https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/module-8-three-cases-analysisemployment-law-original-work-only#:~:text=Module%208%20Three%20Cases%20Analysis/Employment%20Law%20Original%20Work%20Only
Please analyze the following three cases and answer the case questions. Below is a format of the analyze cases.
Case I
Ferrari vs. Ford Motor
Analyst Format
Facts
Legal Issues
Applicable Law
Holding
Reasoning
Case Questions Discussion
1. Under the direct method, what did Ferrari need to establish a disability under ADA? Was he successful? Why or Why not
2. What must Ferrari establish to succeed under indirect method? Is Ferrari able to establish a prima facie case of discrimination? Why or Why not
3. In your opinion, does Ford have enough evidence to show he is disabled? Does it matter that Ferrari’s disability is a result of an on-the-job accident? What type of policy might you develop to deal with this sort of situation?
Conclusion
Reference Page for all three cases
Case 2
Commonwealth v Hunt 45 Mass
Look up all three cases and write up in the following format
Facts
Legal Issues
Applicable Law
Holding
Reasoning
Case Questions Discussion
1. Why do you think it was necessary to dissolve the relationship between criminal conspiracy and labor movement? What was the relationship given by the court between criminal acts and employees’ rights to control their environment at work?
2. Why do you think the court found that there was some good in organizing to affect the employer’s policies? Explain
3. Do you agree with the court’s analysis in this case? Explain
Conclusion
Reference Page for all three cases
Case 3
Reich v Circle C Investments, Inc
Look up all three cases and write up in the following format
Facts
Legal Issues
Applicable Law
Holding
Reasoning
Case Questions Discussion
1. Does any of this case surprise you? Explain
2. If you were the club owner and did not want the dancers to be employees, often receiving this decision, how would you change things.
3. Do you think the dancers should have been considered employees? Why or why not
Conclusion
Reference Page for all three cases