Case Study: Ethical Consultation (Solved)

/in , , , , /by

Case Study: Ethical Consultation (Solved)

A local shelter that receives funding from the National Institute of Health and Mental Health is upgrading its website. Along with several upgrades to the website, the web developer/consultant makes a suggestion that the shelter add a testimonial page where local citizens can describe their positive interactions with the shelter and its services. Since the web developer/consultant want to get that page up and running first, the developer suggests using some positive ratings and responses from Angie’s List® and other similar ratings sites that already have positive stories and experiences with the shelter Case Study: Ethical Consultation (Solved).

The director of the shelter loves the idea of a testimonial page. She thinks it would really add to the community feel of the shelter. However, knowing her funding source, she researches the APA Ethics Code and believes the shelter would be acting inappropriately. To discuss the matter in further detail, the director of the shelter calls you for an ethics consult.

Adapted from: http://www.ethicalpsychology.com/2012/06/vignette-14-psychology-of-advertizing.html

In 500-750 words, explain the advice you would give:

  1. Describe the ethical issues involved in this situation.
  2. Discuss any other concerns about the web developer/consultant’s strategies.
  3. Explain some recommendations that you would make to the shelter.

Use two to three scholarly sources to support your claims.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

GEN499: General Education Capstone (Solved)

/in , , , , /by

GEN499: General Education Capstone (Solved)

Question description (GEN499: General Education Capstone (Solved))

Final Research Project

The topic of your project needs to be a contemporary societal problem, such as healthcare reform, immigration reform, privacy rights, euthanasia, First Amendment Rights, stem cell research, capital punishment, corporate prisons, legalizing drugs, ageism, animal rights, cloning, prayer in schools, racial profiling, recycling/conservation, sexism, outsourcing jobs, workplace bullying, etc. The topic must focus on a single aspect, as in “How far do corporations intrude into the private lives of their employers?” or “The social costs of financing the distribution of custom-designed drugs.” You may suggest another topic to use, but the instructor must approve the topic during the Week Two Discussion.

The Final Research Project will present research relating the responsibilities of a critical thinker to contemporary society. In this assignment, you will do the following:

  • Research one aspect of a contemporary social problem.
  • Define the problem.
  • Propose a possible solution for the problem.
  • Create an argument that supports your thesis position. You should take on the perspective of a critically thinking researcher. The argument must present a thesis statement and evidence to support the thesis statement.
  • Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from the position you take on the issue and explain how those outcomes would influence society and culture.
  • Interpret statistical data from at least two peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
  • Evaluate evidence using the following standards: validity, reliability, and bias related to the chosen topic and accurately identify strengths and weaknesses.

Research and Define the Problem
You must take on the perspective of your major field of study and explain in your paper what that perspective is and how it informs your view of the topic. The topics listed above are far too broad to write about in 10–12 pages (3,300–3,900 words). Instead, you must choose a narrowly defined thesis and approach it from the perspective of your field.

Example: If you are an economics major, and you are interested in immigration reform, you should approach a very specific aspect of immigration reform through the lens of economic theory and practice. A specific thesis question would not be, “How does illegal immigration influence the U.S. economy?” One could write thousands of pages on such a topic. Instead, a better question would be, “How do illegal immigrant hotel workers in Chicago impact the economy of Northern Illinois?” You would then want to do the research and determine the positive and negative impacts they have, ultimately trying to conclude how illegal immigration in this area should be approached ethically.

How to Hone Your Thesis: It is important that you start your research early in this course. Try to find the most important contemporary questions and theories in your field of study and then align the most important questions with a very specific aspect of the general topics above. For example, if you are a psychology major, you might want to start thinking within the realm of healthcare reform or aspects of mental health and criminality in the prison system (GEN499: General Education Capstone (Solved)).

Your Argument
You must present a complete argument, including a major claim with at least five points of evidence, information, or data that will prove the claim.

  • The thesis statement must be
    • A clear, simple declarative sentence as the first or last sentence in the opening paragraph of the essay.
    • Of such a nature that it can be substantiated, corroborated, verified, and proved through appeal to primary or secondary academic research source materials.
  • The introductory paragraph must
    • Present the thesis statement, an explanation for the importance of the topic, and its relation to the student’s field of study.
  • Beliefs, opinions, and personal opinions must not be introduced at any point in the essay.
  • All beliefs and opinions should be supported with academic evidence. Sweeping generalizations with no supporting academicevidence do not reflect adequate critical thinking skills.
  • Do not include rhetorical questions in your essays. All the questions that are pertinent to your project need to be answered in your essay and your answers again need to be supported with evidence from peer-reviewed journal articles and academically published books.

Attributes of Good Critical Thinking in Papers

  • Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue.
  • The evidence that you use should come from high-level researchers engaged in your field of study.
  • Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly.
  • Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue.
  • Your paper should point out the limitations of current evidence and attempt to indicate areas for future research.

