Memo

i need perfect work…….i would like to use the tutor for complete class……..

You are the head of HR and the leaders of your organization just approached you to restructure the sales team. Currently there are four Divisional Vice Presidents that oversee 15 District Managers each. Moving forward, there will be two District Managers with three Regional Directors reporting to each of them. Every Regional Director will oversee 10 District Managers.

Refer to the Organizational Chart for a visual representation of the current and new structure.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word memo to the leaders of your organization in which you complete the following:

· Recommend the best way to implement the change.

· Evaluate how to effectively execute your plan.

· Draft a communications plan that explains the reasons for these changes to the organization.

Click on the Assignment Files tab to submit your memo

Week 2 Organization Chart

HRM/531 Version 13 1

 

Copyright © 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

University of Phoenix Material

Week 2 Organization Chart

 

Current Structure:

 

 

After Restructuring:

 

Division Vice President

15 District Managers

Division Vice President

15 District Managers

Division Vice President

15 District Managers

Division Vice President

15 District Managers

Division Vice President

Regional Director

10 District Managers

Regional Director

10 District Managers

Regional Director

10 District Mangers

Division Vice President

Regional Director

10 District Managers

Regional Director

10 District Managers

Regional Director

10 District Mangers

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

HEALTH POLICY ASSIGNMENTS

Case Study Reflection

Write a 4-5 page paper. Your written assignments must follow APA guidelines. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Pocket Guide to APA Style to ensure that in- text citations and reference list are correct. Submit your assignment to the Dropbox by the end of this Unit.

In 2007 San Francisco began its Healthy San Francisco Plan designed to provide health care for all San Francisco citizens. In 2007, it was estimated that San Francisco had 82,000 uninsured citizens. Under the plan, all uninsured citizens residing in San Francisco can seek care at the city’s public and private clinics and hospitals. The basic coverage includes lab work, x-rays, surgery, and preventative care. The city plans to pay for this $203 million coverage by rerouting the $104 million the city currently spends treating the uninsured in the emergency rooms, mandating business contributions, and requiring income-adjusted enrollment fees. The plan requires all businesses with more than 20 employees to contribute a percentage toward the plan. Many business owners consider this a burden and warn they will not stay in the city. The Mayor sees universal health access a moral obligation for the city.

Take one of the following positions.

· San Francisco has an obligation to provide its citizens with health access.-OR-

· San Francisco does not have an obligation to provide its citizens with health access.

Discuss the following in your assignment:

1. What is the government’s role in regulating healthy and unhealthy behavior?

2. Has the balance between personal freedom and the government’s responsibility to provide health and welfare of its citizens been eroded? Why or why not?

3. Written Assignment

4. Review the following report at:

5. https://kapextmediassl-a.akamaihd.net/healthSci/HA545/HA545_1703C/u5_as.pdf

6. Using this Congressional Report for members of Congress and your textbook, write a 5-page memorandum/paper on the topic of rulemaking.

7. You are a summer intern with Harry Smith, a Congressman from your home district. He has to advise his congressional committee on the impact of interest groups on legislation. Write the memorandum to explain the purpose and influence on rulemaking in the operation of the legislation. You should offer suggestions on the importance of the implementation phase of the legislation.

Paper

Write a 7-9 page paper with bibliography. Your written assignments must follow APA guidelines. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Pocket Guide to APA Style to ensure in-text citations and reference list are correct.

You will synthesize your understanding of why Medicare Part D passed, as well as the influence of the various interest groups and governmental entities during this process. Make sure to discuss both the policy process and the policy environment—that is, the key players involved and other circumstances that shaped this policy-making effort. For this assignment, address the following questions, doing further research as needed:

· How did various stakeholder groups influence the final outcome of Medicare Part D legislation?

· What were the specific strategies and tools that were used most effectively?

· Does the fact that Medicare Part D passed corresponds with your understanding of policy and politics, or did this surprise you? Explain your response.

Paper

Write a 7-9 page paper with a References List. Your written assignment must follow APA guidelines. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Pocket Guide to APA Style to ensure in-text citations and reference list are correct.

You will synthesize your understanding of why Clinton’s Health Plan was unsuccessful. Discuss the features of the Clinton health care reform plan and provide reasons why it failed and describe the influence of the various interest groups and governmental entities during this process. Make sure to discuss both the policy process and the policy environment—that is, the key players involved and other circumstances that shaped this policy-making effort. Consider and discuss the following:

1. Take a position in support or opposition

2. Discuss the context of this legislation – name the expected demanders and suppliers as outlined in our textbook, Chapter 3.

3. Describe the expected interest groups and there specific arguments.

4. Describe the expected interplay between demanders and suppliers, interest groups and analyze the public policy environment.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Week 1 Discussion

Select and READ one of the following case studies (located in your textbook): 

CASE 1-1 BA-ZYNGA! ZYNGA FACES TROUBLE IN FARMVILLE
CASE 1-2 FRACTURING THE LABOR MARKET—EMPLOYMENT IN THE OIL SERVICES INDUSTRY
CASE 2-1 CATALYA HATS: PULLING A RABBIT OUT OF THE HAT OR COMING UP EMPTYHANDED?
CASE 2-2 STRATEGY-DRIVEN HR MANAGEMENT: NETFLIX, A BEHIND-THE-SCENES LOOK AT DELIVERING ENTERTAINMENT

Next,  without getting too wordy, provide at minimum a 3-4 sentence overview  on what the case is about. Then, make a recommendation for improvement  for any situation of your choosing in the case.

NOTES:

  • You may only have no more than two references for your response and each must be appropriately cited in the words.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Union Representation Memo

Assignment must be written to the rubric that is attached.

You have recently joined an organization in an entry level HR position. The organization is now subject to union representation. You have been asked by your supervisor to write a brief memo for your HR colleagues that provides an overview of the expectations for managing human resources in a unionized environment. Your memo must address the following:

A. The differences, from the organization’s perspective, in operating in a union-free environment versus a unionized environment

B. The rights of the union, management, and employees

C The impacts of the union on human resource functions, including

Work restructuring

Performance Management

Employee Discipline and Job Security

Wages and Benefits

Health and Safety

D. Any costs the organization may expect based upon these impacts

Use headings to separate the sections of the paper, double-space, and Times New Roman font, cover page, page numbers, and APA format.

