Marriage And Relationship

/in , , /by

Marriage And Relationship

(Marriage And Relationship)

Marriage and relationships are intricate dances of love, companionship, and mutual growth. At their core, they require trust, communication, and compromise. Marriage symbolizes a commitment to share life’s joys and burdens, to navigate its challenges together, and to support one another’s dreams. It’s a journey of discovering and rediscovering each other, fostering emotional intimacy, and building a shared future.

Successful relationships thrive on empathy, respect, and appreciation for each other’s individuality. They are nurtured by shared experiences, laughter, and moments of vulnerability. However, they also demand patience, forgiveness, and resilience in the face of inevitable conflicts and setbacks.

Maintaining a healthy marriage involves prioritizing the relationship, whether through regular date nights, open dialogue, or acts of kindness. It’s about celebrating milestones, but also weathering storms hand in hand.

Ultimately, marriage and relationships are as unique as the individuals in them. While there’s no one-size-fits-all formula for success, cultivating love, understanding, and commitment lays the foundation for a fulfilling lifelong partnership.

Marriage And Relationship

Relationship Issues that make or break the relationship.

Who is your ideal mate?

What are the deal breakers?

1 to 10, how important is physical appearance?  10 being critically important, 1 being not at all.

What are the most important characteristics of your ideal mate?  Be honest with yourself and PLEASE STAY AWAY from cliche answers if you would.  I mean it!

The safe answer would be something like, “Someone who is there for me, respects me, and loves me for who I am.”  Or, the next most common one I’ve read is, “I need a God fearing man”.

This assignment is supposed to provoke something from deep within your soul that you may have never truly thought deeply enough.

Think about it.  “Someone who respects you and there for you.”  That’s about 70% of all whom you come in contact with on a daily basis, like coworkers, student body, faculty, starbucks employee, etc.  “Someone who loves me for who I am.”  That should be 100% of every one of your regular friends.  If they do not, they are not your friends…..  “God fearing man/woman.”  That should be about 99% of everyone at your church, synagogue, or mosque.

These vanilla answers that people are so readily give really doesn’t fit who you truly are and who you would need, in order for him or her to be your ONE AND ONLY soulmate.

Hence, PLEASE stay away from mundane conversation.  This should be one of the most intriguing conversation we have in this class.

If you have to think about this for 24 to 48 hours to come up with a uniquely fitting statement for yourself, so be it!  It should be that special.  If not, then think deeper.

If this comes across as a soapbox, I apologize, but my previous classes have bored me and each other with this topic as they missed the entire point of this assignment.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Community Nursing Diagnosis

/in , , /by

Community Nursing Diagnosis: Opioid Abuse Intervention

(Community Nursing Diagnosis)

Question description

Add a community nursing diagnosis and relate to HP2020 to the nursing diagnosis part in the aggregate

summarize and put the nursing diagnosis part part only in 2 or 3 poster and power point slides after the add up

Here is the link to whole paper:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rVVL8ql1XFJ5730YgJgE4InYfCYEcX60ozMfbRZOJoM/edit

This is the the nursing diagnosis part in case you cannot find it in the paper.

The nursing diagnosis focused in this paper is “An ineffective health maintenance as evidenced by opioid abuse related to serious impairment, suicide, depression, sleep disturbance, and anxiety by opioids abusers especially teenagers and older”. As witnessed in nursing assessment, the use of opioids for wrong purposes is the reason why opioids abuse is increasing tremendously over the past decades (Butcher et al, 2018). The focus of this paper is therefore to examine the best interventions that can be used to minimize opioids abuse in order to minimize mental health problems that have been witnessed in the past.

In relation to Millennium Development Goals ratified by more than 191 members states, the nursing diagnosis focus in this paper will act as a cornerstone in achieving those MDGs especially in relation to improving maternal health and reducing child mortality (Morton et al, 2017). As part of achieving these MDGs goals, the evidence-based treatment plan for opioids is mainly centered on methadone and Buprenorphine that have been scientifically proven to be effective in treatments for opioid use disorder. A recent meta-analysis has concluded that methadone and Buprenorphine are linked to higher treatment retention.

The nursing diagnosis is important because it helps in minimizing mental health diagnosis that is mainly caused by opioids abuse. It also assists in designing effective secondary prevention that can be employed to minimize the rate of opioids abuse in the community (Morton et al, 2017). The nursing diagnosis is centered on offering coping mechanisms that can be utilized to reduce the number of medical lapses and exacerbation conditions triggered by aforementioned health conditions. When using the nursing diagnosis, it is important to consider the historical and current health records of the patients before delivering the services.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Ethics and law for managers

/in , , /by

Ethics and law for managers

(Ethics and law for managers)

Question description

Assignment 2: Research Project

This assignment consists of two parts. The first part consists of the third installment for the research paper and is worth 20 points out of the 200 points allotted for this assignment. The second part requires application of concepts learned in Weeks 1–3and is worth significantly more than previous assignments and more than the first part of the assignment.