Ethical Outcomes of the Position You Take
After you have defined the problem and created an argument about how one ought to respond to the issue, you need to explain the ethical outcomes of the position you have taken. This should again be in relation to the field of study in which you are working. There might be different ethical outcomes that result from your analysis. For example, going back to the example issue above, from an economic standpoint, illegal immigrants might contribute positively to the economy of Northern Illinois in a specific number of ways. Thus, an economist who believes that positive impact to the economy is the greatest good would say that one should promote the use of illegal immigrants. However, because these workers are often paid less than others and eliminate jobs that could be done by residents of Chicago, there could be other negative ethical outcomes that would outweigh the positive impacts to the economy. It is your goal to draw out the ethical implications of your thesis and explain the underlying rationale that is the foundation for your claim that one action is better than another.

  • Critical thinkers are those who can outline the positive and negative ethical impacts of their positions. In addition, they are able to provide a rationale for why they believe a specific position is the right position, even when it leads to negative outcomes.
  • Critical thinkers are also able to be honest and objective about the limitations and gray areas that pertain to their theses.

Final Research Project Requirements
The Final Research Project may be presented as a formal research paper (essay format), a PowerPoint presentation, a video, or a podcast equivalent to a minimum of 10 – 12 pages in APA format (approximately 3,300 – 3,900 typewritten words, excluding title page and reference pages). Written essays must adhere to all APA formatting standards and requirements, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (GEN499: General Education Capstone (Solved))

PowerPoint presentations must include the full text (at least 3,300 words) in the speaker notes portion of the slides, with appropriate citations, and full reference pages. PowerPoint presentations must adhere to the basic principles of PowerPoint presentation design and must include citations and references according to APA standards and requirements.

Videos and podcasts must include a full transcript, in APA format, including appropriate in-text citations and a references page.

Quotations:
There must be no more than 15% quoted content in the body of your essay. All quoted material must bear quotation marks and a full quotation citation.

Source Documents:

  • There must be 10 or more source documents used, cited, and referenced.
  • Multimedia sources (such as videos) may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. If multimedia sources are used, then they must be authored and distributed by credible sources, such as universities, law schools, medical schools, or professors, or found in the Ashford University Library.
  • Where print documents are used for source materials, those must be peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles, and academically published books. Popular media sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, television and radio shows, etc.) may not be used. Materials from advocacy groups (e.g., Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, National Organization for Women, etc.) may not be used.
  • Two of the peer-reviewed scholarly sources used must include statistical evidence, which must be accurately interpreted.
  • Sites such as ProCon.org and Wikipedia should not be used.
  • Religious texts are neither peer-reviewed nor scholarly and so may not be used in any way.

Summary Conclusion:
You must have a summary conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the project, presenting the major point of the essay and the evidence supporting that point.

Word Count:
The content body of the project must be 3,300 words or more. The word count does not include anything in the title page, running header, or reference list. It is expected that you meet all logistical requirements of this paper.

Reference List:

  • The list of references must include only those source documents that are cited within the body of the project.
  • The project must fully comply with APA formatting standards and requirements as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center: title page, running header with page numbers, font face and size, line spacing, citations, and reference page(s).
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Child and Adolescent Development: Community Center Proposal

/in , , , , , /by

Child and Adolescent Development: Community Center Proposal (Solved)

Question description (Child and Adolescent Development: Community Center Proposal (Solved))

Last week we began working on the creation of the Community Child Development Center proposal by developing activities to promote physical development. In this week’s discussion, you have added to that by focusing on activities and toys that promote cognitive development. In this assignment, you will begin to create the overarching structure of your proposal. The focus of this outline to is to present as clear a picture as possible of your proposal so that you may receive feedback which will guide you as you create your final project. Please refer to the Final Project guidelines for more information on the Final Project as you prepare the outline of your proposal. Using the PSY 104 Community Center Proposal Template, you are to identify all of the activities and objects for each of your five rooms. Remember that you have already completed three activities in week two, and your discussion this week will add an additional activity and a toy. Be sure to incorporate those elements into your outline! You do not have to flesh out the details; the outline will just provide the blueprint for where you are heading. Remember that each room must contain two activities and one toy or object. Each room must address physical, cognitive, and psychosocial development. In addition, each room must address at least one theme. The outline can be formatted in bulleted points like this:

Paragraph 1

  • Identify the activity (all you need here is the title of the activity)
  • Identify the theory and/or research you will use to support the use of this class or activity (i.e Piaget’s formal operations, Erikson’s psychosocial development, etc) You only need to identify it in the outline—not explain it yet
  • Identify which developmental domain(s) this activity supports (physical, cognitive, and psychosocial)

Paragraph 2

  • Identify the activity (all you need here is the title of the activity)
  • Identify the theory and/or research you will use to support the use of this class or activity (i.e Piaget’s formal operations, Erikson’s psychosocial development, etc) You only need to identify it in the outline—not explain it yet
  • Identify which developmental domain(s) this activity supports (physical, cognitive, and psychosocial)

Paragraph 3

  • Identify the item
  • Identify the theory and/or research you will use to support the purchase of this item

Paragraph 4

  • Identify which theme(s) this room addresses: health and well-being, families and parenting, education, culture, and gender. Here are samples of how you might do that in your proposal.