Support your answers! In responding, you must use five references including three from the course materials. They should be from a scholarly journal or credible news source from within the past three years. At least three should be from course materials.

Class Resources:

https://open.lib.umn.edu/humanresourcemanagement/chapter/12-2-collective-bargaining/

https://www.nlrb.gov/rights-we-protect/whats-law/employees/i-am-represented-union/collective-bargaining-rights

https://www.nlrb.gov/rights-we-protect/whats-law/employers/bargaining-good-faith-employees-union-representative-section

https://open.lib.umn.edu/humanresourcemanagement/chapter/12-3-administration-of-the-collective-bargaining-agreement/

http://www.fedsmith.com/2008/07/08/why-do-employees-file-discrimination-complaints/

https://www.flra.gov/cases/arbitration

https://www.bls.gov/ooh/legal/arbitrators-mediators-and-conciliators.htm#tab-2

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

The Loudest Duck

Write a 5-page essay that integrates your understanding through your reading of The Loudest Duck (Liswood, 2010). See the guidelines for writing your paper (below).

Introduction: Write a statement of purpose for your paper and introduce the major points you will address.

Main Body of Paper: Reflect on your reading of the book by answering these questions:

  • What are the core qualities of an inclusive leader? How would you model this in your organization?
  • What challenges do organizational leaders face today in managing diversity? Be specific by giving examples in your organization if possible.
  • How does a leader use power, position, and influence (information and networks) to create inclusive and collaborative environments?
  • How can a leader work for the benefit of all of an organization’s stakeholders?

Be sure to include reflections on how your perspective has changed through your reading and discussions with your classmates and colleagues.

Conclusions and Recommendations – What have you learned from your reading and this paper reflection? How will it change how you make decisions as an organizational leader?

  • How would you amend your Professional Code of Conduct (developed in LDR 502. Ethics) in light of what you have learned about Diversity and Inclusion in LDR 503?
  • How does your professional ethics align or not with the vision, mission, values, operating principles, and ethics of your organization? Are there gaps? If so, explore what implications this has to you as an organizational leader in your workplace.
  • What are the implications of diversity and inclusion in teams and organizations like yours?
  • What are essential aspects of diversity that must be considered in decision making? How does your organization ensure that decision making is inclusive (includes relevant stakeholders)?

IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS: This is a formal term paper for this course. Be sure to include a cover page with the title of the assignment, course name, your name, and date. If you use material from references in your paper, be sure to cite them using APA format. Use 12-pt Times New Roman font and double-space. Be sure to include page numbers. Also, check your work for spelling and grammar before your submit it.

Guidelines for Writing Papers at the Graduate Level

Success Tip: Your papers are written communication of your thoughts and ideas. If you want your audience to understand your ideas and be persuaded to take action in support of them, you need to convey your thoughts in ways that make it easy for your audience to follow your train of thought. This means presenting your ideas in an organized way and developing a voice of an organizational leader (as opposed to an individual contributor). 

For your papers, start with an outline that addresses the major questions posed in the assignment. At the graduate level, your written assignments (papers) are to be presented in APA Style (Union Institute and University’s standard format). Be sure to check your work for grammar and spelling, as well as formatting (12 point, double space, Times New Roman) before submitting assignments to your professor. In general your papers should have the following:

Title Page: Title of the Assignment, Your Name, Date Submitted, Course Name, Professor Name, University Name

Body of the Paper:

  1. Introduction (Section 1): State the purpose of your paper and what you intend to discuss. Be clear, concise, specific, and direct.
  2. Body of Paper (Sections 2 and 3): This is the major content of your assignment. Be sure to answer the questions assigned. Be clear, concise, and back up your statements with facts and citations (APA). If you used an outline, use it to form your headings for each section and subsection of the body of your paper. Typically, your headings will address the major questions posed in the assignment. Headings and subheadings help your readers follow your train of thought and changes in focus.
  3. Conclusion and Recommendations (Section 4): Summarize your paper by revisiting your purpose and discuss how you addressed in your paper. Then, make recommendations for next steps that you will take as a developing leader in your organization.

Supporting Documents:

  1. References: Anything you cite must be listed in your References (APA)
  2. Appendices: If you have backup material for your readers to reference, it should be placed in an Appendix and referred to in the text of your paper.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Week 2 Comparing Leadership Models

Comparing Leadership Models

 

Before you are a leader, success is all about growing yourself. When you become a leader, success is all about growing others. -Jack Welch

\

“Before you are a leader, success is all about growing yourself. When you become a leader, success is all about growing others.” -Jack Welch

 

 

Retrieved from: https://boldomatic.com/p/jS-jPw/before-you-are-a-leader-success-is-all-about-growing-yourself-when-you-become-a

 

2

Introduction

Characteristics of the Universal Model of Leadership

Characteristics of Transformational Leadership

Compare and contrast both models

Significance of both models in business

Some indicators of a good leader are effective communication, accountability, confidence, active listener/observer, how well he/she challenges others, and when to take appropriate corrective action. As a leader you must work well with others and consistently strive to develop your team to be successful. There are many different definitions and perspectives of what a leader entails. Leadership indicates a certain set of qualities and characteristics that can lead a group of people to successful results. Mostly this term is coined within organizations and in the workplace, but a leader, in my opinion, is not confined by the walls of an organization. The research on leadership may suggest that a leader is born into the position, or they have specific traits that enable them to lead. Personal experience has shown that everyone in higher positions are not always suitable for the leadership role. One take away from this course is that an individual may view themselves as a leader; however, it may take objective perspectives including self-assessments to show someone their true attributes.

 

In this presentation, I will compare and contrast two models of leadership, noting similarities and differences. I will also develop a conclusion regarding the significance of those models in business.

