CMIT 380 Project 3 Presentation

This project will be to design a training presentation to the client’s IT staff.

The presentation must meet the following requirements:

  • 11 to 15 slides of easy-to-understand content (text and visuals).  Remember, your audience is the IT team within an accounting firm.
  • voice annotation for every slide (excluding the reference slide) *(I will do the voice annotations).
  • at least two references

The presentation can incorporate screenshots from Project 2 along  with additional screenshots as needed. Content should include work that  needs to go into making the upgrade successful, how to improve security  using two or three of the Windows 10 built-in features, and how-to  backup and restore Windows 10 data using some of the tools available in  Windows 10.

The presentation should address your recommendations for the following items:

  • Version Summary
    • Recommended version of Windows 10 (e.g., Windows 10 Pro, Enterprise,  Pro Workstation) and specific reasons for your choice (e.g., security  features, technical and business requirements).
  • Installation Methods
    • Explain Windows 10 deployment methods. Which method or methods you  think will be appropriate for the upgrade? Consider the hardware  specifications outlined in the project scenario.
  • Security Features
    • Windows Security, BitLocker, Defender, Local Security Policy
  • Backup and Recovery Overview
    • Discuss the importance of backing up and recovery of Windows 10.  This can include explaining what types of files and data that can backed  up and restored. This should address:
      • the problems encountered when Tetra Shillings Accounting fell victim  to a ransomware attack that resulted in the loss of critical data.
      • the concerns that Tetra Shillings Accounting has concerning  recovering data that is lost due to deletion, corruption, or media  failure.
      • the ability to restore system files and settings without affecting the user’s personal files and data.
      • the concerns that the client has about recovering systems that are negatively impacted by an operating system update.
  • Backup and Recovery Tools
    • You will need to explain how to use Windows 10 backup and recovery  tools to meet these objectives. Provide a brief overview of each tool  and how it can be used to address the company’s concerns. Use  screenshots to demo how to configure backups that address the firm’s  need to recover from a ransomware attack and restore the system to a  state before a Windows update, driver, or application was installed.
  • Backup to Recover from Ransomware Attack
    • Describe how to back up and restore individual files using the  utilities available in Windows 10. This should provide the client the  ability to restore files lost due to ransomware attacks or other  potential risks.
  • Backup and Recover a Restore Point
    • Research how to protect backup data that is stored on the network.  Based on your research, you need to present a strategy to protect backup  data that is compromised during a ransomware attack. This will most  likely require a strategy to store, copy, or move backups to an offsite  location. In this slide, you will need to explain the risks of only  having only having a single copy of a backup stored on the network.  Think about if the client suffers another ransomware attack and the  corrupted data cannot be restored because the backups were also  compromised during the attack.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Leadership Self-Assessment

Complete a leadership self-assessment of 5–7 pages.

Be sure you read all of the requirements for this assessment and review the suggested resources to see if they may be useful in completing the assessment.

 

The health care environment is complex, requiring leadership that is comprehensive and collaborative in the field. It is essential for leaders to be well-versed in a range of areas (practice, research, education) as a means of effective engagement with interprofessional communities. Effective leaders have heightened awareness of self and individual leadership styles, leading to professional growth, career advancement, and the ability to develop leaders for the future across the fields of practice (nursing, health administration, public health).

This assessment provides an opportunity to analyze your own leadership qualities to create a portrait of the effective health care professional and leader you aspire to be.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership.
    • Analyze one’s leadership strengths and weaknesses, in reference to one or more leadership theories or styles found in the literature.
    • Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics enable oneself to guide, educate, inform, and influence others in managing change.
  • Competency 2: Explain the role of health care leaders in facilitating interprofessional collaboration.
    • Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics help oneself build and maintain interprofessional collaborative relationships.
  • Competency 3: Analyze standards of professional ethics and the principles of diversity and inclusion as applied by health care leaders in real-world situations.
    • Explain how one can best apply the principles of ethical leadership, given one’s leadership style.
    • Explain why diversity and inclusion are important to employee relations and the provision of safe, high-quality health care.
    • Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics prepare oneself to develop and lead a diverse team of employees and serve a diverse community, within an ethical framework.
  • Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development.
    • Explain how research skills and critical thinking guide effective decision making and foster integrity in research and professional practice.
  • Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
    • Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Week 8 Discussion: Interdisciplinary Works- APA FORMAT (1/2-1 Page)

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 15
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 1 primary source (from artist)
  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source

Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, select and address the following option below:

 

Choose a work of art from any genre that depicts or tells the story of a real life event from any time period, such as The Consecration of the Emperor Napoleon and the Coronation of Empress Joséphine on December 2, 1804 by Jacques Louis David.