The Community Child Development Center Proposal Outline

  • Must be three to four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages).
  • Must use at least one scholarly source in addition to the course text.
    • The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

(Child and Adolescent Development: Community Center Proposal (Solved))

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Quality and Sustainability Paper Part Two: Analysis and Application (Solved)

/in , , , , /by

Quality and Sustainability Paper Part Two: Analysis and Application (Solved)

Question description (Quality and Sustainability Paper Part Two: Analysis and Application (Solved))

Details:

The Quality and Sustainability Paper is a practice immersion assignment designed to be completed in three sections. This is part two of the assignment. Learners are required to analyze the quality outcomes and/or patient safety measures of a health care entity to determine its successes and failures, identify potential obstacles to the implementation of the measures, and determine what collaborative efforts are needed to create sustainability

  1. (Quality and Sustainability Paper Part Two: Analysis and Application (Solved)

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that you support your position by referencing at least six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Write a 1,250-1,500 word paper that provides the following:

  1. Identify or create a health care entity. (Provide an overall description of this entity without using the real name; i.e. location, size, profit or nonprofit, years in operation). Do not give the real name of any entity or person you are describing.
  2. Using defined quality outcomes and/or patient safety measures, describe the health care entity’s successes and failures. Include identified criteria and data that demonstrate why this entity is successful and in what areas.
  3. Using the quality outcomes data, identify a quality or safety area that nursing science can impact. Describe the specific variables.
  4. Identify potential obstacles that may hinder the implementation of the quality or safety measure.
  5. Identify those groups or leadership roles within the entity with whom you may need to collaborate. (Quality and Sustainability Paper Part Two: Analysis and Application (Solved)
Quality and Sustainability Paper Part Two – Analysis and Application 

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%		 2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%		 3
Satisfactory
79.00%		 4
Good
87.00%		 5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
5.0 %Completed Changes and Corrected Errors to Subsequent Paper, Including Transitions for a Scholarly Paper Learner did not attach previous paper and did not make changes as indicated. N/A Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate transitions to connect the ideas between the papers Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate better transitions to connect the ideas between the papers. Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner has includes all necessary transitions to create a scholarly paper.
15.0 %Description of Health Care Entity and Identification of Successes and Failures A heath care entity is not described; the success and failures are not identified. A heath care entity is identified, but a description is not provided. Quality outcomes or patient safety measures are not utilized to identify the success and failures. Criteria and data are not used to substantiate why the entity is successful. A heath care entity is identified and an overall description is provided, but many significant details are missing. The quality measures or patient safety measures utilized fail to accurately identify the successes and failures for the health care entity. Criteria and data do not fully substantiate why the entity is successful, or in what areas. A heath care entity is identified and described, including relevant details. Quality outcomes and /or patient safety measures are utilized to identify the success and failures. Criteria and data are presented that help substantiate why the entity is successful in certain areas. A heath care entity is identified with details that provide insight into the organization. Quality outcomes or patient safety measures clearly define its success and failures. Very detailed criteria and data are presented to substantiate why the entity is successful, and in what areas.
20.0 %Identification of Quality or Safety Measure That Nursing Science Can Improve, and Analysis of Supporting Data Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is not identified. Analysis of data is not performed. Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is suggested, but analysis of data is not performed. Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is presented, but analysis of data does not completely support claim. Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is presented. Analysis offers support, but more explanation is required to fully demonstrate how data supports claim. Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is presented. Analysis is thorough and the data presented supports claim. A very good explanation of the how the data supports the claim is provided.
10.0 %Identification of Potential Obstacles to Implementation of Quality or Safety Measures Potential obstacles that may hinder implementation of quality or safety measures are not identified. Potential obstacles are identified, but a correlation to how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is not established. Potential obstacles are identified, but a correlation to how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is unclear. Potential obstacles are identified. A correlation to how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is generally established. Potential obstacles are identified. A correlation of how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is clearly established and shows insight.
10.0 %Identification of Stakeholders and Leaders Needed for Collaboration Stakeholders needed for collaboration are not identified. Stakeholders needed for collaboration are referenced, but no groups or leaders are identified. Stakeholders needed for collaboration are identified, but the roles of the groups or leaders in the implementation are unclear. Stakeholders needed for collaboration are identified, and the roles of the groups or leaders in the implementation are generally discussed. Stakeholders needed for collaboration are identified, and the roles of the groups or leaders in the implementation are generally discussed.
10.0 %Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations None of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are present. Not all required elements are present. One or more elements are missing, or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more references is questionable. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
 

 

Resources

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311975.2022.2157975

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Case Study: Clinical Supervision

/in , , , /by

Case Study: Clinical Supervision

(Case Study: Clinical Supervision)

Clinical supervision is a structured process where experienced healthcare professionals guide less-experienced practitioners to enhance their skills, ensure patient safety, and maintain ethical standards. It fosters professional growth through reflection, feedback, and support, promoting evidence-based practice and improving patient outcomes within a collaborative learning environment.