Part I—Research Paper

This week, you will research laws or regulations related to the topic you selected. The information may require research of federal and/or state laws, as well as administrative agency laws. Compare the laws of two states, if applicable. For example, if you are writing about gender discrimination, compare the federal law with law from one of the states that also provides protection at the state level. State laws often provide more protection than the federal law. Summarize the information about the laws or regulations you found related to your topic.

Compile your response to Part I in a Microsoft Word document and name it as SU_MBA5005_W3_A2_Part1_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.

Part II—Legal and Ethical Challenges in Business Organizations

Read the scenarios and the questions that follow. Identify the legal issue(s) and apply legal concepts and possible arguments for each question. After reading the scenarios, prepare a resolution for each question using laws, cases, examples, and/or other relevant materials. Consider using short headings (consult APA materials) to separate the topics. Summarize the facts; do not copy the scenarios into the paper. After you have answered the questions and before the conclusion, identify potential ethical issues and propose recommendations to help the organization avoid future occurrences of the legal and ethical issues discussed in the assignment. Support your answers with information from the textbook and at least five scholarly sources other than the text and course lectures.

By Week 3, Day 6 prepare an 8- to 12-page paper that identifies the legal issues and potential solutions and answers all questions presented, supported by relevant legal authority. Properly cite all sources using APA format. Do not exceed the page length by more than two pages, as the instructor is not required to read excess pages.

Compile your response to Part II in a Microsoft Word document and name it as SU_MBA5005_W3_A2_Part2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.

Overview

Famous Subs and Pizza Company (FSPC) is a publicly traded corporation headquartered in Tallahassee, Florida, operating restaurants in ten states. The company also owns a food processing and distribution facility in Jackson, Mississippi. Approximately 20% of the employees work full time; however, FSPC primarily hires part-time employees as delivery drivers, cooks, and sandwich makers. FSPC leases space for most of its restaurants in shopping centers, but the company owns a few of the properties, as well as its headquarters office and the distribution facility. The company has experienced explosive growth over the last three years, but the growth has been accompanied by an increase in legal issues. The CEO, Chip Stone, seeks your advice on the following legal and ethical issues.

S1: Jurisdiction, Torts, and Agency(Ethics and law for managers)

Faye Kennett, 4’5″ tall, visited an FSPC outlet in Birmingham, Alabama. She was four months pregnant and craved a pizza with anchovies. She took the receipt after ordering her food and was reading it while walking to a table. She noticed that the words “Fat Midget” were printed on the receipt. Before she could get to her table, Faye stepped in some water, slipped, and fell, sustaining injuries to her back and left leg. She suffered a miscarriage forty-eight hours after falling at FSPC. Kennett filed a negligence suit in an Alabama state court against FSPC, the store manager, and the employee at the register who had printed the receipt.

  • Explain whether the Alabama state court is the proper court for the lawsuit. Determine whether Kennett could have filed the lawsuit in Florida.
  • Provide arguments for Kennett, FSPC, the manager, and the employee at the register. Determine which party should win and provide support for your selection.

S2: Contracts, Agency, and Torts(Ethics and law for managers)

FSPC hired Pete Zahutt as a delivery driver for one of its stores in Jackson, Mississippi. After five years, FSPC promoted Pete to District Manager and let him drive the company car that was wrapped with the company logo. Once or twice a week, Pete also picked up supplies at the warehouse on his way to work. With his boss’s knowledge, Pete also used the FSPC car during working hours to run some personal errands, like pick up his daughter after school. The company viewed the arrangement as an opportunity for free advertising. One Friday night, after Pete left work in the company car, he delivered two pizzas to some friends, who invited Pete in for a beer. Pete ate some pizza with his friends, drank a few beers, and left for home. On the way home, Pete was texting his girlfriend and hit another car, severely injuring himself and the driver of the other car, Al K. Seltzer. Seltzer sued Pete and FSPC; however, FSPC’s insurance company refused to cover Pete or to defend or indemnify him in the lawsuit. Pete then sued the insurance company and FSPC. The insurance company argued that Pete was not an “insured” under its policy with FSPC because he did not have permission to use the company car when the accident occurred.

The insurance policy defines an insured as “[a]nyone else while using with your permission a covered auto you own, hire, or borrow . . .”

“Permission” is “consent to use the vehicle at the time and place in question and in a manner authorized by the owner, either express or implied.”

  • Did Pete have implied permission to use the car?
  • Ignoring the issue of insurance, is FSPC (and, therefore, the insurance company) liable for the injuries sustained by Seltzer under respondeat superior? If so, on what basis?

S3: ADR, Contracts, and Employment(Ethics and law for managers)

FSPC requires its employees to sign a confidentiality and noncompete agreement. The confidentiality portion explains that employees will be given access to critical information related to recipes, suppliers, and other similar data during their employment. Employees must agree that the information is a valuable asset and that they will not disclose the information during or after their employment. Employees must also agree to not make copies of any such information. The noncompete portion of the agreement states that during employment and for a period of two years after termination for any reason, an individual will not work for any business that derives more than 10% of its revenue from selling sub or pizza products and is located within 3 miles of any FSPC facility. Finally, the agreement provides that any dispute arising from the confidentiality and noncompete agreement shall be resolved exclusively through arbitration.