 

 

3

The Universal Model of Leadership

The Universal Model of Leadership focuses on restructuring the development of the individual to achieve higher performance

360° framework in developing leadership

Task-Relationship application

Five stages of development:

Egocentric

Reactive

Creative

Integral

Unitive

The Universal Model of Leadership is a model that explores the progressive development of an individual. These stages are egocentric, reactive, creative, integral, and unitive. The idea is that every individual is not born into leadership, but similar to the mental, physical, emotional and situational development of a child to an adult, a leader has to train and consciously develop him/herself for the role. A significant part of the model is the identity of the individual as well. We all desire to belong or have a purpose in this world. It is important to know and be secure in our identity as it propels our confidence and the way we present ourselves to others. The goal is to never stop learning as the world is evolving daily in training, technology and consciousness.

 

4

 

The Universal Model of Leadership

Retrieved from: Adams, W. A., Anderson, J. J. (2016). Mastering Leadership: An Integrated Framework for Breakthrough Performance and Extraordinary Business Results. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons

 

5

Transformational Leadership

Transformational leadership is about inspiring employees to perform beyond expectations

Consists of two major elements:

Transactional and Transformational

Consists of four roles:

Idealized influence

Inspirational motivation

Intellectual stimulation

Individualized consideration

 

Hooijberg states “Transformational leadership is about inspiring employees to perform beyond expectations. It consists of two major elements: transactional and transformational” (2013, p. 898). He goes on to further explain, transformational leaders use rewards and punishment to induce certain behaviors in followers and they do so by “inspiring followers to go beyond mere transactional exchanges and consists of four roles: idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration,” (Hooijberg, 2013, p. 898).

 

A transformational leader uses idealized influence by behaving as a “role model for their followers,” Hooijberg,2013, p. 898). By modeling ethical behaviors, upholding the values of the organization, and “being consistent in their pursuit of goals,” these leaders inspire trust and respect (Kinicki & Williams, 2015, p. 465). These leaders inspire by sharing a vision for the organization, and they do so with charisma, defined by Kinicki & Williams as “a form of interpersonal attraction that inspires acceptance and support” (2015, p. 464). Transformational leaders encourage their employees to think creatively and think of innovative solutions to problem. They are gifted at communicating the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats so that subordinates develop a new sense of purpose,” (Kinicki & Williams, 2015, p. 465). Lastly transformational leaders are employees who “actively encourage them to grow and to excel by giving them challenging work, more responsibility, empowerment, and one-on-one mentoring,” (Kinicki & Williams, 2015, p. 465).

 

6

Transformational Leadership

Retrieved from: http://www.educational-business-articles.com/transformational-leadership/

7

Comparison of Models

Agrees that a leader is not born, but developed.

Focuses on restructuring the leader/manager/supervisor, and the sustainment of the organizational goals.

Both models can expand across cultures, genders, etc.

Leaders take accountability for their current skills, and thus train and develop to a positive, inclusive and forward thinking leadership approach.

Extensions of existing theories (i.e. – Universal is an extension of the Keagan approach and Transformational is an extension of Trait theory approach).

Seek to develop the leadership capabilities of surrounding employees.

Here are a few similarities of the Universal Model and Transformational Leadership. The models focus on restructuring the leader that consequentially have a positive effect on the organization in work performance.

8

Differences of Models

Universal Model of Leadership

Development proceeds from lower to higher-order Structures of Mind through a series of well-mapped and researched stages (Adams, W. A., Anderson, J. J. 2016).

Restructures leadership style based on identity and the perspective of the surrounding environment.

Utilizes the LCP 360° assessment framework in developing leadership.

Focuses on the transformation of the consciousness of leader.

 

Transformational Leadership

Followers remain subordinates of the transformational leader, regardless of whatever else might be transformed” (Wren, 1995, p 104-106).

Develops traits based on the organization

Focus on the characteristic of charisma and similar traits.

Reliance on proper training and development.

Here are a few of the differences between the two models of leadership.

9

Significance

Significant influence on:

The confidence and creative approach of leadership

Work performance

Improved employee engagement, productivity, and morale

Models are based on research and application.

The models illustrate examples of success; however, different leadership styles are suited to different situations.

The organization will be successful based on the commitment to the model of leadership they choose to implement.

Leadership has been described “in essence, a process: a series of actions and interactions among leaders and followers which lead to the attainment of group goals” (Wren, 1995, p. 325). Leadership styles and theories are essential to an organization’s structure, culture, and development. Working under positive and encouraging leadership can increase employee performance, engagement and morale. Overtime the idea of leadership roles and duties have changed. In the past, many companies focused on an authoritarian approach that was less inclusive and left no room for individual creativity. Even training protocols change often in fields that I have worked in. The significance of the models is the commitment that each organization takes to change the environment for the better. It illustrates how aware the organization is of its current standing and how it plans to adapt to a beneficial approach for long-term sustainment of present and future goals.

 

10

References

Adams, W. A., Anderson, J. J. (2016). Mastering Leadership: An Integrated Framework for Breakthrough Performance and Extraordinary Business Results. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Hooijberg, R. (2013). Transformational theory of leadership. In E. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory (Vol. 2, pp. 897-899). Thousand Oaks,: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781452276090.n301

Kinicki, A., Williams, B. (2015). Management, 7th Edition. Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/books/1259723542

Landis, E. A., Hill, D., & Harvey, M. R. (2014). A synthesis of leadership theories and styles. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 15(2), 97-100. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.contentproxy.phoenix.edu/docview/1535935047?accountid=35812

Wren, J.T. (1995). The leader’s companion: Insights on leadership through the ages. New York: The Free Press. Yukl, G.A

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

For Eng.Kelvin Only

Due Thursday June 16, 2016 at 12:00 noon

 

For this forum, you need to read chapters 1 & 2 in the textbook and review the Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 PowerPoint presentations.

It is very important for managers to see their jobs as more than just custodians of the “status quo.” Rather, they must proactively anticipate change and continually refine as well as, when necessary, make significant changes to their strategies. This has become particularly important as competitive environments become characterized by increasing rates of unpredictable change.

Defining Strategic Management

Strategic Management is “consisting of the analysis, decisions, and actions an organization undertakes in order to create and sustain competitive advantages” (Dess, Lumpkin, Eisner, & McNamara, 2014, p. 7). This definition captures two main elements of the field of strategic management.

