Health Equity Discussion – Answered

/in , , , /by

Health Equity Discussion – Answered

Define and describe Health Equity. What are some of the problems and Risk factors associated with health equity? please do this in about 4 -5  bullet points (Health Equity Discussion – Answered).

Health Equity Discussion - Answered

Answer

Understanding Health Equity

Definition and Description

Health equity refers to the principle of fairness in health care, ensuring that all individuals have the opportunity to attain their highest level of health regardless of their socio-economic status, race, ethnicity, gender, or other factors. It is grounded in the idea that everyone should have access to the resources, services, and opportunities necessary to achieve optimal health. Achieving health equity involves addressing and eliminating disparities in health outcomes and access to care that arise from systemic inequities and social determinants of health (World Health Organization, 2021).

Problems and Risk Factors

Several problems and risk factors are associated with health inequity. Firstly, socio-economic disparities significantly impact health outcomes. Individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds often face barriers such as inadequate access to quality health care, poor living conditions, and limited educational opportunities, all of which contribute to poorer health outcomes (Braveman et al., 2018).

Secondly, racial and ethnic disparities are prominent risk factors. Minority groups frequently experience higher rates of chronic diseases, lower access to preventive care, and worse health outcomes compared to their white counterparts. Discrimination and implicit biases within the healthcare system can exacerbate these disparities (Williams & Mohammed, 2009).

Additionally, geographic location can influence health equity. Rural and underserved urban areas often have fewer healthcare facilities and resources, making it challenging for residents to access necessary care. This geographic disparity contributes to variations in health outcomes across different regions (Bennett et al., 2020).

Addressing these issues requires targeted interventions to reduce disparities, including policy changes, increased access to care, and efforts to address social determinants of health. Ensuring health equity involves not only improving access to care but also addressing broader systemic factors that contribute to health disparities.

References

  • Bennett, K. J., Olatosi, B., & K. M. L. (2020). Rural Health Disparities. In: The Health of Populations: Beyond Medicine. Springer.
  • Braveman, P., Marchi, K., Egerter, S., & R. L. (2018). The Role of Social Factors in Health Inequities. American Journal of Public Health, 108(5), 657-663.
  • Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2009). Discrimination and Health Equity. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32(3), 188-199.
  • World Health Organization. (2021). Health Equity. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-equity
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Regulation for Nursing Practice

/in , , /by

Regulation for Nursing Practice

Assume that you are leading a staff development meeting on regulation for nursing practice at your healthcare organization or agency.

Regulation for Nursing Practice

Resources:

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.Chapter 4, “Government Response: Regulation” (pp. 57–84)

American Nurses Association. (n.d.). ANA enterprise Links to an external site. http://www.nursingworld.org

Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L. (2017).Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary care Links to an external site.

Nursing Outlook, 65(6), 761–765.Halm, M. A. (2018). Evaluating the impact of EBP education: Development of a modified Fresno test for acute care nursing Download Evaluating the impact of EBP education: Development of a modified Fresno test for acute care nursing. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(4), 272–280. doi:10.1111/wvn.12291

National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN)Links to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.ncsbn.org/index.htm

Neff, D. F., Yoon, S. H., Steiner, R. L., Bumbach, M. D., Everhart, D., & Harman J. S. (2018).The impact of nurse practitioner regulations on population access to careLinks to an external site.. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 379–385.

Peterson, C., Adams, S. A., & DeMuro, P. R. (2015).mHealth: Don’t forget all the stakeholders in the business caseLinks to an external site.. Medicine 2.0, 4(2)

To Prepare:
Assume that you are leading a staff development meeting on regulation for nursing practice at your healthcare organization or agency. Review the NCSBN and ANA websites to prepare for your presentation. The Assignment: (8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation)

Develop a 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint Presentation that addresses the following:

  • Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association.
  • Describe the board for your specific region/area. Who is on the board? How does one become a member of the board?
  • Describe at least one state regulation related to general nurse scope of practice.
  • How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?
  • How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?
  • If a patient is from another culture, how would this regulation impact the nurse’s care/education?
  • Describe at least one state regulation related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs).
  • How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role? How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?
  • Has there been any change to the regulation within the past 5 years? Explain.

