I already did ( # 1-c , and # 1- D ) Do the rest and its in the attachment, do the rest

Instruction:

1. Think of a familiar room or space from your childhood.
   1. Make a list of at least 10 things in the space.
   2. In paragraph form, as though writing a story, describe the room to a reader.
   3. Draw a rectangle on your paper. The top of it is upstage, the bottom is down stage. To the right is stage left, to the left side is stage right. Place US, DS, SL and SR where appropriate next to the lines.
   4. Sketch in items in your room/space (benches, beds, tvs, firplaces and most importantly – doors in and out)
   5. Write a stage note/assignment of what we see when curtain rises as though in one of the plays you read. “the curtain rises to reveal character A’s bedroom. Twin size bed SL covered with clothes. On SR is a flatscreen tv…etc.”

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Irrespective of the size of the business, every organization will encounter an incident that will impede its operation. Still, organizations often operate as if it is invincible to significant disasters or damage and will often have inadequate response policies and practices that address its social responsibility to the community or its workforce. With this in mind, research the 21st Century Oncology Company security breach that occurred in 2015.

Briefly introduce the organization and its security breach incident. Was this a preventable or unpreventable event? Why, or why not. Did the organization’s corporate culture in how it handled its information security practices, and procedures cause the incident to occur? Explain. What aspect of the organization failed that lead to the event? Was it an internal or external failure, or both?

After the incident occurred, what aspect of the organization’s contingency plan was underdeveloped, or not developed that could have addressed the aftermath of the situation – the incident response plan, disaster recovery plan, business continuity plan, or a combination of a few of these plans? Elaborate on your response. Consider the organization’s social or environmental responsibilities. Did the organization do enough to address the damage and effect it had, if either was affected?

If you were responsible for the organization’s Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery planning efforts, what would you have done differently after the event? Why do you believe that your direction would have worked? Elaborate on your response.

Instructions

Scenario Paper Requirements

The scenario papers are not opinion compositions, or a book, chapter, or article review. These papers are positional arguments that are entirely supported by empirical evidence and well-known industry facts. You can include your personal experiences and ideas if it directly relates to the topic, or reinforces your position. However, you must support all statements with evidence. All submissions must adhere to APA guidelines. APA writing is an academic standard; therefore, it is not optional, it is mandatory.

Submissions argue a position based on real-world scenarios and must:

1. Be a scholarly submission

a. Include a title page b. Times New Roman font, 1-inch margin, and double-spaced

2. Be at least two pages in length. a. Your paper must briefly introduce the problem, answer the proposed questions using a logical flow, incorporate materials from the course textbook, include any directly related experience you may have, if applicable, and have a conclusion. b. Because these assignments are short in length, it should not consist primarily of bullet-points. Use fully developed sentences and paragraphs to articulate your thoughts. c. These assignments are not book reviews, article summaries, or opinion pieces. It is a positional proposal or argument on a topic that is supported by empirical facts. i. The page count does not include the title or reference pages

3. Reference page a. Use at least six academic journals or reputable industry resources to support your work to include in-text citation. i. You CANNOT use Wikipedia, LinkedIn articles, blogs, paid vendors, certification websites, or similar sources in academic writing. You CAN use reputable industry articles from publications similar to ComputerWeekly, PCMag, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, or similar sources. Academic journals and popular industry articles are accessible in the university’s library databases and Google Scholar. All references should not have a publication date older than 2005.

4. Be written in a clear and concise manner a. Proofread your work to ensure that it is free of grammatical, contextual, and spelling errors.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

To Prepare:

To take the Assessment, visit http://walden.gallup.com. Using the Guidance Document Resource(s) for the Strengths Finder Assignment, follow the instructions for setting up an account. If the link does not work, please copy and paste the link into your web browser.

• Once you have completed your assessment, you will receive your “Top 5 Signature Themes of Talent” on your screen.
• Click the Download button below Signature Theme Report, and then print and save the report. We also encourage you to select the Apply tab to review action items.

Note: In grading every required paper, your Instructor uses an Assignment Rubric. Review the Rubric prior to completing your assignment.

To complete assignment:

• Take the Gallup’s StrengthsFinder assessment, and get your results. Then, reflect upon them, and respond to the following questions in your paper.

Submit a 4- to 5-page paper (not including title page and references), to include the following:

1. Title page
2. Section headers for each of the following required sections:

• What were your top five identified themes?
• Describe a challenge that you faced and how you used three of your top strengths to take action and reach a desired outcome.
• How can you use this understanding to add value to your role as a scholar practitioner?
• How will this understanding help you add value to your current or future organization?
• What will you do differently tomorrow as a result of this report?
• Describe your current motivations for pursuing your degree.
• Describe your personal goals and your vision as a public health or health education professional.

1. Cite the sources within your text where you refer to them, using APA format.
2. Include a reference list using APA format.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

After reading the chapter on Lifespan Development and watching this video:

http://www.pbs.org/video/frontline-being-mortal/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Please respond in essay form to the following questions:

-Have you ever had to cope with the loss of a loved one? If so, what concepts described in your textbook provide context that may help you understand your experience and process of grieving?

-Given the diversity of customs and norms between different cultures related to human responses to death, what do you think about the controversial removal of the “bereavement exclusion” by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – 5th Edition (DSM-5) (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). (Please read these two links:

• APA_DSM-5-Depression-Bereavement-Exclusion.pdf
• http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/major-depressive-disorder/debate-it-worth-saving-bereavement-exclusion-dsm-5 (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for an explanation of the controversy from both sides of the argument. In your paper explain whether you would have decided to keep the bereavement exclusion or not if you were on the DSM-5 Mood Disorders Work Group. Explain what led you to draw that conclusion and feel free to propose any solutions that you think could be used to better address the controversy.

Friendly reminder that, for further review of the information covered in this chapter, you may want to watch the video(s) from the Discovery Psychology video series related to the information in this chapter. Please see the “Discovering Psychology Video Series” announcement located under “Announcements” on the left side of your Canvas screen for the links and info regarding which video(s) correspond with which chapters in your textbook.

http://www.learner.org/resources/series138.html# (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• The paper was of sufficient length (i.e. one FULL pages; double spaced; 12 point font) (Students are free to write longer than one full page if they desire but it will not necessarily result in a higher grade (i.e. quality is more important than quantity.) Please note that “one full page” does not include the title page and the references page. (With those two pages included the paper should be at least three pages long.)		5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• The paper is well written in terms of spelling, syntax, grammar, punctuation, etc.		5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• The paper is written using APA writing style and at least your textbook is cited and listed on your reference page using APA style . (Please note that points will be lost if the student does not include an APA style title page and an APA style reference page where at least their textbook is listed. An abstract is not required for this paper.)		5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of issues: (Please see PDF entitled “Critical Thinking” posted under “Files” for explanation of this GELO grading criteria.)		5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence (Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion): (Please see PDF entitled “Critical Thinking” posted under “Files” for explanation of this GELO grading criteria.)		5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInfluence of context and assumptions: (Please see PDF entitled “Critical Thinking” posted under “Files” for explanation of this GELO grading criteria.)		5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStudent’s position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis): (Please see PDF entitled “Critical Thinking” posted under “Files” for explanation of this GELO grading criteria.)		5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions and related outcomes (implications and consequences): (Please see PDF entitled “Critical Thinking” posted under “Files” for explanation of this GELO grading criteria.)		5.0 pts
Total Points: 40.0

Next

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!