First, strategic management entails three on-going processes: analysis, decisions, and actions. That is, managers must analyze the internal and external environment as well as their hierarchy of goals in order to formulate and implement strategies.

Second, the essence of strategic management is the study of why some firms outperform others. Looking at Michael Porter’s work we can make the important distinction between strategy and operational effectiveness. Managers must create advantages that are sustainable over a period of time, instead of merely temporary. That is: How can we create competitive advantages in the marketplace that are not only unique and valuable but also difficult for competitors to copy or substitute?

After reading this week’s material, and looking back at Chapters 1 & 2 in the textbook, answer the following questions in this forum.

Forum Assignment

Review Porter’s Five-Forces model of industry competition. Using your own words (do not copy definitions from the text), explain the model’s importance in the concept of strategic grouping within industries.  Then, find a company with a “mission statement”.  Do not use the military please.  Pick a commercial company that is not routinely discussed.  Select a company with a mission statement and tell us whether or not you think the statement is constructive and provides employees with motivation and strategic direction.  Include the mission statement in your post.

Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 250 words, not including repeated questions, references and quotes.  Please respond to at least 2 other students.  Responses should be a minimum of 100 words and include direct questions.  Use your own words.   Direct quotes should be rare in these short forum posts.  If you do have a quote, you should add on to your post so that in the end you have 250 words of your own.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Assignment V: Change Management Plan (WALMART)

Assignment 5: Change Management Plan (WALMART)

Due Week 10 and worth 300 points

In this assignment, you will combine the previous four (4) assignments into a proposal that you could present to the executive leadership and board members. You will argue the value of the change management plan to the overall success of the organization. Add to your previous submissions a plan for sustaining the change in the long run.

Write a six to ten (6-10) page paper in which you:

Section I: Organization: Describe the organization (WALMART) and comment on the HR change that the organization should make. Utilize effective diagnostic tools to assess the organizations ability to change. Support assertions with theoretical evidence.

Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history.

Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed.

Formulate three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories.

Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Propose two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Defend why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization.

Using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change.

Provide results of the diagnostic analysis

Explain the results

Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change. Substantiate your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.

Section II: Kotter Change Plan: Utilizing the Kotter eight (8) step method of change, create a solid change management plan for the HR initiative you identified as requiring improvement.

Ascertain how each of the steps applies to your specific organization.

Develop a strategy that illustrates how you would address each of the eight (8) stages of change:

Establishing a sense of urgency

Creating coalition

Developing vision and strategy

Communicating the vision

Empowering broad-based action

Generating short-term wins

Consolidating gains and producing more change

Anchoring new approaches into the culture

Section III: Resistance and Communication: Research methods of minimizing resistance to change and create plan to address resistance within your change management initiative.

Diagnose the reasons for resistance to change.

Interpret the potential causes of resistance in the organization. Identify and describe three (3) potential causes of resistance to your change plan. Identify and describe three (3) potential sources of resistance to your change plan.

Create a plan for minimizing possible resistance to your change management plan.

Elaborate on the relationship between resistance to change and communication.

Evaluate three (3) communication strategies.

Recommend one (1) communication strategy that would be applicable to your organization. Diagnose why this communication strategy is best for your organization.

Create a solid communication plan for your change initiative.

Section IV: Sustaining Change: Research methods of sustaining change in organizations and create a plan for sustaining proposed change.

Recommend two (2) strategies for sustaining change:

Diagnose the two (2) theories from a scholarly perspective

Evaluate why the strategies selected are viable for the organization

Section V: Presentation: Create a visually appealing and informative presentation espousing the importance of the change management plan you developed.

Create a ten to fifteen (10-15) slide PowerPoint presentation to submit to executive leadership and board members outlining and describing your recommended change. Include the following criteria:

Be creative in your design so that is appealing to others.

Ensure that all of the MAJOR points of the plan are covered.

Create bulleted speaking notes for your presentation to the shareholders in the Notes section of the PowerPoint. Note: You may create or assume any fictitious names, data, or scenarios that have not been established in this assignment for a realistic flow of communication.

Use a professional technically written style to graphically convey the information.

Create a video of yourself presenting the presentation to key stakeholders. Note: View the “Creating a Presentation for Your Course” playlist, located here for tutorials on creating and submitting video assignments.

Section VI: References: Utilize good scholarly research skills and writing skills to develop a solid change plan and presentation.

Use at least ten (10) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources

Write clearly and concisely about managing organizational change using proper writing mechanics.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Evaluate the reactions to change including identifying signs of resistance and approaches to managing it.

Evaluate strategies for communicating change.

Use technology and information resources to research issues in managing organizational change.

Write clearly and concisely about managing organizational change using proper writing mechanics.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Leadership

For Prof. Goodman!

 

Global Economic Environment Course Assignments

 

Hello!  Here’s the Unit 1 Assignment 1 (Unit 1 Economic Problems) which is due by Sunday, 1/17/16 by 11:59am CT:

 

In your textbook, please answer the following problems and submit your assignment:

 

Chapter 1: Problem 5, a through d, on page 23.

 

Chapter 3: Problem 7, a through d, on page 74

 

Class,

 

Hello!  Here’s the Unit 2 Assignment 1 (Unit 2 Economic Problems) which is due by Sunday, 1/24/16 by 11:59am CT:

 

In your textbook, please answer the following problems and submit your assignment:

 

Chapter 6, Problem 6 on p.151.

 

Chapter 7, Problem 6 on p.165.

 

Class,

 

Hello!  Here’s the Unit 3 Assignment 1 (Unit 3 Economic Problems) which is due by Sunday, 1/31/16 by 11:59am CT:

 

In your textbook, please answer the following problems and submit your assignment:

 

Chapter 9, Problem 3 on p.219.

 

Chapter 10, Problem 4 on p.238.

 

Chapter 11, Problem 2 on pp.252-253.

 

Class,

 

Hello!  Here’s the Unit 5 Assignment 1 (Unit 5 Economic Problems) which is due by Sunday, 2/14/16 by 11:59am CT:

 

In your textbook, please answer the following problems and submit your assignment:

 

Chapter 25, Problem 4 on pp.566-567.

