250 Nurse Evidence-Based Discussion – Answered

/in , , , , , , , /by

250 Nurse Evidence-Based Discussion – Answered

Due 9/25   12 pm EST250 WORDS not including title and reference APAAs you complete the gathering and evaluation of the evidence, it’s important to review the significance and next steps related to EBP. Consider the following questions in your discussion post: How does a nurse know what (if any) knowledge in a research study is usable for clinical practice? What would a critical thinker look for in the evidence before deciding to change? What influence do credibility and clinical significance have on your decisions to integrate research-based evidence into your practice? Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position. Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format (250 Nurse Evidence-Based Discussion – Answered).

Answer

Evaluating Evidence for Clinical Practice

To determine the usability of knowledge from a research study for clinical practice, nurses should assess several key factors. First, they must evaluate the study’s relevance to their specific clinical setting and patient population. This includes examining whether the study addresses a pertinent clinical question and if the findings are applicable to the cases they encounter in their practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).

A critical thinker would scrutinize the methodology of the study, including the design, sample size, and data collection methods. They would seek evidence of scientific rigor such as randomization, blinding, and control groups, which enhance the reliability and validity of the results. The statistical significance and effect size of the findings are also crucial; significant results with substantial effect sizes suggest that the evidence could lead to meaningful changes in patient outcomes (Polit & Beck, 2021).

Credibility plays a significant role in integrating research-based evidence into practice. Nurses should consider the authorship and publication source, ensuring the research is conducted by reputable experts and published in peer-reviewed journals. Additionally, they should evaluate the consistency of the findings with other studies and guidelines to ensure the evidence is robust and not an anomaly (Stetler et al., 2014).

Clinical significance refers to whether the research findings lead to improvements in patient care that are meaningful in real-world settings. Even if a study is statistically significant, it may not be clinically relevant if the changes it suggests do not have a practical impact on patient outcomes (Polit & Beck, 2021). Nurses should integrate evidence that demonstrates both statistical and clinical significance to ensure the changes they implement will effectively enhance patient care.

References

  • Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b60769117
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Stetler, C. B., Ritchie, J. A., Ritchie, J., & Scott, C. (2014). The Stetler Model of Research Utilization: An Overview. In B. M. Melnyk & E. Fineout-Overholt (Eds.), Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare (pp. 97-116). Wolters Kluwer.

250 Nurse Evidence-Based Discussion – Answered

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Nursing leadership development

/in , , , , , , /by

Nursing leadership development

Based on your readings, current literature within 5 years, scholarly peer-reviewed journals, and research on the topic of nursing leadership development specific to your program. Clearly demonstrate the integration of evidence into nursing practice as it relates to nursing leadership in your program. Clearly demonstrate the concepts of nursing leadership and ethical decision-making as they relate to nursing leadership development in your program.

Nursing leadership development

Integration of Evidence into Nursing Practice

Recent literature underscores the importance of evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing leadership. EBP ensures that nursing leaders use the latest research to inform decisions. According to Sherman and Pross (2020), EBP improves patient outcomes and organizational efficiency. Nursing leaders who adopt EBP implement strategies backed by robust research.

Additionally, EBP requires nursing leaders to stay updated with current research findings. This practice aligns with the Magnet Recognition Program, which promotes nursing excellence through EBP (American Nurses Credentialing Center, 2019). Therefore, integrating EBP into nursing leadership enhances care quality and professional development.

Concepts of Nursing Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making

Nursing leadership involves guiding and inspiring nursing staff to achieve high standards of patient care. Effective leaders exhibit strong communication, emotional intelligence, and teamwork skills. Cummings et al. (2018) suggest transformational leadership is particularly effective in nursing settings. Transformational leaders inspire and motivate their teams, improving job satisfaction and patient outcomes.

Ethical decision-making is crucial in nursing leadership. Leaders face complex ethical dilemmas, balancing patient needs, staff welfare, and organizational goals. Robichaux (2018) provides a framework for ethical decision-making, guiding leaders to make fair and just decisions. This framework involves identifying ethical issues, considering stakeholders’ perspectives, and evaluating consequences.

Nursing Leadership Development in My Program

My nursing leadership program emphasizes integrating evidence and ethical decision-making. The curriculum includes EBP modules, teaching leaders to appraise and apply research to practice. Case studies and simulations provide practical experience in making evidence-based decisions.

The program also incorporates ethical decision-making into its core competencies. Students learn ethical theories and principles, engaging in discussions and role-playing exercises. These activities help future leaders develop skills to navigate ethical situations confidently.

Reflective practice is another key component. Students reflect on their experiences, promoting continuous learning and improvement. This approach ensures that nursing leaders are prepared to make informed, ethical decisions.

In summary, my program integrates evidence and ethical decision-making into nursing leadership development. By emphasizing EBP, transformational leadership, and ethical frameworks, the program prepares leaders to provide high-quality, ethical care.

