertise as needed. Clear communication with patients regarding their diagnosis, treatment options, and expected outcomes fosters shared decision-making and enhances patient satisfaction.

 

Overall, a well-defined protocol for diagnosis, management, and follow-up care promotes standardized, efficient, and patient-centered healthcare delivery, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes and quality of life.

As pediatric patients grow from infancy to adolescence, there are many common body system disorders that may potentially present. As an advanced practice nurse caring for these patients, you must understand the pathophysiology and epidemiology of these disorders as this will help you to recognize symptoms and select appropriate assessment and treatment options. In this Assignment, you prepare for your role in clinical settings as you design a protocol for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up care for a common body system disorder.

To prepare:

<ul>

  • Reflect on th

e body system disorder that you selected in Week 5 – Asthma

  • Think about the pathophysiology and epidemiology of the disorder.
  • Consider a protocol for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up care of the disorder you selected.
  • Think about how culture might impact the care of patients who present with this disorder.

To complete:

<p>Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:

  • Explain the disorder you selected, including its pathophysiology and epidemiology.
  • Explain a protocol for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up care of this disorder.
  • Explain how culture might impact the care of patients who present with the disorder you selected.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Strategic Interview Design

/in , , /by

Strategic Interview Design: Analysis & Preparation

(Strategic Interview Design)

Assignment 2: Lasa 1-Create an Interview Guide(Strategic Interview Design)

By the due date assigned, complete the following assignment below.

Directions:

During the first week of class you conducted your first practice interview.  You have since had the opportunity to learn about the formal process of interviewing and the techniques used in interviewing. With this new information in mind, it is time to develop a detailed plan for your second interview, which you may conduct face-to-face or over the telephone. Your second interview is broken down into two parts.

  1. The first portion, preparing for the interview, is due this week in Module 3 (LASA 1).
  2.  The second part of this assignment, conducting and analyzing the interview, is due in Module 5 (LASA 2).

For this week you will be completing A. You will need to:

    1. Locate a Volunteer: He/she will play the role of “client” seeking help for persistent headaches and problems sleeping. The person you interview can be someone you know personally or you can contact your classmates through the Student Lounge to arrange to interview one another.
      1. The client believes that stress may be part of the problem with his/her symptoms.  Remember that this is a role play, and your volunteer should be aware that this is a practice interview and not a real psychological interview.
      2. Prior to conducting your interview, ask your volunteer to think about stress that s/he can discuss related to the client’s problems (e.g., your client may think about stress from a job or stress related to a relationship with a significant other). However, DO NOT have your volunteer discuss this stress with you prior to the interview. You want to be able to explore this topic in depth during your interview. This scenario is intentionally left open-ended in order to allow students to maximize opportunity to utilize interview skills during the interview.
    2. Create an Interview Guide:
      1. In order to achieve a quality interview, you will need to first plan your interview, which is this week’s assignment (you will conduct and analyze the interview in Module 5).
      2. The purpose of your interview is to gather in-depth information to aid in diagnosis and treatment planning for the client.  You will need to gather detailed information about the symptoms being reported for both headaches and sleep problems (e.g., How often are the headaches occurring?  How long do they last?  What do they feel like?  Has any treatment helped?  Is there any pattern to the headaches?).  You will also need to present a complete picture of the patient.  What is the patient’s gender, age, marital status, and employment status?  Be sure to go beyond these example questions, and provide an in-depth, highly detailed interview with your client.

Interview Guide TopicsThe Interview Guide should directly address the below topics.  Use each of these topics as headings within your paper to ensure that you directly respond to each.  You should respond with at least a paragraph for each topic/heading.

      1. Identify and summarize the purpose of your interview.  How will the information you gather be used?
      2. Explain how you will structure the interview and your reasoning behind the structuring of the interview. Include a list of topics you plan to cover.
      3. Compose the questions you will use to obtain the information (develop a minimum of 15-20 questions). Be sure that you develop a minimum of 5 open and 5 closed ended questions.
      4. Develop a minimum of 5 examples of paraphrasing, summaries, or reflections techniques that could be used during your interview (must have at least one of each paraphrase, summary, and reflection). When you conduct your actual interview, these exact examples you create may not fit depending on the responses of your interviewee, but it is important to start thinking now about how you will incorporate these techniques.  For this Interview Guide assignment, develop hypothetical examples of each type of technique.
      5. Identify the opening techniques you will utilize to build rapport with the volunteer/client.
      6. Identify types/examples of questions you want to avoid during interview.