Assignment 2: Case Study: Clinical Supervision

For this assignment, you will refer to the Course Case Study. Reread the case study, looking specifically at issues related to clinical supervision. Examine the ACA’s ethical guidelines related to the issue of supervision in Section F and answer the following questions:

  • Explain the ethical issues related to the supervisor.
  • Explain the ethical issues related to the supervisee/student.
  • Examine the influence of your own personal values as it relates to the issues presented in the case.
  • Compare the violations to the APA’s ethical standards and describe the similarities or differences in the ethical code using the following websites:
    • www.apa.org
    • www.counseling.org
  • Imagine you are a member of the ACA ethics committee. Describe the recommendations you have for the supervisor.
  • Describe the recommendations you have for the supervisee/student.

Save the paper as AU_PSY430_M4_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc and submit it to the M4 Assignment 2 Dropbox by Wednesday, September 9, 2015. Your response should be at least 2 pages long.

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Described the ethical issues related to the supervisor.
10
Described the ethical issues related to the supervisee/student.
10
Explained how your own personal values relate to the issues presented in the case.
20
Compared the ethical standards of the APA and the ACA to analyze the differences and similarities.
20
Described recommendations for the supervisor.
10
Described recommendations for the supervisee/student.
10
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
20
Total:
100
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Child Welfare Case Analysis

/in , , , /by

Child Welfare Case Analysis

(Child Welfare Case Analysis)

Assignment 2: LASA: Analysis of Human Services of an Abuse Scenario

In this assignment, you will be introduced to a real-world case that requires a high-level analysis of theoretical, ethical, and legal factors to explain how an abused child should have been handled by the human services agency. This exercise will demonstrate the types of cases that are common in human services. You will learn how to approach such types of cases from necessary perspectives that always need to be considered by a human services worker.

Tasks:

In this assignment, you will read a scenario, analyze its legal and ethical implications, and discuss options to address the human services needs. Consider the following scenario.

You are working in a human services agency that provides diagnostic services and residential placement to youth in the court system. A female Italian immigrant teenager was placed in this center by Children and Youth Protective Services due to suspected sexual abuse by her father. The agency conducted an assessment on the child to determine the effects of the suspected abuse on her functioning, provided her with a safe environment for twelve weeks, during which time she was allowed supervised visitation with her father, and encouraged her to trust the staff members. During this period, her case went to trial and was dismissed despite strong indications of sexual abuse. The court ruling was based largely on the results of the assessment conducted by the agency professional in addition to the client’s activity in residential placement, including visitation with her father during that period of time. As a result, the agency lost its funding for residential placement. Therefore, the girl was returned to her home the following week.

Apply scholarly theory, practice, and ethics to write an 8- to 10-page paper that includes the following:

  • Identify the legal and ethical obligations to both the girl and the father.
  • Identify the multiple levels of system failure in this case.
  • Discuss the distinction between the legal justification for the release of the girl and the ethical problems with such actions. In your discussion, explain how an individual human services provider might come to deal personally with such a conflict.
  • Identify the cultural considerations needed when working with this family.
  • Describe the original or historical intent of child welfare systems in caring for vulnerable children.
  • Discuss to what extent the agencies have fulfilled their responsibilities to their mission and the original intent in creating such agencies.
  • Propose two to three culturally and legally appropriate strategies that may be provided to the girl that will address her human services needs.

Submission Details:

  • By Monday, January 4, 2016, prepare an 8- to 10-page report. Your response should rely upon at least three sources from professional literature. This may include the Argosy University online library resources, relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu, .org, or .gov). Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA format); and use accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
  • Save your report in a Microsoft Word document with the name M5_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc, and upload it to the M5 Assignment 2 LASA Dropbox.

This LASA is worth 300 points and will be graded according to the following rubric.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Evaluating Counseling Skills Effectively

/in , , , /by

Evaluating Counseling Skills Effectively

Evaluating Counseling Skills Effectively

Assignment 1: Peer Critique of Final Interview Session

In this module, your facilitator will assign you the submissions of two students whose final interview papers you will review and critique. Read each file and make notes of o the interactions of the client and the student therapist along with the feedback and summary reports.

Critique as follows:

  • The engagement of the client at the beginning of the session
  • One use of attending
  • One use of paraphrasing
  • One instance of reflecting a feeling
  • One instance of expressing empathy
  • The summarizing at the end of the session

Express your feedback by showing how the client reacted in the notes of the therapist and in the client’s feedback.

In this way, you’ll be providing objective feedback about the results of the skills as evidenced the reports of both the therapist and the client.

Submit your critiques in two to three paragraphs to the M7: Assignment 1 Dropbox and the Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Name your file SP6104_M7_A1_lastname_firstinitial.doc.

Read and review the critiques submitted by others to gain a broad perspective of counseling skills and client responses. Contribute to the discussion by drawing conclusions from the critique results through the end of the module. All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

Assignment 1 Grading CriteriaMaximum PointsProvided feedback about the effects of the counselor on engaging the client by the client’s response.8Provided feedback about the effects of the counselor’s use of attending by describing the client’s response.8Provided feedback about the effects of the counselor’s use of paraphrasing by describing the client’s response.8Provided feedback about the effects of the counselor’s reflecting the client’s feeling by describing the client’s response.8Provided feedback about the effects of the counselor’s expression of empathy by describing the client’s response.8Provided feedback about the effects of the counselor’s use of summarizing at the close of the session by describing the client’s response.8Participated in the discussion by drawing conclusions about the broad range of results of counselor behaviors.8Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.4Total:60

 

The engagement of the client at the beginning of the session

It seems to me that at the beginning of the session the client was a bit reluctant to go see the therapist and was a little uncomfortable doing so. In my opinion the client seems very nervous by using the phrase “um” so much.