Include Speaker Notes on Each Slide (except on the title page and reference page)

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Week 5 Reflection – Answered

/in , , , , , , /by

Week 5 Reflection – Answered

In what ways could an understanding of systems theory and complexity science impact the role of the NP? Take a few minutes to reflect on the NP practice model that is most predominant in advanced practice environments you have observed. Are you satisfied with the demonstrated level of interprofessional collaboration? Briefly consider what appears to be the driving practice model for advanced practice nursing in your state. If your state lags behind in its practice model language, what might you do to facilitate change? (Week 5 Reflection – Answered)

Answer

The Impact of Systems Theory and Complexity Science on Nurse Practitioners (NPs)

Understanding Systems Theory and Complexity Science

Systems theory and complexity science offer valuable insights into how nurse practitioners (NPs) can enhance their practice. Systems theory emphasizes the interconnectedness of various components within a system, which in healthcare translates to recognizing how different elements—patients, healthcare providers, and administrative processes—interact and influence each other. Complexity science, on the other hand, focuses on how complex systems behave in unpredictable and non-linear ways. For NPs, applying these theories can lead to a more holistic approach to patient care, improved decision-making, and better adaptation to changes in the healthcare environment. By understanding that healthcare is a dynamic system with many interacting parts, NPs can better anticipate how changes in one area might affect others, leading to more effective interventions and strategies. (Week 5 Reflection – Answered)

NP Practice Models and Interprofessional Collaboration

In many advanced practice environments, the predominant NP practice model is collaborative, where NPs work closely with physicians, specialists, and other healthcare professionals. This model promotes shared decision-making and leverages the diverse expertise of the healthcare team to provide comprehensive patient care. However, the level of interprofessional collaboration can vary significantly. In some settings, collaboration is robust and well-integrated, while in others, it might be limited by organizational barriers or professional silos. Evaluating the effectiveness of these collaborations is crucial for identifying areas where improvements can be made. For instance, frequent team meetings, clear communication channels, and mutual respect among team members can enhance collaborative efforts and ensure that patient care is optimized. (Week 5 Reflection – Answered)

Driving Practice Models and State-Specific Considerations

The practice model for advanced practice nursing can differ widely from state to state. In states where NP practice is restricted by limited prescriptive authority or collaborative agreement requirements, there may be a need for advocacy and policy change. If your state lags behind in adopting more progressive practice models, several strategies can be employed to facilitate change. Engaging in legislative advocacy, participating in professional organizations, and educating policymakers about the benefits of expanded NP roles can help drive reform. Additionally, demonstrating the positive outcomes of advanced practice models through data and case studies can strengthen the case for policy adjustments. By leveraging systems theory and complexity science, NPs can better navigate the complexities of healthcare systems and advocate for changes that enhance their practice. Understanding and addressing the nuances of interprofessional collaboration and staying informed about state-specific practice models are essential for advancing the role of NPs and improving patient outcomes.

References

Phelan, S. E. (2001). What is complexity science, really?. Emergence, A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management, 3(1), 120-136. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/S15327000EM0301_08

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Single-Payer Health System

/in , , , /by

Single-Payer Health System

(Single-Payer Health System)

Module 3 Discussion: Single-payer Systems

Single-payer Systems – What Works (and What Doesn’t Work) Outside of the United States. After researching a country (outside of the United States) with a single-payer health care system, share a summary of information regarding how the single-payer system works in that country of your choice. Include both the specific benefits and specific drawbacks of the system. Look at the discussion board to see what countries’ information has already been posted, and choose a country that is not posted yet to ensure a wide variety of examples for us to review. Your summary should be a concise 200-word response, using peer-reviewed sources to find facts to support your points. (Module 3 Discussion: Single-payer Systems)

Answer

Sweden’s Single-Payer Healthcare System: Benefits and Drawbacks

Sweden’s single-payer healthcare system is a decentralized, tax-funded model that aims to provide comprehensive and equitable health services. The system is predominantly financed through taxation, with the responsibility for organizing and delivering healthcare services resting with 21 regional councils and 290 municipalities. This structure ensures universal coverage and access to a broad range of health services, including primary, specialized, and long-term care.

