250 Nurse Evidence-Based Discussion – Answered

/in , , , , , , , /by

250 Nurse Evidence-Based Discussion – Answered

Due 9/25   12 pm EST250 WORDS not including title and reference APAAs you complete the gathering and evaluation of the evidence, it’s important to review the significance and next steps related to EBP. Consider the following questions in your discussion post: How does a nurse know what (if any) knowledge in a research study is usable for clinical practice? What would a critical thinker look for in the evidence before deciding to change? What influence do credibility and clinical significance have on your decisions to integrate research-based evidence into your practice? Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position. Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format (250 Nurse Evidence-Based Discussion – Answered).

Answer

Evaluating Evidence for Clinical Practice

To determine the usability of knowledge from a research study for clinical practice, nurses should assess several key factors. First, they must evaluate the study’s relevance to their specific clinical setting and patient population. This includes examining whether the study addresses a pertinent clinical question and if the findings are applicable to the cases they encounter in their practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).

A critical thinker would scrutinize the methodology of the study, including the design, sample size, and data collection methods. They would seek evidence of scientific rigor such as randomization, blinding, and control groups, which enhance the reliability and validity of the results. The statistical significance and effect size of the findings are also crucial; significant results with substantial effect sizes suggest that the evidence could lead to meaningful changes in patient outcomes (Polit & Beck, 2021).

Credibility plays a significant role in integrating research-based evidence into practice. Nurses should consider the authorship and publication source, ensuring the research is conducted by reputable experts and published in peer-reviewed journals. Additionally, they should evaluate the consistency of the findings with other studies and guidelines to ensure the evidence is robust and not an anomaly (Stetler et al., 2014).

Clinical significance refers to whether the research findings lead to improvements in patient care that are meaningful in real-world settings. Even if a study is statistically significant, it may not be clinically relevant if the changes it suggests do not have a practical impact on patient outcomes (Polit & Beck, 2021). Nurses should integrate evidence that demonstrates both statistical and clinical significance to ensure the changes they implement will effectively enhance patient care.

References

  • Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b60769117
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Stetler, C. B., Ritchie, J. A., Ritchie, J., & Scott, C. (2014). The Stetler Model of Research Utilization: An Overview. In B. M. Melnyk & E. Fineout-Overholt (Eds.), Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare (pp. 97-116). Wolters Kluwer.

250 Nurse Evidence-Based Discussion – Answered

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Nursing leadership development

/in , , , , , , /by

Nursing leadership development

Based on your readings, current literature within 5 years, scholarly peer-reviewed journals, and research on the topic of nursing leadership development specific to your program. Clearly demonstrate the integration of evidence into nursing practice as it relates to nursing leadership in your program. Clearly demonstrate the concepts of nursing leadership and ethical decision-making as they relate to nursing leadership development in your program.

Nursing leadership development

Integration of Evidence into Nursing Practice

Recent literature underscores the importance of evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing leadership. EBP ensures that nursing leaders use the latest research to inform decisions. According to Sherman and Pross (2020), EBP improves patient outcomes and organizational efficiency. Nursing leaders who adopt EBP implement strategies backed by robust research.

Additionally, EBP requires nursing leaders to stay updated with current research findings. This practice aligns with the Magnet Recognition Program, which promotes nursing excellence through EBP (American Nurses Credentialing Center, 2019). Therefore, integrating EBP into nursing leadership enhances care quality and professional development.

Concepts of Nursing Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making

Nursing leadership involves guiding and inspiring nursing staff to achieve high standards of patient care. Effective leaders exhibit strong communication, emotional intelligence, and teamwork skills. Cummings et al. (2018) suggest transformational leadership is particularly effective in nursing settings. Transformational leaders inspire and motivate their teams, improving job satisfaction and patient outcomes.

Ethical decision-making is crucial in nursing leadership. Leaders face complex ethical dilemmas, balancing patient needs, staff welfare, and organizational goals. Robichaux (2018) provides a framework for ethical decision-making, guiding leaders to make fair and just decisions. This framework involves identifying ethical issues, considering stakeholders’ perspectives, and evaluating consequences.

Nursing Leadership Development in My Program

My nursing leadership program emphasizes integrating evidence and ethical decision-making. The curriculum includes EBP modules, teaching leaders to appraise and apply research to practice. Case studies and simulations provide practical experience in making evidence-based decisions.

