Posts

Discussion – Theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods – Answered

/in , , , , , , , /by

Discussion – Theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods – Answered

The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability. What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study? Support your answer with current evidence-based literature (Discussion – Theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods – Answered).

Answer

Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Both Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Nursing Research

Advantages

  1. Comprehensive Understanding

    Integrating both qualitative and quantitative methods in a nursing study allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the research problem. Quantitative methods provide numerical data and statistical analysis, which offer generalizable findings and allow for hypothesis testing. In contrast, qualitative methods provide in-depth insights into participants’ experiences, perceptions, and motivations, which help contextualize and interpret the quantitative findings. This combination, often referred to as mixed-methods research, enables researchers to capture both the breadth and depth of a phenomenon, enhancing the overall validity of the study (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2017).

  2. Enhanced Validity and Reliability

    Using both methods can enhance the validity and reliability of research findings. Quantitative methods can offer robust, generalizable results, while qualitative methods can provide rich, contextual details that help explain those results. This approach helps to triangulate findings, where different types of data converge on the same conclusion, thereby increasing the study’s credibility and robustness. For example, a study on patient satisfaction with nursing care could use quantitative surveys to measure satisfaction levels and qualitative interviews to explore patients’ personal experiences and specific areas for improvement (Polit & Beck, 2021).

Disadvantages

  1. Complexity and Resource Intensity

    Combining qualitative and quantitative methods can increase the complexity of the research design and the amount of time and resources required. Researchers must be skilled in both methodologies, which can necessitate additional training and expertise. Moreover, the integration of data from both methods can be challenging and time-consuming, as it involves analyzing and synthesizing different types of data and ensuring that they complement each other effectively (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2010).

  2. Potential for Mixed Results

    The integration of qualitative and quantitative data can sometimes lead to conflicting results, which may complicate the interpretation of findings. For instance, quantitative data might reveal a statistically significant trend, while qualitative data might provide contradictory insights that challenge the statistical conclusions. This discrepancy can create difficulties in drawing coherent conclusions and might require additional analysis and explanation to reconcile the differences (Sandelowski, 2014).

Conclusion

Using both qualitative and quantitative methods in nursing research offers significant advantages, including a comprehensive understanding of research problems and enhanced validity and reliability. However, it also presents challenges such as increased complexity, resource demands, and potential for mixed results. Despite these challenges, the mixed-methods approach remains a valuable strategy for gaining a holistic view of nursing phenomena and improving research outcomes. (Discussion – Theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods – Answered)

References

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b62526911
  • Sandelowski, M. (2014). Using qualitative research. In The SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 97-111). Sage Publications.
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

Assignment: Critiquing Quantitative

/in , , /by

Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies

(Assignment: Critiquing Quantitative)

Question description

Assignment: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies

Critiquing the validity and robustness of research featured in journal articles provides a critical foundation for engaging in evidence-based practice. In Weeks 5 and 6, you explored quantitative research designs. In Week 7, you will examine qualitative and mixed methods research designs. For this Assignment, which is due by Day 7 of Week 7, you critique a quantitative and either a qualitative or a mixed methods research study and compare the types of information obtained in each.

To prepare:

  • Select a health topic of interest to you that is relevant to your current area of practice. The topic may be your Course Portfolio Project or a different topic of your choice.
  • Using the Walden Library, locate two articles in scholarly journals that deal with your portfolio topic: 1) Select one article that utilizes a quantitative research design and 2) select a second article that utilizes either a qualitative OR a mixed methods design. These need to be single studies not systematic or integrative reviews (including meta-analysis and metasynthesis). You may use research articles from your reference list. If you cannot find these two types of research on your portfolio topic, you may choose another topic.
  • Locate the following documents in this week’s Learning Resources to access the appropriate templates, which will guide your critique of each article:
    • Critique Template for a Qualitative Study
    • Critique Template for a Quantitative Study
    • Critique Template for a Mixed-Methods Study
  • Consider the fields in the templates as you review the information in each article. Begin to draft a paper in which you analyze the two research approaches as indicated below. Reflect on the overall value of both quantitative and qualitative research. If someone were to say to you, “Qualitative research is not real science,” how would you respond?

To complete this Assignment:

  • Complete the two critiques using the appropriate templates.
  • Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
  • Contrast the types of information that you gained from examining the two different research approaches in the articles that you selected.
    • Describe the general advantages and disadvantages of the two research approaches featured in the articles. Use examples from the articles for support.
    • Formulate a response to the claim that qualitative research is not real science. Highlight the general insights that both quantitative and qualitative studies can provide to researchers. Support your response with references to the Learning Resources and other credible sources.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? Order now!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!