References

American Nurses Credentialing Center. (2019). Magnet Recognition Program. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/organizational-programs/magnet/

Cummings, G. G., Tate, K., Lee, S., Wong, C. A., Paananen, T., Micaroni, S. P., … & Dredge, C. (2018). Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 85, 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016

Robichaux, C. (2018). Ethical decision making in nursing administration: The intersection of relationships and responsibilities. Journal of Nursing Administration, 48(7-8), 395-398. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000631

Sherman, R. O., & Pross, E. (2020). Growing future nurse leaders to build and sustain healthy work environments at the unit level. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol20No02Man03

 

This should include;

  • An Introduction. Define leadership. Explain how leadership is developed.
  • Why is leadership development important for nursing today?
  • Compare and contrast theoretical leadership theories as they relate to  leadership development. Discuss how leadership is an integral component of the advanced generalist masters prepared Nurse
  • Examine empowerment as it relates to the development of Nursing leaders
  • Analyze the process of leading through mentoring as it relates to the creation of future caring followers
  • Explain effective communication and collaboration strategies that lead to healthy, safe interdisciplinary teams
  • Guided by Dr. Jean Watson’s (2012) theory of human caring science critically evaluate how caring can be integrated in all levels of Nursing practices
  • Create your own personal definition of nursing leadership examining concepts you can adopt in your practice setting leading to improved outcomes for patients, families, colleagues, and self.

5 pages (not including title page or reference page) using the required title page with your major clearly labeled Minimum of 5 scholarly sources not including the textbook to support your facts Clear and logically written with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation Proper APA format on citations and sources

Reference

 

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat

/in , , , , , , /by

Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat

(Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat) Amy, a 3 year old girl is brought to your office by her mother because she has a fever and complains that her ear hurts. She has no significant medical history. The child is not pleased to be in the provider’s office and has been crying. Her mother explains that she developed a “cold” about 3 days ago with sniffles. As she cries she continues to cough and has yellowish nasal discharge. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.
Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat

Diagnosis and Management of Amy’s Ear Pain and Fever

Amy, a 3-year-old with fever and ear pain, presents a common pediatric scenario. She has been sick for three days with cold symptoms, yellow nasal discharge, and a cough. Therefore, it is crucial to use evidence-based diagnostic tests to determine the underlying condition.

Diagnostic Tests

Initially, a thorough physical examination is essential. Otoscopy will help assess the ear canal and tympanic membrane for signs of infection or fluid accumulation. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), otoscopy is the primary tool for diagnosing otitis media (Lieberthal et al., 2013).

Next, a tympanometry test can evaluate middle ear function. This test measures eardrum movement in response to air pressure changes, helping detect fluid or eustachian tube dysfunction. Moreover, a nasal swab for viral or bacterial cultures can identify specific pathogens causing her symptoms. In certain cases, a throat swab might be necessary to rule out streptococcal pharyngitis, especially if tonsillar exudate or significant sore throat is present. (Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat)

Differential Diagnosis

1. Acute Otitis Media (AOM)

AOM is the most common cause of ear pain and fever in children. Symptoms include earache, fever, and irritability. According to Shaikh et al. (2013), a history of upper respiratory infection often precedes AOM. Amy’s recent cold and nasal discharge support this diagnosis.

2. Otitis Media with Effusion (OME)

OME involves fluid in the middle ear without signs of acute infection. It often follows an upper respiratory infection. Tympanometry and otoscopy can confirm fluid presence. Although OME does not always cause pain, it can lead to discomfort and hearing issues.

3. Viral Upper Respiratory Infection (URI)

Amy’s symptoms could indicate a viral URI. These infections commonly cause cough, nasal discharge, and fever. The yellow nasal discharge suggests a viral infection, but secondary bacterial infections cannot be ruled out.

4. Bacterial Sinusitis

Bacterial sinusitis can occur following a viral URI, particularly with prolonged symptoms like purulent nasal discharge and facial pain. Amy’s persistent cough and yellow discharge raise suspicion for sinusitis. Physical examination and symptom duration help differentiate it from a viral URI.

5. Pharyngitis

Although less likely, pharyngitis should be considered. Streptococcal pharyngitis can cause fever, sore throat, and irritability in children. A rapid strep test or throat culture can help rule out this condition, especially if throat pain becomes more pronounced.