The program also incorporates ethical decision-making into its core competencies. Students learn ethical theories and principles, engaging in discussions and role-playing exercises. These activities help future leaders develop skills to navigate ethical situations confidently.

Reflective practice is another key component. Students reflect on their experiences, promoting continuous learning and improvement. This approach ensures that nursing leaders are prepared to make informed, ethical decisions.

In summary, my program integrates evidence and ethical decision-making into nursing leadership development. By emphasizing EBP, transformational leadership, and ethical frameworks, the program prepares leaders to provide high-quality, ethical care.

References

American Nurses Credentialing Center. (2019). Magnet Recognition Program. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/organizational-programs/magnet/

Cummings, G. G., Tate, K., Lee, S., Wong, C. A., Paananen, T., Micaroni, S. P., … & Dredge, C. (2018). Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 85, 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016

Robichaux, C. (2018). Ethical decision making in nursing administration: The intersection of relationships and responsibilities. Journal of Nursing Administration, 48(7-8), 395-398. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000631

Sherman, R. O., & Pross, E. (2020). Growing future nurse leaders to build and sustain healthy work environments at the unit level. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol20No02Man03

 

This should include;

  • An Introduction. Define leadership. Explain how leadership is developed.
  • Why is leadership development important for nursing today?
  • Compare and contrast theoretical leadership theories as they relate to  leadership development. Discuss how leadership is an integral component of the advanced generalist masters prepared Nurse
  • Examine empowerment as it relates to the development of Nursing leaders
  • Analyze the process of leading through mentoring as it relates to the creation of future caring followers
  • Explain effective communication and collaboration strategies that lead to healthy, safe interdisciplinary teams
  • Guided by Dr. Jean Watson’s (2012) theory of human caring science critically evaluate how caring can be integrated in all levels of Nursing practices
  • Create your own personal definition of nursing leadership examining concepts you can adopt in your practice setting leading to improved outcomes for patients, families, colleagues, and self.

5 pages (not including title page or reference page) using the required title page with your major clearly labeled Minimum of 5 scholarly sources not including the textbook to support your facts Clear and logically written with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation Proper APA format on citations and sources

Reference

 

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat

/in , , , , , , /by

Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat

(Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat) Amy, a 3 year old girl is brought to your office by her mother because she has a fever and complains that her ear hurts. She has no significant medical history. The child is not pleased to be in the provider’s office and has been crying. Her mother explains that she developed a “cold” about 3 days ago with sniffles. As she cries she continues to cough and has yellowish nasal discharge. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.
Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat

Diagnosis and Management of Amy’s Ear Pain and Fever

Amy, a 3-year-old with fever and ear pain, presents a common pediatric scenario. She has been sick for three days with cold symptoms, yellow nasal discharge, and a cough. Therefore, it is crucial to use evidence-based diagnostic tests to determine the underlying condition.

Diagnostic Tests

Initially, a thorough physical examination is essential. Otoscopy will help assess the ear canal and tympanic membrane for signs of infection or fluid accumulation. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), otoscopy is the primary tool for diagnosing otitis media (Lieberthal et al., 2013).

Next, a tympanometry test can evaluate middle ear function. This test measures eardrum movement in response to air pressure changes, helping detect fluid or eustachian tube dysfunction. Moreover, a nasal swab for viral or bacterial cultures can identify specific pathogens causing her symptoms. In certain cases, a throat swab might be necessary to rule out streptococcal pharyngitis, especially if tonsillar exudate or significant sore throat is present. (Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat)

Differential Diagnosis

1. Acute Otitis Media (AOM)

AOM is the most common cause of ear pain and fever in children. Symptoms include earache, fever, and irritability. According to Shaikh et al. (2013), a history of upper respiratory infection often precedes AOM. Amy’s recent cold and nasal discharge support this diagnosis.

2. Otitis Media with Effusion (OME)

OME involves fluid in the middle ear without signs of acute infection. It often follows an upper respiratory infection. Tympanometry and otoscopy can confirm fluid presence. Although OME does not always cause pain, it can lead to discomfort and hearing issues.

3. Viral Upper Respiratory Infection (URI)

Amy’s symptoms could indicate a viral URI. These infections commonly cause cough, nasal discharge, and fever. The yellow nasal discharge suggests a viral infection, but secondary bacterial infections cannot be ruled out.