One use of attending

You could tell that the therapist was listening because I the middle of the session as the client is telling his story the therapist is saying ok and nodding his head as to show that he is understanding what is being said. For future sessions I feel that the client could be a little more verbal when responding to what the client had to say. This might make the client more comfortable in opening up.

One use of paraphrasing

To me this was a very good example of paraphrasing. You were about to restate what the patient said into your own words.

ME: Ok.  So, Andy, with all that I’m hearing, between the football, classes and grades, and going out, it really does sound like there are a lot of time management concerns.  Is that correct?

One instance of reflecting a feeling 

A feeling that I noticed was consolation, the advice that was given to the client was something that made them feel better after they’ve been discouraged about coming and opening up.

ME: Ok.  I’m really glad this is helping you, Andy.  You know, together we can work towards ways of managing the time you have and creating a less stressed environment.

One instance of expressing empathy

In my opinion there was a lack of empathy when the client decided to open up there was never really a part that built that bridge.

In my opinion the therapist should have let the client know that there are a very large number of student athletes that are going through some of the same difficulties ironing out these issues

The summarizing at the end of the session

I feel that the full summary of the session and the issues of the client where covered very accurate and very well written.

ME: So, to summarize today, we’ve gone over your grades and that additional tutoring might help, the pressure of school along with football is accumulating and currently your outlet is going out drinking but it could be fishing, and your girlfriend had you come in here to talk with someone, even if this is something that at first you may have felt reluctant to.  Does that sound about right?

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Healthcare Information Systems Impact

/in , , , /by

Healthcare Information Systems Impact

(Healthcare Information Systems Impact)

Question description

Information systems in healthcare: data integrity, legal and ethical implications, writing homework help

Information Systems in Healthcare Paper Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to select a topic related to information systems in healthcare from the list provided, research and analyze the topic, and describe how you will apply your newfound knowledge to your nursing practice.

Course Outcomes(Healthcare Information Systems Impact)

This assignment enables the student to meet one or more of the following Course Outcomes depending upon the topic selected:

CO#1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO#1)

CO#2: Analyze data from all relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care. (PO#2)

CO#3: Define standardized terminology that reflects nursing’s unique contribution to patient outcomes. (PO#3)

CO#4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO#4)

CO#5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO#5)

CO#6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO#6)

CO#7: Examine the use of information systems to document interventions related to achieving nurse sensitive outcomes. (PO#7)

CO#8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO#8)

Rubric See RUBRIC BELOW

Topics(Healthcare Information Systems Impact)

Select ONE of these topics for the focus of your paper:

Standard terminologies (CO3, CO8)

Decision-making support tools (CO4, CO8)

Patient education technology (CO5, CO8)

Data integrity, legal and ethical implications (CO7, CO8)

Directions

1.You are to research, analyze, and write an APA-formatted scholarly paper about the topic that you have selected.

2.Write an introduction that defines and describes the topic. Address what purpose the topic serves and how it impacts the delivery of healthcare in general, and nursing care in particular. Keep in mind that APA guidelines state you are not to use the heading of “Introduction,” but you should include it at the beginning of your paper.

3.Search for scholarly sources and relevant websites. Include a minimum of two scholarly sources. The course textbook does not qualify as a scholarly source. Cite all sources in the body of the paper and include them in the References list following proper APA formatting.

4.Provide one example of this topic. Describe the main features or aspects of the example with support from your sources.

5.Describe an experience where the topic impacted you personally, either when you were receiving health care, or when you were providing nursing care. Relate one positive aspect or one negative aspect of this experience and how it could have been improved.

6.Write a conclusion that summarizes the topic, purpose and how your newfound insight will influence your nursing care.

7.Use Microsoft Word to develop your paper. Use APA formatting. Refer to the Publication manual of the APA, 6th edition. Review the various APA documents included in this course and the Chamberlain Care Student Success Strategies (CCSSS) that can help you with your writing. Take advantage of the tutoring services that are available to Chamberlain students for free.

8.The length of the paper should be a maximum of 4-5 pages, excluding the title page and the reference page. There should only be one small quote maximum in the paper. Citations should primarily include summary and restatement.

RUBRIC

Healthcare Information Systems Impact

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

(Define and describe the topic, its purpose, and its impact on healthcare and nursing care.)
Introduces and describes the topic in depth, its purpose, and its impact on healthcare and nursing care.

25.0 pts

 Introduces and describes the topic in fair depth and detail, its purpose, and its impact on healthcare and nursing care.

22.0 pts

 Introduces and briefly describes the topic, and its impact on healthcare or nursing care.

20.0 pts

 Does not adequately introduce or describe the topic, or minimally describes impact on healthcare or nursing care.

10.0 pts

 Does not introduce or describe the topic, and/or does not describe impact on healthcare or nursing care.