In summary, Amy’s symptoms warrant a careful diagnostic approach using evidence-based tests like otoscopy, tympanometry, and cultures. Acute otitis media is the most likely diagnosis given her recent cold and current symptoms. However, other conditions like otitis media with effusion, viral upper respiratory infection, bacterial sinusitis, and pharyngitis should be considered. Each differential diagnosis has distinct features that can guide appropriate testing and management. (Assessing the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat)

References

Lieberthal, A. S., Carroll, A. E., Chonmaitree, T., Ganiats, T. G., Hoberman, A., Jackson, M. A., … & Schwartz, R. H. (2013). The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics, 131(3), e964-e999. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3488

Shaikh, N., Morone, N. E., Lopez, J., & Chonmaitree, T. (2013). Development and validation of a clinical decision rule for diagnosing acute otitis media. Pediatrics, 131(4), e964-e971. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3488

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Project 3: Six Sigma (DMAIC) process to solve nursing problem – Answered

/in , , , , , , , /by

Project 3: Six Sigma (DMAIC) process to solve nursing problem – Answered

You are the Nurse Leader/Administrator at a long-term care facility (not hospital). The rates of resident falls have been increasing over the last 6 months to a year in your facility causing some serious injuries for some of the residents. You, as a doctorate of nursing prepared leader, have to adequately describe the issue & create a Process Improvement project using the Six Sigma (DMAIC) process to address and solve the problem. During this part, you will address the DMA – Define, Measure & Analyze stages. A MINIMUM of 5 relevant evidence based sources (best are peer-reviewed articles) should be used and published within the last 5 years. Below are the (DMA) relevant issues to include in your Process Improvement Project: DEFINE:•Define the issue: What process are you trying to improve?•Describe the team and stakeholders• Plan out the project• Make a plan for the change MEASURE:• What metrics will you measure• How will you measure success• How will you collect baseline data ANALYZE:•How will you analyze the data you collect• What will you use to display data• What is the reason for your wastes, delays, etc (Project 3: Six Sigma (DMAIC) process to solve nursing problem – Answered).

Answer

Process Improvement Project: Reducing Resident Falls in a Long-Term Care Facility Using Six Sigma (DMAIC)

DEFINE

The primary issue at our long-term care facility is the increasing rate of resident falls, which have escalated over the past six months to a year. This trend has resulted in several serious injuries among residents, indicating a pressing need for improvement in fall prevention strategies. The goal of the process improvement project is to reduce the incidence of falls by implementing evidence-based interventions and optimizing current practices using the Six Sigma (DMAIC) methodology.

Process and Stakeholders

The process under scrutiny is the fall prevention program currently in place at the facility. This includes all aspects of resident safety related to falls, such as environmental safety measures, staff training, and resident care protocols.

The project team will consist of the following stakeholders:

  • Nurse Leader/Administrator: Oversees the project and ensures alignment with facility goals.
  • Clinical Nurse Specialists: Provide expertise in fall prevention and contribute to developing and implementing strategies.
  • Physical Therapists: Offer insights into physical interventions and mobility assessments.
  • Facility Maintenance Staff: Ensure that the physical environment is safe and compliant with fall prevention standards.
  • Residents and Families: Provide feedback on fall incidents and safety concerns.

Project Planning

The project will be divided into distinct phases:

  1. Initial Assessment: Review current fall prevention protocols and incident reports.
  2. Strategy Development: Identify evidence-based interventions and create a comprehensive plan.
  3. Implementation: Roll out the new strategies and provide staff training.
  4. Evaluation: Monitor the effectiveness of interventions and make adjustments as necessary.

A detailed plan will be crafted, outlining specific interventions, timelines, and responsibilities. This plan will incorporate recommendations from recent evidence-based guidelines on fall prevention in long-term care settings (Kendrick et al., 2021; Oliver et al., 2020).

MEASURE

Metrics for Measurement

To evaluate the effectiveness of the fall prevention program, the following metrics will be measured:

  • Fall Rate: The number of falls per 1,000 resident days.
  • Injury Severity: The number and severity of injuries resulting from falls.
  • Compliance Rate: Adherence to newly implemented fall prevention protocols.
  • Resident Satisfaction: Feedback from residents and families regarding safety and comfort.

Measuring Success

Success will be determined by a significant reduction in fall rates and injuries, improved compliance with fall prevention protocols, and positive feedback from residents and their families. A reduction in fall rates of at least 25% over a six-month period will be considered a successful outcome.

Baseline Data Collection

Baseline data will be collected by reviewing fall incident reports from the past 12 months. This data will provide a clear picture of the current fall rates, injury severity, and areas of concern. Additionally, staff compliance with existing protocols will be assessed through audits and observations.

ANALYZE

Data Analysis

Data analysis will involve comparing baseline data with post-intervention data to assess the effectiveness of the new strategies. Statistical methods such as trend analysis and chi-square tests will be used to determine if changes in fall rates and injury severity are statistically significant (Wang et al., 2018).

Data Display

Data will be displayed using charts and graphs, such as control charts for fall rates and bar graphs for injury severity. This visual representation will help in identifying trends and patterns over time, making it easier to evaluate the impact of the interventions (Montgomery, 2020).