Include an Analysis Summary:

In addition to the Interview Guide include an analysis (2-3 paragraphs) of your own preliminary thoughts about this client based on the limited information you have about this client. Have you ever known a person with chronic headaches or sleep problems? What is your “gut reaction” to hearing about a patient with chronic headaches and problems sleeping? That the person is a complainer? Is he/she a victim of terrible illness? Spend some time examining your thoughts and attitudes. It is normal for all of us to make at least preliminary assumptions about everyone we come in to contact with, and a good interviewer has awareness of his or her preliminary assumptions. Include the following in your analysis:

  1. Identify your own beliefs (sympathetic, unsympathetic, or some mixture of both) and explain how these could affect your interview. Do you think that your beliefs are influenced by your own age, cultural, gender, sexual orientation, or ethnicity?
  2. Identify steps you can take to limit the impact of your own beliefs on the interview. Be as specific as possible.

Start planning now! Remember that you will need a volunteer to role play your client in Module 5. Work on identifying that person now and scheduling your interview well in advance to avoid any possible scheduling delays. You will also need to audio or video record the interview in Module 5 so that you can later transcribe the interview. Make sure you have access to the equipment you will need.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Introduction Assignment 5

/in , , /by

Introduction Assignment 5

(Introduction Assignment 5)

Read the following article by Jay Feldman and answer the questions that follow:

There was a time in the not so distant past when many, if not most, publicly held corporations, including the one for which I worked, embraced in their mission statements, codes of conduct and similar pronouncements a responsibility to serve multiple stakeholders: their stockholders, of course, but also their employees as well as customers, suppliers and the community in which they operated. Today, all too many companies, in deed and often in word, articulate a single-minded obligation to serve only their investors by focusing exclusively on profitability.

As a result, we have witnessed corporate downsizings and outsourcing of jobs; restructuring of pension plans or their complete termination; reductions in health care benefits; and wage stagnation in spite of increased productivity. Domestic suppliers have been squeezed or, more often, replaced by cheap foreign sources. Customers seeking service are confronted with automated answering machines and foreign call centers. Environmental concerns are viewed as obstacles to profitability.

At the same time, the senior managers of these enterprises have seen their compensation grow exponentially as a reward for their perceived contributions to the bottom line.

Sadly, what these corporations fail to appreciate is how their obsession with the bottom line is shrinking their markets, both domestic and foreign. The large number of people unemployed, underemployed, afraid of losing their jobs or without the means to pay all their bills perpetuates the present worldwide economic crisis.

Add to this the unwillingness of businesses to pay their fair share of taxes to support education, health care and the infrastructure that is critical to their success. In the end, these self-serving practices endanger the very profitability their practitioners seek to enhance.

We need to return to the earlier model of the corporation as a good citizen. Doing so can help ensure the long-term viability of our free enterprise system.

JAY N. FELDMAN

Port Washington, N.Y., Aug. 27, 2012

The writer is a retired corporate lawyer.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/02/opinion/sunday/sunday-dialogue-how-corporations-behave.html?ref=ethics

Considering the passage above, write a paper of 4 full page APA formatted that addresses the following:

1.    Discuss Alfred North Whitehead’s statement: “What is morality in any given time and place? It is what the majority then and there happen to like and immorality is what they dislike.” Consider the following questions as guide:

a.     Businesses can have ethical standards, but Businesses are not moral agents. Do you agree or disagree?

b.     Is it true that the “bottom line” of business is profit and profit alone?

c.     In business, are there other less tangible goals that are intrinsic to and just as important as making money?

d.     Why should we be moral as individuals?

e.     Why should a corporation or organization be moral?

2.    How would you apply the first formulation of Kant’s categorical imperative to a Business environment?

Consider deontological ethics, teleological ethics, moral objectivism, and ethical relativism in your argument. Provide at least 3 valid reasons to support your argument. Also, be sure to include the following in your paper:

Identify your argument—or thesis statement—within the introduction of your paper.