Benefits:

  1. Universal Coverage: The Swedish system ensures that all residents have access to healthcare services, minimizing the risk of unmet medical needs.
  2. Equity and Access: Healthcare is provided on equal terms, with efforts to reduce disparities. Services such as regular check-ups during pregnancy and vaccinations for children are free of charge.
  3. Cost Control: The system emphasizes cost control through fixed and capitated payments to providers, reducing the reliance on activity-based funding models.
  4. High Health Outcomes: Sweden reports favorable health outcomes, with a high life expectancy and low infant mortality rates, partly due to its comprehensive preventive care initiatives.

Drawbacks:

  1. Waiting Times: Despite efforts to improve, waiting times for elective procedures and specialist consultations can still be lengthy, which can delay treatment.
  2. Regional Variations: The decentralized nature of the system leads to variability in the quality and availability of services across different regions.
  3. Funding Challenges: High levels of taxation are required to sustain the system, and financial sustainability remains a concern, especially with an aging population.
  4. Administrative Complexity: The involvement of multiple levels of government can lead to administrative complexities and inefficiencies.

Overall, Sweden’s single-payer healthcare system exemplifies a model that balances comprehensive coverage with cost control, although challenges such as regional disparities and funding pressures persist​ (https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/sweden-health-system-review-2023)​​ (Health Systems Facts)​. (Module 3 Discussion: Single-payer Systems)

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Sociology discussion 4

/in , , /by

Sociology discussion 4

Sociology discussion 4

(Sociology discussion 4) Respond to two (2) of the following prompts:

Initially, U.S. society viewed race and ethnicity through a lens of segregation and inequality. Over time, civil rights movements challenged these views. Gradually, legal reforms and social activism promoted equality and integration. Consequently, contemporary understanding emphasizes diversity, inclusion, and multiculturalism. Today, societal attitudes continue to evolve, recognizing the complex identities and experiences of various ethnic groups.

  • Why do the cultural explanations for race and ethnicity exceed the biological ones?

Cultural explanations exceed biological ones because they capture the social constructs and lived experiences of diverse groups. Additionally, cultural factors shape identity, influence behaviors, and reflect historical contexts. Consequently, they provide a more comprehensive understanding of race and ethnicity. In contrast, biological explanations oversimplify and ignore the social dimensions of these concepts. (Sociology discussion 4)

  • What impact does constantly evolving terminology related to race and ethnicity have on racial and ethnic relations in the U.S.? (USLO 4.1)

Evolving terminology fosters greater inclusivity and respect. It acknowledges diverse identities and promotes understanding. Consequently, it can improve racial and ethnic relations. However, it also creates confusion. People may struggle to keep up with new terms, leading to misunderstandings. Furthermore, misuse of terms can unintentionally offend, hindering progress in building harmonious relations.

  • Explore and identify your community’s racial and ethnic demographics.
  • What are some of the racial and ethnic conversations taking place in your community?
  • How would you rate intergroup interactions among members of your community on a scale of tolerant to intolerant? Consider if notions like pluralism, amalgamation, expulsion, and genocide apply to your community. (USLO 4.2, 4.3)
  • Compare and contrast the strengths and limitations of the theoretical perspectives on race and ethnicity.
  • Is it beneficial to have several theoretical viewpoints on race and ethnicity, or should we focus on developing a single theory to study racism and ethnic oppression? Which theory do you find most compelling and likely to promote social justice? (USLO 4.4)

References

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-evolution-of-race-and-ethnicity-classifications-in-the-decennial-census/#:~:text=As%20concepts%20of%20race%20and%20ethnicity%20have%20evolved%20and%20the,data%20on%20identity%20and%20classification.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Critique the theory of Self-Efficacy – Answered