Identifying Causes

Analyzing the data will help identify the root causes of falls, such as environmental hazards, inadequate staff training, or deficiencies in resident mobility assessments. Tools such as cause-and-effect diagrams and root cause analysis will be employed to uncover these issues (Pande et al., 2020).

References

  • Kendrick, D., et al. (2021). Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007146.pub4
  • Montgomery, D. C. (2020). Design and Analysis of Experiments (9th ed.). Wiley.
  • Oliver, D., et al. (2020). Interventions to prevent falls in older people living in the community: A systematic review. The Lancet, 396(10263), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31290-5
  • Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., & Cavanagh, R. R. (2020). The Six Sigma Way: How to Maximize the Impact of Your Change and Improvement Initiatives. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Wang, Y., et al. (2018). Statistical Methods for Healthcare Research. Springer.

(Project 3: Six Sigma (DMAIC) process to solve nursing problem – Answered)

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute

/in , , , , , , /by

Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute

(Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute) PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING IN 50 WORDS OR MORE:

The Nursing Legislation and Advocacy page on the FNA website identifies 4-different ways for you to get involved with advocacy.  Discuss which way(s) you would most likely get involved with and why? One of the four different ways to get involved with advocacy that I would get involved in according to the FNA website would be joining the Barbara Lumpkin Institute to have public policy education readily available to improve the healthcare system. By joining this group, I would be given the opportunity to annual symposium and provide financial support to nurses who are involved in healthcare policy (FNA). I love to enjoy researching different topics and interviewing my colleagues on how we can improve to be as safe as possible. I would emphasize the importance of patient-to-nurse ratios and how to manage the nursing shortage starting with staff burnout. There needs to be more support for bedside nursing as it seems like the rate of people going this route is less and less. Find and peruse the Barbara Lumpkin Toolkit (BLT).  What are your thoughts about the information provided in the toolkit and what did you learn that you didn’t know before? I think that the Barbra Lumkin Toolkit (BLT) is an excellent tool to use for anyone looking to promote advocacy in the healthcare setting.  Advocacy is such an important part of nursing not only for our patients but for ourselves as nurses as well. I especially liked learning about the “Ten Commandments for successful living with your legislator”. Something that I didn’t know before is that anyone can call or write to the legislators regarding their reason for change or alteration to current bills. I think that it is so important that nurses get their voices heard and share their opinions with the people who are involved with making changes to the healthcare system. References Florida Nurses Association. Barbara Lumpkin Institute. (n.d.).https://www.floridanurse.org/Links to an external site.

Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute

Advocacy plays a crucial role in nursing, influencing policies that directly impact healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. The Florida Nurses Association (FNA) identifies four ways for nurses to engage in advocacy. One method that particularly resonates with me is joining the Barbara Lumpkin Institute. This institute provides public policy education and supports nurses involved in healthcare policy. Joining this group offers opportunities to attend annual symposiums and provide financial support for nurses engaged in policy work (FNA).

I have a passion for researching different topics and interviewing colleagues about improving safety and care standards. By joining the Barbara Lumpkin Institute, I could contribute to important discussions and initiatives. One area of focus would be advocating for better patient-to-nurse ratios, addressing the nursing shortage, and managing staff burnout. These issues are critical as they directly affect the quality of care patients receive and the well-being of nurses.

There is a pressing need for more support for bedside nursing. Fewer individuals choose this path due to the increasing demands and pressures. Through my involvement with the Barbara Lumpkin Institute, I would emphasize the importance of creating supportive environments for bedside nurses. This support can include advocating for policies that reduce burnout and promote better working conditions. (Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute)

The Barbara Lumpkin Toolkit (BLT)

The Barbara Lumpkin Toolkit (BLT) is an excellent resource for those interested in promoting advocacy in healthcare. Advocacy is vital for both patient care and the nursing profession. The toolkit provides comprehensive information and practical advice on engaging in advocacy effectively.

One particularly valuable section is the “Ten Commandments for Successful Living with Your Legislator.” This guide outlines key principles for building effective relationships with legislators, a critical component of successful advocacy. Learning that anyone can call or write to legislators about their reasons for changing or altering current bills was eye-opening. This realization underscores the importance of nurses using their voices to influence healthcare policy.

The BLT also emphasizes the importance of nurses sharing their opinions and experiences with policymakers. Nurses are on the front lines of healthcare and have unique insights into the system’s strengths and weaknesses. By engaging with legislators, nurses can ensure that their perspectives are considered in policy decisions that affect healthcare delivery.

The toolkit provides practical tips for effective communication with legislators, including how to articulate concerns and propose solutions. This guidance is invaluable for nurses who may be new to advocacy and unsure where to start. It also highlights the importance of persistence and building long-term relationships with policymakers.