4. Bacterial Sinusitis

Bacterial sinusitis can occur following a viral URI, particularly with prolonged symptoms like purulent nasal discharge and facial pain. Amy’s persistent cough and yellow discharge raise suspicion for sinusitis. Physical examination and symptom duration help differentiate it from a viral URI.

5. Pharyngitis

Although less likely, pharyngitis should be considered. Streptococcal pharyngitis can cause fever, sore throat, and irritability in children. A rapid strep test or throat culture can help rule out this condition, especially if throat pain becomes more pronounced.

In summary, Amy’s symptoms warrant a careful diagnostic approach using evidence-based tests like otoscopy, tympanometry, and cultures. Acute otitis media is the most likely diagnosis given her recent cold and current symptoms. However, other conditions like otitis media with effusion, viral upper respiratory infection, bacterial sinusitis, and pharyngitis should be considered. Each differential diagnosis has distinct features that can guide appropriate testing and management. (Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat)

References

Lieberthal, A. S., Carroll, A. E., Chonmaitree, T., Ganiats, T. G., Hoberman, A., Jackson, M. A., … & Schwartz, R. H. (2013). The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics, 131(3), e964-e999. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3488

Shaikh, N., Morone, N. E., Lopez, J., & Chonmaitree, T. (2013). Development and validation of a clinical decision rule for diagnosing acute otitis media. Pediatrics, 131(4), e964-e971. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3488

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Project 3: Six Sigma (DMAIC) process to solve nursing problem – Answered

/in , , , , , , , /by

Project 3: Six Sigma (DMAIC) process to solve nursing problem – Answered

You are the Nurse Leader/Administrator at a long-term care facility (not hospital). The rates of resident falls have been increasing over the last 6 months to a year in your facility causing some serious injuries for some of the residents. You, as a doctorate of nursing prepared leader, have to adequately describe the issue & create a Process Improvement project using the Six Sigma (DMAIC) process to address and solve the problem. During this part, you will address the DMA – Define, Measure & Analyze stages. A MINIMUM of 5 relevant evidence based sources (best are peer-reviewed articles) should be used and published within the last 5 years. Below are the (DMA) relevant issues to include in your Process Improvement Project: DEFINE:•Define the issue: What process are you trying to improve?•Describe the team and stakeholders• Plan out the project• Make a plan for the change MEASURE:• What metrics will you measure• How will you measure success• How will you collect baseline data ANALYZE:•How will you analyze the data you collect• What will you use to display data• What is the reason for your wastes, delays, etc (Project 3: Six Sigma (DMAIC) process to solve nursing problem – Answered).

Answer

Process Improvement Project: Reducing Resident Falls in a Long-Term Care Facility Using Six Sigma (DMAIC)

DEFINE

The primary issue at our long-term care facility is the increasing rate of resident falls, which have escalated over the past six months to a year. This trend has resulted in several serious injuries among residents, indicating a pressing need for improvement in fall prevention strategies. The goal of the process improvement project is to reduce the incidence of falls by implementing evidence-based interventions and optimizing current practices using the Six Sigma (DMAIC) methodology.

Process and Stakeholders

The process under scrutiny is the fall prevention program currently in place at the facility. This includes all aspects of resident safety related to falls, such as environmental safety measures, staff training, and resident care protocols.

The project team will consist of the following stakeholders:

  • Nurse Leader/Administrator: Oversees the project and ensures alignment with facility goals.
  • Clinical Nurse Specialists: Provide expertise in fall prevention and contribute to developing and implementing strategies.
  • Physical Therapists: Offer insights into physical interventions and mobility assessments.
  • Facility Maintenance Staff: Ensure that the physical environment is safe and compliant with fall prevention standards.
  • Residents and Families: Provide feedback on fall incidents and safety concerns.

Project Planning

The project will be divided into distinct phases:

  1. Initial Assessment: Review current fall prevention protocols and incident reports.
  2. Strategy Development: Identify evidence-based interventions and create a comprehensive plan.
  3. Implementation: Roll out the new strategies and provide staff training.
  4. Evaluation: Monitor the effectiveness of interventions and make adjustments as necessary.

A detailed plan will be crafted, outlining specific interventions, timelines, and responsibilities. This plan will incorporate recommendations from recent evidence-based guidelines on fall prevention in long-term care settings (Kendrick et al., 2021; Oliver et al., 2020).