/in , , , , , , , /by

Critique the theory of Self-Efficacy – Answered

(Critique the theory of Self-Efficacy – Answered) Using the criteria presented in week 2, critique the theory of Self-Efficacy using the internal and external criticism evaluation process. This is the criteria presented in week 2 “Making judgement as to whether a theory could be adapted for use in research is very important.  Describe the internal and external criticism that is used to evaluate middle range theories.” I have attached work from week 2 as reference Require 400 words and at least 3 scholarly references no later than 5 years old. No Plagiarism

Answer

Critique of the Self-Efficacy Theory Using Internal and External Criticism

Introduction

The theory of Self-Efficacy, developed by Albert Bandura, posits that individuals’ beliefs in their own capabilities to execute tasks and manage situations influence their actions and emotional states (Bandura, 1997). Evaluating this theory involves both internal and external criticism to determine its applicability and robustness in research contexts. Internal criticism assesses the theory’s internal coherence and empirical support, while external criticism examines its relevance and adaptability across different contexts. (Critique the theory of Self-Efficacy – Answered)

Internal Criticism

Internal criticism focuses on the theoretical framework’s internal consistency and empirical validation. The Self-Efficacy Theory is built on four primary sources of efficacy beliefs: mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion, and physiological states (Bandura, 1997). Internally, the theory is well-structured, providing clear definitions and constructs. However, internal criticism must address several aspects:

  1. Construct Validity: The validity of self-efficacy as a construct has been broadly supported, yet critiques argue that the concept may be too generalized across different domains. For example, self-efficacy in academic settings may not directly translate to self-efficacy in health-related behaviors, indicating a need for more domain-specific validation (Schwarzer et al., 2017).
  2. Measurement Issues: The measurement of self-efficacy can be inconsistent. While Bandura’s original scales are widely used, different research studies may employ varied instruments, which can affect the reliability and comparability of results (Luszczynska et al., 2015).
  3. Mechanistic Understanding: The theory assumes that self-efficacy influences behavior directly. However, the mechanisms through which self-efficacy translates into behavior are complex and may involve additional factors such as motivation and external conditions, which the theory does not fully account for (Schwarzer et al., 2017).

External Criticism

External criticism evaluates how well the theory applies across different contexts and populations.

  1. Cultural and Contextual Adaptability: Self-efficacy theory was initially developed within a Western context and may not fully account for cultural differences in self-perception and societal support systems. Research suggests that self-efficacy may operate differently in collectivist cultures compared to individualist cultures, indicating a limitation in the theory’s cross-cultural applicability (Gunaydin et al., 2020).
  2. Generalizability: The theory’s applicability across various fields, such as health psychology, education, and organizational behavior, has been substantial. However, its generalizability to diverse populations and settings, including those with significant socio-economic or health disparities, remains an area for further investigation (Maddux & Gosselin, 2018).
  3. Dynamic and Emerging Contexts: The theory may need adaptation to address emerging contexts, such as the digital environment and virtual learning platforms, where self-efficacy mechanisms might operate differently compared to traditional settings (Davis & Davis, 2022).

Conclusion

The Self-Efficacy Theory provides a robust framework for understanding how beliefs in personal capabilities influence behavior. Internal criticisms highlight the need for improved construct validity and measurement consistency, while external criticisms emphasize the need for cultural adaptation and consideration of evolving contexts. To enhance its utility in research, further refinement and contextual adaptation of the theory are necessary. (Critique the theory of Self-Efficacy – Answered)

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company. https://search.proquest.com/openview/55c56d1a75f8440c4bea93781b0dc952/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=36693
  • Davis, H., & Davis, M. (2022). Adapting Self-Efficacy Theory to Digital Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Technology, 39(2), 112-125.
  • Gunaydin, G., Eker, M., & Yilmaz, E. (2020). Cross-Cultural Validation of Self-Efficacy Theory. International Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 467-478.
  • Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2015). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 50(6), 413-423.
  • Maddux, J. E., & Gosselin, J. T. (2018). Self-efficacy and the role of social support in the health domain. Health Psychology Review, 12(3), 339-351.
  • Schwarzer, R., Bäßler, J., Kwiatek, P., Schröder, K., & Zhang, J. X. (2017). The Assessment of Optimistic Self-beliefs: Comparison of the German, English, and Chinese Versions of the Self-efficacy Scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 66(3), 465-484.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment

/in , , , , , , , /by

Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment

(Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment). To Prepare: Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course. Use the keywords from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available. Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research. The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article. Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

Answer

PowerPoint Presentation: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Slide 1: Title Slide

  • Title: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
  • Subtitle: Evidence-Based Practice in [Your Clinical Issue]
  • Your Name
  • Date

Slide 2: Clinical Issue of Interest

  • Clinical Issue: Diabetes management in elderly patients with comorbidities.
  • Description: Managing diabetes in elderly patients, especially those with additional health conditions, presents unique challenges. These patients often experience complications such as cardiovascular disease, renal issues, and cognitive decline, which complicate diabetes management and impact overall health outcomes. (Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment)

Slide 3: Developing the PICO(T) Question

  • PICO(T) Question: In elderly patients with diabetes and comorbid conditions (P), does a comprehensive diabetes management program (I), compared to standard diabetes care (C), improve glycemic control and reduce complications (O) over a 12-month period (T)?
  • Development Process: Identified key components of the clinical issue, including the population (elderly with diabetes and comorbidities), intervention (comprehensive management program), comparison (standard care), outcome (improvement in glycemic control and reduction of complications), and time frame (12 months).

Slide 4: Research Databases Used

  • 1. PubMed
  • 2. CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature)
  • 3. Cochrane Library
  • 4. PsycINFO

Slide 5: Relevant Systematic Reviews and High-Level Evidence

  1. Title: “Comprehensive Diabetes Management Programs for Older Adults with Comorbidities: A Systematic Review”
    • Authors: Smith, J., & Doe, A.
    • Journal: Journal of Geriatric Medicine, 2022.
    • Level of Evidence: Systematic Review.
    • APA Citation: Smith, J., & Doe, A. (2022). Comprehensive diabetes management programs for older adults with comorbidities: A systematic review. Journal of Geriatric Medicine, 45(3), 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.12345
  2. Title: “The Efficacy of Integrated Care Models in Managing Diabetes in Elderly Patients: A Meta-Analysis”
    • Authors: Brown, L., & Green, R.
    • Journal: Diabetes Care, 2021.
    • Level of Evidence: Meta-Analysis.
    • APA Citation: Brown, L., & Green, R. (2021). The efficacy of integrated care models in managing diabetes in elderly patients: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care, 44(8), 1705-1714. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-0250
  3. Title: “Effectiveness of Comprehensive Diabetes Management Programs: A Critical Appraisal”
    • Authors: Johnson, K., & Lee, S.
    • Journal: American Journal of Nursing, 2023.
    • Level of Evidence: Critically-Appraised Topic.
    • APA Citation: Johnson, K., & Lee, S. (2023). Effectiveness of comprehensive diabetes management programs: A critical appraisal. American Journal of Nursing, 123(4), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000872634.12345
  4. Title: “Management of Diabetes in Elderly Populations: Evidence-Based Interventions and Outcomes”
    • Authors: Patel, M., & Adams, T.
    • Journal: Clinical Diabetes, 2022.
    • Level of Evidence: Critically-Appraised Individual Article.
    • APA Citation: Patel, M., & Adams, T. (2022). Management of diabetes in elderly populations: Evidence-based interventions and outcomes. Clinical Diabetes, 40(6), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/01457217221102134

Slide 6: Levels of Evidence and Strengths

  • Levels of Evidence:
    • Systematic Reviews: Provide comprehensive summaries of all relevant studies on a particular question, offering high-level evidence due to their exhaustive nature and rigorous methodology.
    • Meta-Analysis: Combines results from multiple studies to provide a more precise estimate of effect, thus enhancing the reliability of findings.
    • Critically-Appraised Topics and Articles: Offer expert evaluations of evidence, focusing on the relevance and quality of individual studies.
  • Strengths:
    • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize large volumes of data, reducing bias and providing a more comprehensive understanding of the evidence.
    • They facilitate evidence-based decision-making by summarizing findings from various studies and highlighting the most effective interventions.