While attending college in Tampa, Florida, Dee Liver worked as a delivery driver for FSPC from June 2012 until May 2014.

Dee signed a document titled “Acknowledgment of Receipt of Employee Handbook,” which states that the handbook contains important information about the employer’s general personnel policies and Dee’s privileges and obligations as an employee. The document also states, “I understand that I am governed by the content of the Handbook and that [Employer] may change, rescind, or add to any policies, benefits, or practices described in the Handbook from time to time in its sole and absolute discretion, with or without prior notice.” Dee was not presented with the confidentiality and noncompete document until January 2014. FSPC stated that she must sign the document as part of her continued employment with the company.

Dee resigned from FSPC when she moved to Gainesville Florida to start pharmacy school. In September 2014, Dee applied for a job and was hired as a delivery driver at Papa John’s Pizza. FSPC filed a lawsuit against Dee for a breach of contract. Dee filed to dismiss the case because the agreement stated that disputes must be resolved through arbitration.

  • Provide arguments for Dee and FSPC related to the arbitration clause. Determine which party will win and provide a reference to a case or other scholarly support for your answer.
  • Ignoring the outcome of the arbitration issues, analyze the noncompete portion of the agreement. Determine which party will win and provide scholarly support for your answer.

S4: Administrative Agencies and Consumer Protection

FSPC operates a food processing plant in Mississippi, where various meat products are packaged for shipment to restaurants. After FSPC customers in Tennessee, Alabama, and Louisiana complained of becoming sick after eating roast beef subs, it was determined that the meat was contaminated with Escherichia coli, a bacteria responsible for causing food poisoning. Additional inspections immediately following the outbreak of E.coli in May 2015 revealed that the restaurants did not provide the required nutritional information for products on their menu.

  • Which government agency is responsible for protecting the public in the E. colicase? Explain the responsibilities of the agency.
  • What are the labeling requirements related to menu items in restaurants? Which agency enforces these requirements?
  • On what basis might the customers who became sick from eating the tainted meat file suit against FSPC? Explain.
  • What types of administrative penalties might FSPC face?

S5: Intellectual Property(Ethics and law for managers)

Pepe Roni was a part-time pizza maker at FSPC and a full-time information technology major at the South University in Tampa. As part of his final project in the capstone class, Pepe developed a computer program that created the fastest and most economical routes for delivery drivers. The program also tracked the locations of drivers. Pepe called the program Deliver Fast. The program was designed to be used by any food delivery service. FSPC believes it owns the invention since Pepe was employed by the company when he developed the program. Pepe believes he owns the rights to the invention since it was created for a school project and could be used for any food delivery company.

  • Provide arguments for FSPC and Pepe regarding ownership of the invention, Deliver Fast. Determine which party should win and provide support for your answer.

S6: Employment and the Constitution

Cal Kulate worked in the accounting department at the FSPC headquarters in Florida. He started out as a cashier in one of the stores, was promoted to store manager, and was eventually promoted to the accounting department at headquarters in Florida. Cal received numerous outstanding-job evaluations over the years with the company. Cal and his partner, Jim, married recently. Jim now received medical, dental, and other benefits as part of Cal’s employment package with FSPC.

Cal reported to the director of accounting, Faith Christianson. Cal did not receive a raise for the first time in ten years, after receiving an unflattering performance review from Faith. Other employees heard Faith say, “Same-sex marriages are wrong. The Bible states that marriage should be between a man and a woman.” Faith posted Bible verses in the breakroom and at the bottom of her e-mails. Cal reported Faith’s behavior to Human Resources, but her behavior only worsened after the report.

Cal posted some comments about Faith’s behavior on his Facebook page. He asked if other employees had experienced any discriminatory actions by Faith or other managers. Cal commented that the company did not discipline Faith after he reported her behavior; therefore, he believed the company supported sexual orientation discrimination. Cal also posted an unflattering caricature of Faith on his Facebook page. One commenter suggested that Cal report the company to the EEOC. After another employee showed the posts to Faith, she demanded that Cal remove the posts. When Cal refused, he was terminated.

One of the employees who worked for Cal, Cybil Wrights, reported Faith’s treatment of Cal to the EEOC. Cybil was an at-will employee who had been with FSPC for two years. In response to the EEOC report, Faith terminated Cybil.

  • Does Cal have a valid federal or state discrimination claim against FSPC? Explain thoroughly.
  • Did the company violate Cal’s First Amendment rights by requiring him to remove information about Faith from his Facebook page? Explain thoroughly.
  • Does Cybil have any causes of action against FSPC? Identify any such causes and analyze them.

S7: Recommendations(Ethics and law for managers)

As the new director of compliance, you have reviewed each of the issues presented. The CEO, Chip Stone, requests that you propose specific recommendations on how to avoid both legal and ethical issues in the future related to a minimum of five areas that need improvement. Be specific and detailed and be sure to base recommendations on relevant legal and ethical principles. Do not provide generic resolutions, such as “the company should provide training and implement procedures to avoid future problems.”