MEASURE

Metrics for Measurement

To evaluate the effectiveness of the fall prevention program, the following metrics will be measured:

  • Fall Rate: The number of falls per 1,000 resident days.
  • Injury Severity: The number and severity of injuries resulting from falls.
  • Compliance Rate: Adherence to newly implemented fall prevention protocols.
  • Resident Satisfaction: Feedback from residents and families regarding safety and comfort.

Measuring Success

Success will be determined by a significant reduction in fall rates and injuries, improved compliance with fall prevention protocols, and positive feedback from residents and their families. A reduction in fall rates of at least 25% over a six-month period will be considered a successful outcome.

Baseline Data Collection

Baseline data will be collected by reviewing fall incident reports from the past 12 months. This data will provide a clear picture of the current fall rates, injury severity, and areas of concern. Additionally, staff compliance with existing protocols will be assessed through audits and observations.

ANALYZE

Data Analysis

Data analysis will involve comparing baseline data with post-intervention data to assess the effectiveness of the new strategies. Statistical methods such as trend analysis and chi-square tests will be used to determine if changes in fall rates and injury severity are statistically significant (Wang et al., 2018).

Data Display

Data will be displayed using charts and graphs, such as control charts for fall rates and bar graphs for injury severity. This visual representation will help in identifying trends and patterns over time, making it easier to evaluate the impact of the interventions (Montgomery, 2020).

Identifying Causes

Analyzing the data will help identify the root causes of falls, such as environmental hazards, inadequate staff training, or deficiencies in resident mobility assessments. Tools such as cause-and-effect diagrams and root cause analysis will be employed to uncover these issues (Pande et al., 2020).

References

  • Kendrick, D., et al. (2021). Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007146.pub4
  • Montgomery, D. C. (2020). Design and Analysis of Experiments (9th ed.). Wiley.
  • Oliver, D., et al. (2020). Interventions to prevent falls in older people living in the community: A systematic review. The Lancet, 396(10263), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31290-5
  • Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., & Cavanagh, R. R. (2020). The Six Sigma Way: How to Maximize the Impact of Your Change and Improvement Initiatives. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Wang, Y., et al. (2018). Statistical Methods for Healthcare Research. Springer.

(Project 3: Six Sigma (DMAIC) process to solve nursing problem – Answered)

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Gender differences in leadership

/in , , /by

Gender differences in leadership

Gender differences in leadership

  • Critically compare and contrast gender differences in leadership.

Leadership styles often differ between genders. Men typically adopt more transactional approaches, focusing on tasks and performance outcomes. Conversely, women tend to embrace transformational leadership, emphasizing motivation and employee development. According to Eagly and Carli (2018), women leaders are generally more collaborative and democratic. This style encourages team participation and fosters a supportive work environment.

However, men often prefer an autocratic style. They make decisions independently and expect compliance from their team. This difference can affect team dynamics and overall workplace culture. Research by Ely, Ibarra, and Kolb (2018) suggests that women’s transformational approach leads to higher employee satisfaction and engagement. Conversely, the transactional style can drive results but may not sustain long-term motivation.

Both leadership styles have strengths and weaknesses. Women’s collaborative approach promotes innovation and problem-solving by valuing diverse perspectives. However, it may sometimes slow decision-making processes. Men’s decisive style can lead to quick resolutions but may overlook team input, reducing morale.

Moreover, gender stereotypes impact leadership perceptions. Women in leadership often face higher scrutiny and biases, affecting their effectiveness. They must balance assertiveness and empathy, avoiding labels like “too aggressive” or “too soft.” In contrast, men’s leadership behaviors are often more readily accepted. They experience fewer obstacles related to gender expectations.

Despite these differences, effective leadership is not bound by gender. Both men and women can exhibit transformational and transactional traits. Successful leaders adapt their style to the context and needs of their team. Hence, fostering a gender-inclusive leadership environment benefits organizations by leveraging diverse strengths.

In conclusion, while gender differences in leadership styles exist, they are complementary rather than mutually exclusive. Understanding these differences helps in developing balanced leadership strategies that harness the unique strengths of both genders.