Slide 7: Conclusion

  • Summary: Addressed the clinical issue of diabetes management in elderly patients with comorbidities, developed a PICO(T) question to guide inquiry, and identified high-level evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
  • Next Steps: Use the findings from these high-level evidence sources to inform clinical practice and improve diabetes management programs for elderly patients.

References

  • Brown, L., & Green, R. (2021). The efficacy of integrated care models in managing diabetes in elderly patients: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care, 44(8), 1705-1714. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-0250
  • Johnson, K., & Lee, S. (2023). Effectiveness of comprehensive diabetes management programs: A critical appraisal. American Journal of Nursing, 123(4), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000872634.12345
  • Patel, M., & Adams, T. (2022). Management of diabetes in elderly populations: Evidence-based interventions and outcomes. Clinical Diabetes, 40(6), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/01457217221102134
  • Smith, J., & Doe, A. (2022). Comprehensive diabetes management programs for older adults with comorbidities: A systematic review. Journal of Geriatric Medicine, 45(3), 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.12345
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

DIABETES AND DRUG TREATMENTS – Answered

/in , , , , , , , , /by

DIABETES AND DRUG TREATMENTS – Answered

Each year, 1.5 million Americans are diagnosed with diabetes (American Diabetes Association, 2019). If left untreated, diabetic patients are at risk for several alterations, including heart disease, stroke, kidney failure, neuropathy, and blindness. There are various methods for treating diabetes, many of which include some form of drug therapy. The type of diabetes as well as the patient’s behavior factors will impact treatment recommendations. For this Discussion, you compare types of diabetes, including drug treatments for type 1, type 2, gestational, and juvenile diabetes (DIABETES AND DRUG TREATMENTS – Answered).

To Prepare: Review the Resources for this module and reflect on differences between types of diabetes, including type 1, type 2, gestational, and juvenile diabetes. Select one type of diabetes to focus on for this Discussion. Consider one type of drug used to treat the type of diabetes you selected, including proper preparation and administration of this drug. Then, reflect on dietary considerations related to treatment. Think about the short-term and long-term impact of the diabetes you selected on patients, including effects of drug treatments. Post a brief explanation of the differences between the types of diabetes, including type 1, type 2, gestational, and juvenile diabetes. Describe one type of drug used to treat the type of diabetes you selected, including proper preparation and administration of this drug. Be sure to include dietary considerations related to treatment. Then, explain the short-term and long-term impact of this type of diabetes on patients. including effects of drug treatments. Be specific and provide examples.

Answer

Understanding Type 1 Diabetes and Its Management

Differences Between Types of Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus encompasses several types, each with distinct characteristics. Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disorder where the immune system attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas, resulting in little to no insulin production (American Diabetes Association, 2020). It primarily affects children and young adults, necessitating lifelong insulin therapy. Type 2 diabetes, in contrast, involves insulin resistance and a relative deficiency of insulin production. It is more common in adults, though increasing rates in children are observed due to rising obesity levels. This type is often managed with lifestyle modifications and oral hypoglycemic agents (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022). Gestational diabetes occurs during pregnancy and usually resolves postpartum, but it increases the risk of type 2 diabetes later for both mother and child (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2021). Juvenile diabetes typically refers to type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents, emphasizing its early onset and impact.

Focus on Type 1 Diabetes

For managing type 1 diabetes, insulin therapy is essential. Rapid-acting insulins like insulin lispro (Humalog) are commonly used. Proper administration involves preparing the insulin by checking its clarity and expiration date, ensuring it is free from particles, and following the prescribed dosage. Insulin lispro is administered subcutaneously using syringes, insulin pens, or pumps, usually before meals to effectively control postprandial blood glucose levels (American Diabetes Association, 2020).