 

Chapter 27, Problem 4 on p.612.

 

Chapter 29, Problem 8 on pp.657-658.

 

Chapter 30, Problem 3a on p.680.

 

WEEK 1 – Reflection

 

Throughout the course, you have been building toward the achievement of the following competencies:

 

  • Analyze contemporary leadership practices from the perspective of innovation in a global environment.
  • Evaluate the leadership skills that drive innovation.
  • Evaluate what leaders of innovation do to shape organizational culture.
  • Communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions.

 

For this discussion, reflect on the knowledge and skills you developed over the past six weeks. Address the following in your post:

 

  • Select one competency that you feel is the most important to you. How has your ability to perform these skills and apply this knowledge evolved? What concepts, skills, or insights were most relevant to you?
  • How have you grown in your academic and professional goals? Have you made progress on any items in the action plan you developed during first course?

 

———————

 

Leading Innovation

 

The white paper by Leslie, which you read earlier in this unit, presented a comprehensive study of 10 leadership skills and practices that will be needed to effectively lead organizations into and in the future. Based on what you know so far about the DNA of disruptive innovators, explain which of these leadership skills provides the best support for leading innovation and creating innovative organizations. What are the specific attributes of the leadership approaches that support innovation?

 

WEEK 2 – The Role of Leaders in Innovation (DUE SAT.@12am)

 

Assignment Overview

 

This course explores the role of leaders in creating organizations that innovate. This requires an understanding of the skills of the leader, as well as the global context of leadership. In this assignment, you will analyze leadership practices in innovative organizations and your own strengths and weaknesses as a leader.

 

Assignment Instructions

 

Review your completed Discovery and Delivery Skills self-assessment from pages 38–40 in The Innovator’s DNA. Use this assessment to generate insight regarding your own discovery and delivery skills. Specifically, summarize the results and reflect on how your own strengths equip you—and how your weaknesses hinder you—in supporting innovation in the global context.

 

For the paper, select and explain at least two leadership practices (see Leslie’s white paper) and how they support innovation in organizations. Explain the relevance of these practices to either one of the case studies for this course (Intuitive Surgical or Procter & Gamble), or to your own work context.

 

You will be evaluated on how well you communicate your insights and analysis. It is expected that you will communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions. To aid you in doing this, follow these guidelines:

 

  • Carefully organize your paper so that a section is labeled with a heading and devoted to each of the following topics. Make sure that the reader can easily find:

 

  • A section that explains how at least two leadership practices support innovation in organizations.
  • A section that analyzes the role of discovery skills (see The Innovator’s DNA) for their support of innovation in organizations.
  • A section that analyzes the role of delivery skills (see The Innovator’s DNA) for their support of innovation in organizations.
  • A section that explores your own strengths and weaknesses in the discovery and delivery skills, and how they help or hinder your ability to support innovation in organizations. (Be sure you address both discovery and delivery skills).

 

  • Graphs or diagrams may be included in appendices, if they are well-explained and applicable.
  • Each section of the paper must be supported using the course readings, and additional scholarly resources or reputable industry publications may be used, if needed. One to three supporting resources are recommended.

 

Your assignment will be scored on the following objectives—see the scoring guide for details:

 

  • Explain how established leadership practices support innovation in organizations.
  • Analyze the role of discovery skills for their support of innovation in organizations.
  • Analyze the role of delivery skills for their support of innovation in organizations.
  • Assess strengths and weaknesses related to leadership skills and an individual’s ability to support innovation.
  • Communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions.

 

Submission Requirements

 

  • Written communication: Writing should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • Paper length: 4–6 pages, excluding appendices, cover page, table of contents (if present), and References page.
  • APA formatting: References and citations should follow APA (6th edition) style guidelines.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.

 

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click on the linked resources for helpful writing information.

 

Note: Feedback from your instructors is an important method to understanding where you are excelling, what you need to improve, and to be aware of your progress on course competencies. This feedback goes beyond a score on your assignment. It includes comments about each of the grading criteria and general comments about the assignment. This written feedback will help you know how well you are demonstrating the competencies associated with each assignment. Therefore, it is important to know how to access all of this feedback.

 

The brief slide presentation, Accessing Qualitative Feedback, linked in the Resources, will take just a couple of minutes to view. It will walk you through, click-by-click, what you will do to see your instructor’s feedback for each assignment. Viewing this presentation will ensure that you are seeing all feedback that your instructors provide.

 

Describing the DNA of Innovators 250 Words (DUE WED.@12am)

 

In the Hitt, Takacs-Haynes, and Serpa article you read in this unit, the authors made a compelling argument for what will be required of leaders in the future. The future competitive landscape for organizations requires new forms of strategic leadership. Nayar, CEO of HCL Technologies, described his own strategic leadership in preparing his company for the future.

 

For this discussion, discuss how the ideas from these authors are similar to and different from those in The Innovator’s DNA. Compare and contrast the concepts presented by The Innovator’s DNA, Nayar, and Hitt, et al. What insights can a leader of innovation glean from these resources or ideas as a whole? How can these be applied to an organization, or what effect might they have on an organization’s culture?

 

Response Guidelines

 

Post a substantive reply to at least two other learners. Be sure to reconnect your thoughts to the discussion topic and readings. Your replies should demonstrate clear links between the discussion topic, readings, and the content in the posts.

 

WEEK 3- Discovery and Delivery Skills in Innovation Leadership

 

As a follow-up to your Unit 2 assignment, explore the application of your own discovery and delivery skills. How do these skills contribute to innovation, and what can you do to further develop your skills? Focus your response on 3–5 skills, and provide examples or ideas for possible next-steps in your development.

 

Response Guidelines

 

Post a substantive reply to at least two other learners. As you review your colleagues’ posts, be sure to reconnect your thoughts to the discussion topic and assigned readings. Your replies should demonstrate clear links between the discussion topic, readings, and the content in the posts.