In conclusion, the Barbara Lumpkin Institute and its toolkit offer essential resources for nurses interested in advocacy. Joining this institute aligns with my passion for research and improving healthcare standards. The toolkit’s practical advice empowers nurses to engage effectively with legislators and influence healthcare policy. Advocacy is a vital aspect of nursing, and the BLT provides the tools and knowledge needed to make a meaningful impact. (Getting Involved in Nursing Advocacy Through the Barbara Lumpkin Institute)

References

Florida Nurses Association. Barbara Lumpkin Institute. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.floridanurse.org/

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations

/in , , , , , , , /by

Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations

(Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations) Post a comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations in your state/region with those of at least one other state/region. Describe how they may differ. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how the regulations you selected may apply to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) who have legal authority to practice within the full scope of their education and experience. Provide at least one example of how APRNs may adhere to the two regulations you selected.

Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations

Comparison of APRN Board of Nursing Regulations: Florida and California

Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) are subject to specific regulations that vary by state. Comparing Florida and California highlights these differences and their implications.

Florida APRN Regulations

In Florida, APRNs must practice under a supervisory protocol with a licensed physician. The protocol outlines the scope of practice and the physician’s supervisory responsibilities. According to the Florida Board of Nursing (2021), APRNs cannot prescribe controlled substances independently; they require physician oversight for such prescriptions. (Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations)

California APRN Regulations

Conversely, California grants APRNs more autonomy. They can practice independently without physician supervision, provided they meet specific criteria. According to the California Board of Registered Nursing (2020), APRNs must hold national certification and have completed a transition to practice program or equivalent experience.

Key Differences

1. Supervisory Requirements

Florida requires a supervisory protocol, limiting APRN autonomy. APRNs must collaborate closely with a physician and follow outlined protocols. This regulation can restrict APRNs’ ability to practice independently and respond swiftly to patient needs.

In contrast, California allows independent practice. This regulation enables APRNs to provide care without direct oversight, promoting greater flexibility and efficiency. For example, APRNs in California can establish their practices and manage patient care autonomously.

2. Prescriptive Authority

Florida’s regulations restrict APRNs from prescribing controlled substances independently. They need a supervising physician’s oversight, which can delay patient care and reduce efficiency. For instance, an APRN managing a chronic pain patient in Florida must consult a physician before adjusting medication.

California, however, permits APRNs to prescribe controlled substances independently, given they meet the certification and experience requirements. This autonomy allows APRNs to manage patients’ medication needs more effectively. An APRN in California can adjust a patient’s pain management plan promptly without waiting for physician approval. (Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations)

Application of Regulations

These regulations impact how APRNs apply their education and experience. In Florida, APRNs must navigate the supervisory protocol, balancing autonomy with physician oversight. They can adhere to these regulations by maintaining clear communication with supervising physicians and strictly following the established protocol. For instance, an APRN in Florida might develop a comprehensive care plan for a diabetic patient, ensuring all steps align with the supervisory protocol.

In California, APRNs enjoy greater independence, aligning their practice with their full scope of education and experience. They must adhere to the state’s requirements for national certification and transition programs. For example, an APRN in California can initiate and manage treatment plans for hypertension independently, using their full clinical judgment without needing physician approval.

Conclusion

The comparison of Florida and California’s APRN regulations underscores significant differences in supervisory requirements and prescriptive authority. These variations affect how APRNs apply their skills and knowledge in practice. Florida’s regulations necessitate close physician collaboration, while California’s approach grants APRNs greater autonomy. Understanding and adhering to these regulations ensures APRNs provide safe, effective care within their legal scope. (Comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations)

References

California Board of Registered Nursing. (2020). Nurse Practitioner. Retrieved from https://www.rn.ca.gov/

Florida Board of Nursing. (2021). Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN). Retrieved from https://floridasnursing.gov/

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Aligning My Research Proposal with NLN’s Vision

/in , , , , , , /by

Aligning My Research Proposal with NLN’s Vision 

(Aligning My Research Proposal with NLN’s Vision) Complete your week 4 required discussion prompt. The  NLN vision series is considered a roadmap for where nurse education is  headed. Review the different statements listed at the following linkhttp://www.nln.org/newsroom/nln-position-documents/nln-living-documents Links to an external site.  Consider where your research proposal most closely fits within or  aligns to the listed statements. Choose one or two and explain in detail  why you feel it aligns with the NLN’s vision.

Aligning My Research Proposal with NLN's Vision

The National League for Nursing (NLN) vision series offers a comprehensive roadmap for advancing nursing education. After reviewing the various statements on the NLN website, my research proposal aligns closely with “A Vision for Advancing the Science of Nursing Education” and “A Vision for Teaching with Simulation.”

A Vision for Advancing the Science of Nursing Education

My research proposal focuses on innovative teaching strategies to enhance nursing students’ critical thinking and clinical decision-making skills. The NLN emphasizes the importance of evidence-based teaching practices to improve educational outcomes. According to the NLN (2016), advancing the science of nursing education involves integrating research findings into curricula and fostering a culture of inquiry.