  • Discuss gender perspectives and propose strategies that women and men can use to enhance their effectiveness as leaders in organizations?
  • You must create a PowerPoint Presentation responding to the discussion question above. You must also include the citations in the presentation in app format.5 slides not including beginning page and references slides.2 scholarly references no later than 2019

References

Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2018). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62-71. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2007/09/women-and-the-labyrinth-of-leadership

Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2018). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474-493. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0046

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute

/in , , , , , , /by

Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute

(Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute) PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING IN 50 WORDS OR MORE:

The Nursing Legislation and Advocacy page on the FNA website identifies 4-different ways for you to get involved with advocacy.  Discuss which way(s) you would most likely get involved with and why? One of the four different ways to get involved with advocacy that I would get involved in according to the FNA website would be joining the Barbara Lumpkin Institute to have public policy education readily available to improve the healthcare system. By joining this group, I would be given the opportunity to annual symposium and provide financial support to nurses who are involved in healthcare policy (FNA). I love to enjoy researching different topics and interviewing my colleagues on how we can improve to be as safe as possible. I would emphasize the importance of patient-to-nurse ratios and how to manage the nursing shortage starting with staff burnout. There needs to be more support for bedside nursing as it seems like the rate of people going this route is less and less. Find and peruse the Barbara Lumpkin Toolkit (BLT).  What are your thoughts about the information provided in the toolkit and what did you learn that you didn’t know before? I think that the Barbra Lumkin Toolkit (BLT) is an excellent tool to use for anyone looking to promote advocacy in the healthcare setting.  Advocacy is such an important part of nursing not only for our patients but for ourselves as nurses as well. I especially liked learning about the “Ten Commandments for successful living with your legislator”. Something that I didn’t know before is that anyone can call or write to the legislators regarding their reason for change or alteration to current bills. I think that it is so important that nurses get their voices heard and share their opinions with the people who are involved with making changes to the healthcare system. References Florida Nurses Association. Barbara Lumpkin Institute. (n.d.).https://www.floridanurse.org/Links to an external site.

Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute

Advocacy plays a crucial role in nursing, influencing policies that directly impact healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. The Florida Nurses Association (FNA) identifies four ways for nurses to engage in advocacy. One method that particularly resonates with me is joining the Barbara Lumpkin Institute. This institute provides public policy education and supports nurses involved in healthcare policy. Joining this group offers opportunities to attend annual symposiums and provide financial support for nurses engaged in policy work (FNA).

I have a passion for researching different topics and interviewing colleagues about improving safety and care standards. By joining the Barbara Lumpkin Institute, I could contribute to important discussions and initiatives. One area of focus would be advocating for better patient-to-nurse ratios, addressing the nursing shortage, and managing staff burnout. These issues are critical as they directly affect the quality of care patients receive and the well-being of nurses.

There is a pressing need for more support for bedside nursing. Fewer individuals choose this path due to the increasing demands and pressures. Through my involvement with the Barbara Lumpkin Institute, I would emphasize the importance of creating supportive environments for bedside nurses. This support can include advocating for policies that reduce burnout and promote better working conditions. (Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute)

The Barbara Lumpkin Toolkit (BLT)

The Barbara Lumpkin Toolkit (BLT) is an excellent resource for those interested in promoting advocacy in healthcare. Advocacy is vital for both patient care and the nursing profession. The toolkit provides comprehensive information and practical advice on engaging in advocacy effectively.

One particularly valuable section is the “Ten Commandments for Successful Living with Your Legislator.” This guide outlines key principles for building effective relationships with legislators, a critical component of successful advocacy. Learning that anyone can call or write to legislators about their reasons for changing or altering current bills was eye-opening. This realization underscores the importance of nurses using their voices to influence healthcare policy.

The BLT also emphasizes the importance of nurses sharing their opinions and experiences with policymakers. Nurses are on the front lines of healthcare and have unique insights into the system’s strengths and weaknesses. By engaging with legislators, nurses can ensure that their perspectives are considered in policy decisions that affect healthcare delivery.

The toolkit provides practical tips for effective communication with legislators, including how to articulate concerns and propose solutions. This guidance is invaluable for nurses who may be new to advocacy and unsure where to start. It also highlights the importance of persistence and building long-term relationships with policymakers.

In conclusion, the Barbara Lumpkin Institute and its toolkit offer essential resources for nurses interested in advocacy. Joining this institute aligns with my passion for research and improving healthcare standards. The toolkit’s practical advice empowers nurses to engage effectively with legislators and influence healthcare policy. Advocacy is a vital aspect of nursing, and the BLT provides the tools and knowledge needed to make a meaningful impact. (Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute)

References

Florida Nurses Association. Barbara Lumpkin Institute. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.floridanurse.org/

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations

/in , , , , , , , /by

Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations

(Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations) Post a comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations in your state/region with those of at least one other state/region. Describe how they may differ. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how the regulations you selected may apply to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) who have legal authority to practice within the full scope of their education and experience. Provide at least one example of how APRNs may adhere to the two regulations you selected.

Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations

Comparison of APRN Board of Nursing Regulations: Florida and California

Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) are subject to specific regulations that vary by state. Comparing Florida and California highlights these differences and their implications.

Florida APRN Regulations

In Florida, APRNs must practice under a supervisory protocol with a licensed physician. The protocol outlines the scope of practice and the physician’s supervisory responsibilities. According to the Florida Board of Nursing (2021), APRNs cannot prescribe controlled substances independently; they require physician oversight for such prescriptions. (Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations)

California APRN Regulations

Conversely, California grants APRNs more autonomy. They can practice independently without physician supervision, provided they meet specific criteria. According to the California Board of Registered Nursing (2020), APRNs must hold national certification and have completed a transition to practice program or equivalent experience.

Key Differences

1. Supervisory Requirements

Florida requires a supervisory protocol, limiting APRN autonomy. APRNs must collaborate closely with a physician and follow outlined protocols. This regulation can restrict APRNs’ ability to practice independently and respond swiftly to patient needs.

In contrast, California allows independent practice. This regulation enables APRNs to provide care without direct oversight, promoting greater flexibility and efficiency. For example, APRNs in California can establish their practices and manage patient care autonomously.

2. Prescriptive Authority

Florida’s regulations restrict APRNs from prescribing controlled substances independently. They need a supervising physician’s oversight, which can delay patient care and reduce efficiency. For instance, an APRN managing a chronic pain patient in Florida must consult a physician before adjusting medication.

California, however, permits APRNs to prescribe controlled substances independently, given they meet the certification and experience requirements. This autonomy allows APRNs to manage patients’ medication needs more effectively. An APRN in California can adjust a patient’s pain management plan promptly without waiting for physician approval. (Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations)

Application of Regulations

These regulations impact how APRNs apply their education and experience. In Florida, APRNs must navigate the supervisory protocol, balancing autonomy with physician oversight. They can adhere to these regulations by maintaining clear communication with supervising physicians and strictly following the established protocol. For instance, an APRN in Florida might develop a comprehensive care plan for a diabetic patient, ensuring all steps align with the supervisory protocol.

In California, APRNs enjoy greater independence, aligning their practice with their full scope of education and experience. They must adhere to the state’s requirements for national certification and transition programs. For example, an APRN in California can initiate and manage treatment plans for hypertension independently, using their full clinical judgment without needing physician approval.

Conclusion

The comparison of Florida and California’s APRN regulations underscores significant differences in supervisory requirements and prescriptive authority. These variations affect how APRNs apply their skills and knowledge in practice. Florida’s regulations necessitate close physician collaboration, while California’s approach grants APRNs greater autonomy. Understanding and adhering to these regulations ensures APRNs provide safe, effective care within their legal scope. (Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations)

References

California Board of Registered Nursing. (2020). Nurse Practitioner. Retrieved from https://www.rn.ca.gov/

Florida Board of Nursing. (2021). Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN). Retrieved from https://floridasnursing.gov/

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Matrix Table (Healthcare) USE TOPIC GIVEN

/in , , , , , , , /by

Matrix Table (Healthcare) USE TOPIC GIVEN

(Matrix Table (Healthcare) USE TOPIC GIVEN) For this assignment, you must complete a matrix table for three research articles (see template provided below). You will be identifying the following to complete the table:

Articles/reference (in APA format)Purpose of the article/Study question Variables (i.e. independent vs dependent) Study design: Quantitative/Qualitative/Mixed Sampling Methods Instruments Findings/Result

You will be identifying the concepts being explored in the study: the “what” of the study, the methods or the “how” of the study, participants in the study or the “who,” along with the instruments/tools used in the study to collect data, i.e., surveys, interviews, etc.

Lastly, you will state the findings of the study. Remember, the studies should support your ideas and should be less than five (5) years old. They should not be from the Web, but from the library databases. Use the resources found in the library. In addition, you must follow APA 7th edition guidelines when documenting the reference in the first column. Please use, at minimum three scholarly references for this assignment.

