Theories Of Inquiry

Theories Of Inquiry

Theories of inquiry encompass various philosophical perspectives on how knowledge is acquired and validated. Empiricism posits that knowledge arises from sensory experience, emphasizing observation and experimentation. Rationalism asserts that reason and logic are the primary sources of knowledge, independent of sensory experience. Constructivism suggests that individuals construct knowledge based on their subjective experiences and interpretations. Pragmatism focuses on the practical consequences of beliefs, advocating for methods that produce useful outcomes. Postmodernism challenges the notion of objective truth, emphasizing the role of power dynamics and cultural influences in shaping knowledge. Each theory offers unique insights into the nature of inquiry and knowledge, shaping methodologies across disciplines such as science, philosophy, and education. Ultimately, the choice of theory influences how researchers approach questions, gather evidence, and evaluate findings, contributing to the ongoing dialogue about the nature and pursuit of knowledge in human understanding.

Theories Of Inquiry

Please find attached feedback from the Instructor based on the previous assignments

Directions:

Reflect on the feedback provided by your instructor on the draft of the 10 Strategic Points that you previously completed. Integrate that feedback as well as your own new ideas into a revised draft the 10 Strategic Points for the potential dissertation research study.

Resources

1. 10 Strategic Points

Familiarize yourself with this document found in the DC Network under the Research/Dissertation tab. You will be completing this document as you progress in the dissertation process. This document will be expanded to become your dissertation.

https://dc.gcu.edu/

1. Insight, Inference, Evidence, and Verification: Creating a Legitimate Discipline

Morse, J. M. (2006). Insight, inference, evidence, and verification: Creating a legitimate discipline. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1-7.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=21331314&site=ehost-live&scope=site

2. Pursuing Excellence in Qualitative Inquiry

Gergen, K. J. (2014). Pursuing excellence in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Psychology, 1(1), 49-60. doi:10.1037/qup0000002

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2014-07617-006&site=ehost-live&scope=site

3. Qualitative Inquiry in the History of Psychology

Wertz, F. J. (2014). Qualitative inquiry in the history of psychology. Qualitative Psychology, 1(1), 4-16. doi:10.1037/qup0000007

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2014-07617-002&site=ehost-live&scope=site

4. The Promises of Qualitative Inquiry

Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., & Freeman, M. (2015). The promises of qualitative inquiry. American Psychologist, 70(1), 1-9. doi:10.1037/a0038597

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2015-00137-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!