 

———————————–

 

The Role of Global Trends in Innovation

 

In your reading from the Dess, Lumpkin, Eisner, and McNamara text for this unit, the authors explored the concept of global trends. You also saw Rosling’s vivid depiction of historical trends in the video 200 Years, 200 Countries, 4 Minutes.

 

For this discussion, explain why it is important for innovation leaders to understand global trends. What is the connection between global trends and the five discovery skills of disruptive innovators?

 

Response Guidelines

 

Post a substantive reply to at least two other learners. As you review your colleagues’ posts, be sure to reconnect your thoughts to the discussion topic and assigned readings. Your replies should demonstrate clear links between the discussion topic, readings, and the content in the posts.

 

WEEK 4 – Analysis of Leaders in Innovation

 

Assignment Overview

 

Your readings have introduced you to Vineet Nayar, then-CEO of HCL Technologies. His approach to leading innovation transformed an at-risk IT services company into a global leader. By examining Nayar’s example and that of other leaders like him, we can learn more about the skills and behaviors of such leaders and how they prepare their organizations to be more innovative. It helps to have a model of assessment when studying these leaders. For this assignment, you will use the five discovery skills from your The Innovator’s DNA textbook.

 

Assignment Instructions

 

For this assignment, identify and analyze the global trends that influenced the need for Nayar to create a more innovative organization. Explain the relationship between the global trends and Nayar’s role as a leader of innovation.

 

Evaluate Nayar’s use of the five discovery skills as an innovation leader. Address all five discovery skills, assessing whether each has a role in this situation, as well as the level of Nayar’s effectiveness in using each skill.

 

Make recommendations for Nayar’s improvement on use of the discovery skills. Consider potential opportunities for Nayar to improve his skills or apply them differently.

 

You will also be evaluated on how well you communicate your analysis and insights. It is expected that you will communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions. To aid you in doing this, follow these guidelines:

 

  • Carefully organize your paper so that a section is labeled and devoted to each of the following topics. Make sure that the reader can easily find:

 

  • A section that analyzes factors in the global environment that influenced Nayar’s need to create a more innovative organization.
  • A section that assesses how the five discovery skills can be used to impact innovation in organization.
  • A section that evaluates Nayar’s use of the discovery skills and includes recommendations for him to improve his use of the skills that encourage and support innovative organizations.

 

  • Optionally, graphs or diagrams may be included in appendices, if they are well-explained and applicable.

 

  • Each section of the paper must be supported using the course readings, and additional scholarly resources or reputable industry publications may be used, if needed. One to three supporting resources are recommended.

 

Your assignment will be scored on the following objectives—see the scoring guide for details:

 

  • Analyze factors in the global environment that influence the need to create innovation within an organization.
  • Assess the potential impact of the five discovery skills on an organization.
  • Evaluate a leader’s use of discovery skills related to supporting innovation within an organization.
  • Recommend leadership improvements and opportunities related to supporting innovation within an organization.
  • Communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions.

 

Submission Requirements

 

  • Written communication: Writing should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • Paper length: 5–6 pages, excluding appendices, cover page, table of contents (if present), and References page.
  • APA formatting: References and citations should follow APA (6th edition) style guidelines.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.

 

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click on the linked resources for helpful writing information.

 

——

 

Open Innovation and the Role of People

 

In this discussion, you will explore how leaders can be used to support open innovation. Your The Innovator’s DNA text uses Procter & Gamble as an example of an innovative organization in several discussions. You have also examined the Procter & Gamble case study from IBS Research Center.

 

  • How can the DNA of innovation leaders be used to support open innovation at Procter & Gamble?
  • Also discuss the role of people—pertaining to the DNA of disruptive organizations—in supporting open innovation at the company.

 

Response Guidelines

 

Post a substantive reply to at least two other learners. As you review your colleagues’ posts, be sure to reconnect your thoughts to the discussion topic and assigned readings. Your replies should demonstrate clear links between the discussion topic, readings, and the content in the posts.

 

WEEK 5 – The DNA of Disruptive Leaders and Organizations

 

Intuitive Surgical, which Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen (2011) recognize as a highly innovative company, finds itself in a difficult competitive situation. While it produces many of the best robotic surgical devices and controls much of the market, its patents will soon expire, and new competitors are challenging its leadership. How should leaders at Intuitive Surgical apply the five discovery skills of disruptive innovators and the DNA of disruptive organizations (people, processes, and philosophies) to retain their leadership and/or establish leadership in new market segments? While Intuitive Surgical has demonstrated a high innovation premium in the past, can it leverage the DNA of innovation leaders and organizations to remain competitive? For this discussion, select two of the five skills to address.

 

Response Guidelines

 

Post a substantive reply to at least two other learners. For this response, reply to posts that analyzed different skills from the ones you addressed. Your replies should demonstrate clear links between the discussion topic, readings, and the content in the posts.

 

Reference

 

Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. M. (2011). The innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.

 

———————-

 

Conducting an Initial Analysis

 

The final assignment asks you to conduct an analysis of either Procter & Gamble or Intuitive Surgical. After reviewing both cases and the expectations for the final assignment, make a preliminary determination as to which company you plan to use for your final project. You are not required to stay with this selection for the final assignment.

 

For this discussion, conduct an initial analysis of your chosen company by answering the following:

 

  • What is your initial impression of which leadership practice or practices would be appropriate and why?
  • How well does the company you have chosen exemplify application of the five discovery skills of innovation leaders?
  • How well did the leaders guide the company toward the right people, processes, and philosophies; and which is most important in this situation?

 

Response Guidelines

 

Post a substantive reply to at least two other learners. As you review your colleagues’ posts, focus on others who chose the same company you chose. Examine points of agreement and differences in your analyses, but pay particular attention to the differences. In your reply posts, explore what you learned from these different perspectives and how they enhanced your understanding of the situation. If you disagree with another learner, engage in respectful and professional dialogue.

 

WEEK 6 – Innovation Leadership Evaluation

 

Assignment Overview

 

In this course, you have explored three main concepts:

 

  • How leadership practices support innovation in the global context.
  • The behaviors of leaders that drive innovation and the creation of innovative organizations.
  • What innovative leaders do to shape organizational culture and processes.