  • Include the title and the artist and some background of the event.
  • What is the relationship between the work of art and the event?
  • Did the artist depict the event accurately?
  • Does the artist make changes regarding the event? If so, why do you think the artist made these changes?
  • Examine the artist’s message in the depiction.
  • Support your point(s) with a statement from the artist.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NRS-427V Week 5 Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal

Concepts in Community and Public Health – Disaster Management

Grand Canyon University

 

 

The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities.

 

Note: This is an individual assignment. Applying what you have learned thus far, develop a community teaching proposal designed to address the needs of your community.

Select one of the following as the focus for the teaching plan:

  1. Primary Prevention/Health Promotion
  2. Secondary Prevention/Screenings for a Vulnerable Population
  3. Bioterrorism/Disaster
  4. Environmental Issues

Complete the “Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal.” This will help you organize your plan and create an outline for the written assignment.

  1. After completing the teaching proposal, review the teaching plan with a community health and public health provider in your local community.
  2. Request feedback (strengths and opportunities for improvement) from the provider.
  3. Complete the “Community Teaching Experience” form.

 

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Week 5 Course Project Milestone: Annotated Bibliography

Week 5 Course Project Milestone: Annotated Bibliography

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a file upload

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: review all chapters
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 5 scholarly sources (This includes the source from Week 3 Proposal.)

Instructions
Create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources (including your source from Week 3). Include the following:

  • Introduction and thesis for your paper (to the best extent as you know it at this time)
  • Publication details
  • Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)

The annotation section should include the following:

  • Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).
  • Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles.
  • State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.
  • Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.
  • Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.

Example Publication

APA Reference
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education1(1), 58-63.

Annotation Example
In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gage learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 1-2 paragraphs per annotation
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page

Grading
This activity will be graded based on Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric.

Weekly Objectives (WO)
WO2.1-2.3, 2.6

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 100 ptsAnnotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 100 ptsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength5.0 ptsOutstandingMeets length requirement0.0 ptsNo EffortDoes not meet length requirement5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent10.0 ptsOutstandingAddresses all aspects of the assignment.8.5 ptsAbove AverageAddresses most aspects of the assignment.7.5 ptsAverageAddresses some aspects of the assignment.6.0 ptsBelow AverageAddresses few aspects of the assignment.0.0 ptsNo Marks10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation50.0 ptsOutstandingFor all 5 sources, the annotations summarize the articles; identify the key points; analyze the issues; assess the value of the source.42.5 ptsAbove AverageFor 4 sources, the annotations summarize the articles; identify the key points; analyze the issues; assess the value of the source.37.5 ptsAverageFor 3 sources, the annotations summarize the articles; identify the key points; analyze the issues; assess the value of the source.30.0 ptsBelow AverageFor 1 or 2 sources, the annotations summarize the articles; identify the key points; analyze the issues; assess the value of the source.0.0 ptsNo Marks50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization10.0 ptsOutstandingIdeas are logically organized, including inviting introduction (with a thesis statement) and a satisfactory conclusion that come together in complete concepts.8.5 ptsAbove AverageIdeas are well organized, including inviting introduction (with a thesis statement) and a satisfactory conclusion, with complete concepts.7.5 ptsAverageOrganization and concepts need some restructuring.6.0 ptsBelow AverageOrganization and concepts are difficult to follow and incomplete.0.0 ptsNo Marks10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting15.0 ptsOutstandingThroughout the whole work, the writing actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety.12.75 ptsAbove AverageThroughout most of the work, the writing actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety.11.25 ptsAverageThroughout some of the work, the writing actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety.9.0 ptsBelow AverageThroughout little of the work, the writing actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety.0.0 ptsNo Marks15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Citation and Reference Formatting10.0 ptsOutstandingThroughout the whole work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style.8.5 ptsAbove AverageThroughout most of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style.7.5 ptsAverageThroughout some of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style.6.0 ptsBelow AverageThroughout little of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style.0.0 ptsNo Marks

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

4 Question Due By 24 Hours ONLY

Financial Management Unit VIII Assignment

This assignment will allow you to demonstrate the following objectives:

 Compute the net present value, profitability index, and internal rate of return for a given company.  Predict the best choice for a company based on analysis of financial data.  Compute a company’s WACC using given percentages.  Calculate the cost of capital of a stock.  Computer the after-tax cost of capital for bonds.

