Non-State Actors & Intelligence

/in , , , /by

Non-State Actors & Intelligence

(Non-State Actors & Intelligence)

Assignment Instructions

Instructions: Please answer the two questions below with essay answers. Each essay answer should be 3 pages double-spaced in Times New Roman 12 Font (for a total of 6 pages double-spaced). Remember, you need to use Turabian style citation.

Question 1: Can all non-state actor threats be addressed unilaterally as a non-traditional threat to only one country? Do some of these non-traditional threats span borders and require international cooperation to counter the threat? If so, why? What problems might such cooperation bring?

Question 2: Review the following article:

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol35no2/pdf/v35i2a06p.pdf

What are the most important differences between the Kent and Kendall visions of intelligence? Why are these differences so important and worth discussing? Which vision might be most applicable today and why?

Question 1: Non-State Actor Threats and International Cooperation

I. Introduction

  • Define non-state actor threats (e.g., terrorism, cyber threats, transnational crime).
  • Briefly outline the importance of addressing these threats.

II. Unilateral vs. Multilateral Approaches

  • Discuss the concept of unilateral action and provide examples (e.g., a single country responding to cyber attacks).
  • Explore instances where unilateral actions may be effective.
  • Define multilateral cooperation and its importance in addressing cross-border threats.

III. Cross-Border Nature of Non-Traditional Threats

  • Provide examples of threats that span borders (e.g., human trafficking, climate change).
  • Explain why some threats require international cooperation (e.g., shared intelligence, resources).

IV. Challenges of International Cooperation

  • Discuss potential problems such as:
    • Differing national interests and priorities.
    • Legal and political barriers.
    • Issues of sovereignty and trust between nations.
    • Coordination of actions and responses.

V. Conclusion

  • Summarize the key points made.
  • Restate the importance of a balanced approach to addressing non-state actor threats.

Question 2: Kent vs. Kendall Visions of Intelligence

I. Introduction

  • Introduce the concepts of Kent and Kendall’s visions of intelligence.
  • State the significance of these visions in the context of modern intelligence operations.

II. Overview of the Kent Vision

  • Describe Kent’s focus on the analytical aspect of intelligence.
  • Emphasize the importance of understanding the context and implications of intelligence.

III. Overview of the Kendall Vision

  • Discuss Kendall’s emphasis on the operational side of intelligence.
  • Highlight the importance of actionable intelligence and real-time data.

IV. Key Differences Between Kent and Kendall

  • Compare and contrast their views on:
    • The role of intelligence in policy-making.
    • The balance between analysis and operational effectiveness.
    • The relationship between intelligence and other governmental functions.

V. Relevance of Differences Today

  • Explain why these differences are critical in today’s context (e.g., complexity of modern threats).
  • Discuss which vision is more applicable in the current geopolitical landscape and why.

VI. Conclusion

  • Summarize the importance of both visions in understanding intelligence operations.
  • Reflect on the need for a nuanced approach that considers both perspectives.

Additional Tips

  • Use Turabian style for citations; make sure to include footnotes or endnotes as required.
  • Incorporate scholarly sources to support your arguments.
  • Be sure to proofread for clarity and coherence.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!