Include definitions of utilitarianism, Categorical Imperatives, Process Philosophy, moral relativism, moral absolutism, ethical relativism, moral objectivism, deontological ethics, and teleological ethics.

Consider morality and ethics from the perspective of Alfred North Whitehead’s process philosophy, and Immanuel Kant’s universal categorical imperative. Could you argue that Businesses can have ethical standards, despite the fact that Businesses are not moral agents? Why or why not? Please explain.

Distinguish between descriptive and normative definitions of morality

  • Use proper grammar, spelling and punctuation.
  • You may find that you change your mind on the issue as you are writing your paper. That is fine, but be sure to present your ultimate decision at the beginning of the paper, and stick to it consistently throughout. This may require that you go back and change the first few paragraphs that contain your thesis statement.
  • Your argument should be clear, concise, and supported with logically valid claims.

Please submit your assignment.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials. 

Reference

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Coaching Employees

/in , , /by

Coaching Employees

(Coaching Employees)

Consider the following scenario:

You were very pleased with your decision to select Mala during your last recruitment initiative. Just out of college, Mala has the enthusiasm and professional drive that could benefit your health care organization. However, you recognize that Mala will have a lot to learn in a clinical setting. As a nurse manager, you have led many successful group trainings, but have far less experience coaching employees one-on-one. You wonder how you should approach this relationship and what steps you should take to increase the positivity and effectiveness of this experience.

Coaching is an ongoing process that is an integral function of the management role. It focuses on the development needs of the employee and is built on a relationship of trust between the leader and follower. Coaching is a powerful activity that demonstrates value of and respect for the employee. In this Assignment, you examine how you could serve as a coach to facilitate an individual’s professional development.

To prepare

  • Reflect on the information shared in the article, “Coaching Nurses: A Real Example of a Real Difference.” Which of these best practices might you use to strengthen your own coaching skills?
  • Review Chapter 7, “Coaching and Developing Others” in the course text, From Management to Leadership: Strategies for Transforming Health Care. Consider how the author compares coaching staff in a health care setting to coaching athletes, directing a movie, and conducting a symphony. Then, examine the six steps of the coaching process. How does each of the coaching steps build upon one another to create a positive and effective coaching experience?
  • In preparation for this hypothetical coaching exercise, identify one individual, staff member, or employee (from your current organization or a past setting) who could benefit from coaching. Create a pseudonym for him or her.
  • Use the six-step coaching process to develop a coaching and development plan.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Philosophy Critical Thinking

/in , , /by

Philosophy critical thinking: Forum Questions (6)

(Philosophy Critical Thinking)

Each Question must be answered within 6-8 sentences, there is tw

1.) What do you think of my claim that almost no-one in politics and media makes a conscious effort to avoid rhetoric and engage in real argument?  Are there exceptions, public figures that you think try to avoid rhetoric as best they can? Can anyone think of any examples of rhetoric from your own life, from a book, or from the news?  A time when someone presented reasons for believing something that clearly weren’t argument at all, but they still felt quite convincing? (https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766)

2.) What do you think of the Dave Barry article?. Any examples of dubious or outright absurd statistics that have come your way?  Or can anyone think of any examples of what I might mean when I say that it is dangerous to be too skeptical about statistics? (http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/public_html/heuveb/Teaching/CriticalThinking/Web/Handouts/DaveBarryArgueEffectively.pdf)

3.) How would you describe the political landscape in other countries that you are familiar with?  It is a common opinion that America has worse political polarization, because we have only two parties that have any real power. What, other than politics, do we associate with being “left”/”right” or “liberal”/”conservative”?

4.) How might someone try to determine, more objectively, whether or not a neighborhood is safe or unsafe?  What are some other issues that people would usually use inductive arguments to reason about? (http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/ded_ind.html)

5.) What are your major premises? If you HAD to say, “Yes, I suppose I have an ideology,” (existentialism, paleo-conservatism, classical liberalism, bohemianism, etc.) what might it be?  And what would be some of its major premises? (https://myetudes.org/access/content/group/d8e623df-1730-4b24-801b-8bf6101c4899/Reading%20-%20Implied%20Premises.pdf)

6.) What do you think of his claims in, “The Peter Singer Solution to World Poverty”?  What is the structure of his argument here; why should we give to the poor?  What are possible objections to his theory? (http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/singermag1.html)

(Philosophy Critical Thinking)