Submission Details:

Submit your responses to both the parts to the W3 Assignment 2 Dropbox by Week 3, Day 6.(Ethics and law for managers)

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Part I—Research Paper

  • Provided a discussion of relevant laws and regulations related to the topic selected.
 20
Part II—Legal and Ethical Challenges in Business Organizations

S1: Jurisdiction, Torts, and Agency

  • Evaluated the potential jurisdictions for filing the lawsuit; the arguments for Kennett, FSPC, the manager, and the employee; and which party should win.
 20
S2: Contracts, Agency, and Torts

  • Evaluated whether Pete had implied permission to use the car and FSPC’s liability for the injuries.
 20
S3: ADR, Contracts, and Employment

  • Analyzed arguments for both parties related to the arbitration clause, including which party will win, and provided a case to support the answer.
  • Analyzed the noncompete portion of the agreement, including which party will win, and provided scholarly support for the answer.
 20
S4: Administrative Agencies and Consumer Protection

  • Defended a selection of the government agency responsible for protecting the public in the E. coli case and generalized the responsibilities of the agency related to FSPC’s business.
  • Defended a selection of the government agency that is responsible for enforcement of food labeling and summarized the labeling requirements related to FSPC’s products.
  • Assessed the penalties that each agency might issue to FSPC.
 30
S5: Intellectual Property

  • Justified arguments for FSPC and Pepe regarding the ownership of the invention and selected which party should win.
 10
S6: Employment and the Constitution

  • Analyzed the validity of any federal or state discrimination claim Cal may have against FSPC.
  • Analyzed whether the company violated Cal’s first amendment rights by requiring him to remove information about Faith from his Facebook page.
  • Analyzed any causes of action Cybil has against the company.
 20
S7: Recommendations

  • Proposed specific recommendations on how to avoid both legal and ethical issues in the future.
 20
Created a clear, concise, and organized report; demonstrated ethical scholarship in an accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Nursing Care Models Paper

/in , , /by

Nursing Care Models Paper, writing homework help

(Nursing Care Models Paper)

Question description

It is very important that in order to complete this assignment you read the pages stated from the text on Finkelman (2012), pages 118-127. If not points will be deducted.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to identify nursing care models utilized in today’s various health care settings and enhance your knowledge of how models impact the management of care and may influence delegation. You will assess the effectiveness of models and determine how you would collaborate with a nurse leader to identify opportunities for improvement to ensure quality, safety and staff satisfaction.

Directions

1.  Read your text,Finkelman (2012) pp- 118- 127.

2.  Observe staff in delivery of nursing care provided. Practice settings may vary depending on availability.

3.  Identify the model of nursing care that you observed. Be specific about what you observed, who was doing what, when, how and what led you to identify the particular model.

4.  Write a 5-7 page paper that includes the following:

5.  Review and summarize two scholarly resources (not including your text) related to the nursing care model you observed in the practice setting.

6.  Review and summarize two scholarly resources (not including your text) related to a nursing care model that is different from the one you observed in the practice setting.

7.  Discuss your observations about how the current nursing care model is being implemented. Be specific.

8.  Recommend a different nursing care model that could be implemented to improve quality of nursing care, safety and staff satisfaction. Be specific.

9.  Provide a summary/conclusion about this experience/assignment and what you learned about nursing care models.

10.  Write your paper using APA format. Submit to the Dropbox.

Grading Criteria: Nursing Care Models Paper(Nursing Care Models Paper)

Category Points % Description
Identify Nursing Care Model in practice including specifics about who, what when, where, etc. 60 30% Identifies Nursing Care Model for delivery of nursing care.  Provides specifics.
Besides Finkelman, locate scholarly resources related to Nursing Care Models 40 20% In addition to Finkelman, locates four scholarly resources related to Nursing Care Models. Summarizes all resources in body of paper.
Implementation and Recommendations 60 30% Describe implementation of current Nursing Care Model and recommend a different model that could be utilized to improve quality of nursing care, safety and staff satisfaction.
Conclusion/ summary 20 10% Summarize what you learned about this experience including new knowledge about nursing care models.
Clarity of writing 20 10% Content is organized, logical, and with correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct.  APA formatting is apparent and CCN template is utilized. References are properly cited within the paper; reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell and grammar check is obvious.

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

A

 Very Good or High Level of Performance

B

 Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance

C

 Poor, Failing, or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

F
After an introduction paragraph, identifies Nursing Care Model in practice including specifics about who, what when, where, etc.

60 points

 After an introduction paragraph, thoroughly identifies Nursing Care Model in practice including specifics about who, what when, where, etc.

55-60 points

 After an introduction paragraph, clearly identifies Nursing Care Model in practice including specifics about who, what when, where, etc.

50-54 points

 After an introduction paragraph, briefly identifies Nursing Care Model in practice including minimum specifics about who, what when, where, etc.

46-49 points

 Does not provide an introduction paragraph but identifies Nursing Care Model in practice in first or subsequent paragraphs including minimum specifics about who, what when, where, etc.