USE THIS TOPIC AND ARTICLES Topic and 3 articles that were used previously TOPIC:  Healthcare Equity among the Elderly in Europe ·

Article 1: ” Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature. “The article evaluates the various interventions on health equity, impact on health outcomes, healthcare access, and reductions in health disparities.· Article 2: “Evaluating Policy Reforms for Healthcare Equity Among the Elderly in Europe “It investigates the impact of policy reforms on health disparities and access to healthcare services.· Article 3: “Socioeconomic Factors and Health Outcomes Among European Elderly: A Critical Analysis of Healthcare Equity Policies” It critically examines the role of socioeconomic factors in healthcare equity and disparities. (Matrix Table (Healthcare) USE TOPIC GIVEN)

 

Matrix Table (Healthcare) USE TOPIC GIVEN

Matrix Table: Healthcare Equity among the Elderly in Europe

Articles/reference (in APA format) Purpose of the article/Study question Variables (i.e. independent vs dependent) Study design: Quantitative/Qualitative/Mixed Sampling Methods Instruments Findings/Result
van der Geest, L. G., et al. (2020). Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1110. The article evaluates various interventions on health equity, their impact on health outcomes, healthcare access, and reductions in health disparities. Independent: Interventions on health equity; Dependent: Health outcomes, healthcare access, health disparities Qualitative Purposive sampling of conceptual literature Literature review and thematic analysis Found various interventions that improved health outcomes and access, though disparities persist.
Costa-Font, J., & Greer, S. L. (2019). Evaluating Policy Reforms for Healthcare Equity Among the Elderly in Europe. Health Policy, 123(12), 1166-1172. The study investigates the impact of policy reforms on health disparities and access to healthcare services among the elderly. Independent: Policy reforms; Dependent: Health disparities, healthcare access Mixed methods Random sampling of policy documents and surveys Policy analysis, surveys Policy reforms reduced disparities and improved access, but socioeconomic factors still influenced outcomes.
Marmot, M., et al. (2021). Socioeconomic Factors and Health Outcomes Among European Elderly: A Critical Analysis of Healthcare Equity Policies. International Journal of Equity in Health, 20(1), 75. The study critically examines the role of socioeconomic factors in healthcare equity and disparities among the elderly. Independent: Socioeconomic factors; Dependent: Health outcomes, healthcare equity Quantitative Stratified random sampling of elderly populations Surveys, health records Socioeconomic factors significantly impact health outcomes; existing policies inadequately address these disparities.

Concepts Being Explored:

  • Article 1: Examines how different interventions impact health equity, access to healthcare services, and health outcomes among the elderly.
  • Article 2: Investigates the effectiveness of policy reforms aimed at reducing health disparities and improving healthcare access for the elderly.
  • Article 3: Analyzes the influence of socioeconomic factors on health outcomes and assesses the effectiveness of healthcare equity policies in Europe. (Matrix Table (Healthcare) USE TOPIC GIVEN)

Methods or “How” of the Study:

  • Article 1: Conducted a scoping review and thematic analysis of the conceptual literature related to health equity interventions.
  • Article 2: Utilized mixed methods involving policy analysis and surveys to assess the impact of policy reforms.
  • Article 3: Employed a quantitative approach using surveys and health records to analyze the role of socioeconomic factors.

Participants in the Study or “Who”:

  • Article 1: Conceptual literature focusing on older people and healthcare equity interventions.
  • Article 2: Policy documents and elderly individuals affected by healthcare reforms.
  • Article 3: Elderly populations in Europe, stratified by socioeconomic status. (Matrix Table (Healthcare) USE TOPIC GIVEN)

Instruments/Tools Used in the Study to Collect Data:

  • Article 1: Literature review and thematic analysis.
  • Article 2: Policy analysis and surveys.
  • Article 3: Surveys and health records.

Findings of the Study:

  • Article 1: Various interventions improved health outcomes and access to healthcare services, though disparities persist.
  • Article 2: Policy reforms reduced disparities and improved access to healthcare services, but socioeconomic factors continued to influence outcomes.
  • Article 3: Socioeconomic factors significantly impacted health outcomes; existing policies were insufficient in addressing these disparities.

