Human Resources Assignment

is an individual assignment.  Read Ex3.2 (Goebel et al. v. Frank Clothiers; p.631) and complete Questions 2–5. The questions are listed on pages 633 and 634 in the textbook. You are expected to read relevant sections in Chapter 3 as you work on these questions. In the attachment, you will find information on what you are expected to learn from this exercise.

MGT367 Fall 2019

 

Exercise 3.2: Goebel et al. v. Frank Clothiers

 

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to analyze a case scenario.

Skills:

– Be able to determine adverse/disparate impact using the “four-fifth rule”

Knowledge:

Know when the “four-fifth rule” should be used

Know what to do (and not do) when disparate impact is evident

Task: The details of this exercise can be found on page 631 in the textbook. You should be

prepared to answer Questions #2–5 at the end of the exercise.

 

Criteria for Success: Students will need to be able to demonstrate their understanding of this exercise by

correctly answering the questions related to this exercise on the exam.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!