Instructions: Answer the questions directly on this document. When you are finished, select “Save As,” and save the document using this format: Student ID_UnitVIII. Upload this document to BlackBoard as a .doc, docx, or .rtf file. Show all of your work.

1. The Turnip Company plans to issue preferred stock. Currently, the company’s stock sells for $110. Once new stock is issued, the Turnip Company would receive only $90. The dividend rate is 8%, and the par value of the stock is $100. Compute the cost of capital of the stock to your firm. Show all work.

2. The Maximus Corporation is considering a new investment, which would be financed from debt. Maximus could sell new $1,000 par value bonds at a new price of $920. The bonds would mature in 13 years, and the coupon interest rate is 10%. Compute the after-tax cost of capital to Maximus for bonds, assuming a 34% tax rate. Show work.

3. Connor Corporation is considering two projects (see below). For your analysis, assume these projects are mutually exclusive with a required rate of return of 10%.

Project 1 Project 2 Initial investment $(465,000) $(700,000) Cash inflow Year 1 $510,000 $850,000

Compute the following for each project:

 NPV (net present value)  PI (profitability index)  IRR (internal rate of return)

Based on your analysis, answer the following questions :

 Which is the best choice? Why?  Which project should be selected and why? If the projects had the same IRR amounts but

different NPV totals, then how would you know which project to select? Explain.  What would happen if both projects had negative NPV totals? Which project would you choose?

What do negative NPVs indicate? Explain.

 

 

Financial Management Unit VIII Assignment

 Should we also use the payback method to assist us in project selection? Why or why not? Explain.

4. The capital structure for Magellan Corporation is shown below. Currently, flotation costs are 13% of market value for a new bond issue and $3 per share for preferred stock. The dividends for common stock were $2.50 last year and have an estimated annual growth rate of 6%. Market prices are $1,020 for bonds, $20 for preferred stock, and $30 for common stock. Assume a 34% tax rate.

Financing Type % of Future Financing

Bonds (8%, $1k par, 16 year maturity) 36% Common equity 45% Preferred stock (5k shares outstanding, $50 par, $1.50 dividend)

19%

Total % 100%

Compute the company’s WACC. Is this WACC considered reasonable given the assumptions and other relevant information? Explain.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

7-3-2 Project Part Two: Speaking Notes Draft

SCI 200 Project Part Two: Speaking Notes Draft Guidelines and Rubric Overview: An effective presentation includes a summary of the main points in the slides, but the presenter should add additional content in the speaker notes to help explain each point. Some presenters have the the ability to memorize the details through cues in the outline of the presentation, and some can even speak off the cuff. However, for this project, you will create speaker notes while developing your presentation slides in Module Eight. This will help you consider the outline of your presentation and the content you want to include on each slide. Prompt: Your presentation will be 5–7 slides, with accompanying speaker notes to fill in the details you would not necessarily include in the slides. For this assignment, you will be drafting the speaker notes that will accompany your slide presentation. The speaker notes can be bullet points related to each step of the presentation or more developed paragraphs that would help you deliver the presentation. This choice is up to you, but either way, the speaker notes should contain substantial details that address each of the required parts of your presentation. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Provide a brief overview of the scientific background of your issue and question. How does the issue relate to the natural sciences? II. Explain how the issue impacts the audience. In other words, how is the issue relevant to members of the audience? Why should the audience care about

the response to your question or the outcome of your hypothesis? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation. III. Describe the empirical evidence you have to support your conclusions about the impact of the issue on you personally and on your audience. Support

your response with specific examples from your research investigation. IV. Explain why this issue is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this issue to investigate? V. Illustrate how your investigation of the issue impacted the way you thought about the issue. In other words, how did thinking like a scientist to research,

develop a question, and formulate a hypothesis affect what you thought about the issue you selected? How did scientific thinking change the lens through which you viewed the issue? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.

VI. Communicate your message in a way that is tailored to your specific audience. For instance, you could consider your vocabulary, your audience’s potential knowledge of current natural science (or lack thereof), and what is specifically important to the audience. This element will not necessarily be a separate slide or step in the process. In your notes that address the previous six prompts, note word choices or pieces that are specifically tailored for your audience.

 

Rubric Guidelines for Submission: The draft of your speaker notes can be bullet points or paragraphs related to each step in the presentation. Submissions should be 2–4 pages, double spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. You should use current APA guidelines (or another format approved by your instructor) for any references. For your final project, please keep in mind that these speaker notes will accompany 5-7 slides.