0-49 points
Besides Finkelman, locate scholarly resources related  to Nursing Care Models

40 points

 Thoroughly reviews and summarizes two scholarly resources (not including your text) related to the nursing care model you observed in the practice setting; then, reviews and summarizes two scholarly resources (not including your text) related to a nursing care model that is different from the one you observed.

37-40 points

 Clearly reviews and summarizes two scholarly resources (not including your text) related to the nursing care model you observed in the practice setting; then, reviews and summarizes two scholarly resources (not including your text) related to a nursing care model that is differentfrom the one you observed.

34-36 points

 Briefly reviews only one resource (besides text) related to nursing care model observed in practice setting and only one resource (besides text) related to a nursing care model that is differentfrom the one you observed.

30-33 points

 Briefly reviews only one resource (besides text) related to nursing care model observed in practice setting ORonly one resource (besides text) related to a nursing care model that is different from the one you observed.

0-29 points
Implementation and Recommendations

60 points

 Thoroughly describes implementation of current Nursing Care Model and recommends a different model that could be utilized to improve quality of nursing care, safety and staff satisfaction.

55-60 points

 Clearly describes implementation of current Nursing Care Model andrecommends a different model that could be utilized but omits quality or safety or staff satisfaction.

50-54 points

 Briefly describes implementation of current Nursing Care Model and recommends a different model that could be utilized but omits two of the following (quality/safety/staff satisfaction).

46-49 points

 Briefly describes implementation of current Nursing Care Model or recommends a different model that could be utilized. Various elements are missing related to improving quality of nursing care, safety and staff satisfaction.

0-45 points
Conclusion/ summary

20 points

 Includes conclusion paragraph and thoroughly summarizes what you learned about this experience including new knowledge about nursing care models.

18-20 points

 Includes conclusion paragraph and clearly summarizes what you learned about this experience including new knowledge about nursing care models.

16-17 points

 Includes conclusion paragraph but briefly summarizes what you learned about this experience or includes new knowledge about nursing care models but not both.

14-15 points

 Does not Include a conclusion paragraph orconclusion/summary is present but difficult to find in closing paragraphs of paper.

0-13 points
Clarity of writing

20 points

 Content is organized, logical, and with correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct. APA formatting is apparent utilizing CCN template. References are properly cited within the paper; reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell and grammar check is obvious. Less than three errors noted.

18–20 points

 Content is mostly organized, logical and with correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct. APA formatting is apparent utilizing CCN template. References are properly cited within the paper; reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell check and grammar check is obvious. Four to six errors noted.

16–17 points

 Content is somewhat organized, logical and with correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct. APA formatting is somewhat apparent but CCN template was not utilized. References are properly cited within the paper; reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell check and grammar check are not obvious. Seven to 10 errors noted.

14–15 points

 Content is disorganized and writing has numerous grammar, spelling, or syntax errors and APA formatting errors are obvious. Spell check and grammar check are not obvious. More than 11 errors noted.

0–13 points
Total Points Possible= 225 Points Earned = A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Building Self-Sufficiency

/in , , /by

Strategic Service Plan for Hanna: Building Self-Sufficiency

(Building Self-Sufficiency)

Question description

This Assignment is in two parts, the first is to use the S.M.A.R.T. goals that you wrote in Discussion as the basis for a hypothetical case plan for Hanna  Use the Sample Service Plan found below to create a short service plan using her presenting problem and the goals to remove her barriers to treatment. Remember to base the goals on her strengths. Then, do some research to find at least three agencies in your local area that could provide these services. My area is New York.

Sample Service Plan.docx

In the second part of this Assignment, write a 1,000-word APA formatted paper that answers the questions below. Remember to base your responses on the service plan that you created in the first portion of the Assignment. When you are finished, add your paper to the service plan and submit it as one Assignment.

In your paper, respond to these questions:

  1. What is Hanna’s presenting problem? How has this kept her from focusing on her treatment?
  2. Describe Hanna’s barriers to treatment and how those could be prevented or minimized.
  3. Explain the short, mid, and long-term goals that you proposed and tell how they help Hanna build self-sufficiency skills.
  4. Predict Hanna’s success by explaining her strengths. How did you use her strengths in the development of the service goals?

Scenario: Hanna

Hanna is in treatment at your mental health center for Acute Stress Disorder. She tells you that recently, she is unable to think clearly at night because she begins to feel anxious that her oldest son will not return safely from his military deployment. She adds that her boss has given her two extra shifts a week at her call center job. It is overwhelming during those shifts the client reports because they are the heaviest call times. Client stated that she is in line for a promotion, so does not want to refuse the shifts. Client then reported that she has not been eating or sleeping well because she has to drink wine to get to sleep at night. Client stated that she thinks that she needs to drink to get to sleep now. When asked about her children, client stated that she and her husband have custody of them, but her youngest daughter is causing a lot of trouble in school. She thinks that the daughter might have a mental health or learning disability issue but is unsure. The client mentions that her husband might contact the school because he is really good with working with the children on their homework at night. Before leaving the session, the client reported that her stomach has been hurting for the past week and she can barely move sometimes because of the cramps.