1.) What do you think of my claim that almost no-one in politics and media makes a conscious effort to avoid rhetoric and engage in real argument?  Are there exceptions, public figures that you think try to avoid rhetoric as best they can? Can anyone think of any examples of rhetoric from your own life, from a book, or from the news?  A time when someone presented reasons for believing something that clearly weren’t argument at all, but they still felt quite convincing? (https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766)

2.) What do you think of the Dave Barry article?. Any examples of dubious or outright absurd statistics that have come your way?  Or can anyone think of any examples of what I might mean when I say that it is dangerous to be too skeptical about statistics? (http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/public_html/heuveb/Teaching/CriticalThinking/Web/Handouts/DaveBarryArgueEffectively.pdf)

3.) How would you describe the political landscape in other countries that you are familiar with?  It is a common opinion that America has worse political polarization, because we have only two parties that have any real power. What, other than politics, do we associate with being “left”/”right” or “liberal”/”conservative”?

4.) How might someone try to determine, more objectively, whether or not a neighborhood is safe or unsafe?  What are some other issues that people would usually use inductive arguments to reason about? (http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/ded_ind.html)

5.) What are your major premises? If you HAD to say, “Yes, I suppose I have an ideology,” (existentialism, paleo-conservatism, classical liberalism, bohemianism, etc.) what might it be?  And what would be some of its major premises? (https://myetudes.org/access/content/group/d8e623df-1730-4b24-801b-8bf6101c4899/Reading%20-%20Implied%20Premises.pdf)

6.) What do you think of his claims in, “The Peter Singer Solution to World Poverty”?  What is the structure of his argument here; why should we give to the poor?  What are possible objections to his theory? (http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/singermag1.html)

1.) What do you think of my claim that almost no-one in politics and media makes a conscious effort to avoid rhetoric and engage in real argument?  Are there exceptions, public figures that you think try to avoid rhetoric as best they can? Can anyone think of any examples of rhetoric from your own life, from a book, or from the news?  A time when someone presented reasons for believing something that clearly weren’t argument at all, but they still felt quite convincing? (https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766)

2.) What do you think of the Dave Barry article?. Any examples of dubious or outright absurd statistics that have come your way?  Or can anyone think of any examples of what I might mean when I say that it is dangerous to be too skeptical about statistics? (http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/public_html/heuveb/Teaching/CriticalThinking/Web/Handouts/DaveBarryArgueEffectively.pdf)

3.) How would you describe the political landscape in other countries that you are familiar with?  It is a common opinion that America has worse political polarization, because we have only two parties that have any real power. What, other than politics, do we associate with being “left”/”right” or “liberal”/”conservative”?

4.) How might someone try to determine, more objectively, whether or not a neighborhood is safe or unsafe?  What are some other issues that people would usually use inductive arguments to reason about? (http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/ded_ind.html)

5.) What are your major premises? If you HAD to say, “Yes, I suppose I have an ideology,” (existentialism, paleo-conservatism, classical liberalism, bohemianism, etc.) what might it be?  And what would be some of its major premises? (https://myetudes.org/access/content/group/d8e623df-1730-4b24-801b-8bf6101c4899/Reading%20-%20Implied%20Premises.pdf)

6.) What do you think of his claims in, “The Peter Singer Solution to World Poverty”?  What is the structure of his argument here; why should we give to the poor?  What are possible objections to his theory? (http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/singermag1.html)

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Assignment 1: Being Professional

/in , , /by

Assignment 1: Being Professional

(Assignment 1: Being Professional)

Weight: 10%
Due date:  Tuesday August 14 at 2359
Length: 600 words
Feedback mode: Via Canvas

Feedback will be provided using Turnitin’s Online marking tool and general comments.

Learning Objectives Assessed:

1. Describe principles of professionalism in health care practice

2. Communicate relevant information clearly and appropriately.

Graduate Outcomes supported:

1. Work ready

2. Active and lifelong learners

Details:

You are required to prepare a 600-word written assignment regarding professionalism and being a professional. You are required to use the template provided to structure your writing

___________________________________________

The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) is the organisation responsible for the implementation of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. across Australia. AHPRA works with 14 National Health Practitioner Boards (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. in implementing the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

If there is concern or complaint about a registered health practitioner, National Boards may decide to refer a registered practitioner or student to a panel. Registered health practitioners may be referred to a performance and professional standards panels, for conduct and performance issues.