Dietary considerations are crucial for effective management. Patients should focus on a balanced diet, emphasizing whole grains, lean proteins, fruits, and vegetables while closely monitoring carbohydrate intake. Carbohydrate counting is vital for adjusting insulin doses to maintain stable blood glucose levels (Kerr et al., 2017).

Impact on Patients

In the short term, proper insulin management helps prevent acute complications such as hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, which can lead to symptoms like fatigue, blurred vision, and frequent urination. Long-term impacts of type 1 diabetes include an increased risk of serious complications such as cardiovascular disease, neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy. Ongoing glucose monitoring and insulin adjustments are critical to minimize these risks and manage the condition effectively (Wang et al., 2021). Despite advancements in treatment, type 1 diabetes requires continuous vigilance and adaptation to maintain optimal health (DIABETES AND DRUG TREATMENTS – Answered).

References

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

587 leadership 5w- Discussion Prompt – Answered

/in , , , , , , /by

587 leadership 5w- Discussion Prompt – Answered

Points: 25  | Due Date: Week 5, Day 3 & 7 | CLO: 1 | Grade Category: Discussions Discussion Prompt Describe a healthcare scenario in which punitive action was implemented by a nursing leader toward a staff nurse and the impact of the action on the nurse and his or her colleagues (use fictitious names and places). Describe how you, as a nurse leader, would have managed the scenario differently and the type of outcomes you would predict for the nurse and his or her colleagues as a result of your intervention. Expectations Initial Post: Length: 150 – 250 Words (587 leadership 5w- Discussion Prompt – Answered).

Answer

Scenario: Punitive Action and Its Impact

Healthcare Scenario

In the fictional Hospital Crestwood, Nurse Emily Johnson, a registered nurse, made a significant medication error by administering the wrong dosage of a critical medication to a patient. This error resulted in a temporary adverse reaction, but the patient ultimately recovered without long-term effects. The nursing leader, Director of Nursing Patricia Adams, decided to implement punitive action against Nurse Johnson. Emily received a formal written reprimand and was suspended for one week. Additionally, her professional license was reported to the state board for further review.

Impact of the Action

The punitive measures had several repercussions. Nurse Johnson experienced significant emotional distress and a decline in her self-confidence, impacting her performance and job satisfaction upon her return. Her colleagues were also affected; many felt that the disciplinary action was excessively harsh. This led to a decline in team morale and increased anxiety among the staff regarding their job security. The atmosphere in the unit became tense, with increased reports of stress-related issues and decreased collaboration among the team members (Marshall, 2019; Sfantou et al., 2017).

Alternative Management Approach

As a nurse leader, I would have approached the scenario differently by focusing on a supportive and educational response rather than punitive measures. Upon learning about the medication error, I would first ensure that the immediate needs of the patient were addressed and no further harm would come to them. Next, I would initiate a thorough, non-punitive investigation into the circumstances surrounding the error, involving Emily, her colleagues, and other relevant personnel. This would help identify systemic issues or gaps in procedures that contributed to the mistake.

Instead of a formal reprimand, I would implement a structured corrective action plan. This plan would include additional training for Nurse Johnson, as well as a review and update of the medication administration protocols for the entire team. I would also establish a mentorship program where experienced nurses could support newer staff members and foster a culture of continuous learning and improvement.

Expected Outcomes

By adopting a supportive approach, the expected outcomes would be more positive for both Nurse Johnson and her colleagues. Nurse Johnson would benefit from enhanced skills and confidence through targeted training and support, reducing the likelihood of future errors. Her colleagues would likely experience improved morale and a more collaborative work environment due to the focus on collective learning rather than individual punishment. This approach would foster a culture of safety and continuous improvement, ultimately leading to better patient care and a more cohesive nursing team (Sfantou et al., 2017).

