Nursing Scholarly Assignment: Description of the Theory of Pain
Nursing Scholarly Assignment: Description of the Theory of Pain
(Nursing Scholarly Assignment: Description of the Theory of Pain) Introduction
Discuss the historical background of theories of pain mechanisms
Analysis of the underpinning for the theory of pain – discuss the analysis of the underpinning for the theory of pain. Theoretical or background work that has been done in the field that will support formation or creation of theory.
Applications of the theory of pain – explain how the theory is used in practice
Suggestion for additional research – discuss the need for additional research
Conclusion – all resources correctly referenced
MUST USE SIX CURRENT SCHOLARLY REFERENCES off CINAHL Complete Database, MEDLINE Complete Database, LIRN and EBSCO HOST
Capstone project
Write 2-3 pages applicable to your capstone project. Identify the stakeholders (use fictitious names for stakeholders) that will play a major part with your study and integrate with your project.
Topics to include:
Roles of stakeholders
Identify your stakeholders – are they supportive to your project?
List of stakeholders who will be interested in the results of your project
Promoting stakeholder participation
Possible concerns/barriers from stakeholders
Strategies that you will use to gain support and assistance from your stakeholders
Expectations
US sources and topic is (nurse retention).
Length: 2-3 pages
Format: APA 7th ed.
Research: At least one peer reviewed reference within the last 5 years
Moral and ethical dilemmas
It is challenging to engage in meaningful discussions with patients when moral and ethical dilemmas present themselves.
How we engage with our patients can have a profound impact on the care they receive and the decisions they make. The following exercise will present you with moral and ethical dilemmas common to many clinical practices.
The moral and ethical challenges here are often ones the practitioner will have strong, personal feelings about. Your task in this exercise is to serve as the practitioner advocate for the patient by engaging in dialog that does not project personal bias or prejudice while also providing the patient with the medical information needed to make an informed, personal decision. As you choose your responses, try to use one of the ethical decision-making models we’ve explored to systematically evaluate each dilemma and choose the best way to engage the patient in dialog.
The following questions refer to your experience in this week’s exercise, Conducting Moral and Ethical Dialog in Clinical Practice. Describe your overall experience with the moral and ethical dialog exercise, and address at least three (3) of the following:
Did you find any of the scenarios more difficult to deal with than others?
Did you feel any internal conflict with any of the scenarios?
How did your personal and professional background impact how you decided to interact with the patient?
Do you feel the responses the patient gave to the practitioner’s response were reasonable or typical?
Were you taken aback by any of the patient reactions?
How might this activity contribute to your role as a nurse advocate in a moral and ethical practice?
Did you utilize an ethical decision making model to explore a systematic way to evaluate any of these ethical dilemmas? If so, describe the effectiveness.