 

 

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Scientific Background Provides brief overview of scientific background of issue and question, and explains how issue relates to natural sciences

Provides brief overview of scientific background of issue and question, and explains how issue relates to natural sciences, but with gaps in detail or clarity

Does not provide brief overview of scientific background of issue and question, and does not explain how issue relates to natural sciences

15.8

Audience Explains how issue impacts audience, supporting response with examples from research investigation

Explains how issue impacts audience but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support

Does not explain how issue impacts audience

15.8

Empirical Evidence Describes empirical evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issues on self and audience, supporting response with examples from research investigation

Describes empirical evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issues on self and audience, but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support

Does not describe empirical evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issues on self and audience

15.8

Personally Explains why issue is important personally

Explains why issue is important personally but with gaps in clarity or detail

Does not explain why issue is important personally

15.8

Investigation Illustrates how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue, supporting response with examples from research investigation

Illustrates how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support

Does not illustrate how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue

15.8

Message Communicates message effectively in a way that is tailored to specific audience

Communicates message to audience, but communication is not effective or is not tailored to specific audience

Does not communicate message to audience

15.8

Articulation of Response

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

5.2

Total 100%

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Need This Done In 16hrs

Grille de correction du devoir 1 1

Grille de correction du devoir 1

Nom : Code permanent :

Élément de compétence visé par cette évaluation :

Analyser les caractéristiques de la situation de communication dans des discours d’ordre culturel ou d’un autre ordre.

Question Critère Barème de notation Commentaires
Étape 1 : Analyse d’une communication orale (40 points)
A

B

D

Détermination juste

· des six composantes du schéma de Jakobson

· des deux fonctions du discours

· du ou des registres de langue

1 point/composante

1 point/fonction

 

____ / 6

____ / 2

____ / 2

 
C Explications claires et efficaces de la fonction dominante et de la fonction secondaire

Illustration pertinente de chaque fonction

3 points/explication

3 points/illustration

____ / 6

____ / 6

 
E

F

Relevé de deux facteurs contribuant à la réussite de la communication

Explications claires et efficaces de la contribution de ces facteurs à la réussite de la communication

Illustration pertinente de chaque facteur

3 points/facteur

3 points/explication

3 points/illustration

____ / 6

____ / 6

____ / 6

 
Question Critère Barème de notation Commentaires
Étape 2 : Comparaison du traitement d’une nouvelle dans deux journaux (30 points)
G

H

Relevé de ressemblances et de différences significatives

Illustrations pertinentes des ressemblances Illustrations pertinentes des différences

Démonstration juste de l’influence des médias dans le traitement de la nouvelle

3 points/ressemblance 3 points/différence

3 points/illustration 3 points/illustration

 

____ / 6 ____ / 6

____ / 6 ____ / 6

____ / 6

 

 
Étape 3 : Intervention dans le groupe de discussion (15 points)
I Commentaire clair et cohérent

Référence pertinente au message de l’une des communications

Présence de la source

Utilisation du registre neutre

  ____ / 6

____ / 5

____ / 2

____ / 2

 
Étape 4 : Révision et correction de la langue (15 points)
J Orthographe d’usage exacte

Orthographe grammaticale exacte

Syntaxe correcte

Ponctuation adéquate

Vocabulaire précis et varié

Pénalité de 0,5 point par faute de ponctuation et de 1 point pour toute faute d’orthographe d’usage (une fois par texte), d’orthographe grammaticale, de syntaxe, de vocabulaire

N. B. – Inscrire le type d’erreur commise selon les codes suivants :

U : orthographe d’usage

G : orthographe grammaticale

S : syntaxe

P : ponctuation

V : vocabulaire

____ / 15  
Total : __ / 100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principes et procédés de la communication 601-FPC-FD (60.2) image1.png

image1.png

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Social Work Leadership- External Factors Impacting An Organization

Social workers in administrative roles must be able to identify and analyze the external factors that affect the function of the human services organizations for which they work. Though you may apply leadership and management skills as you assume an administrative position, you may also be able to repurpose many of the assessment skills you use in clinical practice for macro social work. Just as you gather information about a client and develop strategies for treatment at a micro level, so too, at a macro level, you gather and analyze information about a situation or program and identify appropriate strategies that will support positive organizational functioning.

For this Discussion, you address the Phoenix House case study in the Social Work Case Studies: Concentration Year text.

Post an analysis of the supervisor’s role in the Phoenix House case study and identify leadership skills that might help the supervisor resolve the issue. Identify which aspect of this situation would be most challenging for you if you were the supervisor. Finally, explain how you would use leadership skills to proceed if you were the supervisor.