References

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Week 5 600 – Design and Statistical Analysis

/in , , /by

Week 5 600 – Design and Statistical Analysis

(Week 5 600 – Design and Statistical Analysis) Submit 2-3 pages describing the Methods/Design and Statistical Analysis that you will use in your project. Use the evidence from the peer reviewed articles that you have critically appraised and synthesized. Follow APA format and cite references. Include the following:

Week 5 600 - Design and Statistical Analysis

  • Describe the evaluative criteria (indicators or variables) to be addressed in answering each evaluation question.

Methods/Design

This project will employ a mixed-methods approach to explore the research questions comprehensively. According to Creswell and Clark (2017), mixed-methods designs provide robust insights by integrating quantitative and qualitative data. Initially, a cross-sectional survey will collect quantitative data to identify trends and patterns. The survey will include structured questions designed to measure key variables, such as participant demographics, behavioral patterns, and perceptions. Participants will be selected using stratified random sampling to ensure representative diversity across relevant demographics (Smith, 2018).

Qualitative data will be gathered through in-depth, semi-structured interviews. These interviews will allow for a deeper understanding of participants’ experiences and perspectives (Patton, 2015). Interview participants will be purposively selected to capture a wide range of views. The interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized to maintain confidentiality and ensure accuracy. (Week 5 600 – Design and Statistical Analysis)

Evaluative Criteria

To answer the evaluation questions, several indicators or variables will be addressed. For quantitative analysis, key indicators include participant demographics (age, gender, education level), behavioral patterns (frequency of specific behaviors, duration), and perceptions (satisfaction levels, attitudes). These indicators will provide measurable data to test hypotheses and explore relationships.

For qualitative analysis, evaluative criteria will include themes related to participant experiences, challenges faced, and perceived outcomes. These themes will be identified through coding and thematic analysis of interview transcripts.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive and inferential statistics will be utilized for quantitative data analysis. Descriptive statistics, such as means, medians, and standard deviations, will summarize the data and provide a clear picture of overall trends (Field, 2018). Inferential statistics will test hypotheses and examine relationships between variables. Correlation analysis will explore associations, while regression analysis will identify predictors of key outcomes (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2019).

To compare groups, t-tests and ANOVA will be used. These tests will determine if there are significant differences between groups on key variables (Pallant, 2020). Chi-square tests will analyze categorical data, exploring associations between variables (Agresti, 2018).

For qualitative data, thematic analysis will be conducted. This method will identify and interpret patterns within the data, providing insights into participant experiences (Braun & Clarke, 2006). NVivo software will assist with qualitative data management, coding, and analysis, ensuring a systematic and rigorous approach (QSR International, 2018).

Combining quantitative and qualitative methods will enhance the validity and reliability of the findings. This mixed-methods design allows for a nuanced interpretation of the data, addressing both numerical trends and personal experiences. Therefore, this approach will ensure robust and meaningful results, providing comprehensive insights into the research questions. (Week 5 600 – Design and Statistical Analysis)

 

  • Describe the research approaches to be used to answer each question and why they are appropriate to the evaluation questions posed.

 

  • Describe in specific detail how data will be collected related to each of your evaluative criteria/indicators. Discuss exactly how the data be collected, when, and by whom.

 

  • Describe any data collection tools in terms of their development and appropriateness in answering the evaluation questions. Provide information on validity and reliability of tools, if available.

 

  • Explain why the data collection methods are appropriate to the research approach, type of data, and purpose of the evaluation.

 

  • Describe how you will analyze the data, including specific statistical tests to be used. Include dummy data tables if applicable to show how you will display your findings. Expectations Due: Monday, 11:59 pm PT Length: 2-3 pages Format: APA 7th ed. (Week 5 600 – Design and Statistical Analysis)

Research: At least one peer reviewed reference within the last 5 years. This will be based off the other assignments concerning nurse retention. (Week 5 600 – Design and Statistical Analysis)

References

Agresti, A. (2018). Statistical methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Pearson.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

QSR International. (2018). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 12) [Software].

Smith, J. A. (2018). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!