 

The final assignment for this course challenges you to integrate these concepts while focusing on a particular organization. You will integrate what you have learned from the course studies, discussions, and previous assignments to demonstrate your mastery of the course competencies.

 

Effective leaders of innovation must consider three levels of thinking and action by:

 

  • Considering the global context in which their organization competes.
  • Strategizing their personal actions for innovation.
  • Shaping their organization’s culture and processes to enable innovation.

 

All of the leaders and organizations that we have explored in this class have strengths and weaknesses in each of these levels. Your final assignment is an opportunity to explore and analyze all three levels regarding the organization you have chosen (either Procter & Gamble or Intuitive Surgical).

 

Assignment Instructions

 

For this assignment, you will write a 5–6 page paper with a focus on either the Procter & Gamble or Intuitive Surgical case studies. Choose one case, and focus your efforts on that organization. Both Procter & Gamble and Intuitive Surgical are also profiled in various discussions throughout The Innovator’s DNA. You must integrate that information, as well as any other research regarding innovation in these organizations, into your work too.

 

You will be evaluated on how well you communicate your insights and analysis. It is expected that you will communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions. To aid you in doing this, follow these guidelines:

 

  • Carefully organize your paper so that a balanced amount of text covers each item below, and label each section with a heading so that it is clear which of the following topics the section covers. You want your reader to be able to easily find:

 

  • A section that analyzes which leadership practices would encourage innovation, considering the global context of the organization in your chosen case. Explain why you chose these practices and how they will help the leaders in their responsibilities as leaders of innovation.
  • A section that evaluates how the chosen case exemplifies—or does not exemplify—the five discovery skills of innovation leaders.
  • A section that analyzes the actions the leaders of the organization in your chosen case took to shape culture and processes to be more innovative.

 

  • Present an argument for which one of the three organizational DNA factors is most important for this organization’s future success.
  • Graphs or diagrams may be included in appendices, if they are well-explained and applicable.
  • Each section of the paper must be supported using the course readings, and additional scholarly resources or reputable industry publications may be used, if needed. One to three supporting resources are recommended.

 

Your assignment will be scored on the following objectives—see the scoring guide for details:

 

  • Analyze leadership practices that encourage innovation in the organization’s global context.
  • Evaluate the application of the five discovery skills of innovation leaders.
  • Analyze the effect of leadership on an organization’s culture and processes.
  • Argue which organizational factor is most important for an organization’s future success.
  • Communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions.

 

Submission Requirements

 

  • Written communication: Writing should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • Paper length: 5–6 pages, excluding appendices, cover page, table of contents (if present), and References page.
  • APA formatting: References and citations should follow APA (6th edition) style guidelines.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.

 

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click on the linked resources for helpful writing information.

 

——————-

 

Becoming a Leader of Innovation

 

Review your post from the first discussion in Unit 1, and evaluate your initial understanding of innovation compared with what you know today. For this discussion, describe how your knowledge of innovation has changed. Also explain how your perception of your own role in leading innovation has changed. Going forward, what one thing will you do differently to be a leader of innovation?

 

Response Guidelines

 

Post a substantive reply to at least two other learners. As you review your colleagues’ posts, be sure to reconnect your thoughts to the discussion topic and assigned readings. Your replies should demonstrate clear links between the discussion topic, readings, and the content in the posts.

 

————————–

 

Reflection

 

Throughout the course, you have been building toward the achievement of the following competencies:

 

  • Analyze contemporary leadership practices from the perspective of innovation in a global environment.
  • Evaluate the leadership skills that drive innovation.
  • Evaluate what leaders of innovation do to shape organizational culture.
  • Communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the business professions.

 

For this discussion, reflect on the knowledge and skills you developed over the past six weeks. Address the following in your post:

 

  • Select one competency that you feel is the most important to you. How has your ability to perform these skills and apply this knowledge evolved? What concepts, skills, or insights were most relevant to you?
  • How have you grown in your academic and professional goals? Have you made progress on any items in the action plan you developed during first course?

 

Response Guidelines

 

When responding to at least two other learners, provide encouraging feedback about how they have grown over the past six weeks. If applicable, provide recommendations for how they may continue to develop their skills and knowledge, or suggest additional strategies for leveraging the knowledge gained in the course.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Case Analysis On Case Study: “Collective Bargaining In College Dorms.”

Assignment Grading Rubric

Course: GB520 Unit: 5 Points: 100

 

Copyright Kaplan University

Assignment 5 Instructions

Review the SHRM case, “Collective Bargaining in College Dorms.”

Prepare a 4–6 page case analysis on the topic of strategic management and why it is critical to the success of an organization in meeting its goals and mission. In your analysis respond to the following question: What is strategic management and why is it critical to the success of an organization in meeting its goals and mission?

Your analysis of this case and your written submission should reflect an understanding of the critical issues of the case, integrating the material covered in the text, and present concise and well-reasoned justifications for the stance that you take.

Case analysis criteria: Your case analysis should consist of:

• A brief analysis of the situation and pending decision problem, as presented in the case, and as relevant to your answer. This should be exceptionally brief and you should assume the person reading the Assignment is familiar with the details of the case.

• Identification of the major issues surrounding the organization or individuals involved with the organization.

• Identification of alternate courses of action to address the issues identified. • The decision or recommendation for action, with the appropriate supporting arguments. • The case question is designed to guide the direction of your analysis in the case. Your analysis should

address and ultimately answer the question.

You may discuss your case analysis Assignment with the class, but you must submit your own original work.

Case analysis tips: Avoid common errors in case analyses, such as:

• Focusing too heavily on minor issues. • Lamenting because of insufficient data in the case and ignoring creative alternatives. • Rehashing of case data — you should assume the reader knows the case. • Not appropriately evaluating the quality of the case’s data. • Obscuring the quantitative analysis or making it difficult to understand.

Typical “minus (–)” grades result from submissions that:

• Are late. • Are not well integrated and lack clarity. • Do not address timing issues. • Do not recognize the cost implications or are not practical. • Get carried away with personal biases and are not pertinent to the key issues. • Are not thoroughly proofread and corrected.