Hanna’s Immediate Needs 

  1. Relieve her physical pain.
  2. Reduce and learn to cope with her stress.
  3. Get on a healthy sleep pattern.
  4. Start eating a healthy diet.
  5. Obtaining a screening for an alcohol dependency problem.
  6. Psychological evaluation

 

Each paper should include:

  • A title page
  • The paper body of the paper
  • Use standard margins: 1″ on all sides.
  • Use standard 12-point font size, Times New Roman or Arial.
  • Use standard double-spacing: average of 22 lines per page, and between 20 and 24 lines per page.
  • Use left-aligned text. Do not right-justify.
  • A reference page
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Integrative Literature Review3

/in , , , /by

Integrative Literature Review3

(Integrative Literature Review3)

The primary goal of this literature review is to integrate concepts from four different content domains within the larger field of psychology. The four content domains should be chosen from previous coursework in this program. In this paper, students will review the findings in the individual empirical articles, organize the research in a meaningful way, evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the research findings, and present an integrated synthesis of the research that sheds new light on the topics within and across the four domains.  The result of a successful integrative literature review may be a significant contribution to a particular body of knowledge and, consequently, to research and practice. Therefore, before writing this literature review, substantive new research must be conducted via the Internet and within the Ashford University Library for each of the four chosen domains.

A minimum of six sources must be included for each of the four domains. Although content from literature reviews completed in prior courses within this program may be included, it may not constitute the total research for the individual domains addressed within this assignment. No more than four sources from previous literature reviews completed in this program may be utilized for this integrative review.  The headings listed below must be used within the paper to delineate the sections of content. These sections include the following: a clear introduction that provides a general review and organizes the research in a meaningful way; a discussion in which the evidence is presented through analysis, critique, and synthesis; and a conclusion in which the discussion is drawn together in a meaningful way, the claims of the introduction are brought to a logical closure, and new research is proposed.  Introduction

•Provide a conceptual framework for the review.

•Describe how the review will be organized. The questions below may be used to guide this section.

◦What are the guiding theories within the domains?

◦How are the domains connected?

◦Are there competing points of view across the domains?

◦Why is the integration of these domains important?

◦What is the history of these domains?

◦What are the related theories or findings?

•Describe how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized

. •How and why was the literature chosen?

•What is your claim or thesis statement?  Discussion

•Provide the analysis, critique, and synthesis for the review.  Analysis

•Examine the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains.

•Integrate concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology.

•What claim(s) can be made in the introduction?

(Integrative Literature Review3)

•What evidence supports the claim(s) made in the introduction?  Critique

•Evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings.

•How well does the literature represent the issues across the four domains?

•Identify the strengths and the key contributions of the literature.

•What, if any, deficiencies exist within the literature?

•Have the authors omitted any key points and/or arguments?

•What, if any, inaccuracies have been identified in the literature?

•What evidence runs contrary to the claims proposed in the introduction, and how might these be reconciled with the claims presented?

•Explain how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings.

•Did the ethical issues influence the outcomes of the research?

•Were ethical considerations different across the domains?  Synthesis

•Integrate existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives.

•Describe the research that has previously been done across these domains, as well as any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist.

•Relate the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made.

•Construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains.  Conclusion

•Provide a conclusion and present potential future considerations.

•State your final conclusion(s).

•Synthesize the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary.

•What questions remain?

(Integrative Literature Review3)

•What are the possible implications of your argument for existing theories and for everyday life?

•Are there novel theories and/or testable hypothesizes for future research?

•What do the overarching implications of the studies show?

•Where should the research go from this point to further the understanding of these domains and the greater study of psychology?

The Integrative Literature Review

•Must be 20 to 30 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

•Must include a separate title page with the following: ◦Title of paper ◦Student’s name ◦Course name and number ◦Instructor’s name ◦Date submitted

•Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.

•Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.

•Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.

•Must use at least 24 peer-reviewed sources, including a minimum of 20 from the Ashford University Library.

•Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

•Must include a separate reference list that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Evaluating Healthcare Research

/in , , /by

Evaluating Healthcare Research: Quant & Qual

(Evaluating Healthcare Research)

You will select one quantitative and one qualitative peer-reviewed journal article on a healthcare topic of interest.

Question description

Introduction:

There are many sources of information available on the web and in journals relating to the nursing discipline. Therefore, it is of pivotal importance to understand the basic tenets of critical appraisal of research for its use in intraprofessional healthcare practices. The aim of evidence-based practice (EBP) is to employ a three-pronged approach blending the best available research evidence, patient values and preferences, and clinical expertise.

In this task, you will critique two primary research evidence sources. You will select one quantitative and one qualitative peer-reviewed journal article on a healthcare topic of interest.

Requirements:

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. Use the Turnitin Originality Report available in Taskstream as a guide for this measure of originality.

The rubric provides detailed criteria for evaluating your submission. You are expected to use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Note: Research evidence must not be more than ten years old.

Note: Be sure to upload a copy of the full text of the articles with your submission.

