Ethical Perspectives on Technology
Ethical Perspectives on Technology
(Ethical Perspectives on Technology)
Answer must be at least 300 words, double-space 12pt Time New Roman
Consider the following scenario, and descsribe how a Utilitarian, Deontologist, and a Virtue ethicist would approach this delimma, noting any differences in their approach and conclusion:
You’ve just taken a job running the IT department for a small school system in rural Wisconsin. The computers are out of date , and currently running Windows 95, which limits what the 2,500 students are able to fo online. There are 100 computers that need to be upgraded to Windows 10, but the school system can’t afford to pay the $20,000 to buy the software licenses for each computer.
You, however, have a personal copy of Windows 10, and know how to copy it to each machine without buying individual licences. If you did this, it would violate the software agreement you made with Microsoft when you bought your personal copy (promising not to install it on other machines), and Microsoft would lose $20,000 in revenue. (Microsoft had $90 billion in revenue last year; the $20,000 would represent 0.00002% fo that total revenue).
Responce.
Ethical Analysis of the IT Dilemma
Utilitarian Approach:
A utilitarian would assess this dilemma by focusing on the consequences of the action. Installing Windows 10 on all 100 computers without proper licenses would significantly benefit the 2,500 students by enhancing their learning opportunities, access to modern educational tools, and preparing them for future technological demands. The harm to Microsoft, losing $20,000 out of $90 billion in revenue, would be negligible in comparison. From a utilitarian perspective, the greatest good for the greatest number would justify copying the software illegally, as the net benefits to society (improved education) outweigh the minor financial loss to a large corporation. The conclusion would likely be to proceed with the installation.
Deontological Approach:
A deontologist would focus on the morality of the act itself, rather than the consequences. Copying and installing Windows 10 without proper licenses directly violates the contractual agreement with Microsoft and constitutes theft. This action breaches the ethical duty to uphold agreements and respect intellectual property rights. Regardless of the potential benefits to the students, a deontologist would argue that breaking the law and violating ethical principles cannot be justified. The conclusion would be not to install the software unlawfully and instead explore legal alternatives, such as seeking grants or donations.
Virtue Ethics Approach:
A virtue ethicist would consider the character and moral virtues demonstrated by the decision-maker. Copying the software might be seen as dishonest, undermining virtues like integrity and respect for the law. However, failing to address the students’ needs could be viewed as neglecting virtues like compassion and responsibility. A virtue ethicist might seek a balanced solution that aligns with both honesty and care for the students, such as negotiating with Microsoft for discounted licenses or organizing a community fundraiser. The conclusion would aim for a creative, ethical resolution that fosters virtuous character.