Support your post with specific references to the resources. Be sure to provide full APA citations for your references.

The Phoenix House Case Study:

I am the senior social worker at a program called Phoenix House. Phoenix House is an after-school program supporting at-risk middle school youth. It is funded in part by local school districts. Students are generally referred to Phoenix House by school administrators or parents.

I supervise a staff of four full-time social workers and two social work interns from a local university. Staff responsibilities generally include helping students with homework, individual and group counseling, field trips, and recreational games and activities.

Students are usually referred to Phoenix House when school administrators feel that the student is on the cusp of expulsion or long-term suspension from their school, usually due to disciplinary issues. Parents of students may also enroll their children in the Phoenix House program if they feel it will be beneficial. Parents are made aware of Phoenix House and its services through PTA meetings and via school administrators when a disciplinary incident takes place. Although it is free of charge and funded primarily through school district funds, parents are discouraged from using Phoenix House as an after-school or extracurricular activity for their children.

The average clients of Phoenix House are boys and girls between the ages of 11 and 14. The clients possess a range of presenting issues, mostly relating to inappropriate behavior. Some of the clients have been involved with the juvenile justice system in some form or fashion. Almost all of the clients have been suspended from their school at one point or another. Common problems with clients at Phoenix House include fighting, bullying, stealing, and vandalizing.

The staff I supervise have quite a bit of experience working with juveniles with behavioral issues. Some of them have worked in juvenile detention facilities and others have worked at court-mandated youth programs.

We have recently accepted a new client named Daniel. Daniel is a 13-year-old, Caucasian male. Daniel was enrolled by his mother when he was suspended from his school after a marijuana cigarette was found in his book bag by school security staff. It was the first time Daniel had been suspended from his school and the first time a disciplinary report had been filed on him.

Sarah, one of the social workers, asked to speak to me concerning Daniel. Sarah had spoken to Jim, one of our social work interns, about Daniel and the appropriateness of his presence at Phoenix House. Jim is concerned that Daniel is not a “good fit” at Phoenix House because he does not seem to match up with the character and attitudes of the other clients. Sarah shares Jim’s concern and is also concerned that the other clients may be a harmful influence to Daniel.

Sarah is Daniel’s counselor, as well, and has gotten permission from Daniel to share some of his statements from their counseling sessions. The statements indicate Daniel has no idea how the marijuana cigarette got into his book bag and that Daniel suspects it was put there by another student as a joke or as a means to get rid of it during bag searches. Sarah, who has years of experience working with at-risk youth, indicates that she believes Daniel. Daniel has also gone on to state that his mother has a tendency to overreact, and this may be the reason why she enrolled him in the Phoenix Houseprogram instead of listening to his explanations.

In response to Jim and Sarah’s concerns, I contacted Daniel’s mother, Lisa. Lisa listened to my concerns but did not feel that it would be right to remove him from the Phoenix House program. She said that even if he had done nothing wrong, Daniel could learn a valuable lesson about consequences by being in the Phoenix House program. I attempted to explain to Lisa that this is not really the purpose of the program and also indicated that Phoenix House is not meant to be a typical after-school or extracurricular program. Lisa retorted that it is her right to enroll her son in the program, and in her opinion, the end result of Daniel being in the program will be positive in nature.

I have shared this conversation with the staff at our weekly meetings. The staff seem convinced that Daniel will not have a positive experience at Phoenix House and feel he is being picked on and bullied by the other clients despite their efforts to prevent it. Some staff members have also pointed out that this may be an ethical issue because they feel the situation violates the social work value of “do no harm”

Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. M. (Eds.). (2014b). Social work case studies: Concentration year. Baltimore, MD: Laureate International Universities Publishing [Vital Source e-reader].

  • “Social Work Supervision, Leadership, and Administration: The Phoenix House” (pp. 82–84)
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

International Business Communication Paper

Essay/Paper Rubric 70

Essay/Paper Rubric 70 points
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
30.0 pts

Excellent

The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples.

22.5 pts

Good

The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples.

15.0 pts

Acceptable

The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately).

7.5 pts

Unacceptable

The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology.

 

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasoning
30.0 pts

Excellent

The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications.

22.5 pts

Good

The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications.

15.0 pts

Acceptable

The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications.

7.5 pts

Unacceptable

The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem.

 

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Grammar and Mechanics
10.0 pts

Excellent

The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

7.0 pts

Good

The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

5.0 pts

Acceptable

The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

 

10.0 pts
Total Points: 70.0
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!