0.0 pts
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Topic Examples

(Provide one example of your topic. Describe the main features or aspects of the example.)
Provides one outstanding example that exemplifies your topic. Describes the main features or aspects of the example in depth.

50.0 pts

 Provides one appropriate example that relate to your topic. Describes the main features or aspects of the example in some detail.

44.0 pts

 Provides one example that relates to your topic. Describes the main features or aspects of the example briefly.

40.0 pts

 Provides one correct example but inaccurately describes the example.

19.0 pts

 Does not provide an example.

0.0 pts
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Personal Experience

(Describe a personal or work-related experience with the topic. Relate one positive or one negative aspect of this experience, and how it could have been improved.)
Describes a personal or work-related experience that is an excellent example of the topic. Relates one positive or one negative aspect of this experience, and how it could have been improved.

50.0 pts

 Describes a personal or work-related experience that generally relates to the topic. Relates one positive or one negative aspect of this experience, and how it could have been improved.

44.0 pts

 Describes a personal or work-related experience that somewhat relates to the topic. Relates one positive OR one negative aspect of this experience, but does not describe how it could have been improved.

40.0 pts

 Minimally describes an experience that generally relates to the topic. Fails to describe positive or negative aspects of this experience or how it could be improved.

19.0 pts

 Fails to describe, an experience, or describes one that does NOT relate to the topic.

0.0 pts
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

(Write a conclusion that summarizes the topic, purpose and how your newfound insight will influence your nursing care.)
Clearly summarizes the topic including its definition, purpose and how what you have learned will influence your nursing care.

25.0 pts

 Summarizes the topic including its definition, purpose, and how what you have learned will influence your nursing care.

22.0 pts

 Fairly summarizes the topic including its definition, purpose, and how what you have learned affects your nursing care in the future.

20.0 pts

 Minimally summarizes the topic but fails to include its definition, purpose, OR what you have learned that will influence your future nursing care.

10.0 pts

 Fails to summarize the topic. Omits the definition, and impact on your nursing care.

0.0 pts
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Supporting Evidence

(Locate, cite, and reference a minimum of two relevant scholarly sources of evidence that indicate an information search has been conducted. The textbook does not qualify as a scholarly source. One scholarly source must be a peer-reviewed journal article.)
Locates, cites, and references a minimum of TWO relevant scholarly sources of evidence that indicate an information search has been conducted. The textbook is not a scholarly source. One source must be a peer-reviewed journal article.

25.0 pts

 Locates, cites, and references a minimum of TWO relevant scholarly sources of evidence that indicate an information search has been conducted. The textbook is not a scholarly source.

22.0 pts

 Locates, cites, and references a minimum of ONE relevant scholarly source and the textbook as evidence that indicates an information search has been conducted.

20.0 pts

 Locates, cites and references only ONE relevant source of evidence that indicates an information search has been conducted. The source is not necessarily scholarly.

10.0 pts

 Fails to locate relevant sources, or there is no indication that an information search has been conducted.

0.0 pts
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Writing and APA Format

(• Title page, running head, and page numbers.
• Include an introduction, body, and conclusion/ recommendations sections (Level 1 headings) that are clearly labeled. There is a logical flow.
• Page count met of 4-5 pages maximum, excluding the title page and reference page.
• Only one small quote maximum was included. Uses summary and restatement primarily for citations.
• Grammar, punctuation, paragraphing, and sentence structure are correct.
• Body of the paper includes properly formatted in-text citations, and the reference page includes properly referenced sources that were cited in the paper in APA format.
• Evidence of spelling and grammar check.)
• Title page, running head, and page numbers. • Sections include an introduction, topic examples, personal experience, and conclusion. • Level 1 headings used appropriately • Each section has at least three sentences. • Grammar, punctuation, paragraphing, and sentence structure are correct. • Citations throughout demonstrate support of student’s ideas and opinions. • Reference page includes all sources and no errors in format. • Meets page requirements- 4-5 page maximum, excluding title and reference pages. • Only has one small quote in the paper. Uses summary and restatement primarily for citations. • Evidence of spell and grammar check.

25.0 pts

 • Minimal error in APA title page, running head, or page numbers noted. • Sections include an introduction, topic examples, personal experience, and conclusion. Level 1 headings may or may not be used appropriately. • Minimal errors in grammar, spelling, paragraphing, punctuation, and/or sentence structure noted. • Citations are present but not in correct format. • References are present, with minimal errors in format. • Meets page requirements- 4-5 page maximum, excluding title and reference pages. • Only has one small quote in the paper. Uses summary and restatement primarily for citations.

22.0 pts

 • Some errors in APA title page, running head, and/or page numbers noted. • Sections indicated, but level 1 headings not used. • Some errors in grammar, paragraphing, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence structure noted. • Citations are present but not in correct format. • References are present, with some errors in format. • Does not meet page requirement for assignment. • Some indication of errors within document. • Has one-two small quotes in the paper. Uses summary and restatement primarily for citations.

20.0 pts

 • Multiple errors in APA formatting. • Multiple grammar, spelling, paragraphing, and punctuation errors noted. • Citations are incorrectly formatted. • References are incorrectly formatted. • Little evidence of proofreading prior to submitting paper. • Does not meet page requirements. • Uses more than two quotes in the paper. Does not meet guidelines.