Assignment submission: Before you submit your Assignment, you should save your work on your computer in a location that you will remember. Save the document using the naming convention: Username_Unit5_Assignment.doc.

 

 

 

Assignment Grading Rubric

Course: GB520 Unit: 5 Points: 100

 

Copyright Kaplan University

Make sure your document includes:

• Your name • Date • Course name and section number • Unit number • Case name • Page numbers

The case analysis should be a minimum of 4–6 pages long, double-spaced. Check for correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage. Citations should be in APA style.

 

 

 

Assignment Grading Rubric

Course: GB520 Unit: 5 Points: 100

 

Copyright Kaplan University

Assignment Rubric

These papers are related to specific issues or cases and will vary in length. In all cases, papers must be well referenced and in APA format. The papers will be evaluated using the following rubric.

At least 20% of a case study paper grade is related to composition that includes organization, writing style, and mechanics. Often, composition issues also impact the grading of the assigned focus paper topic content because composition impacts the effective presentation of your ideas and material.

Case Study Analysis Rubric

Grade Content, Focus, Use of Text/Research, and Organization

Analysis and Critical Thinking

Writing Style, Grammar, and APA Format

100% 100 points

50% 50 points

30% 22 points

20% 15 points

90–100%

 

90–100 points

Response successfully answers the Assignment question(s); thoroughly uses the text and other literature. Includes a strong thesis statement, introduction, and conclusion. The main points of the paper are developed clearly. All arguments are supported well (no errors in logic) using outside sources as assigned.

Sources are primarily academic journals, with thoughtfully used web sources. References are applied substantively to the paper topic. Skillfully addresses counter-arguments and does not ignore data contradicting its claim. Refers to sources both in-text and in the reference page.

Response exhibits strong higher-order critical thinking and analysis (e.g., evaluation). Paper shows original thought.

Analysis includes proper classifications, explanations, comparisons, and inferences.

Critical thinking includes appropriate judgments, conclusions, and assessments based on evaluation and synthesis of information.

Grammatical skills are strong with typically less than one error per page. Correct use of APA when assigned.

Appropriate to the Assignment, fresh (interesting to read), accurate (no far-fetched, unsupported comments), precise (say what you mean), and concise (not wordy).

Project is in 12-point font. Narrative sections are double- spaced. Project is free of serious errors: grammar, punctuation, and spelling help to clarify the meaning by following accepted conventions.

 

 

Assignment Grading Rubric

Course: GB520 Unit: 5 Points: 100

 

Copyright Kaplan University

Grade Content, Focus, Use of Text/Research, and Organization

Analysis and Critical Thinking

Writing Style, Grammar, and APA Format

80–89%

 

80–89 points

Response answers the Assignment question(s) with only minor digressions; sufficiently uses the text and other literature. Provides a good thesis statement, introduction, and conclusion that require some revision but that form a good basis.

Develops the main points clearly.

Supports most arguments concretely (no logical errors) using outside sources as assigned.

Some sources are non- academic with over reliance on web sources. References not always clearly tied to development of ideas. Does not ignore data contradicting its claim, though the refutation may need additional support. Refers to outside sources in the text and reference page.

 

Response generally exhibits higher-order critical thinking and analysis (e.g., evaluation). Paper shows some original thought.

Analysis includes adequate classifications, explanations, comparisons, and inferences.

 

Critical thinking includes adequate judgments, conclusions, and assessments based on evaluation and synthesis of information.

Internally, each section has good organization. Transitions found between and within sections are mostly clear and effective. Generally appropriate to the Assignment, accurate (no far-fetched, unsupported claims), precise, and concise. Includes a title page and reference page.

 

Project is in 12-point font. Narrative sections are double- spaced. Project contains some minor grammatical and punctuation errors. Few misspellings. Citations generally follow APA guidelines (perhaps one or two minor errors).

 

 

Assignment Grading Rubric

Course: GB520 Unit: 5 Points: 100

 

Copyright Kaplan University

Grade Content, Focus, Use of Text/Research, and Organization

Analysis and Critical Thinking

Writing Style, Grammar, and APA Format

70–79%

 

70–79 points

Response answers the project Assignment(s) with some digression; sufficiently uses the text and other literature. Provides a thesis statement that needs revision. The introduction and conclusion do not set up or close the paper very effectively. Shows too little original thought (strings of citations that are not developed to support the thesis).

Main points are adequately defined in only some areas of the paper; points may be over- emphasized or repeated. Some arguments are supported with outside research, but others may not be. Relies too heavily on personal experience or one source. The paper does not meet the source requirements. Some obvious counter- arguments are ignored or not well refuted.

Response exhibits limited higher-order critical thinking and analysis (e.g., application of information).

Analysis includes limited classifications, explanations, comparisons, and inferences.

Critical thinking includes limited judgments, conclusions, and assessments based on evaluation and synthesis of information.

Sentences are occasionally wordy or ambiguous; tone is too informal. Grammatical skills are adequate with no more than 2–3 errors per page. The paper is not well organized. Sections lack transitions and several sentences may be monotonous or confusing. The overall structure of the Assignment is not effective. Appropriate in places, but elsewhere vague writing interferes with the development and clarity of the main points. Numerous grammatical and punctuation errors. Misspellings are more frequent, but they are the sort spell checkers do not catch, such as “effect/affect.” An attempt at APA citation was made, but there are multiple errors larger than a misplaced period. Narrative sections are not double-spaced.

60–69%

60–69 points

Response answers the Assignment question(s), but digresses significantly; insufficiently uses the text and other literature.

Response exhibits simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis but does demonstrate comprehension.

Sentences are generally wordy and/or ambiguous; tone is too informal. Grammatical skills are inadequate, clarity and meaning are impaired, typically 3–5 errors per page. Inadequate use of APA format.

0–59%

0–59 points

 

Response insufficiently answers the Assignment question(s); insufficiently uses the text and other literature.

Response exhibits simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis and demonstrates limited knowledge on the subject matter.

Sentences unclear enough to impair meaning; tone is inappropriate and/or inconsistent. Grammatical skills are incompetent for college level; typically 6 or more errors per page. Unacceptable use of APA format.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!