My research proposal aims to investigate the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) in nursing education. PBL is an instructional method that uses real-world problems to stimulate students’ critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. By aligning with the NLN’s vision, my proposal seeks to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on effective educational practices. Furthermore, the NLN advocates for the continuous evaluation of teaching methods to ensure they meet the evolving needs of nursing students. My research will assess PBL’s impact on students’ clinical competencies, providing evidence that can inform curriculum development. (Aligning My Research Proposal with NLN’s Vision)

Additionally, the NLN vision highlights the need for collaboration between educators and researchers. My proposal includes a collaborative component, involving faculty members and nursing students in the research process. This approach fosters a scholarly community committed to improving nursing education through research and practice.

A Vision for Teaching with Simulation

Another NLN statement that aligns with my research is “A Vision for Teaching with Simulation.” Simulation-based education has become a cornerstone in nursing programs, offering safe and controlled environments for students to practice clinical skills. The NLN (2015) advocates for the integration of high-fidelity simulations to enhance learning and prepare students for real-world clinical scenarios.

My proposal includes a component on using simulation to complement PBL. By incorporating simulation exercises, students can apply theoretical knowledge to simulated clinical situations, reinforcing their learning and building confidence. The NLN vision emphasizes the importance of debriefing in simulation education. My research will evaluate how structured debriefing sessions impact students’ reflective thinking and ability to learn from their experiences. (Aligning My Research Proposal with NLN’s Vision)

Moreover, the NLN supports the use of simulation to address diverse learning needs and accommodate various learning styles. My proposal recognizes the diverse backgrounds and learning preferences of nursing students. Therefore, it aims to create inclusive and effective simulation experiences that cater to different learning styles.

My research proposal aligns with the NLN’s vision statements on advancing the science of nursing education and teaching with simulation. By integrating evidence-based teaching practices and utilizing innovative simulation techniques, my proposal aims to enhance nursing education and prepare students for the complexities of clinical practice. The alignment with the NLN’s vision ensures that my research contributes to the ongoing efforts to improve nursing education and ultimately, patient care. (Aligning My Research Proposal with NLN’s Vision)

References

National League for Nursing. (2015). A vision for teaching with simulation. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/newsroom/nln-position-documents/nln-living-documents

National League for Nursing. (2016). A vision for advancing the science of nursing education. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/newsroom/nln-position-documents/nln-living-documents

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Community public health

/in , , , , , , , /by

Community public health

Covid-19 and the Need for Health Care Reform(King, 2020)  NEJM. Identify 1 flaw in the US healthcare system that was made evident during the pandemic, and 1 innovation during the pandemic that improved health care. Please read the article above and answer the question in not more than two pages. (Community public health)

Community public health

Flaw in the US Healthcare System Evident During the Pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant flaw in the US healthcare system that became evident was the disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. Marginalized communities, including racial minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, experienced disproportionately higher rates of infection, severe illness, and death from COVID-19. This highlighted longstanding inequalities in healthcare access, resources, and quality of care across different populations. The pandemic exacerbated these disparities, showcasing the systemic issues that need addressing to ensure equitable healthcare delivery for all Americans.

Innovation in Healthcare During the Pandemic

Amid the challenges brought by the pandemic, a notable innovation in healthcare was the rapid expansion and adoption of telehealth services. Telehealth allowed patients to receive medical care remotely, reducing the risk of virus transmission in healthcare settings and ensuring continuity of care for non-COVID-19 health needs. This innovation not only provided a safe alternative for patients during the pandemic but also demonstrated the potential for telehealth to improve access to healthcare services in underserved rural and urban areas beyond the pandemic. (Community public health)

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic underscored both the vulnerabilities and strengths of the US healthcare system. Addressing disparities in healthcare access and outcomes remains crucial to building a more resilient and equitable healthcare system. Innovations like telehealth have shown promise in transforming healthcare delivery and should be further integrated into future healthcare reforms to enhance access, efficiency, and patient-centered care.

If you have specific insights from the NEJM article you mentioned, feel free to share, and I can help tailor the response accordingly!

(Community public health)

References

https://www.nejm.org/search?q=Covid-19+and+the+Need+for+Health+Care+Reform

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Nutrition & Hydration/Persistent Vegetative State (PVS)

/in , , , , , , , /by

Nutrition & Hydration/Persistent Vegetative State (PVS)

(Nutrition & Hydration/Persistent Vegetative State (PVS)) After studying the course materials located on Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources page, answer the following:

Cure / care: compare and contrast.