A. Evaluate a primary quantitative research peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

1. Identify how the researcher addresses the five following areas of the selected journal article, using the attached “Evidence Table”:

• background or introduction

• review of the literature

• discussion of methodology

• data analysis

• researcher’s conclusion

2. Critique whether the evidence presented in each section of the journal article supports the researcher’s conclusion.

Note: Try to think about how the first four sections in the A1 table support the fifth section, the conclusion.

 

3. Explain the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations of the journal article.

4. Identify strengths and limitations of the study.

5. Describe how the evidence informs nursing practice.

B. Evaluate a primary qualitative research peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

1. Identify how the researcher addresses the five following areas of the selected journal article, using the attached “Evidence Table”:

• background or introduction

• review of the literature

• discussion of methodology

• data analysis

• researcher’s conclusion

2. Critique whether the evidence presented in each section of the journal article supports the researcher’s conclusion.

Note: Try to think about how the first four sections in the B1 table support the fifth section, the conclusion.

 

3. Explain the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations of the journal article.

4. Identify strengths and limitations of the study.

5. Describe how the evidence informs nursing practice.

C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

File Attachments:
Evidence Tablelink opens in new window
Web Links:
1. XAP Task 1 Rubric
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

General Education Capstone

/in , , /by

General Education Capstone Assignment – Alberto

(General Education Capstone)

Question description

The Rough Draft

Throughout this course, you have been working toward your final project. This week, you will be submitting a rough draft of that project. Using the information from your outline, your bibliography, and your literature review, combine the information to create a rough draft (you will have the opportunity for this to be reviewed by your instructor and your peers). Once you have completed your work, post it to W6 Discussion: Peer Review forum. Note that we will return to this forum in week 6. Pay close attention to the following criteria to ensure you covered everything.

For All Assignment Types
Your assignment should be well-organized and demonstrate an orderly flow of information that clearly addresses the subject chosen. In addition to the above criteria, your final project should include the following elements.

You have three options in how you can present your final project:

As a Paper

Your paper should be creative and demonstrate what you have learned. It should be a minimum of 5-7 pages in length and you will use APA style formatting with a title page and reference section. You should use Times New Roman, 12pt. font, double-space your lines, and set your page up with one inch margins. See the APA templates at Writing Commons for details on how to format your paper.

As a Presentation

Like the paper option, your presentation should be creative and demonstrate what you have learned throughout the project. Your presentation should be 8-10 minutes in length, include visual elements (graphics, pictures, etc.), be presented using a program such as PowerPoint or Prezi, and you should record yourself giving the presentation. Consider using screen capture programs such as JING or Screencast-O-Matic.

As a Speech

As it is in the other two options, your speech should be creative and demonstrate what you have learned throughout the project. Your speech should be 8 to 10 minutes in length and include a typed handout.

The Community Organization: Clearly indicate the focus of the organization and the community needs that the organization wants to address. A brief historical background of the organization should also be included.

  • Discuss any community partnerships that they have. Suggest additional partnerships that you feel they should have.
  • Explore how the cross-cultural challenges and humanitarian considerations are involved.
  • Demonstrate how the organization uses volunteers and the economic benefits associated with this (not just “free labor”).
  • Illustrate any roadblocks that the organization has faced or potential could face and how they did or might find solutions.
  • Describe the organization’s vision for the future.
  • Indicate what areas in which you feel the organization could improve. What challenges (technological, political, economic, laws and regulations, community-based initiatives, educational, etc.) will they need to overcome?
  • Discuss potential ways you might be able to contribute to the organization. How could your own interests, talents, and skills benefit this organization?

Research:

  • You will need to include a minimum of ten (10) sources to support your project claims.

Writing:(General Education Capstone)

  • Title your Project
  • Introduction: Begin with the attention-getter, tie in the background information, and end the introduction with your thesis.
  • Body:
    • Clearly identify the topic of each section. The topic must be a statement, not a question, and should begin with your own ideas and your own words.
    • After identifying your topic, use quotations or paraphrase from your sources to help illustrate the point you are making (be sure to identify the author(s) and source(s)).
    • After you have given support, spend a sentence or two explaining how the example(s) support the section topic.
    • A compilation of your research, your literature review, your methods, (how the data was collected or generated and analyzed), and your results should be included in the body of your project.
  • Conclusion:
    • Restate your thesis.
    • After stating your thesis, restate the topics from each of your body sections and emphasize what is important for your audience/readers to remember.
    • End your conclusion with a call to action that illustrates what your audience/readers should do with the information you presented.