The website  http://www.ahpra.gov.au/Publications/Panel-Decisions.aspx (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.  displays details of panel decisions from the National Boards, and some earlier cases will display summaries of the Panel findings.  You can also find detailed panel finding summaries at these links http://www.healthpractitionerstribunal.sa.gov.au/decisions (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/tas/TASHPT/

Using the links in the above paragraph, choose one of the summaries in which a finding of unsatisfactory professional performance or unprofessional conduct is made. Briefly address the following two points. You should highlight your understanding of the definition of “professionalism” by mentioning the concepts associated with “being a professional” and “professionalism” within your writing.

  • Summarise the case and outline why you found it interesting. (300 words)
  • Through your analysis, discuss why you think the situation occurred. (300 words)

There is no need to cite other works in this assignment.

Please use the template for this assessment which can be downloaded herePreview the document

Please name your file Family name_initials_Assessment_1 prior to submission.

Rubric:Assignment 1: Being Professional

WeightCriteriaExcellent Satisfactory Not Satisfactory 4Summary of case and reason for selecting caseSummary is well structured,
summarises the key points and is within word count (150-300 words). Reason for choosing case is clearly articulated.    (4 marks)Summary is appropriately structured, but does not cover all relevant points and/or does not meet the word count (over/under). Does not clearly articulate the reason for choosing the case. (2 marks)

Summary is not well structured, does not cover all relevant points and does not meet word count (over/under). Does not articulate the reason for choosing the case.      (1 mark)

4Discussion of the finding. Discussion is well structured, shows an excellent understanding of the concept of professionalism and is within the word count. (4 marks)

Discussion is appropriately structured, shows a partial understanding of the concept of professionalism and/or does not meet the word count (over/under).  (2 marks)                             

Discussion is not well structured, does not cover all relevant points and does not meet the word count (over/under).

(1 mark)

2Quality of writing – includes spelling, grammar and punctuation.Excellent writing, with no more than five spelling, grammar or punctuation errors.      (2 marks)                                     

Satisfactory writing, with no more than ten spelling, grammar or punctuation errors.  (1 marks)

Unsatisfactory writing, with more than ten spelling, grammar or punctuation errors.  (0.5 marks)

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Quality Improvement in Healthcare

/in , , /by

Quality Improvement in Healthcare: Human-Centered Approach

(Quality Improvement in Healthcare)

Quality improvement in healthcare requires a human-centered approach that prioritizes patient needs, preferences, and experiences. This approach emphasizes collaboration among healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders to identify areas for improvement and implement effective solutions. Key elements include gathering and analyzing patient feedback, engaging frontline staff in problem-solving, and integrating technology to streamline processes while maintaining a focus on human interaction and empathy. By centering quality improvement efforts around the individuals receiving care, healthcare organizations can enhance patient satisfaction, safety, and outcomes. This approach fosters a culture of continuous learning and adaptation, where healthcare professionals are empowered to innovate and address the evolving needs of their patients and communities. Ultimately, a human-centered approach to quality improvement not only enhances the delivery of care but also strengthens trust and relationships between patients and providers, contributing to a healthier and more resilient healthcare system.

Nicohwilliams

1) As health care looks at continuous improvement (as done in manufacturing), one of the most prominent questions that has arisen is, “Can the principles that worked in manufacturing really transfer over to health care? Taking care of a patient is not like building a car on an assembly line. Can standardized processes really work in a setting that focuses on humans and their needs?”

2) Write a paper of 1,000–1,200 words that takes a position on this argument. Justify the rationale for your position.

3) Refer to the assigned readings to incorporate specific examples and details into your paper.

4) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines

A few references:

Edward Deming’s 14 Principles: Business Quality Improvement,” located on the more business.com website

“Failure IS an Option,” by Scannell, from Cio (2013).

“Introducing Quality Improvement,” by Kurth and Morton, from Pediatric Anesthesia (2013).

The Fit Organization: How to Create a Continuous-Improvement Culture,” by Markovitz, from Rotman Management (2016).

The Key to Success is Staying Focused on the Customer,” by Blanchard, from Material Handling and Logistics (2016).

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!