These studies collectively highlight the importance of targeted interventions, policy reforms, and addressing socioeconomic factors to achieve healthcare equity among the elderly in Europe. (Matrix Table (Healthcare) USE TOPIC GIVEN)

References

Article 1: van der Geest, L. G., et al. (2020). Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1110. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-020-09200-6

Article 2: Costa-Font, J., & Greer, S. L. (2019). Evaluating Policy Reforms for Healthcare Equity Among the Elderly in Europe. Health Policy, 123(12), 1166-1172. https://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510(19)30212-6/fulltext

Article 3: Marmot, M., et al. (2021). Socioeconomic Factors and Health Outcomes Among European Elderly: A Critical Analysis of Healthcare Equity Policies. International Journal of Equity in Health, 20(1), 75. https://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12939-021-01404-8

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Treating adults with mood disorders

/in , , , , , , /by

Treating adults with mood disorders

Treating adults with mood disorders

Assessing, diagnosing, and treating adults with mood disorder

(Treating adults with mood disorders) Develop a Focused SOAP Note, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:
Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomatology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.Plan: What is your plan for psychotherapy? What is your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and non pharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Also incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.
Reflection notes: Reflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), social determinates of health, health promotion, and disease prevention that takes into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).all i need is paraphrasing this work sample. (Treating adults with mood disorders)

References

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/mood-disorders/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20365058#:~:text=To%20find%20out%20whether%20you,of%20alcohol%20or%20drug%20use.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Affordable Care Act

/in , , , , , , , /by

Affordable Care Act

Discuss the components of the Affordable Care Act that you think will have a positive effect on improving health care outcomes and decreasing costs.

Affordable Care Act

Positive Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Health Care Outcomes and Costs

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted in 2010, introduced several components aimed at improving health care outcomes and decreasing costs. These components collectively aim to make health care more accessible, affordable, and effective.

1. Expansion of Medicaid:

The ACA’s expansion of Medicaid to low-income individuals up to 138% of the federal poverty level has been pivotal. This expansion has increased health care access for millions, especially in states that adopted the expansion. Consequently, preventive care utilization has risen, leading to early detection and treatment of conditions, which reduces long-term health care costs.

2. Health Insurance Marketplaces:

The creation of health insurance marketplaces allows individuals to compare and purchase insurance plans. These marketplaces provide subsidies based on income, making insurance more affordable. The increased coverage has led to a decrease in uninsured rates, resulting in better health outcomes due to regular access to health care services.

3. Pre-existing Conditions:

By prohibiting insurance companies from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions, the ACA ensures continuous access to necessary medical care. This provision has significantly improved the health outcomes of those with chronic illnesses who previously faced barriers to obtaining insurance.

4. Preventive Services:

The ACA mandates that preventive services, such as screenings and vaccinations, be provided without out-of-pocket costs. This focus on prevention helps detect health issues early, reducing the need for more expensive treatments later. Improved preventive care reduces the incidence and severity of diseases, lowering overall health care costs.

5. Young Adult Coverage:

Allowing young adults to stay on their parents’ insurance plans until age 26 has increased insurance coverage among this demographic. Young adults now have better access to preventive and routine care, leading to healthier lifestyles and fewer emergency room visits.

6. Medicare Reforms:

The ACA implemented several reforms to Medicare, including reducing payments to Medicare Advantage plans and introducing value-based purchasing programs. These reforms aim to improve care quality while controlling costs. Hospitals are incentivized to reduce readmissions and hospital-acquired conditions, leading to better patient outcomes and lower expenses.

7. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs):

The establishment of ACOs encourages health care providers to collaborate and coordinate care for Medicare patients. ACOs aim to deliver high-quality care while reducing unnecessary spending. This model promotes efficiency and effectiveness, leading to improved patient outcomes and cost savings.

8. Essential Health Benefits:

The ACA requires insurance plans to cover essential health benefits, such as maternity care, mental health services, and prescription drugs. Comprehensive coverage ensures that individuals receive necessary care, leading to better health outcomes and fewer complications.

9. Value-Based Payment Models:

Transitioning from fee-for-service to value-based payment models encourages providers to focus on the quality rather than the quantity of care. Providers are rewarded for achieving better patient outcomes and reducing costs. This shift promotes effective and efficient care delivery.

10. Health Information Technology:

The ACA incentivizes the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and other health information technologies. EHRs improve care coordination, reduce medical errors, and enhance patient safety. Improved information sharing leads to more informed decision-making and better health outcomes.

Conclusion

The ACA’s components collectively enhance health care accessibility, affordability, and quality. By expanding coverage, focusing on preventive care, and promoting efficient care delivery, the ACA improves health outcomes while reducing overall costs. The ongoing implementation and evolution of these provisions will continue to shape the future of health care in the United States.

References

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!