10.0 pts

 • Many errors in APA formatting. • Many grammar, spelling, paragraphing, and punctuation errors noted. • Citations are missing. • References are missing. • No sign of proofreading prior to submitting paper.

0.0 pts
25.0 pts
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Comprehensive Research Paper Submission

/in , , , /by

Comprehensive Research Paper Submission

(Comprehensive Research Paper Submission)

Assignment 1: LASA 2: Final Project: Final Research Paper

Submit your final research paper to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned. It should include a cover page, abstract, intro/lit review, method section, results (simply report what statistics you propose to use), discussion section, and reference page.

Your final paper should be double-spaced, 8 to 10 pages in length, and properly edited.

Please use the following information to help you with each section:

  1. Cover page: Pay attention to APA style and refer to the example in your textbook.
  2. Abstract: Is written on its own page and is a very brief summary of your study. Think in terms of one sentence stating your research question, one or two sentences regarding background and what we already know about it, one or two sentences regarding your methodology (e.g., how many participants were used and how were your variables assessed), and one or two sentences about your findings.
  3. Intro/lit review: incorporate the feedback and make revisions to the introduction and literature review submitted in Week 4.
  4. Method section: incorporate the feedback and make revisions to the Method section submitted in Week 4.
  5. Results section: in one paragraph, state what statistical test would have been used and why it was chosen.
  6. Discussion section: broken down into the following paragraphs:
    • paragraph 1: statement of your results/findings (or what you imagine might be your results).
    • paragraph 2: what might have affected those results (i.e., threats to internal and external validity). Include flaws in your design and confounding variables.
    • paragraph 3: implications for your findings including the significance and impact on the field as well as future research directions.
  7. Reference page: Pay attention to APA style and refer to the example in your textbook.

Assignment 1 Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

Abstract: Clear and concise review of most important components of the research study. Met the required word count.

44

Literature review: Convincing evidence is given that a thorough review of literature was completed and  a variety of sources (at least 4) are appropriate and directly used to support hypothesis

44

Methods: Clear understanding of participants for research study

20

Measures or Instruments: Measures/instruments used in research study are identified and accurate.

20

Procedure: Procedures for research study are identified and accurate.

20

Ethical Issues: Presentation of possible ethical issues and solutions is clear and convincing and present APA ethical guidelines.

36

Results and Discussion section: Anticipated results, flaws, Implications for results, Future directions

52

Writing Components (20% of LASA 2 grade)

Organization (16 points): Introduction, Thesis, Transitions, and Conclusion.

Usage and Mechanics (16 points): Grammar, Spelling, and Sentence structure.

APA Elements (24 points): Attribution, Paraphrasing, and Quotations.

Style (8 points): Audience, and Word Choice.

64

Total:

300

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Showcasing Psychology Program Mastery

/in , , , /by

Showcasing Psychology Program Mastery

(Showcasing Psychology Program Mastery)

 

Psychology Work

Final Project

For your Final Project, you will create a website that showcases the skills you have gained throughout your psychology program.  Your website will consist of the following elements: a homepage, a literature review, expert opinions, résumés, a case study, and a list of pertinent websites.  Each of these sections will be its own tab on the website.  When complete, you may choose to use this website after graduation as a means to showcase your abilities to potential employers and/or graduate schools.

To begin, review the elements required for each section of your website below.

Next, visit the Wix.com (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. website to familiarize yourself with this technology.  Scroll down on the webpage and click the pink arrow to view a quick tour video of the website platform.  Note: This site is best viewed using either the Chrome or Firefox web browsers.  Refer to the Wix.com Quick-Start Guide (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.for step-by-step instructions on setting up your website.

Wix_com_Quick_Start_Guide.pdf

If you experience any technical difficulties, please visit the Wix Support Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. The technical support offered through your Student Portal will not be able to assist you with the Wix website.  When you are ready to create your website, click the Start Now button to register and begin building.  If you are unable to utilize the Wix platform to complete this assignment and you have already watched the tutorial, read through the Wix.com Quick-Start Guide, and contacted the Wix Support Center, please contact your instructor.

(Showcasing Psychology Program Mastery)

It is highly recommended that you complete any and all written work in a separate document first and then cut and paste the required content into your webpage. This will allow you to edit and save your work separate from the website, should anything occur which causes the website to fail.  Additionally, you will be able to work on your content without having to remain connected to the internet and it may be easier to develop and edit your content in Word, prior to publishing it on your website.

Sections of the Final Project will be completed within the course weeks and will be revised for inclusion in this project. Carefully review all suggestions and comments from the instructor and/or your classmates before including that work within the content of your website.

Clearly label the website as your course project. Although it will not be searchable to the general public, it will be publicly available and anyone who is given your specific site link will be able to view it.

Copy and paste the URL to your website into a Word document for submission. Once you have received your final grade for this course, you have the option of deleting this website through your account with Wix.com.