Note: You will have the opportunity to revise and perfect this project, but you should do your best to make each step as complete as possible so you can receive more relevant and constructive feedback from your instructor and your peers.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Advancing Healthcare Quality Improvement

/in , , /by

Advancing Healthcare Quality Improvement: Strategies and Implementation

(Advancing Healthcare Quality Improvement)

Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers. Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer, Take Reference From (2013-2018) If Is Possible, Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One. SUSTANTIVE POST NEEDED

Comment 1

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) is taken very serious at my organization, as I am sure it is taken serious at my fellow classmates facilities. CQI is a quality management process that encourages the health care team members to continuous ask “how are we doing” and “can we get better” (Moran, 2012). CQI is for the safety and education of the patients and staff members. We report out each morning about 30-day readmissions in house or patients at high risk for a 30-day readmit. We have a team that identifies the trends of the readmission predictors in order to identified patients currently in house at high risk for 30-day readmission. After the identification of the high risk patients, a structured discharge plan is put in place. Education on the disease process and discharge instructions is immediately started with the patient and care givers. Outside resources are immediately identified, such as home health and hospice, and the patient is given the patient choice form to pick the company that they would like to use on discharge. On discharge, the patient will know their disease process and how to manage at home. The patient will state what medications they are taking and what they are taking them for.
The patient will also state what time of day the medication is due. The patient will receive a phone call within forty eight hours after discharge from the hospital to make sure the patient continues to understand all discharge instructions and medications.

Comment 2

Continuous quality improvement, CQI, is a viewpoint or attitude for evaluating processes and improving them to attain customer satisfaction (Huber, 2014). CQI focus in healthcare is usually related to improving patient outcomes (Conner, 2014).

There is no delaying that hospitals need to deal a brand in today’s medical world. I can speak for the organization where our brand is high-quality care at low cost. A part of growing a brand that delivers high-quality care consistently it is vital to continue to maintain an emphasis/focus on identified quality improvement initiatives. To create a hospital culture supportive of quality improvement, respondents stressed the importance of hospital leadership being in the vanguard to engage nurses and other staff. As a representative of an accrediting organization said, “For any quality improvement project to be successful, the literature shows that support has to trickle down from the top (Draper, Felland, Liebhaber, & Melichar, 2008).

The chief nursing officer, CNO, is passionate about the delivery of high-quality care, she talks about it each month at nursing leadership, and it is a constant in my staff meeting minutes. It is vital that we empower the nurses who are delivering the care at the front line to buy into initiatives. We have encouraged staff to participate in hospital-wide performance improvement and report out our progress as a healthcare system in unit councils.

One example of how we are applying CQI in our current practice is through our CAUTI initiative. We have developed an education package for the staff which was accompanied by a nurse-driven protocol for patients that have a foley. If we have a patient who comes through the emergency department, they need to meet specific criteria before a foley can be inserted. We have seen great successes in this project, and the results have been extremely positive.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Practicum: Week1 Journal Entry

/in , , /by

Practicum: Week1 Journal Entry

(Practicum: Week1 Journal Entry)

As a future advanced practice nurse, it is important that you are able to connect your classroom experience to your practicum experience. By applying the concepts you study in the classroom to clinical settings, you enhance your professional competency. Each week, you complete an Assignment that prompts you to reflect on your practicum experiences and relate them to the material presented in the classroom. This week, you begin documenting your practicum experiences in your Practicum Journal.

                                                                  The Assignment 

In preparation for this course’s practicum experience, address the following in your Practicum Journal:

· Select one nursing theory and one counseling theory to best guide your practice

in psychotherapy.
Note: For guidance on nursing and counseling theories, refer to this week’s 

   Learning Resources. 

· Explain why you selected these theories. Support your approach with evidence-

based literature.

· Develop at least three goals and at least three objectives for the practicum

experience in this course.

· Create a timeline of practicum activities based on your practicum requirements.

NOTE: THE Practicum Journal Template (Word document) IS ATTACHED WITH 

                THIS ASSIGNMENT.

                                                     Learning Resources

Required Readings

Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Springer.

  • Chapter      11, “Group Therapy” (pp. 407–428)

Nichols, M. (2014). The essentials of family therapy (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

  • Chapter 1, “The Foundations of Family Therapy” (pp.      1–6)
  • Chapter      2, “The Evolution of Family Therapy” (pp. 7–28)

Breeskin, J. (2011). Procedures and guidelines for group therapy. The Group Psychologist, 21(1). Retrieved from http://www.apadivisions.org/division-49/publications/newsletter/group-psychologist/2011/04/group-procedures.aspx

Khawaja, I. S., Pollock, K., & Westermeyer, J. J. (2011). The diminishing role of psychiatry in group psychotherapy: A commentary and recommendations for change. Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 8(11), 20–23. Retrieved from http://innovationscns.com/

Koukourikos, K., & Pasmatzi, E. (2014). Group therapy in psychotic inpatients. Health Science Journal, 8(3), 400–408. Retrieved from http://www.hsj.gr/medicine/group-therapy-in-psychotic-inpatients.php?aid=2644

Lego, S. (1998). The application of Peplau’s theory to group psychotherapy. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, 5(3), 193–196. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2850.1998.00129.x

McClanahan, K. K. (2014). Can confidentiality be maintained in group therapy? Retrieved from http://nationalpsychologist.com/2014/07/can-confidentiality-be-maintained-in-group-therapy/102566.html

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2014). HIPAA privacy rule and sharing information related to mental health. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/special/mhguidancepdf.pdf

                                                        Required Media

Sommers, G., Feldman, S., & Knowlton, K. (Producers). (2008a). Legal and ethical issues for mental health professionals, volume 1: Confidentiality, privilege, reporting, and duty to warn [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!