Evaluating Flexible Budget Variances
Evaluating Flexible Budget Variances
(Evaluating Flexible Budget Variances)
flexible budget variances
The questions are found in the text of unit 6 reading material which can be found at the bottom of page 395 and top of 396 .Please cite sources and use some outside scholarly sources.
1. Static versus flexible budget variances) Answer all questions posed by Case ATC 8-1.
2. Why is it important to investigate both price (rate) and volume (efficiency)variances when rewarding employees for satisfactory work when performance evaluations are based on meeting budgets?
3. What are some qualitative consideration that might be helpful in employee performance evaluations?
(Evaluating Flexible Budget Variances)
1. Static vs. Flexible Budget Variances (Case ATC 8-1)
The key difference between static and flexible budget variances is that a static budget is set at the beginning of the period and remains fixed, whereas a flexible budget adjusts based on actual levels of activity. In Case ATC 8-1, the static budget variance reveals the difference between the budgeted and actual results for a fixed level of activity, while the flexible budget variance adjusts for changes in the volume of output, making it more adaptable for performance evaluations. By comparing both variances, managers gain insights into cost control and efficiency, highlighting areas where costs were either saved or overspent based on actual performance (Horngren, Datar, & Rajan, 2015).
2. Importance of Investigating Price (Rate) and Volume (Efficiency) Variances
When rewarding employees, it’s essential to examine both price (rate) and volume (efficiency) variances to understand the root causes of any budget discrepancies. A price variance occurs when the cost per unit of input differs from what was expected, often due to purchasing or usage deviations. Volume (or efficiency) variances, on the other hand, occur when the amount of input used to produce a given level of output varies from expectations. Investigating both variances allows management to accurately attribute outcomes to employee performance rather than uncontrollable factors like fluctuating market prices. This detailed analysis supports fair and constructive feedback for employees and informs decisions on salary adjustments, bonuses, or promotions (Drury, 2013).
3. Qualitative Considerations in Employee Performance Evaluations
In addition to quantitative measures, qualitative factors play a critical role in comprehensive performance evaluations. Some qualitative considerations include:
- Leadership and Teamwork: An employee’s ability to lead projects or work well within a team is crucial, as these traits often enhance overall productivity and morale. Even if the budget goals are unmet, strong leadership and collaboration can contribute positively to long-term performance.
- Adaptability: Employees who demonstrate flexibility and adaptability, especially in response to unforeseen challenges, add significant value. This is particularly important in dynamic industries where market and operational conditions can shift unexpectedly.
- Problem-Solving Skills: Employees who actively identify and address inefficiencies or risks are valuable, as they contribute to continuous improvement within the organization.
- Customer Satisfaction: For roles that involve client interaction, customer satisfaction and retention are essential qualitative measures that reflect an employee’s contribution to business sustainability and reputation (Latham & Locke, 2018).
Evaluating these qualitative aspects, alongside financial metrics, provides a well-rounded view of employee performance that can lead to fairer and more effective evaluations.
References
- Drury, C. (2013). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.
- Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2015). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson.
- Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2018). Goal setting and performance management in the public sector. Routledge.