Basic care: Nutrition, hydration, shelter, human interaction. Are we morally obliged to this? Why? Example Swallow test, describe; when is it indicated? When is medically assisted N/H indicated?
Briefly describe Enteral Nutrition (EN), including: NJ tube NG tube PEG Briefly describe Parenteral Nutrition (PN), including:

a. Total parenteral nutrition

b. Partial parenteral nutrition

Bioethical analysis of N/H; state the basic principle and briefly describe the two exceptions.
Case Study: Terry Schiavo (EXCEL FILE on Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources page). Provide a bioethical analysis of her case; should we continue with the PEG or not? Why yes or why not? Read and summarize ERD paragraphs #:  32, 33, 34, 56, 57, 58.
Submission Instructions: is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.  If references are used, please cite properly according to the current APA style. (Nutrition & Hydration/Persistent Vegetative State (PVS))

Nutrition & Hydration/Persistent Vegetative State (PVS)

Cure vs. Care: A Comparison

Cure and care are fundamental concepts in healthcare. Cure aims to eliminate disease and restore health. It involves medical interventions, treatments, and medications. For instance, antibiotics cure bacterial infections by eradicating bacteria. Care, however, focuses on comfort, well-being, and quality of life. It includes basic needs like nutrition, hydration, and emotional support. An example of care is providing palliative care to a terminally ill patient to ease pain and discomfort.

Basic Care: Moral Obligations

Basic care encompasses nutrition, hydration, shelter, and human interaction. Society holds a moral obligation to provide these essentials. Neglecting these needs can result in severe consequences, including death. For instance, a swallow test evaluates a patient’s ability to safely swallow food and liquids. It is indicated when there are signs of dysphagia, such as coughing while eating. Medically assisted nutrition and hydration are indicated when patients cannot meet their needs orally, such as in cases of severe dysphagia. (Nutrition & Hydration/Persistent Vegetative State (PVS))

Enteral Nutrition (EN)

Enteral Nutrition (EN) involves delivering nutrients directly into the gastrointestinal tract. This method is preferred when the digestive system functions properly but the patient cannot ingest food orally.

  • NJ Tube: A nasojejunal tube is inserted through the nose into the jejunum. It is used when gastric feeding is not tolerated.
  • NG Tube: A nasogastric tube is inserted through the nose into the stomach. It is used for short-term feeding.
  • PEG: A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is placed directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall. It is used for long-term feeding.

Parenteral Nutrition (PN)

Parenteral Nutrition (PN) delivers nutrients directly into the bloodstream. It is used when the digestive system cannot be used.

  • Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN): Provides all nutritional needs intravenously. It is used for patients with non-functioning gastrointestinal tracts.
  • Partial Parenteral Nutrition (PPN): Supplements oral intake or enteral nutrition. It provides partial nutritional support.

Bioethical Analysis of Nutrition and Hydration

The basic principle is to provide care that respects patient autonomy and beneficence. However, there are exceptions:

  1. When treatment is futile or does not benefit the patient.
  2. When treatment imposes a disproportionate burden relative to its benefits.

Case Study: Terry Schiavo

The Terry Schiavo case raises significant bioethical questions. Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state, and her family was divided over continuing her PEG feeding. Ethical analysis should consider patient autonomy, quality of life, and medical futility.

Continuing PEG feeding in this case might not improve her quality of life or lead to recovery. Discontinuing it respects her previously expressed wishes and recognizes the burden of prolonged artificial nutrition.

Summary of ERD Paragraphs

  • ERD 32: Emphasizes the dignity of every human person and the obligation to provide basic care.
  • ERD 33: Stresses the need for competent decision-making in healthcare.
  • ERD 34: Highlights the importance of respecting patient autonomy and informed consent.
  • ERD 56: Discusses the moral obligation to provide food and water, even by artificial means, unless it is futile or burdensome.
  • ERD 57: Encourages the use of palliative care and comfort measures.
  • ERD 58: Clarifies the conditions under which artificial nutrition and hydration can be withheld or withdrawn.

In Terry Schiavo’s case, the analysis suggests discontinuing PEG feeding aligns with her wishes and the principle of not imposing disproportionate burdens. It respects her dignity and the quality of life considerations outlined in the ERD.

References

Florida Nurses Association. Barbara Lumpkin Institute. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.floridanurse.org/

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Euthanasia & Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS)

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Euthanasia & Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS)

Euthanasia & Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS)

(Euthanasia & Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS)) After studying the course materials located on Module 8: Lecture Materials & Resources page, answer the following:

  • Euthanasia Medical or Generic definition & Bioethical definition.
  • Describe pain and suffering within context of faith
  • Physician Assisted Suicide / Death ( PAS / PAD) Definition. Is it ethical?
  • Should we have the right to end our lives? Why yes or why not?
  • Better alternatives to PAS; compare and contrast each: Hospice Palliative care / Terminal sedation
  • Case studies.