Creating the Website(Showcasing Psychology Program Mastery)

The website:

  • Must be named with the following convention: your last name + PSY496 Final Project. Example: Smith PSY496 Final Project.
  • Must include six tabs with the following headings and information. Watch the screencast video below to assist you with setting up your required tabs.
  1. Home Page
    Briefly introduce yourself and provide information regarding your professional background. Summarize your experiences within the Psychology program at Ashford University and what you hope to do upon graduation. You may include a professional photograph as well.
  2. Literature Review
    • Create a brief literature review that presents a fair and comprehensive analysis of relevant literature pertaining to the topic you chose in Week One. This page must include the following:
      • A brief introduction of the topic and its relevance (300 to 500 words).
      • Three to five peer-reviewed articles based on applied psychological research. Each of the articles must directly relate to your chosen topic.
      • A one- to two-paragraph (500 to750 words total) analysis and summary for each article.
      • A reference list at the bottom of the page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  3. Expert Opinions
    • Begin with the work you completed for the Mental Health Disciplines discussion in Week Three. In this section, you will demonstrate your awareness of the psychological career alternatives in a community setting and take on the role of two experts in different fields of psychology.  You will also evaluate contributions of psychological research in the applied context of these experts and discuss methodological issues unique to their areas of psychological research.
    • Take into consideration the comments your classmates and your instructor made on your discussion post.
    • Include information from at least two peer-reviewed articles of your choosing that were published within the last five years to substantiate your experts’ claims.  The sources may not be any of those that are listed within this course.  For information on how to generate search terms for specific resources, visit the Ashford University Library website.
    • Make any necessary changes to your presentation and create a new oral video presentation using a screencast program such as Jing and Screencast-O-Matic. You may also use YouTube or a voiceover PowerPoint saved as a video file with audio. Using the instructions on the Wix.com platform, embed the video of your oral presentation (screencast or video) in the Expert Opinions page of your website. As an alternative to embedding your video, you may copy and paste a working URL on the Expert Opinions page.
  4. Résumés
    • Begin with the work you completed for the Develop Professional Résumés assignment in Week Three. Based on the feedback from your instructor, make the recommended changes to the résumés you created for the two experts from the Presentation by Experts discussion in Week Three and the Expert Opinions web page you created.
      Next, create your own professional résumé, that includes brief descriptions of the major duties associated with any relevant work experience you have.
      Your résumé should appear first on the page followed by the résumés you created for the experts.
    • To begin constructing your personal résumé, utilize the Resume Builder tool provided by Ashford University. This will allow you to create drafts of your résumé so that you may revise and refine your assignments before submitting them. Because your final project will be available for public viewing, do not include your actual personal contact information (i.e., address, phone number, email).
    • To utilize this tool:
    • Log into the Ashford University Student Portal
    • Click on Job Search & Resume Builder link under Career Services
    • Go to the My Documents Tab
    • Select the Resume Builder Tab
    • Create, save and edit these résumés to meet your assignment guidelines.
  5. Case Study
    • Begin with the work you completed for the Case Study: Evaluating Ashford University Institutional & Program Outcomes assignment in Week One.
    • Review the feedback you received from your instructor and then create a case study that takes on the role you did not pursue.
    • If you used your own story or that of a willing volunteer for the original assignment, then you will create a case study for a fictitious character.
    • If you created a character for the case study in the original assignment, then you will use your own story or that of a willing adult volunteer.
    • In this section, you will:
      • Create a 750- to 1000-word case study of a real (either yourself or a willing adult volunteer) or fictitious person who has developed the competencies of their academic program at Ashford University.
      • Evaluate your real or fictitious person’s learning within the program as it contributes to the overall attainment of the institutional outcomes.
      • Include at least one personal life example and one career example of applying the competencies to resolve personal challenges and an ethical dilemma (e.g., a client or research subject reveals compromising information about a friend or family member who also happens to be someone you know in a personal/social context).
      • Create or describe a scenario in which the person wrestles with an issue related to the assigned research topic in her or his personal and/or professional life. Be specific in your discussion of the scenario and provide details demonstrating professional problem solving on the part of the person in your case study.
      • Include a section wherein your fictitious person or you articulate a personal point of view, evaluate evidence, determine options for responding and evaluate the pros and cons of the options prior to making a decision about a course of action within the scenario.
      • Conclude with how the problem was resolved and what the person learned while at Ashford University that assisted in an effective resolution.
  6. Websites
    • Create an annotated list of 10 to 12 reputable, professional websites (e.g., government agencies, professional organizations, professional associations…) that are relevant to psychological research and practice. Commercial or non-academic websites may not be used for this assignment.
    • Consider the merits of each website.  Based on your knowledge of scholarly applications of psychological research, evaluate the use of scholarly applied psychological research and analyze the interpretations that are presented on each site.  For information on how to evaluate web resources, visit the Ashford University Library website.
    • The list should be in alphabetical order with each website cited according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
    • The annotations should be four to five sentences long and reflect the relevance and usefulness of each website in terms of your topics of psychological research and your professional needs.

In addition, your website must:(Showcasing Psychology Program Mastery)

  • Include a footer with the date submitted (in Copyright section).
  • Address the topics of each page with critical thought.
  • Use the number of peer-reviewed sources listed with the instructions for each web page.
  • Document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Include a separate reference section at the bottom of each web page, for the sources used on that page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!