Brief summary of: Hemlock Society Jacob Kevorkian & Britanny Maynard. Read and summarize ERD paragraphs #:  59, 60, 61.Submission Instructions: is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling. If references are used, please cite properly according to the current APA style

Euthanasia: Medical and Bioethical Definitions

Medically, euthanasia refers to the deliberate act of ending a person’s life to relieve suffering, often involving a physician administering a lethal dose of medication. Bioethically, euthanasia is viewed through the lens of moral principles, examining whether it respects human dignity, autonomy, and the sanctity of life.

Pain and Suffering within the Context of Faith

Within faith contexts, pain and suffering are often seen as part of the human experience, with redemptive value and a test of faith. Many religious perspectives emphasize compassionate care and support over measures to hasten death, viewing suffering as an opportunity for spiritual growth and community support.

Physician-Assisted Suicide / Death (PAS/PAD) Definition and Ethical Considerations

Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) or physician-assisted death (PAD) involves a doctor providing a patient with the means to end their own life, typically through prescribed medication. The ethicality of PAS/PAD is highly debated. Proponents argue it respects patient autonomy and alleviates suffering, while opponents contend it undermines the sanctity of life and could lead to a slippery slope of devaluing life, especially among vulnerable populations. (Euthanasia & Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS))

Right to End Our Lives: Ethical Considerations

The debate over whether individuals should have the right to end their lives hinges on autonomy versus the intrinsic value of life. Advocates for the right to die emphasize personal autonomy and the relief of unbearable suffering. Conversely, opponents argue that legalizing this right could lead to societal devaluation of life, particularly for the disabled and terminally ill.

Better Alternatives to PAS: Hospice, Palliative Care, and Terminal Sedation

Hospice and palliative care focus on providing comfort and improving the quality of life for terminally ill patients without hastening death. Hospice care offers comprehensive support, including pain management, emotional support, and spiritual care. Palliative care provides similar services but can be offered at any stage of illness, not just end-of-life. (Euthanasia & Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS))

Terminal sedation involves sedating a patient to alleviate intractable suffering, with the patient remaining unconscious until death occurs naturally. While not intended to hasten death, it allows patients to escape unbearable pain. Comparing these alternatives, hospice and palliative care focus on holistic support and pain relief, while terminal sedation addresses extreme cases of suffering when other methods fail.

Case Studies: Hemlock Society, Jacob Kevorkian, and Brittany Maynard

The Hemlock Society advocates for the right to die with dignity, providing education on end-of-life choices, including PAS/PAD. Jacob Kevorkian, known as “Dr. Death,” assisted terminally ill patients in ending their lives, sparking significant ethical and legal debates. Brittany Maynard, a terminally ill woman, chose to end her life under Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act, bringing national attention to the right-to-die movement.

ERD Paragraphs 59, 60, 61 Summary

ERD 59 emphasizes that euthanasia and PAS are morally unacceptable, as they undermine the respect for human life. ERD 60 discusses the importance of pain management and palliative care, encouraging efforts to relieve suffering without hastening death. ERD 61 highlights the need for compassionate care and the moral duty to avoid actions that intentionally cause death, affirming the value of life even in suffering. (Euthanasia & Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS))

Conclusion

The discussions on euthanasia, PAS/PAD, and end-of-life care revolve around balancing ethical principles, patient autonomy, and the sanctity of life. While there are no easy answers, a focus on compassionate, holistic care remains paramount. The case studies and ethical directives underscore the complexities and moral imperatives in these deeply personal decisions. (Euthanasia & Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS))

Reference

Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide:

Emanuel, E. J., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., Urwin, J. W., & Cohen, J. (2016). Attitudes and practices of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe. JAMA, 316(1), 79-90. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2532018

Pain and Suffering within the Context of Faith:

Sulmasy, D. P. (2006). The rebirth of the clinic: An introduction to spirituality in health care. Georgetown University Press. https://press.georgetown.edu/Book/Rebirth-of-the-Clinic

Hospice and Palliative Care:

National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. (2021). Palliative care and hospice care. https://www.nhpco.org/palliativecare

Terminal Sedation:

Rietjens, J. A., van Delden, J. J., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., Buiting, H. M., van der Maas, P. J., & van der Heide, A. (2008). Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: Descriptive study. BMJ, 336(7648), 810-813. https://www.bmj.com/content/336/7648/810

Hemlock Society, Jacob Kevorkian, and Brittany Maynard:

Quill, T. E., & Greenlaw, J. (2008). Physician-assisted death. Ethics in Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine. https://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/pad.html

The Brittany Maynard Fund. (2014). Brittany’s story. https://www.thebrittanyfund.org/brittanys-story/

Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (ERD):

United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. (2018). Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services, Sixth Edition. https://www.usccb.org/resources/ethical-religious-directives-catholic-health-service-sixth-edition-2016-06_0.pdf

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!